Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Equinor gets nod for strong Oseberg 2024-25 gas output

  • Market: Natural gas
  • 04/09/24

The Norwegian energy ministry has given the green light for a high Oseberg gas production quota for the 2024-25 gas year, but has concerns about the effect of an acceleration of gas exports on oil production.

While the ministry would not reveal to Argus how much gas it has permitted state-controlled Equinor to produce from Oseberg in October 2024-September 2025, other details from the permit approval letter suggest that the quota is again high. But the ministry has cautioned that Equinor must ensure maximum recovery of the oil in the main Oseberg Brent reservoir. It has ordered the field's operator to include an updated overall drilling plan in its 2025-26 permit application.

Gas blowdown has begun at the main parts of the Oseberg field, which involves a shift to gas production rather than gas injections as the amount of oil that can be profitably extracted declines. The gas production permit — for Oseberg, Oseberg Sor and Oseberg Ost combined — was 7bn m³ in each of the past three gas years including 2023-24, up from 5bn m³ in 2020-21 and 4bn m³ in 2019-20 (see graph).

The Oseberg licensees also plan to produce part of the gas in 2024-25 that has been "carried forward" from previous gas years. The Oseberg permit has flexibility within defined constraints — shareholders can under or overproduce against their quota and balance it out with higher or lower output in the following gas years.

To ensure sufficient gas production capacity to support its planned 2024-25 exports, Equinor initially submitted a request to the Norwegian Offshore Directorate (NOD) to accelerate two gas wells that it had previously planned to drill after two time-critical oil wells. Following discussion with the NOD, Equinor adjusted its plan and now aims to recomplete one gas well and speed up another gas well. Compared with the option of accelerating two gas wells, this entails a lower risk of the two oil wells being pushed back past the remaining time window for viable drilling, the ministry said. This balance between consideration of remaining oil and ensuring gas production capacity is "satisfactory", according to the NOD.

The ministry, after considering the directorate's advice, assessed that Equinor's requested 2024-25 gas production volume and drilling plan "support good resource management". But the ministry expressed concerns that Equinor's plan to delay drilling of oil wells to prioritise gas wells will mean that reservoir pressure becomes too low for profitable oil extraction.

The ministry specified that it is approving the 2024-25 gas production and drilling plan on the basis that Equinor will extract gas "to the greatest extent possible" from reservoir segments that have the least remaining oil potential, so that the pressure at oil reservoirs is maintained for as long as possible. Equinor must continue to monitor the reservoir, the ministry said. And it should take measures if gas extraction has unexpected consequences and inform the resource authorities of this, the ministry said.

The NOD emphasises that the Oseberg C facility has a shorter expected lifetime than the facilities at the Oseberg field centre. Since only Oseberg C can drill wells to the northernmost segment of Oseberg, called Alpha Nord, all necessary oil and gas wells for this segment must be drilled early enough for reserves to be produced before Oseberg C is shut down. Equinor must also investigate and implement other measures such as low-pressure production to achieve the greatest possible value creation from the Oseberg field, the ministry said.

Equinor must submit its application for a 2025-26 gas permit by 1 February. Its plan needs to include an updated overall drilling strategy, and it needs to be clarified with the ministry in good time for submission, the ministry said.

Oseberg gas permit vs production bn m³

Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
23/06/25

Iran fires missiles at US military base in Qatar

Iran fires missiles at US military base in Qatar

London, 23 June (Argus) — Iran today fired missiles at a US base in Qatar in retaliation for the weekend attack on its nuclear facilities. The Iranian military said the US' Al-Udeid base was its target. The Qatari government said it intercepted the missiles and there were no deaths or injuries. Tensions in the region have been stretched since the US bombed Iranian nuclear facilities at the weekend. US president Donald Trump today again expressed a desire for regime change in Tehran, which in turn said US military interests were now legitimate targets. Earlier, Qatar closed its airspace and the US and UK embassies there issued safety warnings to their citizens, suggesting this Iranian attack was flagged and expected. The price of Ice Brent crude fell by as much as 4.5pc in the wake of the Iranian attack to an intraday low of $72.48/bl, having hit a five-month high of $81.40/bl earlier in the day. The Iranian move echoes its attacks on US military targets in Iraq after the US' killing of senior Iranian military commander Qassem Soleimani in January 2020. Perhaps mindful of this, foreign firms operating in Iraq today started removing some employees from the country. Regional airlines began cancelling and rerouting flights across the Middle East, with flight tracking showing almost no flights in the air above the Mideast Gulf. By Ben Winkley Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Trump again brings up regime change in Iran


23/06/25
News
23/06/25

Trump again brings up regime change in Iran

Washington, 23 June (Argus) — President Donald Trump's administration is trying to articulate what it ultimately aims to achieve in Iran, after directly involving the US in the Israel-Iran war over the weekend. Senior administration officials took to the TV news shows on Sunday to assert that Washington is not trying to topple the government in Iran. They claimed that the US bombing raids, in the early hours of Sunday Tehran time, caused irreparable damage to Iran's nuclear program. And they suggested that the US will not carry out additional air strikes unless Iran retaliates against US interests in the region or targets vessel traffic in the strait of Hormuz. But Trump then contradicted his own administration's message by posting on his social media platform: "If the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!" Iran has responded with tough rhetoric to the US air strikes but did not hit back at US interests across the region, even though Iran and Israel continued to exchange missile attacks. Tehran said today that US airstrikes have expanded the range of legitimate military targets for its armed forces, while a senior Iranian lawmaker said the parliament has concluded that the strait of Hormuz "should be closed". The strait of Hormuz is the world's most critical oil transit route, with around 17mn b/d of crude and refined products — roughly a quarter of global seaborne oil trade — passing through it. Iran has repeatedly threatened to close the strait in past confrontations but has never followed through on that rhetoric. In the past, Tehran has targeted or seized vessels transiting the waterway, prompting some shipowners to consider alternative routes. Crude oil futures, which in the run-up to the US attack already reflected risk premiums associated with potential disruption to oil flows from the Mideast Gulf, rose in early trading in Asia today but eased later in the day. Trump, who has frequently touted declines in oil prices during his second administration, posted today: "EVERYONE, KEEP OIL PRICES DOWN. I'M WATCHING! YOU'RE PLAYING RIGHT INTO THE HANDS OF THE ENEMY. DON'T DO IT!" He then posted, "To The Department of Energy: DRILL, BABY, DRILL!!! And I mean NOW!!!" The Energy Department cannot mandate how much crude US oil companies produce, but it does control the US emergency oil stocks. Uncertainty ahead The Pentagon has been more restrained than Trump and his national security advisers in providing an assessment of the air strikes. Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman, general Dan Caine said on Sunday that initial assessments indicated that Iran's nuclear facilities suffered "extremely severe damage and destruction" but noted that it was too early to say whether Iran maintains any nuclear capability. Trump by contrast posted about "monumental damage" and asserted that "obliteration is an accurate term" in reference to Iran's nuclear sites. "Sometimes we have a tendency to think that a military solution can insert some certainty into a situation," said retired general Joe Votel, who commanded Middle East-based US forces in 2016-19. "But I think what we're seeing here is that there still is a significant amount of uncertainty about what is going to take place." It will take time to accurately assess the impact of US air strikes on Iran's nuclear program, Votel said today during a discussion hosted by think tank the Middle East Institute. The UN's nuclear watchdog, the IAEA, said on 22 June that no increases in off-site radiation levels had been reported following the US strikes. The eventual shape of Iran's response is a further cause of uncertainty, Votel said. "Do they have a surprise for us, if they held something in reserve that we're going to see revealed here?" An Iranian counter-attack aimed at the US would invite more US strikes. But if Iran's response proves muted or non-existent, "will we be going back?," he asked. "And then, how does all this conclude?" The US embassy in Qatar today issued a "shelter in place" warning to US citizens in the country, which hosts the largest US air force base in the region. The US embassy did not cite a specific threat, noting that the warning was out of an "abundance of caution". The UK embassy issued a similar warning to British citizens. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Subsidised bio-LNG deemed eligible under FuelEU


23/06/25
News
23/06/25

Subsidised bio-LNG deemed eligible under FuelEU

London, 23 June (Argus) — Subsidised bio-LNG and other types of alternative fuels are deemed eligible under FuelEU Maritime Regulation, according to sources with knowledge of the matter. FuelEU allows emissions reductions supported under other legal frameworks, such as the support schemes under RED, in order to encourage greater investment in less carbon-intensive marine fuels. Under Directive (EU) 2018/2001 (RED), the greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions are counted towards member states' targets, while under FuelEU the targets are set to shipping companies. Excluding subsidised marine fuels may otherwise lead to competitive disadvantages for smaller sectors, such as European biomethane. The European Commission has not yet issued an official statement. Demand for bio-LNG has risen sharply this year with the start of FuelEU Maritime in January, requiring ship-owners to reduce their GHG emissions by 2pc in 2025, with targets steadily rising to 80pc in 2050. Subsidised, bunker dob bio-LNG in Northwest Europe was last assessed at €78.09/MWh ($89.55/MWh) on Thursday, while its unsubsidised counterpart was assessed at €93.59/MWh. By Madeleine Jenkins Bio-LNG vs Gas Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Iran raises Hormuz closure threat after US strikes


23/06/25
News
23/06/25

Iran raises Hormuz closure threat after US strikes

Dubai, 23 June (Argus) — A senior Iranian lawmaker says parliament has concluded that the strait of Hormuz "should be closed" in response to US airstrikes on three nuclear sites early Sunday — a move that would severely disrupt global oil flows. Esmaeil Kowsari — a member of the national security and foreign policy commission, and a former high-ranking commander in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) — told state-owned Press TV that lawmakers had reached a consensus that closure would be the appropriate response. Argus understands that while members of parliament were all in agreement, the issue was not formally put to a vote. Kowsari said the final decision lies with the Supreme National Security Council, Iran's top security body. His comments have drawn global attention as markets await Iran's response to the strikes, which US president Donald Trump ordered against nuclear facilities at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. The Fordow site is heavily fortified and located underground. The Natanz facility had already been targeted by Israeli strikes, prompting a series of retaliatory missile and drone exchanges between Iran and Israel. Iranian officials, including supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, had repeatedly warned Washington that any direct military action would trigger a response causing "irreparable" harm to the US. . Variety of options The strait of Hormuz is the world's most critical oil transit route, with around 17mn b/d of crude and refined products — roughly a quarter of global seaborne oil trade — passing through it. Iran has repeatedly threatened to close the strait in past confrontations but has never followed through. It has, however, previously targeted or seized vessels transiting the waterway, prompting some shipowners to consider alternative routes. Closure of the strait is one of several retaliatory options regularly floated by Iranian political and military leaders. Others include military strikes on US bases across the Mideast Gulf. The US maintains installations in Bahrain, Qatar, the UAE, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and Iraq. Asked whether closing the strait was under consideration, Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araqchi declined to confirm, saying only that "there are a variety of options available to us". Araqchi travelled to Moscow late on Sunday and is expected to meet Russian president Vladimir Putin on Monday. Moscow has condemned the US strikes. Ali Akbar Velayati, a long-time adviser to Khamenei, also issued a veiled threat to Washington, saying: "West Asia is not Greenland, and the strait of Hormuz is fundamentally different from the Panama Canal." The comment referenced earlier threats by Trump to assert US control over Greenland and the Panama Canal during the early days of his second term. US secretary of state Marco Rubio warned that any attempt by Iran to close the strait would be "a terrible mistake." "It's economic suicide for them if they do it, and we retain options to deal with that," he said. By Nader Itayim Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US bombs nuclear sites in Iran: Update


22/06/25
News
22/06/25

US bombs nuclear sites in Iran: Update

Updates with remarks from President Donald Trump Washington, 21 June (Argus) — The US conducted air strikes on three nuclear facilities in Iran, President Donald Trump said Saturday evening. US bombers targeted the heavily fortified, underground facility at Fordow and sites at Natanz and Isfahan, Trump said on his social media platform. "The strikes were a spectacular military success," Trump said in a televised address Saturday night. "Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated. Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace. If they do not, future attacks will be far greater and a lot easier." Trump waited until after the US planes had left Iranian airspace before making the announcement. Israel's air and missile strikes, underway since 13 June, had already targeted those three facilities, in addition to some domestic energy infrastructure and urban areas across Iran. UN nuclear watchdog the IAEA on Friday warned of potential nuclear safety hazards from the ongoing Israeli attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities and cautioned Israel against targeting Iran's Busherh nuclear power plant and a nuclear research laboratory in Tehran. Washington-based military experts assessed that only the US Air Force had the right type of munitions to destroy Fordow. Involving the US in the Israel-Iran war is a watershed moment for Trump's presidency. Trump in the past decade has often lambasted his predecessors for involving the US in costly and fruitless military adventures in the Middle East. But he has changed his tune since the beginning of Israel's offensive on Iran, claiming that eliminating Iran's nuclear program was worth the US involvement. Trump, in his televised address, referenced the US' killing of senior Iranian military commander Qassem Soleimani in January 2020 — the last time US and Iranian forces directly exchanged fire. Tehran's response at that time involved missile attacks on US bases in Iraq that wounded more than 100 US military personnel, but drew no heavy US retaliation. The markets will closely watch Tehran's reaction to the US air strikes. Even before the US bombing raids, Trump's public musings about a possible US role in Israel's campaign against Iran in the past week spurred the oil industry and shipping sectors to increase the risk premiums embedded in their calculations. Most immediately at stake are Iran's 2.5mn b/d of crude, condensate and products exports, which mostly head to China. Oil markets are also concerned about the risk of contagion if Israel and the US draw retaliatory attacks elsewhere in the Mideast Gulf or jeopardize shipping through the strait of Hormuz — the global oil market's single most vulnerable chokepoint, through which pass about 17mn b/d of crude and products, or about a quarter of seaborne oil trade. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more