Beccs revenues 'dependent on sustainability'
Danish state-controlled utility Orsted and UK utility Drax are increasingly dependent on sustainability criteria for their revenue streams from carbon removal (CDR) credit sales from bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (Beccs) projects, delegates heard at the Argus Biomass conference in London last week.
"The key to be able to create such a project is to secure finance, which actually comes from the sale of carbon removal certificates," Orsted senior lead business developer for CCS David Fich said. Adding that the ability of companies to prove the sustainability of the biomass they source was now key to securing financing — including from CDR — for Beccs, and not only a matter of communicating that bioenergy and Beccs were environmentally friendly and carbon neutral businesses.
Drax commercial director Angela Hepworth agreed: "Sustainability here is not a nice-to-have, this is the very foundation of our licence to upgrade and our ability to sell the credits and enable us to progress in these projects."
Aligned standards within the industry and stronger incentives would encourage corporates to buy carbon credits against reputation backlashes, Hepworth added.
Drax and Swedish utility Stockholm Exergi commissioned a methodology for measuring the net CO2 removal through Beccs published in October 2023, which was overall well-received by market participants. The utilities also presented it to the European Commission in the same month.
A standardised approach to Beccs would encourage smaller buyers, which rely on certifications to identify the sustainable criteria of the carbon removal value chain when purchasing CDR credits, Fich said. While most larger corporates were doing their own due diligence.
"The smaller buyers are those that are able to pay more," Fich said, adding that these companies were necessary to improve the liquidity of the market.
Orsted signed a contract with Microsoft in May 2023 for the purchase of 2.76mn t of carbon removals over the next 10 years. Drax is also selling CDR certificates in the voluntary carbon market](https://direct.argusmedia.com/newsandanalysis/article/2441200) and is hoping to get the credits into the UK's trading scheme.
Such deals "will help to make Beccs credits be seen in the more mainstream markets," Hepworth said.
Related news posts
EBRD ‘green project’ funding hit €6.54bn in 2023
EBRD ‘green project’ funding hit €6.54bn in 2023
London, 15 May (Argus) — The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) hit a record level of investments in the "green economy" in 2023, at €6.54bn ($7.1bn) in 337 projects — up from €6.36bn in 2022. The multilateral development bank (MDB) again reached its target for at least 50pc of its total annual investment to go towards green projects. Of total investments, 50pc went to green projects — flat on the year. The EBRD initially set the goal for 2025, but hit it in 2021, with 51pc of its investment going to green projects. The EBRD's investments stood at €13.1bn in 2023 — a new record high — going towards 464 individual projects. The bank has since the beginning of 2023 ensured that all new investment projects are in line with the Paris climate agreement goals. The Paris agreement seeks to limit the rise in temperature to "well below" 2°C above pre-industrial levels, and preferably to 1.5°C. Countries' focus on MDBs and their role in delivering climate finance has intensified in recent years. Climate finance is set to dominate climate talks this year, including at the UN Cop 29 summit, set for November in Baku, Azerbaijan. Mukhtar Babayev, Cop president-designate, last month called on MDBs and parties to the Cop process to deliver on climate finance. The EBRD is owned by 73 shareholder governments, the EU and the European Investment Bank. By Georgia Gratton Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
US court upholds RFS blending targets for 2020-22
US court upholds RFS blending targets for 2020-22
Washington, 14 May (Argus) — A federal appeals court has affirmed biofuel blending requirements for 2020-22 under the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS), rejecting lawsuits from refineries and renewable fuel producers challenging the standards. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) acted within its authority in the rule when it revised the biofuel blending targets to account for small refinery exemptions it expected it would award in the future, the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit said today in a 2-1 ruling. The court rejected a complaint by refineries that argued EPA could only revise the annual biofuel blending targets based on exemptions it had already approved in the past. "The statute does not confine EPA to the Refiner Petitioners' preferred method of accounting for small refinery exemptions," DC Circuit judge Cornelia Pillard wrote on behalf of the majority. "EPA's choice to account for them both retrospectively and prospectively is not arbitrary or capricious." The ruling leaves intact a 2022 rule that required renewable fuel blending to increase to 20.63bn USG by 2022, up from 17.13bn USG in 2020. For the first time under the RFS, the rule used a new formula that tried to avoid a recurrent issue under which EPA failed to account for upcoming requests from small refineries for exemptions from the RFS. EPA has subsequently decided to start denying all small refinery exemptions, under a new argument that small refiners do not face a disproportionate hardship from complying with the RFS. But if the courts throw out that finding in a pending lawsuit , the formula at issue in today's court ruling could take on a greater relevance for how EPA accounts for small refinery exemptions when setting biofuel blending targets. The DC Circuit rejected a separate lawsuit by cellulosic ethanol producers that said EPA should have required increased blending of cellulosic ethanol, based in part on the availability of carryover compliance credits. The court found EPA had adequate authority to waive volumetric targets set by the US Congress in 2007 based on its finding there were inadequate domestic supplies of the fuel, which is produced from plant fibers. Judge Gregory Katsas, who dissented from the ruling, said he believed the biofuel blending requirements for 2022 were set "arbitrarily high." Katsas cited EPA's finding that those standards would impose an estimated $5.7bn in additional costs for fuel but only deliver $160mn in energy security benefits. Katsas also faulted EPA for increasing the biofuel blending targets by 250mn USG in 2022 to "cancel out a legal error" from biofuel blending targets in 2016. Katsas said there was no authority to transfer volume requirements from one year to another. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Japan’s NYK to build biomass-fuelled biomass carrier
Japan’s NYK to build biomass-fuelled biomass carrier
Tokyo, 14 May (Argus) — Japanese shipping company Nippon Yusen Kaisha (NYK Line) and its partners plan to explore developing what it described as the world's first biomass-fuelled biomass carrier. NYK Line, its subsidiary NYK Bulk and Projects Carriers, Japanese firm Tsuneishi Shipbuilding and UK biomass supplier Drax signed an initial agreement on 13 May to jointly study developing a biomass-fuelled biomass carrier, with an aim to build it by the end of 2029. The vessel will be equipped with a pyrolysis gasifier system, burning wood pellets from storage to generate gas for use in a gas-engine power generator. The electricity will be used to move the ship. NYK Line expects the vessel to be a Handysize bulker with 20,000-45,000t of cargo capacity, but is unsure of the exact capacity and whether the vessel will be expanded. The companies aim to use wood pellets for now, but may examine if other type of wooden biomass can be consumed in the future. NYK Line expects to curb greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 22pc, compared to conventional marine fuels. It has been a challenge for Handysize bulkers to switch to alternative marine fuels because of their fuel tanks' limited size, so the companies are examining the use of biomass to reduce GHG emission on these ships. Japanese shipping firms have tried to shift away from conventional marine fuels to achieve decarbonisation, by introducing LNG , LPG , ammonia , batteries and methanol . But a biomass-fuelled ship is unprecedented, said NYK Line. Biomass-fired power generation have been commercialised on land, but companies need further technological development to implement it on vessels. By Nanami Oki Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Potential strike threatens Vancouver port again
Potential strike threatens Vancouver port again
Calgary, 13 May (Argus) — A labour dispute at the Canadian port of Vancouver could result in another work stoppage, less than a year after a strike disrupted the flow of more than C$10bn ($7.3bn) worth of goods and commodities ranging from canola and potash to coking coal. Negotiations between the British Columbia Maritime Employers Association (BCMEA) and the International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) Ship and Dock Foremen Local 514 union have stalled as the two sides try to renew an agreement that expired on 1 April 2023. A 21-day "cooling-off period" concluded on 10 May, giving the union the right to strike and the employers association the right to lock out the workers. A vote and 72-hour notice would first need to occur before either action is taken. The BCMEA filed a formal complaint to the Canada Industrial Relations Board (CIRB) the same day, which had to step in last year in another dispute. The BCMEA locked horns with ILWU Canada over a separate collective agreement in 2023 leading to a 13-day strike by the union in July. This disrupted the movement of C$10.7bn of goods in and out of Canada, according to the Greater Vancouver Board of Trade. Vancouver's port is the country's largest — about the same size as the next five combined — and describes itself as able to handle the most diversified range of cargo in North America. There are 29 terminals belonging to the Port of Vancouver. Terminals that service container ships endured the most significant congestion during last year's strike. Loadings for potash, sulphur, lumber, wood pellets and pulp, steel-making coal, canola, copper concentrates, zinc and lead concentrate, diesel and renewable diesel liquids and some agri-foods were also disrupted. The Trans Mountain-operated Westridge Marine Terminal responsible for crude oil exports on Canada's west coast was unaffected. A deal was eventually reached on 4 August. The strike spurred on proposed amendments to legislation in Canada that would limit the effect of job action on essential services. A bill introduced in Canada's Parliament in November would update the Canada Labour Code and CIRB Regulations accordingly. The bill has been progressing through the House of Commons, now having completed the second of three readings. By Brett Holmes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more