South32 misses Australian coking coal output target

Market: Coal, Coking coal
22/07/24

Australian-South African diversified resources company South32 was 2pc off its coking coal production target of 4.4mn t at its Australian Illawarra coal operations in the 2023-24 fiscal year to 30 June.

The firm is on track to complete the sale of its Illawarra operations in New South Wales (NSW) state by the end of September, marking its exit from coal as it focuses on its non-ferrous metal portfolio. It completed three and started a fourth longwall move at the Appin and Dendrobium mines, leaving new owner Golden Energy and Resources and M Resources with a lower maintenance burden into 2025.

South32's total coal production was down by 24pc in 2023-24 compared with the previous year, largely because of maintenance. The firm increased production in the fourth quarter and final half of 2023-24 after a weak first half but the quarter was still down by 15pc on April-June 2023.

South32 expects its costs for 2023-24 to be around $150/t, which is in line with its guidance, which was raised from $140/t in February. It received an average price for its Illawarra coal of $275/t for its metallurgical coal and $113/t for its thermal coal for January-June compared with $276/t and $101/t respectively in July-December 2023.

The firm's operating margins at its Illawarra metallurgical coal operations were $17/t on thermal coal and $152/t on metallurgical coal in 2022-23 when its operating costs were $127/t. It will release its 2023-24 results on 29 August.

Argus last assessed the premium hard coking coal price at $229/t fob Australia on 19 July, down from $334.50/t on 19 January and close to the $235.50/t on 19 July 2023. It assessed the high-grade 6,000 kcal/kg NAR thermal coal price at $134.87/t fob Newcastle on 19 July, up from $128.09/t on 19 January and down from $129.18/t on 19 January 2023.

South32 last year dropped plans for a $700mn expansion at Dendrobium, following a dispute with NSW's water agency over its potential impact on water quality. Dendrobium, which supplies coking coal to the Whyalla steelworks in South Australia and exports from NSW's Port Kembla coal terminal, is expected to close in 2028.

By Jo Clarke

South32 Illawarra Coal output (mn t)
	Apr-Jun '24	Jan-Mar '24	Apr-Jun '23	2023-24	2022-23	2023-24 guidance

Met coal production	1.27	1.24	1.50	4.31	5.50	4.40
Met coal sales	1.36	1.05	1.53	4.17	5.40
Thermal coal production	0.21	0.16	0.25	0.63	1.02	0.60
Thermal coal sales	0.18	0.19	0.17	0.70	0.96
Total production	1.49	1.41	1.75	4.94	6.52	5.50
Source: South32

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News

18/06/25

Banks increased fossil fuel financing in 2024: Report

London, 18 June (Argus) — Banks "significantly increased" their fossil fuel financing in 2024, reversing a trend of steadily declining fossil fuel financing since 2021, a report from a group of non-profit organisations found this week. The 65 biggest banks globally committed $869bn in 2024 to "companies conducting business in fossil fuels", the report — Banking on Climate Chaos — found. Those banks committed $429bn last year to companies expanding fossil fuel production and infrastructure. The report assesses lending and underwriting in 2024 from the world's top 65 banks to more than 2,700 fossil fuel companies. Figures are not directly comparable year-on-year, as the previous report, which assessed 2023, covered financing from 60 banks. The 60 biggest banks globally committed $705bn in 2023 to companies with fossil fuel business, last year's report found. Those banks committed $347bn in 2023 to companies with fossil fuel expansion plans. Of the five banks providing the most fossil fuel finance in 2024, four were US banks — JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup and Wells Fargo. The 65 banks assessed in this year's report have committed $7.9 trillion in fossil fuel financing since 2016, when the Paris climate agreement took effect, the report found. Finance is at the core of climate negotiations like UN Cop summits. Developed countries are typically called upon at such events to provide more public climate finance to developing nations, but the focus is also shifting to private finance, as overseas development finance looks set to drop . But fossil fuel financing banks are increasingly facing the risk of targeted and more complex climate-related litigation, according to a recent report by the London School of Economics' centre for economic transition expertise (Cetex). Climate litigation is not currently adequately accounted for in financial risk assessment, with case filing and decisions negatively impacting carbon financiers, it said. "While early climate cases primarily targeted governments and big-emitting ‘carbon majors', cases against other firms have proliferated quickly," Cetex said. The report also showed that, based on a review of disclosures from 20 banks supervised by the European Central Bank, many banks across Europe recognise litigation risks as material in the context of climate and environmental factors but tend to not be specific about the risks incurred. By Georgia Gratton and Caroline Varin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more

News

EPA seeks end to power plant CO2, mercury rules

11/06/25

News

11/06/25

EPA seeks end to power plant CO2, mercury rules

Washington, 11 June (Argus) — The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on Wednesday proposed the repeal of CO2 and mercury emissions standards for power plants, its latest steps in an effort to undo many of the regulations enacted by President Donald Trump's predecessors The agency said the repeals will help bring about an end to the "war on much of our domestic energy supply" waged by previous administrations, while saving consumers money "We have chosen to both protect the environment and grow the economy," EPA administrator Lee Zeldin said. "There was this false binary choice made before we got here." Together, the repeals would save more than $1bn/yr for American families, Zeldin said. The standards, finalized last year by EPA during the administration of former president Joe Biden, cover CO2 emissions from existing and new coal-fired power plants and new natural gas-fired units, as well as mercury emissions from coal- and oil-fired power plants. At the time, EPA said the CO2 rules will lead to a 90pc reduction in emissions from coal-fired power plants, while it tightened the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) for coal- and oil-fired units by 67pc and included new emissions-monitoring requirements. In addition, the MATS for lignite-fired units were tightened by 70pc to put them in line with the standards for other coal plants. The CO2 rule includes standards for new coal and gas units and guidance for existing coal-fired power plants, the latter of which vary by unit type, size and other factors such as whether a power plant provides baseload or backup power. It does not include standards for existing gas-fired generators, which EPA had proposed in 2023 but last year decided to scrap in favor of a "new, comprehensive approach". While the CO2 regulation would be fully repealed, Zeldin said the agency is proposing to only undo last year's "gratuitous" changes to MATS, such as the new lignite standards. "If finalized no power plant will be allowed to emit more than they do now or as much as they did one or two years ago," he said. In addition to repealing the two Biden regulations, EPA is proposing to undo the Clean Power Plan, developed by the agency during the administration of former president Barack Obama. It would do this in part by reversing a previous agency determination that it could regulate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from power plants, and by also finding that those emissions "do not contribute significantly to dangerous air pollution." The Clean Power Plan has never been enforced, and the US Supreme Court in 2022 ruled the agency lacked the authority to regulate CO2 emissions from power plants in the way envisioned by that approach. Unlike during Trump's first term, when EPA first sought to repeal the Clean Power Plan, the agency this time around is not proposing any replacement. The previous replacement rule was struck down by the US District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals in 2021. The lack of a new rule could make EPA more vulnerable to legal challenges, which are all but certain to be filed by environmental groups and some states. "This administration is transparently trading American lives for campaign dollars and the support of fossil fuel companies, and Americans ought to be disgusted and outraged that their government has launched an assault on our health and our future," Sierra Club climate policy director Patrick Drupp said. Zeldin said he was not concerned about any potential litigation. "I would say with great enthusiasm and excitement for the future, I know we are absolutely going down the right path," he said. Coal and electric sector groups cheered EPA's proposal. "Today's announcement nullifies two of EPA's most consequential air rules, removing deliberately unattainable standards and leveling the playing field for reliable power sources, instead of stacking the deck against them," National Mining Association president Rich Nolan said. EPA in March included the CO2 and mercury rules among 31 Obama and Biden-era regulations and actions it planned to review and potentially repeal. Since then, the White House has identified more than 60 fossil fuel-fired power plants that will have two extra years to comply with the more-stringent MATS, giving them a reprieve while EPA works to formally repeal the regulations. The March announcement also included a reconsideration of the 2009 endangerment finding for GHG emissions, which underpins all of the major climate regulations EPA issued in recent years. "I don't have anything to announce today as it relates to any proposed rulemaking that may be to come on that topic," Zeldin said. EPA will open a 45-day public comment period on each proposed repeal once they are published in the Federal Register . By Michael Ball Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

India, Turkey drive US April met coal exports

11/06/25

News

11/06/25

India, Turkey drive US April met coal exports

London, 11 June (Argus) — US coking coal exports picked up slightly on the year in April despite lower Atlantic consumption, driven by buyers in India and Turkey. Suppliers in the country shipped 3.28mn t of coking coal in the month, according to data from GlobalTradeTracker, a 4pc increase from April 2024. India took 600,000t from the US in April, 62pc more than the year before, while exports to Turkey jumped by 275pc to 289,000t. Participants in the US market shifted their attention to India when China placed tariffs on US coals in February. Suppliers shipped no new tonnes to China in the month, with two diverting cargoes to other countries, according to port logs and data from vessel tracking service Kpler. A US east coast supplier found a buyer for the diverted tonnes in South Korea, while a ship carrying coal from Alabama changed its destination to Japan. US coking coal exports to Poland were the highest since 2010 and the fourth-largest in history, probably as a result of lost domestic production by Polish coking coal and met coke producer Jastrzebska Spolka Weglowa (JSW) earlier this year. The European country took 267,000t from the US, a 368pc increase from the year before. Although Polish importers took fewer seaborne tonnes in total in April, Chinese sanctions on US coking coal drove Canadian suppliers to China and pushed US high-volatile prices down, making US imports more attractive. Canada exported 178,000t to Poland in April 2024 and sent no cargoes in the same month this year. The US sent 1.23mn t to the EU in April, a 10pc drop from the year before. Importers in the Netherlands took 26pc less at 408,000t. Suppliers sent significantly less to Austria, with exports falling by 73pc to 74,000t. Suppliers shipped no new tonnes to China in the month, with two diverting cargoes to other countries, according to port logs and data from Kpler. A US east coast supplier found a buyer for the diverted tonnes in South Korea, while a ship carrying coal from Alabama changed its destination to Japan. By Austin Barnes US coking coal exports Apr 2025 '000t Country Apr 2025 Apr 2024 %±y-o-y World 3,281 3,145 4 India 600 370 62 Brazil 440 448 -2 Netherlands 408 549 -26 Turkey 289 77 275 Poland 267 57 368 Italy 201 114 76 Japan 182 235 -23 Malaysia 151 0 N/A Canada 117 158 -26 Vietnam 102 0 N/A — GTT Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Vietnam's coal imports hit 23-month high in May

11/06/25

News

11/06/25

Vietnam's coal imports hit 23-month high in May

Singapore, 11 June (Argus) — Vietnam's coal imports in May rose on the year to the highest level in 23 months, supported by restocking by utilities to cater for an increase in power demand in northern parts of the country. Seaborne receipts reached 7.2mn t in May, up from about 6.5mn t a year earlier and 7.16mn t in April , according to customs data. This marks the highest level since the 7.21mn t of coal imported in June 2023. Imports reached 31.64mn t in January-May, up from 27.06mn t a year earlier, Vietnamese customs data show. The data do not differentiate between coking and thermal coal. Receipts rose in May on restocking by utilities and steady industrial coal consumption in line with the economic activity in the country. The country's industrial output grew by 9.4pc in May from a year earlier, according to Vietnam's General Statistics Office (GSO), supporting its economic growth outlook. The utility restocking comes as hot weather peaks in June in northern Vietnam, which could buoy power demand and prompt utilities to boost coal-fired generation. This could support imports as power plants could continue to restock imported cargoes given that seaborne prices are at multi-year lows. Argus assessed the GAR 4,200 kcal/kg coal market for geared Supramaxes at $42.41/t fob Kalimantan on 6 June, the lowest since 26 March, 2021, when it was marked at $39.37/t. The country's overall generation last month stood at 28.62TWh , edging higher from 28.09TWh a year earlier, and 26.85TWh in April, data from state-owned utility EVN show. Coal-fired power accounted for the bulk of the generation last month at 15.8TWh, although this was down from 17.08TWh a year earlier and 16.09TWh in April. Hydropower output rose to 7.65TWh, up by 64pc from a year earlier, and also rising from an estimated 4.7TWh in April. EVN has asked all its units and plants to ensure stable supply of electricity, it said, and it will also ask local authorities to implement measures to save electricity to help manage loads on the grid. Indonesian coal accounted for the bulk of Vietnam's imports at 2.9mn t in in May, little changed from a year earlier and from April, the customs data show. Imports from Australia rose to 2.38mn t in May, up from 1.18mn t a year earlier, and from 2.23mn t in April. By Saurabh Chaturvedi Vietnam coal imports mn t Vietnam coal import trend mn t Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Australian coal supply hit by rain-related disruptions

10/06/25

News

10/06/25

Australian coal supply hit by rain-related disruptions

Singapore, 10 June (Argus) — Rain-related disruptions at Australia's Newcastle port — a major loading terminal for thermal coal in the country — and connecting rail networks have curtailed the availability of spot high-calorific value (CV) coal cargoes. Logistical challenges at the port and coal hauling railway lines following heavy rains and flooding since late May have exacerbated uncertainty in the seaborne market, with scarce availability of prompt June-loading and July-loading cargoes. The supply-side interruption comes at a time when demand for high-CV Australian NAR 6,000 kcal/kg coal is showing signs of picking up, although interest from China, the world's biggest coal importer, is still limited given the surplus of domestic coal. The uptick in Japanese demand and supply tightness has supported prices. Argus assessed the NAR 6,000 kcal/kg coal market at $101.80 fob Newcastle on 6 June, up by 42¢/t on the week. The assessed price has also recovered from its year-to-date low of $91.71 on 25 April. The premium of NAR 6,000 kcal/kg coal over NAR 5,500 kcal/kg is at $36.72/t fob Newcastle on 6 June, the highest since 3 January, when it was $41.07/t fob Newcastle. Shifting trade flows Vessel queues at Newcastle port was over 100/d on 6 June, according to market participants. Coal producers operating at Newcastle are facing delays of up to 10 days at Port Waratah Coal Services (PWCS) terminals and about 20 days at Newcastle Coal Infrastructure (NCIG) terminals. The delays may also lead to additional demurrage costs for producers, although at least one producer announced force majeure to cover the obligations. Several Australian coal producers said they are out of spot cargoes for June-July, while offers for August are also scarce. This comes as some Japanese buyers requested for July-loading cargoes but could not find any firm offers because of delays and a backlog of shipments at Newcastle, prompting them to enquire for cargoes in other regions such as China . Some traders may be holding Australian high-CV coal at China's Yantai West port, according to market participants. China does not consume high-CV NAR 6,000 kcal/kg coal, which is usually procured by Japanese utilities, and these stocks are likely held by Japanese trading houses, according to market participants. Cargoes of NAR 6,000 at this port were heard to be offered at $130-140/t cfr Japan, according to one Australian producer. But Argus could not independently verify the details of these offers. A Japanese utility likely purchased as many as two 28,000-36,000t cargoes of thermal coal from the Yantai West port in May, according to data from analytics firm Kpler. The data does not show any vessel movement from Yantai West port to Japan so far this month. Japan's power demand has been gradually increasing as temperatures have risen after the end of spring in late May. The country's power demand averaged 86GW in the week to 8 June, increasing by 4pc from a week earlier, according to nationwide transmission system operator the Organisation for Cross-regional Co-ordination of Transmission Operators. Some Japanese utilities are also restarting coal-fired power plants after conducting seasonal maintenance during the spring season. By Nadhir Mokhtar Australian coal premiums on NAR 6000 basis against NAR 5500 $/t Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more