Mideast petchem firms break ground on China, Qatar JVs

Market: Petrochemicals
21/02/24

Key Middle East petrochemical producers broke ground on new joint venture (JV) petrochemical complexes this week in China and Qatar.

In China, Saudi Arabian state-controlled Sabic and China's Fujian Energy and Petrochemical group broke ground on construction of the Sabic Fujian Petrochemical Complex at Gulei Petrochemical Industrial Park in Fujian province. The complex will have a cracker producing 1.8mn t/yr of ethylene, with downstream units producing polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), ethylene glycol and polycarbonate.

Commercial operations are slated to begin in the second half of 2026. Sabic Industrial Investment Company has a 51pc stake in the venture, and Fujian Fuhua Gulei Petrochemical owns the remaining 49pc.

In Qatar, state-owned QE and US-based CPChem broke ground on a PE complex in Ras Laffan Industrial City. QE owns 70pc and CPChem the remaining 30pc. The site will have an ethane cracker that can produce 2.08mn t/yr of ethylene. It also includes two downstream high density polyethylene (HDPE) units with a combined capacity of 1.68mn t/yr. The producers expect commercial operations to begin in late 2026.

CPChem and QE are also building an integrated polymers facility in Orange, Texas through their Golden Triangle Polymers venture. This facility will include an ethane cracker that can produce 2.08mn t/yr and two 1mn t/yr HDPE units. CPChem owns a 51pc stake and QE the remaining 49pc.

Joint ventures have become a popular option for global petrochemical producers looking to expand their reach, as they can help better manage risks associated with fluctuating regional demand, volatile feedstock costs and supply chain uncertainties. Mergers are also being considered. Austria's OMV is in negotiations with the Abu Dhabi's state-controlled Adnoc for a potential consolidation of their polyolefins businesses. This could create a single entity with PE and PP sales volumes exceeding 8mn t/yr.

By Matthew Rajendra

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News

15/01/25

Eni plans to close Brindisi cracker by end April

Milan, 15 January (Argus) — Italy's Eni is planning to close its steam cracking capacity in Brindisi by the end of April despite calls for a rethink, trade union Filctem Cgil said. "The company said it intends to close the cracker within the first four months of the year," Filctem Cgil national secretary Antonio Pepe told Argus . The timeline emerged last week at a meeting between the trade unions, government and Eni at the industry ministry in Rome called to discuss the next steps for the Brindisi plant. It followed an earlier meeting in December on Eni's plans to shut its cracking capacity at Priolo in Sicily and end polyethylene production at its 160,000t/yr site in Ragusa. At that meeting Eni said it intended to close the Priolo cracker by the end of this year and start of 2026. "There will now be a final meeting at the end of this month to pull together the threads of the two meetings and take decisions," Pepe said. Eni, which is more than 30pc state owned, is looking to significantly cut the exposure of its chemicals business Versalis to basic chemicals, a sector that it sees is facing structural and irreversible decline in Europe. Last October, it unveiled a €2bn ($2.06bn) euro restructuring plan to close basic chemical plants and invest in innovative platforms over the next five years. The plans include building a new biorefinery at the Priolo site at a cost of around €800-900mn. Eni has previously said the Brindisi and Priolo crackers will be shut down within 12-18 months . The nameplate ethylene capacity at Brindisi is 410,000 t/yr and propylene capacity is 220,000 t/yr. The Priolo site has nameplate capacities of 430,000 t/yr ethylene, 250,000 t/yr propylene, and 790,000 t/yr aromatics. Filctem CGIL has called on Rome to reject Eni's plans to close cracking operations at Brindisi and Priolo, claiming it would put 20,000 jobs at risk and deal a death blow to Italy's chemicals industry. By Stephen Jewkes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more

News

Mexico’s industrial output up 0.1pc in November

13/01/25

News

13/01/25

Mexico’s industrial output up 0.1pc in November

Mexico City, 13 January (Argus) — Mexico's industrial production edged up 0.1pc in November, as gains in autos and other manufacturing offset weaker construction, national statistics agency Inegi said. Mexican bank Banorte described the monthly increase as "rather small," noting it followed a 1.1pc decline in October and was largely driven by base comparison effects. The bank added that the overall industrial outlook remained "fragile." Manufacturing, which represents 63pc of Inegi's seasonally adjusted industrial activity indicator (IMAI), increased by 0.7pc in November, though it failed to fully recover from a 1.7pc drop in October. Transportation manufacturing, a key subsector accounting for 12pc of the sector, rose by 3.8pc after a steep 4.3pc decline the prior month. Despite recent volatility, Mexico's auto sector achieved record annual light vehicle production in 2024, reaching 3.99mn units. Yet, automaker association AMIA warned of potential challenges in 2025 because of economic uncertainty, which could affect investment and demand. Mining, which makes up 12pc of the IMAI, increased by 0.1pc in November following a 1.1pc decline in October. Growth was driven by a 41.4pc jump in mining-related services, while oil and gas output fell by 2.4pc, marking a fifth consecutive monthly decline for hydrocarbons. Construction, representing 19pc of the IMAI, contracted by 1.8pc in November after modest gains of 0.2pc in October and 1.1pc in September. As industry eyes potential policy shifts under US president-elect Donald Trump, Banorte projected a weak start to 2025 for Mexico's industrial output. But it expects momentum to build as government spending on priority infrastructure projects "moves more decisively." By James Young Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

New years resolutions

10/01/25

News

10/01/25

New years resolutions

London, 10 January (Argus) — Many of last year's underlying challenges for the plastic recycling industry are likely to carry forward into 2025, although recyclers can take some positives from policy developments and normalised consumer price inflation. One of the most widely felt challenges for recyclers around the world in 2024 was the ready availability of competitively priced virgin polymer to their customers, which eroded demand and pricing power. This is unlikely to change significantly in 2025 for PET, PE or PP. Growing production capacity — particularly in Asia — is pushing more virgin material into the market, and limp economic growth is preventing today's various geopolitical uncertainties from buoying underlying petrochemical feedstock costs, which are underpinned by crude. Notwithstanding continued growth in India, purchasing managers' index (PMI) data show a range between stagnation and contraction in the major economies. Argus' base case for the coming years — assuming there is no severe deflation in China and that incoming US president Donald Trump does not deliver the harsher protectionist policies hinted at during his campaign — points to steady but sub-par economic growth, led by Asia and the US. But GDP projections see the eurozone struggling to attain 1pc growth in 2025. Globally, consumer price inflation remains above the 10 year average, but it has normalised since 2022-23, which should help to sustain the demand recovery that major fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) companies — the largest buyers of packaging-quality recyclates — reported in 2024. Many European and US recyclers reported rising demand for rHDPE BM grades in the second half of 2024. But headwinds persist for construction, another important sector for recycling, with no market expectations of a near-term uptick in Europe, and US Federal Reserve statements flagging slower than previously expected interest rate cuts in 2025 having the potential to deter building activity. The effects of policy developments also remain to be seen. India and the EU are both introducing mandatory recycled content for PET beverage bottles — and more plastic packaging types in India's case — this year. But in the case of the EU the target percentage is not far above what market participants estimate was already achieved in 2024, and uncertainty over enforcement mechanisms could dampen the impact. A shift towards more complicated certification requirements for imported recyclates might also limit the benefit for overseas suppliers. On a smaller scale, California's mandatory recycled content for PET beverage bottles has risen to 25pc this year from 20pc. And deposit return schemes have launched in Austria and Poland, which should increase feedstock availability for local recyclers. But other potential policy changes that could affect the recycling industry remain unresolved. These include an EU decision on mass balance rules for chemical recycling, China's potential acceptance of rPET for food-contact applications — mooted for some time by market participants without any official announcements — and an outcome to UN plastic treaty negotiations, although an agreement to fully satisfy recyclers already appears unlikely. The direction of travel in legislation — and a broad expectation that the economic picture will gradually brighten — should help the recycling industry in the long term. But it would be unrealistic to expect a sudden turnaround in 2025, given that last year's pressures have yet to relent. Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Tough UK recycling environment needs highlighting: BPF

10/01/25

News

10/01/25

Tough UK recycling environment needs highlighting: BPF

London, 10 January (Argus) — UK plastic recyclers, as with counterparts elsewhere, face a tough environment. Last year's change of government brought with a desire to focus on the circular economy, but directing policy to provide meaningful support to recyclers is a multi-faceted challenge. Argus spoke to Helen Jordan, sustainability manager at the British Plastics Federation (BPF), about the association's expectations for the industry and recommendations after the government recently outlined its position on mass balance for chemical recycling. Edited highlights follow: There's a lot of concern about the plastic circular sector economy in the UK, with some high-profile closures in the past 12-24 months. Should we be worried, and what can help put development of the industry back on track? There is concern over what's happening and the conditions that have caused the situation. We have just been working on a briefing document for government setting out that these closures are happening, and the issues that have led to them, such as the price of virgin material and the difficulty of competing against imports of recycled material and competition from plastic waste exporters. But I don't think it's all doom and gloom. The government should be looking at what needs to happen to prevent further closures, but I think we've still got a lot of scope to grow recycling in the UK. There is a focus in government around the circular economy, and I think this is a very good time to remind them of how important recycling in the UK is as part of that overall picture. I think government will be listening to those sorts of message, which is why we wrote this briefing document saying — among other things — there are problems with the Packaging Recovery Notice (PRN) system, and with how the Plastic Packaging Tax (PPT) has been developed, but we can put measures in place to change that. And I think if we can stop some of these delays in legislation and make sure it works for UK recyclers, there's still a great opportunity. The EU confirmed PPWR legislation in December and the Single Use Plastic directive will mandate recycled content in PET beverage bottles in the EU from next year. Is there willingness in the UK to develop similar requirements? We expect a lot of the impacts will roll into the UK because companies supplying the EU will need to meet EU requirements. EU demand for recycled material from the UK could also increase, because — unlike the PPT, where companies have the option to pay the tax and use virgin material — under PPWR recycled content is a requirement. This could also be seen as a risk to availability of recycled material for UK converters. But PPWR recycled content requirements will not come in for six years. I think there's still a chance for the UK to do something, potentially faster than the EU did, although we are not aware of anything in development. In the BPF's recent Recycling Road Map, you significantly reduce your estimate of how much chemical recycling would contribute to the overall picture by 2030. Why was that and what does it signify? When we wrote the first road map in 2020-21, we felt that our estimate for chemical recycling by 2030 was realistic and actually lower than what companies were saying they would be able to achieve within that timescale. But time has shown that we are not getting the commitment to investment in the UK that we were hoping to see, and we felt that we had to scale back expectations for 2030 because that's only five years away. Delays to rules around how mass balance accounting can be used to attribute chemically recycled content to count towards the PPT have been a big problem and that's why we've been pushing to get it dealt with. We must create the right environment so that people see it as a place to invest. Our hope is that the recommendation on mass balance from the recent consultation makes people start looking to the UK and seeing we've made a commitment to mass balance, which the EU hasn't yet. This might encourage companies to invest in the UK. You are referring to the government's recent recommendation for fuel use-exempt mass balance to be allowed for calculating chemically recycled content in the context of the PPT. What are the next steps in this? They say their intention is to use fuel use-exempt and there's been overriding support for mass balance in general. The biggest question from our members is the time scale for next steps. They are keen to work with industry to develop the next stage and work out how to put the plan in place. Questions around how certification would work and how mass-balance attributed ‘credits' for chemically recycled content could be transferred within companies need to be resolved. We are going to be working with HMRC to understand the detail and get involved in the next stage of developing legislation. At the moment there is no indication of a timescale. That will be our big question, because we need the reassurance it will happen, as this encourages people to invest. Was your members' reaction to the consultation universally positive? It was positive in terms of its aligning — in most cases — with what industry was calling for. We have always said we need chemical recycling to complement mechanical recycling and we need developments to infrastructure in both. There was always support for mass balance as long as that complementary element of it works. But the big questions are what's next and what's the time scale. Another element of the consultation response was recommending pre-consumer recyclates become ineligible for counting towards the 30pc threshold of recycled content above which the PPT does not apply. What has the reaction been to this and how significant do you think the impact might be? We are still developing a statement on this, but as you can imagine it's an area with mixed views. We don't think the timescale for putting this into practice would necessarily need to be aligned with confirmation on mass balance. Excluding pre-consumer recyclates might need to be a slightly longer journey and a phased approach might be necessary to support companies that invested in machinery on the basis that they were allowed to use pre-consumer recyclates to count towards their PPT threshold, and to allow development work in areas where you currently can't use post-consumer recyclates without challenges. We haven't got data from members saying how much of what counts towards meeting their 30pc comes from pre-consumer and post-consumer. It's likely that in some sectors, where using post-consumer is really challenging, people are using more pre-consumer. We're talking to our members to form a clear position on this. But a phased approach, not necessarily aligning to mass balance changes, seems to make sense because you won't be replacing pre-consumer content with chemically recycled content. It will take a long time to scale up chemical recycling, and you cannot expect to turn pre-consumer off and turn chemical recycling on at the same time. Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US physical trade in ethane, propane, rose in 2024

09/01/25

News

09/01/25

US physical trade in ethane, propane, rose in 2024

Houston, 9 January (Argus) — Growing natural gas liquids (NGL) production in the US last year led to higher volumes of physical trading for ethane and propane in 2024, according to Argus data. Volumes of physical ethane traded at the Enterprise (EPC) storage cavern in Texas surged last year by 43pc to 90.12mn bl from 63.2mn bl in 2023, according to trades recorded by Argus . The gains in physical in-well trading activity at Mont Belvieu, the world's largest storage hub for the feedstock, came even as spot ethane prices fell in 2024 to an average of 19.03¢/USG, down from 24.59¢/USG the previous year, on the back of production gains and weaker prices for natural gas. US ethane production from gas processing averaged 2.8mn b/d in the first 10 months of 2024, up from 2.64mn b/d during the same period in 2023, according to the latest US Energy Information Administration (EIA) data. Gains in US ethane production come amid growing demand from petrochemical buyers in China and Europe, which has bolstered US ethane exports and led to additional investments by both Enterprise Products Partners and Energy Transfer in additional dock capacity for the feedstock. US ethane exports averaged 478,800 b/d in the first 10 months of 2024, down by 1.8pc from 487,600 b/d in 2023, due in part to loading delays associated with tie-in work for additional refrigeration at Gulf coast facilities. But exports in January-October 2024 were up by 17pc from the same period in 2022 on additional term contracts with international ethylene producers. Higher trading volumes in 2024 were not limited to ethane. Physical in-well trading of propane at Energy Transfer's LST storage cavern in Mont Belvieu rose by 30pc to 44.7mn bl in 2024, and in-well trading of propane at Enterprise's EPC storage cavern rose by 19pc to 68.3mn bl in 2024 versus 2023, according to trades recorded by Argus . US propane production from gas processing averaged 2.13mn b/d in January-October 2024, according to the latest available EIA data, up from 2mn b/d during the same period in 2023. LST and EPC propane prices rose in 2024 versus 2023 alongside increases in crude. Prompt-month LST propane averaged 77.12¢/USG during 2024, up from 71.13¢/USG in 2023. EPC propane averaged 77.63¢/USG in 2024, up from 70.83¢/USG in 2023. Argus publishes volume-weighted averages of physical trading at Mont Belvieu in addition to daily ranges. Ethane's traded midpoint averaged a 0.009¢/USG premium over the volume-weighted average in 2024. LST propane's traded range averaged a 0.037¢/USG discount to the volume-weighted average, and EPC propane's traded midpoint averaged a 0.143¢/USG discount to the volume-weighted average last year. By Amy Strahan Physical trading '000 bl Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more