Mexico leans on private imports in fuels crisis
State-owned Pemex and private-sector companies have increased the rate of gasoline imports into Mexico by a combined 36pc in January according to government data released to rebut claims of import cuts amid fuel shortages.
Fuel shortages began in late December in central and western Mexico following the government's decision to fight fuel theft by shutting down pipelines subject to repeated illegal taps and shifting fuel delivery to tank trucks.
President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador has promised to wean Mexico off of its dependence on imported fuels in the long term, but has now called on the private sector to help with both fuel distribution and imports.
According to energy ministry (Sener) data disclosed for the first time Glencore was the largest gasoline importer in the first nine days of January with 18,500 b/d. ExxonMobil was second with 12,800 b/d and Windstar third with 9,800 b/d.
The private companies combined imported 49,700 b/d of gasoline, up by 19pc from the 41,900 b/d average rate in December.
Imports represented 78pc of the 788,000 b/d of gasoline consumed from January to October 2018 in Mexico. The portion of demand covered by imports might be even higher this month as Mexican refineries have been operating at lower than normal levels.
Pemex still brings in 94pc of the imported gasoline, with 764,800 b/d, up by 37pc from 559,000 b/d in December.
No values were disclosed for diesel or other fuels by the ministry. Its recently launched website with preliminary weekly data on fuel movements has been shut since 11 January. The shuttering of the site, estadisticashidrocarburos.gob.mx, during the height of the crisis was raised at a hearing in congress where Pemex's chief executive and the energy minister had been summoned but did not appear.
Glencore's imports showed the biggest jump following no imported volumes in December. The company started operations at its 600,000 bl Dos Bocas terminal in late August.
The rate of ExxonMobil's gasoline imports are down by 32pc from the average December rate to 12,800 b/d. The company's private rail and truck network has helped the company's Mobil-branded retail station avoid some of the fuel shortage in the rest of the country.
The third-largest importer, El Paso, Texas-based WindStar increased its gasoline imports by 27pc to 9,800 b/d in the first days of January.
Windstar's chief financial officer Reynold Gonzalez told Argus most of its imports went to Philips 66-branded stations in the north of the country, but an undisclosed volume went to other resellers in Mexico.
Marathon's subsidiary in Mexico, Tesoro, reduced its gasoline import rate by 73pc to 2,900 b/d. The company won the only successfully awarded open season of state-run Pemex.
Other international companies that are on the list of gasoline importers include Novum Energy, with 1,400 b/d, and Vitol with 200 b/d during both the first days of January and all of December.
Mexican private importers included retail group Combustibles de Oriente with 1,700 b/d as it has one of the few private fuel storage terminals in the state in Tamaulipas.
Mexican retail fuel station owners or retailers Impulsora de Productos Sustentables, Karzo, PetroTamps and Energeticos San Roberto all imported less than 1,000 b/d total.
| Mexico's gasoline imports | '000 b/d | ||
| Company | 18 Dec | 19 Jan* | ±% |
| Pemex | 559.0 | 764.8 | +36.8 |
| Glencore | - | 18.5 | - |
| ExxonMobil | 18.8 | 12.8 | -31.9 |
| Windstar | 7.7 | 9.8 | +27.3 |
| Tesoro (Marathon) | 10.7 | 2.9 | -72.9 |
| Combustibles de Oriente | 0.9 | 1.7 | +88.9 |
| Novum | 1.7 | 1.4 | -17.6 |
| Impulsora de Productos Sustentables | 0.1 | 0.9 | +800.0 |
| Distribuidora de Combustibles Karzo | 0.5 | 0.4 | -20.0 |
| Vitol | 0.2 | 0.2 | - |
| Grupo Petrotamps | 0.0 | 0.2 | - |
| Energeticos San Roberto | 0.0 | 0.1 | - |
| Others | 1.3 | 0.8 | -38.5 |
| Total | 600.9 | 814.5 | +35.5 |
| — Finance ministry, energy ministry | |||
| *import rate for the first nine days of January | |||
Related news posts
Low-carbon methanol costly EU bunker option
Low-carbon methanol costly EU bunker option
New York, 16 May (Argus) — Ship owners are ordering new vessels equipped with methanol-burning capabilities, largely in response to tightening carbon emissions regulations in Europe. But despite the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions savings that low-carbon methanol provides, it cannot currently compete on price with grey methanol or conventional marine fuels. Ship owners operate 33 methanol-fueled vessels today and have another 29 on order through the end of the year, according to vessel classification society DNV. All 62 vessels are oil and chemical tankers. DNV expects a total of 281 methanol-fueled vessels by 2028, of which 165 will be container ships, 19 bulk carrier and 14 car carrier vessels. Argus Consulting expects an even bigger build-out, with more than 300 methanol-fueled vessels by 2028. A methanol configured dual-fuel vessel has the option to burn conventional marine fuel or any type of methanol: grey or low-carbon. Grey methanol is made from natural gas or coal. Low-carbon methanol includes biomethanol, made of sustainable biomass, and e-methanol, produced by combining green hydrogen and captured carbon dioxide. The fuel-switching capabilities of the dual-fuel vessels provide ship owners with a natural price hedge. When methanol prices are lower than conventional bunkers the ship owner can burn methanol, and vice versa. Methanol, with its zero-sulphur emissions, is advantageous in emission control areas (ECAs), such as the US and Canadian territorial waters. In ECAs, the marine fuel sulphur content is capped at 0.1pc, and ship owners can burn methanol instead of 0.1pc sulphur maximum marine gasoil (MGO). In the US Gulf coast, the grey methanol discount to MGO was $23/t MGO-equivalent average in the first half of May. The grey methanol discount averaged $162/t MGOe for all of 2023. Starting this year, ship owners travelling within, in and out of European territorial waters are required to pay for 40pc of their CO2 emissions through the EU emissions trading system. Next year, ship owners will be required to pay for 70pc of their CO2 emissions. Separately, ship owners will have to reduce their vessels' lifecycle GHG intensities, starting in 2025 with a 2pc reduction and gradually increasing to 80pc by 2050, from a 2020 baseline. The penalty for exceeding the GHG emission intensity is set by the EU at €2,400/t ($2,596/t) of very low-sulplhur fuel oil equivalent. Even though these regulations apply to EU territorial waters, they affect ship owners travelling between the US and Europe. Despite the lack of sulphur emissions, grey methanol generates CO2. With CO2 marine fuel shipping regulations tightening, ship owners have turned their sights to low-carbon methanol. But US Gulf coast low-carbon methanol was priced at $2,317/t MGOe in the first half of May, nearly triple the outright price of MGO at $785/t. Factoring in the cost of 70pc of CO2 emissions and the GHG intensity penalty, the US Gulf coast MGO would rise to about $857/t. At this MGO level, the US Gulf coast low-carbon methanol would be 2.7 times the price of MGO. By comparison, grey methanol with added CO2 emissions cost would be around $962/t, or 1.1 times the price of MGO. To mitigate the high low-carbon methanol costs, some ship owners have been eyeing long-term agreements with suppliers to lock in product availabilities and cheaper prices available on the spot market. Danish container ship owner Maersk has lead the way, entering in low-carbon methanol production agreements in the US with Proman, Orsted, Carbon Sink, and SunGaas Renewables. These are slated to come on line in 2025-27. Global upcoming low-carbon methanol projects are expected to produce 16mn t by 2027, according to industry trade association the Methanol Institute, up from two years ago when the institute was tracking projects with total capacity of 8mn t by 2027. By Stefka Wechsler Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Europe receives straight run fuel oil from Dangote
Europe receives straight run fuel oil from Dangote
London, 15 May (Argus) — A cargo of low-sulphur straight run fuel oil (LSSR) produced at Nigeria's 650,000 b/d Dangote refinery has been delivered to Europe for the first time. The 90,000t cargo was loaded at Dangote's terminal in Lekki on 25 April and discharged in Rotterdam on 13 May, according to data from trade analytics firm Kpler. The cargo will likely be used as a blendstock to produce very-low sulphur fuel oil (VLSFO), market participants said. Roughly 72pc of the fuel oil exported from Dangote has been delivered to the US since the refinery offered its first LSSR export tender in mid-February . A total of just under 620,000t has been delivered so far. Another LSSR shipment of 83,400t departed the refinery on 7 May, according to trade analytics firm Vortexa. It is scheduled to arrive in France on 22 May, but market participants say this is unlikely to be the cargo's final destination. LSSR price assessments on a fob Amsterdam-Rotterdam-Antwerp (ARA) basis have stayed at a $5/bl premium to front-month Ice Brent crude futures this week, narrowing from an 18-month high of $7.50/bl in mid-April . Maintenance work that began in the first quarter affected fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) units at some refineries. FCCs take LSSR and low-sulphur vacuum gasoil to increase gasoline yields. By Isabella Reimi and Bob Wigin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Singapore’s bunker sales hit 10-month low in April
Singapore’s bunker sales hit 10-month low in April
Singapore, 15 May (Argus) — Singapore's April bunker sales fell to a 10-month low on weak very-low sulphur fuel oil (VLSFO) demand. But consumption of high-sulphur fuel oil (HSFO) and B24 biofuel bunkers remained firm. Singapore VLSFO bunker sales fell to at least a 15-month low of 2.25mn t in April, according to data from the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore. This came because of slower demand as more buyers turned to lower-priced HSFO. Singapore HSFO sales accounted for a 42pc share of total fuel oil sales in April, up from a 31pc share a year earlier. Disruptions in the Red Sea led to increased fuel usage by ocean-going vessels with higher rates of scrubber technology adoption, raising demand for HSFO by a greater extent than for VLSFO. Consumption of bio-blended VLSFO, or B24, climbed by 61pc on the year because buying interest gained traction, but slipped by 10pc from strong consumption in March . LNG bunker sales rose by over sixfold on the year but edged down from a record high in March . By Cassia Teo and Asill Bardh Singapore bunker sales 000t Apr-24 m-o-m ± % y-o-y ± % Jan-Apr 2024 ± % Low-sulphur fuel oil (LSFO) 2,252 -6.9 -16 10,088 -2.2 Marine fuel oil (MFO) 1,600 0.0 31 6,466 32 Low-sulphur MGO (LSMGO) 277 -11.0 -11 1,201 -3.0 Bio-blended LSFO 60 -10.0 61 186 53 Liquified natural gas (LNG) 36 -7.9 582 111 N/A MGO 9.7 88.0 -37 43 -9.2 Marine diesel oil (MDO) 0.0 N/A N/A 0.0 N/A Bio-blended MDO 0.0 N/A N/A 0.0 N/A Bio-blended marine gasoil (MGO) 0.0 N/A N/A 0.0 N/A Bio-blended LSMGO 0.0 N/A N/A 0.0 N/A Bio-blended MFO 0.0 N/A -100 0.0 -100 Ultra low sulphur fuel oil (ULSFO) 0.0 N/A N/A 0.0 N/A Bio-blended ULSFO 0.0 N/A N/A 0.0 N/A Methanol 0.0 N/A N/A 0.0 N/A Total 4,235 -4.7 -0.6 18,096 8.9 Source: MPA Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Australia to explore biofuels mandate, incentives
Australia to explore biofuels mandate, incentives
Sydney, 15 May (Argus) — Australia's federal budget is funding mandate studies and pursuing certification schemes, given the increasing likelihood biofuels will play a significant role in the nation's energy transition. The federal government has pledged A$18.5mn ($12.3mn) in the four years from 2024-25 to develop a certification scheme for low-carbon liquid fuels, including SAF and renewable diesel, by expanding its guarantee of origin programme for long-term demand by the industry . An extra A$1.5mn over two years from 2024-25 will go to analysis of the regulatory impact of the costs and benefits of introducing mandates for low-carbon liquid fuels, while the government has promised consultation on possible production incentives for domestic project developers. Money from the A$1.7bn Future Made in Australia innovation fund will also be made available for liquid fuels research, to be administered by the Australian Renewable Energy Agency to commercialise net zero technology. "The package of announcements is dealing with crucial areas essential for deployment, including certification to ensure Australia develops a sustainable liquid fuels industry, resourcing to support key demand side interventions such as a low carbon fuels standard and consultation on additional supply-side measures such as production credits," Bioenergy Australia chief executive Shahana McKenzie said on 15 May. The funding pales in comparison to the $9bn hydrogen investment promised by the government, although much of that is deferred to the decade from the 2027-28 fiscal year. About 45pc of Australia's energy use is supplied by liquid fuels but the nations lags behind many countries on decarbonising its transport sector. Australia's Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation forecasts demand for jet fuel will grow 75pc by 2050. But no domestic production facility has yet reached a financial close, despite major airlines committing to increasing their SAF use. Domestic feedstocks including agricultural residues could meet 60pc of Australian jet fuel demand initially, growing to 90pc by 2050, Bioenergy Australia has said, while pursuing renewable fuels could cut the country's dependence on oil product imports from 90pc to 61pc by 2040. By Tom Major Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more