Latest market news

Brazil hikes import tax on polymers, chemicals

  • Market: Petrochemicals
  • 19/09/24

Brazil's government increased import taxes of 30 polymers and chemicals to 20pc from 12.6pc this week, including polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC).

Another 32 chemical products remain under evaluation by Gecex, the Brazilian committee for commercial trade management. With the 18 September decision, most rates will rise and will remain at this level for 12 months.

Domestic manufacturers and chemical industries associations welcomed the decision, arguing that the measure will help level the playing field against foreign competitors who benefit from lower production costs. Brazil's chemical industry association Abiquim has been asking the government provide commercial protections for 62 products since May.

Supporters of the tax hike, including Abiquim, say it will help create jobs and strengthen Brazil's domestic economy. They also said that the increased revenue from the higher taxes can be reinvested in infrastructure and public services, further benefiting the country.

Brazilian petrochemical major Braskem said Thursday that it sees the tax increase as a positive step towards ensuring fair competition and fostering growth within the industry. Braskem produces basic chemicals, PE, PP and PVC.

The most important aspect of the tax increase is not the number of products covered, but what it represents in value, said Abiquim's executive president Andre Passos Cordeiro. "These 30 products that were approved represent about 65pc of the import volume of this set of 62 products that we had proposed to the government," he said. "They also represent 75pc of the value of this same set of imports. The decision is welcome, well-founded technically, and brings relief to the chemical industry."

The share of chemical imports in the Brazilian market soared in the last 20 years, according to Abiquim, reaching 47pc in 2023 from 21pc in 2000. In the first half of this year, the sector's trade deficit was close to $23bn, while the national industry's idle capacity reached its worst level ever.

"We were losing strength with the closure of factories and loss of jobs," Cordeiro said. "I reiterate that the government's decision was essential for us, as an industry and as Brazilians. A strong industry presupposes a strong country."

The Brazilian chemical industry is responsible for around 11pc of Brazil's GDP, according to Cordeiro

Taxes could up consumer costs

Critics of the tax hikes say they will increase costs for consumers and manufacturers who rely on imported polymers and chemicals.

Brazil's plastic industry association Abiplast said it was concerned that the higher import taxes will increase production costs for plastic products, which could result in higher prices for end consumers.

In a letter to associates, Abiplast said that the measure could hurt small- and medium-sized enterprises that do not have the same capacity as larger companies to absorb the increased costs.

The tax hike could also negatively impact the competitiveness of Brazilian products in the global market, Abiplast said. By increasing the cost of raw materials, Brazilian plastic converters may find it more challenging to compete with foreign companies that have access to cheaper inputs. That could lead to a decrease in exports and a potential loss of market share internationally.

Furthermore, opponents of the tax increase highlight that the measure could have unintended consequences on the broader economy. Higher production costs could lead to inflationary pressures, affecting the purchasing power of Brazilian consumers. They also point out that the tax increase may not necessarily lead to the desired boost in domestic production, as the domestic industry may not have the capacity to meet the increased demand for polymers and chemicals.

The letter, signed by the chairman of the association's board Jose Ricardo Roriz Coelho, also said that despite exhaustive explanations to the government about the taxes' downsides, final approval [of the tax hike] still goes through Brazil's partners in trade bloc Mercosur — Argentina, Uruguay, and Paraguay. If validated, the measure is expected to go into effect in October and last for one year. Abiplast said it will continue battling to reverse the measure, which the association deems unreasonable.

Higher domestic prices may follow

The market is taking some notice of the new proposed measures. One US polymers exporter to Brazil told Argus that if the tax hike becomes effective, Brazilian polymers manufacturers are expected to immediately raise prices to recover their margins.

"The timing for the tax hike announcement was fine-tuned to let local producers secure additional margins in a time that sales are expected to increase in Brazil due to Christmas and New Year celebrations," one market participant told Argus.

But any drop in polymer imports into Brazil from the taxes should recover in he beginning of next year, the source said. "Brazil's polymers production is not enough to address local demand, so imports will always be needed," the source said.

Brazil's January-August PE imports surged by 45pc from the same period in 2023, reaching almost 1.4mn metric tonnes. North America had a 79pc share, while South America had another 10pc. The country also buys from Asia and the Middle East.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News

Argent to start production at new glycerine refinery


03/10/24
News
03/10/24

Argent to start production at new glycerine refinery

London, 3 October (Argus) — Biofuels producer Argent Energy is expected to commence production at its new glycerine refinery in early October, a source told Argus . The new Argent refinery, which is located at its Port of Amsterdam site, is Europe's largest facility dedicated to producing bio-based, technical-grade refined glycerine. The facility has a production capacity of 50,000 t/yr and will upgrade crude glycerine into 99.7pc technical-grade glycerine to supply the European chemical market, the company said. Technical-grade refined glycerine can be used in the production of epichlorohydrin, polyether polyol and anti-freeze, among other applications. Additionally, its use as a feedstock for biofuels generation, such as marine fuels, is being studied as it could offer a cheaper alternative to LNG and distillates. The Netherlands has the largest marine fuel sector in the EU. "Our entrance into the chemical market is driven by our goal to maximise product value and support the circular economy. By upgrading glycerine from our processes into a technical-grade product, we're giving the chemical industry a bio-based option they can confidently use in their own products," Argent Energy chief executive Louise Calviou said. The glycerine produced in Argent's new facility will be made via the biodiesel production route, with the product being certified under International Sustainability and Carbon Certification (ISCC) guidelines. Argent Energy currently has a capacity of 190,000 t/yr for waste-based biodiesel, with sites in Amsterdam and northwest England. The company plans to soon triple biofuel production at its Amsterdam site alone. By George Barsted and Carolina A. Palma Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

California textile recovery bill signed into law


02/10/24
News
02/10/24

California textile recovery bill signed into law

Houston, 2 October (Argus) — California governor Gavin Newsom (D) signed a bill into law on 28 September that will establish the US's first extended producer responsibility (EPR) textile recycling program. The law (SB 707) requires producers of apparel or textile articles in California to create a producer responsibility organization (PRO) that will handle and recycle textiles and apparel across the state, under the supervision of California's Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle). SB 707 is the first EPR system for clothing that has passed in the US and leaves a lot of leeway to the PRO and CalRecycle in implementing the law. It provides relatively few details about how the EPR program will work and does not set any minimum recycled targets. The law was written by California State Senator Josh Newman (D) and was supported by textile industry participants and recyclers. "To achieve (our corporate goal of becoming a circular business by 2030), we must partner with policymakers to support efforts in creating more circular systems for textiles and other products," IKEA US Sustainability Manager Mardi Ditze said following the bill's passage. "We applaud Senator Newman for leading a collaborative process with industry stakeholders on SB 707 and support efforts to increase textile circularity in California and across the US." The PRO is required to provide free textile recycling drop-off centers for residents of California, and CalRecycle is authorized to impose monetary penalties against producers for violations of the program's requirements under the bill. Producers will be expected to join an approved PRO by 1 July 2026, and the EPR system is planned to begin enforcement on 1 July 2030. By Hadley Medlock Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Unilateral action can tackle plastic waste: OECD


02/10/24
News
02/10/24

Unilateral action can tackle plastic waste: OECD

London, 2 October (Argus) — Only stringent global measures addressing production and waste management combined can come close to eliminating plastic leakage into the environment by 2040, a new OECD report says. The report — Policy Scenarios for Eliminating Plastic Pollution by 2040 — projects the impact of different policy measures, ranging from business as usual, through measures only aimed at boosting collection and recycling or only enacted in developed countries, up to global measures targeting both upstream production and downstream waste management. It concludes that global plastic production will grow by 69pc by 2040 — versus a 2020 baseline — if the current policy environment is maintained, whereas the recycling rate would only increase by around 5pc, resulting in a 50pc increase in the leakage of plastic into the environment. Combining measures aimed at curbing plastic demand — including production caps, development of re-use systems and increased design-for-recycling — with policies aimed at boosting collection and recycling of plastic waste could reduce virgin plastic production, boost recycling rates above 40pc and reduce leakage to near zero. In a scenario where OECD members enact measures across the supply chain while non-OECD nations focus on downstream measures, virgin plastic production would rise only slightly by 2040, from 2020, the report says. But it projects that there would still be more than 10mn t/yr of plastic waste leaking into the environment, compared with 20mn t in 2020. Furthermore, the report concludes that enacting measures across the supply chain will be the most cost-effective way of limiting the environmental impact of plastic waste. This is because upstream measures such as design-for-recycling will reduce the cost of improving collection and recycling, which will be higher in many non-OECD countries where existing waste management infrastructure is more limited. Global measures across the supply chain would cost 0.37pc of gross domestic product (GDP) in OECD countries and 0.62pc of GDP in non-OECD economies by 2040, the report projects, compared with over 0.5pc and nearly 1pc, respectively, if only downstream measures were implemented. "These costs exclude the avoided costs of inaction and should be considered in the context of vastly improved environmental outcomes", the report notes. Shaping the debate The release of the report comes ahead of the fifth and final scheduled round of UN negotiations to develop a binding global treaty to tackle plastic waste, which will begin in South Korea in November. In past sessions, there has been ongoing debate about the scope that the treaty should take. Some delegates, especially from countries with a reliance on plastic-producing industries, have so far favoured a focus on downstream measures and opposed caps on virgin plastic production. A recent change of tack from the US in support of production caps surprised many observers, but its impact on discussions will depend on how much leverage it is willing to use to convince others to follow suit. Discussions during the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee on Plastic Pollution on 25 September in New York showed member countries are still far apart in terms of policy agreements, with frustration sometimes visible from a few diplomats about the lack of progress in certain areas. Negotiations up to this point indicate that achieving the OECD's ideal scenario for tackling plastic waste will be extremely challenging. By Will Collins Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

California enacts carpet recovery law


01/10/24
News
01/10/24

California enacts carpet recovery law

Houston, 1 October (Argus) — California Governor Gavin Newsom last week signed into law an extended producer responsibility (EPR) program for carpets that overhauls the state's carpet recycling program. The law establishes a minimum mandate for carpet-to-carpet recycling, requiring new carpets to contain at least 5pc recycled carpet by 2028. It also requires a visual mark to identify synthetic carpet and greatly increases fees for a producer responsibility organization (PRO) that fails to meet carpet recycling mandates. The National Stewardship Action Council, an organization that advocates for a circular economy, said that the law will make "critical improvements" to the state's carpet recycling program. The carpet recycling mandate is intended to avoid the "downcycling" of bottles into carpet, as bottles are more easily recycled than carpet. Since 2011, California has required consumers to pay a carpet stewardship fee to fund the Carpet America Recovery Effort (CARE), a manufacturer-run organization that collects and recycles scrap carpet. CARE told Argus in July that the bill as proposed would upend the institution by replacing it with an inexperienced PRO to manage carpet recycling. The revised bill that Newsom signed on 27 September allows CARE or another industry group to serve as a PRO that would manage the carpet stewardship program. The law increases state government scrutiny on the PRO and increases fines for mismanagement of the program. The author of the bill, California Assemblymember Cecilia Aguiar-Curry (D), said that the law was in direct response to CARE's mismanagement of carpet recycling, and would strengthen accountability and transparency for the program. "Even with constant intervention and enforcement actions by CalRecycle and the California legislature, CARE's failure to successfully manage California's carpet recycling program has resulted in more carpet in landfills, wasted consumer fee money, constant litigation with the state, and serious damage to recycling infrastructure in this state," Aguiar-Curry said. CARE did not immediately respond to request for comment. The bill previously included materials such as vinyl and polyurethane flooring as part of the EPR program, but those sections were removed after industry organizations complained about their inclusion in a carpet bill . By Zach Kluver Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more