Viewpoint: Indonesian coal sellers plan amid volatility

  • : Coal
  • 18/12/31

Regulatory obstacles in Indonesia could hamper coal production in 2019 and uncertainty about China's import policy could also curb exports, even though a number of producers have announced tentative plans to raise output in the coming year.

A period of high prices that began in 2016 and lasted throughout much of 2018 on strong demand from main buyers China and India has prompted Indonesian producers to raise output where possible and several mining companies have announced plans to raise production even further in 2019.

China's coal consumption rose during 2018 on increased demand from its electricity, steel, construction and chemical industries. Total imports of all types of coal reached 271.19mn t in the first 11 months, already narrowly exceeding the country's import quota for full-year 2018, which had been set at parity to 2017 imports. India's overall imports have also been driven up by surging power demand amid industrial and manufacturing growth, with its imports of Indonesian coal amounting to the lion's share at 92.4mn t in the first 11 months, or just under 93.17mn t for full-year 2017, according to customs data.

Indonesia exported 356.5mn t of all types of coal in January-October, up by 35.5mn t from a year earlier, according to the latest data from government statistics agency BPS. This could theoretically put exports at an annualised rate of around 427.8mn t for 2018, although the Argus Seaborne Thermal Coal Outlook has forecast these exports at closer to 415mn t, given the weaker China seaborne demand from November. But even projected Indonesian exports of 415mn t would substantially exceed those of 2017 when Indonesia exported 389.47mn t, up from 369mn t in 2016.

The government raised the 2018 production target to 507mn t in September, although the Indonesian coal mining association (APBI-ICMA) does not expect the industry to reach this target, given the big drop in prices from November when China announced plans to tighten enforcement of its import quotas. Prices for the most actively traded fob Indonesian GAR 4,200 kcal/kg (NAR 3,800 kcal/kg) coal fell by 33pc from $47.19/t at the start of the year to $30.52/t on 21 December, according to Argus assessments, with the sharpest falls registered last month when a low of $28.73/t was recorded.

APBI-ICMA has also said it expects output to fall slightly in 2019 from 2018 to 480mn-500mn t. The likely total production for 2018 was not provided, although the government revised the production target in September from 485mn t to 507mn t, but did not announce any change to the domestic market obligation (DMO) that had been set at 121mn t.

Production plans

Some of Indonesia's biggest producers such as Bumi Resources, Bukit Asam, Geo Energy, Delta Dunia and Harum Energy are looking to raise output in 2019 amid anticipated increased demand from India as well as new emerging markets such as Vietnam, Thailand and Cambodia, even as uncertainty looms over China's import quotas for 2019. But the Indonesian government has not set an output target for 2019 yet or a DMO, which is normally set at 25pc of a producer's output. This is making it harder for many producers to plan and industry insiders say some of the companies' announcements about 2019 production hikes could prove overly ambitious.

Indonesia's largest coal mining firm, Bumi Resources, has said it aims to boost its production in 2019 to 90mn t, subject to approval from the energy and mining ministry (ESDM), from an expected 83mn t in 2018. The firm produced 62.6mn t in January-September.

State-owned producer Bukit Asam has said it is aiming to raise its production by 7-8pc in 2019 to meet strong domestic power generation demand and on expectations of increased interest from Japan, Taiwan and the Philippines in its high-calorific value (CV) coal. The firm, which produced 19.7mn t in January-September, says it is on track to achieve its 25.54mn t target for 2018.

Bukit Asam is focusing on boosting output of high-quality coal GAR 6,100 kcal/kg and 6,400 kcal/kg coal from around 900,000t in 2018 to 3mn t in 2019 to take advantage of the higher prices these grades command in the premium seaborne markets of Japan, Taiwan and the Philippines.

Geo Energy, which was earlier in 2018 targeting 11mn-12mn t of coal output, will end up producing 7.5mn t, down slightly from 7.7mn t in 2017, largely because of China's imports curbs, the company said. Chinese buyers take up 90-95pc of Geo Energy's production. Geo Energy is targeting 14mn t of coal production in 2019, as it expects to take advantage of China lifting its imports curbs post the lunar new year from February 2019.

Delta Dunia produced 4.6mn t of coal in October, taking total output for January-October to 34.9mn t from 33.9mn t during the same 10 months in 2017. The company now expects to achieve output of 5mn t/month for November and December to hit the lower end of its 45mn-50mn t production target.

Harum Energy aims to produce 5mn-5.5mn t of coal in 2019, an increase of at least 8.7pc on the company's expected 2018 output of 4.6mn t, in a bid to offset the effects of lower coal prices on company revenues. In particular, Harum aims to develop sales in emerging markets in Asia, such as Vietnam, the Philippines and Bangladesh. The largest foreign markets that Harum Energy currently supplies to are South Korea, Malaysia and China, which made up 34pc, 25pc and 19pc, respectively, of the company's orders in January-September.

Some Indonesian producers are positioning themselves more defensively and starting to consider reducing output, although few have gone on the record announcing this. Others plan to keep output stable in 2019 given lower prices and uncertainty around China's buying. Indonesian mining firm Kideco plans to keep production flat in 2019 at around 34mn t from 2018.

Indonesian coal mining company Adaro Energy has set a production target of 54mn-56mn t for 2019, it said in its work plan and budget submitted to the ESDM. Adaro will keep its 2019 production targets unchanged year on year amid uncertainty over Chinese import demand in the near term.

Sticking points

But despite plans by some firms to raise output, regulatory obstacles in Indonesia could further hamper coal production in 2019, according to APBI-ICMA. The biggest potential sticking points are uncertainty surrounding mining licences and some companies' struggle to meet their DMOs.

Legacy mining licences, known as PKP2B contracts, will begin to lapse in 2019 and the process for extending or converting these remains unclear. This might force firms to freeze output expansion plans while they await clarification. Eight first-generation PKP2B concessions are due to expire in 2019-26, starting with Harum Energy's Tanito Harum concession on 14 January.

Another factor that could limit production is the DMO requirement for producers to sell 25pc of their coal production on the domestic market. Firms that fail to meet this requirement are prohibited from increasing output and face having their output limited to four times their domestic sales volume. Some mining companies, especially the smaller ones, have struggled to sell their coal domestically because they do not produce the required specifications. Domestic power producers require coal in a 4,200-5,000 kcal/kg GAR range.

APBI-ICMA has also warned that it expects Indonesia's dominant state-owned power producer PLN to consume only 22pc of the 25pc of production set aside under the DMO in 2018

The DMO was set at around 121mn t for 2018, but the association expects PLN to take around 92mn t at most, leaving around 29mn t unallocated. Although there are a few small private power generators, mainly in the form of captive power plants, these are not likely to make a serious dent on the unallocated volumes. This is also contributing to planning difficulties for producers as they try to second-guess likely Indonesian government policy on DMO targets as well as unpredictable Chinese demand.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

24/05/02

Canadian rail workers vote to launch strike: Correction

Canadian rail workers vote to launch strike: Correction

Corrects movement of grain loadings from a year earlier in final paragraph. Washington, 2 May (Argus) — Workers at the two major Canadian railroads could go on strike as soon as 22 May now that members of the Teamsters Canada Rail Conference (TCRC) have authorized a strike, potentially causing widespread disruption to shipments of commodities such as crude, coal and grain. A strike could disrupt rail traffic not only in Canada but also in the US and Mexico because trains would not be able to leave, nor could shipments enter into Canada. This labor action could be far more impactful than recent strikes because it would affect Canadian National (CN) and Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CPKC) at the same time. Union members at Canadian railroads have gone on strike individually in the past, which has left one of the two carriers to continue operating and handle some of their competitor's freight. But TCRC members completed a vote yesterday about whether to initiate a strike action at each carrier. The union represents about 9,300 workers employed at the two railroads. Roughly 98pc of union members that participated voted in favor of a strike beginning as early as 22 May, the union said. The union said talks are at an impasse. "After six months of negotiations with both companies, we are no closer to reaching a settlement than when we first began, TCRC president Paul Boucher said. Boucher warned that "a simultaneous work stoppage at both CN and CPKC would disrupt supply chains on a scale Canada has likely never experienced." He added that the union does not want to provoke a rail crisis and wants to avoid a work stoppage. The union has argued that the railroads' proposals would harm safety practices. It has also sought an improved work-life balance. But CN and CPKC said the union continues to reject their proposals. CPKC "is committed to negotiating in good faith and responding to our employees' desire for higher pay and improved work-life balance, while respecting the best interests of all our railroaders, their families, our customers, and the North American economy." CN said it wants a contract that addresses the work life balance and productivity, benefiting the company and employees. But even when CN "proposed a solution that would not touch duty-rest rules, the union has rejected it," the railroad said. Canadian commodity volume has fallen this year with only rail shipments of chemicals, petroleum and petroleum products, and non-metallic minerals rising, Association of American Railroads (AAR) data show. Volume data includes cars loaded in the US by Canadian carriers. Coal traffic dropped by 11pc during the 17 weeks ended on 27 April compared with a year earlier, AAR data show. Loadings of motor vehicles and parts have fallen by 5.2pc. CN and CPKC grain loadings fell by 4.3pc from a year earlier, while shipment of farm products and food fell by 9.3pc. By Abby Caplan Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Japan's trading firms see metals prices cutting profits


24/05/02
24/05/02

Japan's trading firms see metals prices cutting profits

Tokyo, 2 May (Argus) — Major Japanese trading houses are expecting lower profits from their metals businesses during the April 2024-March 2025 fiscal year, mostly because of lower prices of commodities such as iron ore and coking coal . Japanese trading house Mitsui forecast profits for its metal and natural resource business falling by 14pc on the year to ¥290bn ($1.87bn) during 2024-25, primarily because of lower iron ore prices. Mitsui plans to cut iron ore output by 0.3pc on the year to 60.9mn t at its mining projects where the company owns production ri ghts or a production stake during 2024-25 . This includes the joint venture project Robe River in Australia with Australian iron ore producer Rio Tinto. Japanese trading house Sojitz also expects profits from its metal and natural resource business to decline to ¥35bn, down by 20pc on the year, mostly because of a bearish coking coal market. The company said its overall coal business can cut production costs during 2024-25, partly because it plans larger-scale output at the Gregory Crinum coking coal mine in Australia, without disclosing further details. But Sojitz said it cannot generate higher profits because of lower coking coal prices. The trading house expects the average coking coal price to fall to $230/t during 2024-25, according to the company's chief financial officer Makoto Shibuya, down by $57/t from a year earlier. The company reiterated that the price is not necessarily their selling price. Sumitomo expects profits from its natural resource business would remain flat at ¥72bn on the year, mostly as its nickel production in Madagascar recovers from the output cuts in 2023 , with an aim to produce 19,000t of nickel during 2024-25, up by 9.8pc on the year. A rebound in nickel production could offset possible losses from coal and coking coal prices falling to $266/t and $133/t respectively in the ordinary market, down by $21 and $9, according to the trading house. Sumitomo plans to increase coking coal production by 9.1pc to 1.2mn t but reduce coal output by 4.8pc to 4mn t during 2024-25. By Yusuke Maekawa Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US southbound barge demand falls off earlier than usual


24/05/01
24/05/01

US southbound barge demand falls off earlier than usual

Houston, 1 May (Argus) — Southbound barge rates in the US have fallen on unseasonably low demand because of increased competition in the international grain market. Rates for voyages down river have deteriorated to "unsustainable" levels, said American Commercial Barge Line. Southbound rates declined in April to an average tariff of 284pc across all rivers this April, according to the US Department of Agriculture (USDA), which is below breakeven levels for many barge carriers. Rates typically do not fall below a 300pc tariff until May or June. Southbound freight values for May are expected to hold steady or move lower, said sources this week. Southbound activity has increased recently because of the low rates, but not enough to push prices up. The US has already sold 84pc of its forecast corn exports and 89pc of forecast soybean exports with only five months left until the end of the corn and soybean marketing year, according to the USDA. US corn and soybean prices have come down since the beginning of the year in order to stay competitive with other origins. The USDA lowered its forecast for US soybean exports by 545,000t in its April report as soybeans from Brazil and Argentina were more competitively priced. US farmers are holding onto more of their harvest from last year because of low crop prices, curbing exports. Prompt CBOT corn futures averaged $435/bushel in April, down 34pc from April 2023. Weak southbound demand could last until fall when the US enters harvest season and exports ramp up southbound barge demand. Major agriculture-producing countries such as Argentina and Brazil are expected to export their grain harvest before the US. Brazil has finished planting corn on time . unlike last year. The US may face less competition from Brazil in the fall as a result. Carriers are tying up barges earlier than usual to avoid losses on southbound barge voyages. Carriers that have already parked their barges will take their time re-entering the market unless tariffs become profitable again. The carriers who remain on the river will gain more southbound market share and possibly more northbound spot interest. By Meghan Yoyotte and Eduardo Gonzalez Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

G7 coal exit goal puts focus on Germany, Japan and US


24/05/01
24/05/01

G7 coal exit goal puts focus on Germany, Japan and US

London, 1 May (Argus) — A G7 countries commitment to phase out "unabated coal power generation" by 2035 focuses attention on Germany, Japan and the US for charting a concrete coal-exit path, but provides some flexibility on timelines. The G7 commitment does not mark a departure from the previous course and provides a caveat by stating the unabated coal exit will take place by 2035 or "in a timeline consistent with keeping a limit of 1.5°C temperature rise within reach, in line with countries' net-zero pathways". The G7 countries are Italy — this year's host — Canada, France, Germany, Japan, the UK and the US. The EU is a non-enumerated member. The announcement calls for accelerating "efforts towards the phase-out of unabated coal power generation", but does not suggest policy action. It calls for reducing "as much as possible", providing room for manoeuvre to Germany, Japan and the US. Coal exports are not mentioned in the communique. Canada and the US are net coal exporters. France, which predominantly uses nuclear power in its generation mix is already scheduled to close its two remaining coal plants by the end of this year. The UK will shut its last coal-fired plant Ratcliffe in September . Italy has ended its emergency "coal maximisation plan" and has been less reliant on coal-fired generation, except in Sardinia . The country has 6GW of installed coal-fired power capacity, with state-controlled utility Enel operating 4.7GW of this. The operator said it wanted to shut all its coal-fired plants by 2027. Canada announced a coal exit by 2030 in 2016 and currently has 4.7GW of operational coal-fired capacity. In 2021-23, the country imported an average of 5.7mn t of coal each year, mainly from the US. Germany Germany has a legal obligation to shut down all its coal plants by 2038, but the country's nuclear fleet retirement in 2023, coupled with LNG shortages after Russia's invasion of Ukraine, led to an increase in coal use. Germany pushed for an informal target to phase out coal by 2030, but the grid regulator Bnetza's timeline still anticipates the last units going offline in 2038. The G7 agreement puts into questions how the country will treat its current reliance on coal as a backup fuel. The grid regulator requires "systematically relevant" coal plants to remain available as emergency power sources until the end of March 2031 . Germany generated 9.5TWh of electricity from hard-coal fired generation so far this year, according to European grid operator association Entso-E. Extending the current rate of generation, Germany's theoretical coal burn could reach about 8.8mn t. Japan Japan's operational coal capacity has increased since 2022, with over 3GW of new units connected to the grid, according to the latest analysis by Global Energy Monitor (GEM). Less than 5pc of Japan's operational coal fleet has a planned retirement year, and these comprise the oldest and least efficient plants. Coal capacity built in the last decade, following the Fukushima disaster, is unlikely to receive a retirement date without a country-wide policy that calls for a coal exit. Returning nuclear fleet capacity is curtailing any additional coal-fired generation in Japan , but it will have to build equivalent capacity to replace its 53GW of coal generation. And, according to IEA figures, Japan will only boost renewables up to 24pc until 2030. The US The US operates the third-largest coal-power generation fleet in the world, with 212GW operational capacity. Only 37pc of this capacity has a known retirement date before 2031. After 2031, the US will have to retire coal-fired capacity at a rate of 33GW/yr for four years to be able to meet the 2035 phase-out deadline. By Ashima Sharma Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Mitsui makes delayed exit from Paiton power project


24/05/01
24/05/01

Mitsui makes delayed exit from Paiton power project

Tokyo, 1 May (Argus) — Japanese trading house Mitsui completed on 30 April the ¥109bn ($690mn) sale of its stake in Indonesia's 2,045MW Paiton coal-fired power plant in east Java following multiple delays. Mitsui originally tried to complete its exit by the end of March 2022 . It said the procedures with Paiton's offtaker Indonesian state-owned power firm Persero took more time than expected without providing further details. Japanese thermal power producer Jera withdrew from Paiton by selling its 14pc share in 2021. Mitsui sold its 45.515pc share in Paiton Energy, as well as a 45.515pc stake in Netherlands-based subsidiary Minejesa Capital and a 65pc stake in Singapore-based IPM Asia that are related companies of the Paiton project. Mistui sold the stakes to RH International (RHIS), which is a Singapore-based subsidiary of Thai power producer Ratch, and Indonesian power company Medco Daya Abadi Lestari's subsidiary Medco Daya Energi Sentosa (MDES). Paiton Energy is now owned by RHIS, MDES and Qatar-based company Nebras Power. Mitsui did not disclose their ownership ratios. Paiton consists of the 615MW No.7, 615MW No.8 and the 815MW No.3 units, which sell electricity to Persero through an unspecified long-term contract. Mitsui now holds 9.6GW of power capacity assets globally, with 8pc being coal-fired projects. The exit from Paiton cut its coal-fired ratio by 8 percentage points, while raising its renewable ratio by 3 percentage points to 32pc. Growing global pressure against coal-fired power generation likely prompted Mitsui to exit Paiton. Energy ministers from G7 countries this week pledged to accelerate "efforts towards the phase-out of unabated coal power generation". By Nanami Oki Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more