Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Low water spurs Mississippi River restrictions

  • Market: Agriculture, Coal, Fertilizers, LPG, Petroleum coke
  • 27/08/24

The US Coast Guard implemented draft restrictions for the lower Mississippi River yesterday as water levels fall.

Beginning from around Tiptonville, Tennessee, to Rosedale, Mississippi, southbound barge drafts cannot be greater than 11ft and tow more than seven barges wide. Southbound transit from Rosedale to Tunica, Mississippi, cannot have a draft deeper than 11.5ft. Northbound drafts from Tunica to Tiptonville cannot be greater than 10ft.

The operating drafts were reduced to 9ft in mid-October, but water levels began declining in June last year.

The low water threshold of -2ft has been passed at Tunica Mhoon Landing, Mississippi, reaching -3.4ft. Memphis, Tennessee is only 2.5ft above its low water threshold. The US Coast Guard has initiated a 9ft draft requirement over the last two years when several points along the lower Mississippi have fallen below their low water threshold. Multiple sites on the lower Mississippi are forecast to reach their low water thresholds by the second week of September, according to the National Weather Service.

Southbound freight rates are likely to rise as draft restrictions force barge carriers to employ larger fleets to move the same volumes, especially as crop harvests continue. With restrictions on the number of towable barges, more transits will have to occur for both south and northbound products.

Grain exporters at New Orleans have taken to the sidelines as the risk of grain being caught on the lower Mississippi River has increased.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
18/06/25

Banks increased fossil fuel financing in 2024: Report

Banks increased fossil fuel financing in 2024: Report

London, 18 June (Argus) — Banks "significantly increased" their fossil fuel financing in 2024, reversing a trend of steadily declining fossil fuel financing since 2021, a report from a group of non-profit organisations found this week. The 65 biggest banks globally committed $869bn in 2024 to "companies conducting business in fossil fuels", the report — Banking on Climate Chaos — found. Those banks committed $429bn last year to companies expanding fossil fuel production and infrastructure. The report assesses lending and underwriting in 2024 from the world's top 65 banks to more than 2,700 fossil fuel companies. Figures are not directly comparable year-on-year, as the previous report, which assessed 2023, covered financing from 60 banks. The 60 biggest banks globally committed $705bn in 2023 to companies with fossil fuel business, last year's report found. Those banks committed $347bn in 2023 to companies with fossil fuel expansion plans. Of the five banks providing the most fossil fuel finance in 2024, four were US banks — JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup and Wells Fargo. The 65 banks assessed in this year's report have committed $7.9 trillion in fossil fuel financing since 2016, when the Paris climate agreement took effect, the report found. Finance is at the core of climate negotiations like UN Cop summits. Developed countries are typically called upon at such events to provide more public climate finance to developing nations, but the focus is also shifting to private finance, as overseas development finance looks set to drop . But fossil fuel financing banks are increasingly facing the risk of targeted and more complex climate-related litigation, according to a recent report by the London School of Economics' centre for economic transition expertise (Cetex). Climate litigation is not currently adequately accounted for in financial risk assessment, with case filing and decisions negatively impacting carbon financiers, it said. "While early climate cases primarily targeted governments and big-emitting ‘carbon majors', cases against other firms have proliferated quickly," Cetex said. The report also showed that, based on a review of disclosures from 20 banks supervised by the European Central Bank, many banks across Europe recognise litigation risks as material in the context of climate and environmental factors but tend to not be specific about the risks incurred. By Georgia Gratton and Caroline Varin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

India buys 145,000t of DAP at $775-781.50/t cfr


18/06/25
News
18/06/25

India buys 145,000t of DAP at $775-781.50/t cfr

London, 18 June (Argus) — Three Indian importers have bought a combined 145,000t of DAP at prices in a range of $775-781.50/t cfr. NFL bought 45,000t of DAP from a trading firm at $781.50/t cfr in its tender that closed on 13 June. The tender had sought black, brown or neutral-coloured DAP for shipment from the loading port by 30 June from memorandum of understanding (MOU) suppliers. The origin of the cargo sold is not yet confirmed. Two fellow Indian importers have each bought 50,000t of DAP at $775/t cfr for shipment in July from Saudi Arabian producer Ma'aden. The price for the Saudi Arabian DAP is in line with sales totalling 110,000t of DAP at $774.93-775/t cfr earlier this week. It would net back to the low-mid $760s/t fob. By Tom Hampson Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US Supreme Court asked to rule on tariffs


17/06/25
News
17/06/25

US Supreme Court asked to rule on tariffs

Washington, 17 June (Argus) — Plaintiffs in one of the legal cases challenging President Donald Trump's authority to impose tariffs are asking the Supreme Court to hear their arguments even before US federal appeals courts rule on their petition. The legal case brought by the plaintiffs — toy companies Learning Resources and hand2hand — resulted in a ruling by the US District Court for the District of Columbia in late May that Trump did not have the authority to impose tariffs by citing a 1978 law called the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). That case is currently on appeal at the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit. The plaintiffs today urged the Supreme Court to take the case and schedule oral arguments at the start of its fall term in October, or possibly in a special September sitting. The plaintiffs argued the Supreme Court will eventually have to rule on the case given the unprecedented use of IEEPA by the Trump White House to impose tariffs, so special consideration should be given to the case even before appeals courts rule on it. The Supreme Court is under no obligation to fast-track the case. The schedule for legal challenges to Trump's authority is clashing with his claims to be negotiating multiple deals with foreign trade partners. Trump cited the IEEPA to impose, then rescind, tariffs of 10-25pc on energy and other imports from Canada and Mexico in February-March. He used the same law to impose 20pc tariffs on China in February-March, and to impose 10pc tariffs on nearly every US trading partner in April. The US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit has stayed the toy companies' case until the resolution of a separate, broader legal challenge to Trump's tariff authority. In that case, the US Court of International Trade ruled in late May that Trump's use of IEEPA was illegal and ordered the administration to remove all tariffs it imposed under that rubric and to refund all import duties it collected. The trade court's ruling is under review at the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which scheduled an oral argument on 31 July to hear from plaintiffs — a group of US companies and several US states — and from the Trump administration. The trade court's ruling in late May was unexpected, as it "actually ruled on the merits of the case, as opposed to just granting or denying an injunction," according to Alec Phillips, chief political economist with investment bank Goldman Sachs' research arm. "The question now is, will the Federal Circuit uphold the ruling, and will ultimately the Supreme Court uphold the ruling?" The Trump administration argued that the legal challenges to its tariff authority could undermine its ability to negotiate with foreign trade partners. The administration has so far produced two limited trade agreements, with the UK and China, despite promising in early April to unveil "90 deals in 90 days". Trump on Monday described ongoing trade negotiations as an easy process. "We're dealing with really, if you think about it, probably 175 countries, and most of them can just be sent a letter saying, 'It'll be an honor to trade with you, and here's what you're going to have to pay to do'", Trump said. But on the same day he pushed back on calls from Canada and the EU to negotiate trade deals, arguing that their approach is too complex. "You get too complex on the deals and they never get done," Trump said. The legal challenges to Trump's authority under IEEPA will not affect the tariffs he imposed on foreign steel, aluminum, cars and auto parts. US trade statistics point to a significant tariff burden in place in April, the latest month for which data are available.The effective US tariff rate on all imports — the amount of duties collected divided by the total value of imports — rose to 7.1pc in April from 2.4pc in January. Trump has dismissed concerns about the impact of tariffs on consumer prices, noting on Monday that "we're making a lot of money. You know, we took in $88bn in tariffs." Treasury Department revenue data show that the US has collected $98bn in customs revenue for the year through 13 June, up from $63bn in the same period last year. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Keyera acquiring Plains' Canada NGL assets for $3.75bn


17/06/25
News
17/06/25

Keyera acquiring Plains' Canada NGL assets for $3.75bn

Houston, 17 June (Argus) — Midstream operator Keyera will acquire Plains All American's Canadian natural gas liquids (NGLs) business for C$5.15bn ($3.75bn). The transaction, which is expected to close by the first quarter of 2026, includes 193,000 b/d of fractionation capacity in western Canada, more than 1,500 miles of pipelines gathering 575,000 b/d of NGLs, 23mn bl in NGL storage capacity, and the 5.7 Bcf/d Empress straddle gas processing plant. The acquisition is expected to deliver C$100mn of annual synergies between the assets in the first year, according to Keyera. Plains said the divestiture will allow the US-based midstream operator to focus on its crude handling assets in both the US and Canada. Plains will keep nearly all of its NGL assets in the US. The acquisition of Plains' assets gives Keyera NGL fractionators and gas processing plants in Fort Saskatchewan, and at the Empress facility in western Canada as well as storage at Sarnia, Ontario. It also links Keyera's existing assets to takeaway agreements for LPG exports out of British Columbia. Keyera chief executive Dean Setoguchi said the acquisition "... brings key infrastructure under Canadian ownership, keeping value and decision-making closer to home." Plain's Canadian business is underpinned by fee-based contracts with an average remaining life of 10 years, Keyera said. Associated NGL production in Canada is expected to grow by 500,000 b/d by 2040, according to Keyera, as natural gas production in western Canada climbs by 6 Bcf/d during the same timeframe. By Amy Strahan Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US ethane exports slump as China flows blocked


17/06/25
News
17/06/25

US ethane exports slump as China flows blocked

The EIA has revised down its forecast for US ethane exports following the introduction of licensing requirements, writes Amy Strahan Houston, 17 June (Argus) — US exports of ethane fell to a nearly five-year low in early June following the US Department of Commerce's restrictions on shipments to China , but market participants expect the trade dispute to be short-lived. The department's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) sent a letter to midstream firm Enterprise Products in late May requiring it as the operator of the 240,000 b/d (5mn t/yr) Morgan's Point ethane terminal in Texas to obtain a licence for future shipments to China citing possible military uses for ethane and butane. The US' largest ethane exporter, Energy Transfer, which operates the 180,000 b/d Nederland ethane terminal, then received a similar notice on 3 June. Enterprise's request for emergency authorisation to ship three ethane cargoes totalling 2.2mn bl (177,000t) was subsequently denied, sending ethane prices at the Mont Belvieu hub in Texas to a six-month low of 19.25¢/USG ($142/t) on 5 June. Around 198,000 b/d of US ethane loaded during the week to 26 May, after Enterprise received its letter, down from 410,000 b/d a week earlier and 547,000 b/d in the same week of 2024, Kpler data show. They are forecast to stand at 218,000 b/d over the week to 9 June. Ethane prices at Mont Belvieu had recovered to levels seen before the trade restriction by 10 June, owing in part to seasonal gains in Gulf coast natural gas prices but also because market participants expect disruptions to cargo loadings to be temporary, with the US and China holding trade talks in London this month. Very large ethane carriers (VLEC) that deliver ethane to China were on standby by mid-June. The Pacific Ineos Grenadier , which loaded ethane from Morgan's Point while Enterprise appealed against the BIS measure, has been moored at the company's nearby Houston terminal since 9 June. Satellite's Seri Erlang remains offshore Energy Transfer's Nederland facility, while its STL Qianji ang , which loaded at Nederland in the first week of June, is now heading to India. Another Satellite vessel, STL Yangtze , discharged in India in early June, possibly owing to maintenance at Satellite's cracker in Lianyungang , China, and is now returning to Nederland, according to Kpler. "We are all hoping the policy will be reversed soon," one market participant says, while another adds that it is likely to be resolved in days and not weeks. Restricted view US government agency the EIA has nevertheless attempted to forecast the impact the restriction would have on US ethane exports, revising down its forecast by 51pc to 310,000 b/d (6.4mn t/yr) for 2026. US ethane export capacity is on track to grow to as much as 900,000 b/d by the end of next year following the opening of new projects, including Enterprise's new 360,000 b/d Neches River ethane and propane terminal near Beaumont, Texas, and expansions at Morgan's Point and Energy Transfer's Marcus Hook terminals. Chinese buyers of US ethane are also hopeful of a relatively swift resolution owing to the mercurial trade policy of the Donald Trump administration. If it is not forthcoming, they may look to switch feedslates to LPG and naphtha when possible in the shorter term, and those that have invested in new VLEC fleets could repurpose them to LPG or ethylene in the longer term. Neither would be an attractive proposition given the substantial levels of investment in new ethane-fed cracking and VLEC capacity, but would ensure that domestic downstream derivative plants are kept running. Chinese companies are unlikely to begin importing ethylene instead given the margins would still be uncompetitive compared with cracking alternative feedstocks. In any event, buyers "do not want to make a big decision they will regret", one market participant says. Mont Belvieu ethane price Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more