Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

SAF market is far from takeoff: Airlines

  • Market: Agriculture, Biofuels, Emissions, Oil products
  • 27/09/24

Airline executives descended on climate events in New York this week to emphasize their commitments to use more sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) — and to hint that these goals will prove difficult absent additional government support.

At events tied to the UN General Assembly and Climate Week NYC, supporters of alternative jet fuels said that a range of policies were growing the market, including tax incentives, US states' low-carbon fuel standards and increasingly stringent mandates for SAF usage in the EU. While US production capacity of SAF is expected to rise significantly in the coming years, there is still concern that limited supply and a steep premium to conventional petroleum jet fuel will hinder adoption.

SAF "will always be more expensive because it's a better product," said Aaron Robinson, vice president of US SAF for the International Airlines Group, a holding company that includes British Airways and Iberia.

Executives, while calling generally for more policies to stimulate supply and demand, were more inclined to support subsidies over mandates. The airline industry already runs on tight margins, and executives fear that prospective customers could stay home instead of paying more for lower-carbon flights.

"I think the worst thing we could do right now is choose a very short-term solution that takes that green premium and directly saddles it onto our customers," said Delta Air Lines chief sustainability officer Amelia DeLuca. She argued that the EU's SAF mandates were "pushing the fuel forward a little bit too fast in terms of where the supply and the green premium are."

Still, the most prominent government subsidy for SAF — a tax credit kicking off next year in the US that will offer up to $1.75/USG for domestic SAF producers — was described as helpful but insufficient. The Inflation Reduction Act, which included that credit, was "historic, monumental, not good enough," said United Airlines chief sustainability officer Lauren Riley.

President Joe Biden's administration has frustrated US biofuel groups by not yet providing guidance around qualifying for that credit, known as "45Z," which requires SAF to meet an initial carbon intensity threshold and increases the subsidy as the fuel's greenhouse gas emissions fall. Regardless, airlines and fuel producers say that the credit — which expires at the end of 2027 — is too short-lived to build up a supply chain.

Policies like the 45Z credit should "have an end" but the end needs to be "far enough into the future," ExxonMobil vice president of strategy and planning for product solutions Tanya Vetter said this week at a clean energy event in Washington, DC.

Competing interests

Prolonging the 45Z credit would require legislation, but reopening a debate over clean fuels incentives in Congress could divide groups generally supportive of SAF.

Airlines and refiners support more flexibility around feedstocks — including fuels produced from foreign sources like Chinese used cooking oil and fuels produced by co-processing petroleum — while farm groups want policy to increase demand for domestically produced vegetable oils and corn ethanol. A bipartisan group of farm state lawmakers this week introduced legislation that pairs an extension of the 45Z credit through 2034 with restrictions on fuels sourced from foreign feedstocks.

With Congress set to debate tax policy next year regardless of who controls the White House, airlines supportive of more generous and longer-lasting SAF subsidies will also have to contend with Republicans that want to repeal much of the Inflation Reduction Act and with competing lobbies that would rather devote funds to extending other incentives.

For instance, Justine Fisher — the chief financial officer at the Canadian carbon capture company Svante — signaled interest this week in increasing a tax credit for carbon capture, utilization, and storage that is included in the law. The incentive, which offers $85/metric tonne for captured carbon and is more popular than other parts of the law among oil and gas companies, is currently not "high enough to make project economics work," she said.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
18/06/25

Banks increased fossil fuel financing in 2024: Report

Banks increased fossil fuel financing in 2024: Report

London, 18 June (Argus) — Banks "significantly increased" their fossil fuel financing in 2024, reversing a trend of steadily declining fossil fuel financing since 2021, a report from a group of non-profit organisations found this week. The 65 biggest banks globally committed $869bn in 2024 to "companies conducting business in fossil fuels", the report — Banking on Climate Chaos — found. Those banks committed $429bn last year to companies expanding fossil fuel production and infrastructure. The report assesses lending and underwriting in 2024 from the world's top 65 banks to more than 2,700 fossil fuel companies. Figures are not directly comparable year-on-year, as the previous report, which assessed 2023, covered financing from 60 banks. The 60 biggest banks globally committed $705bn in 2023 to companies with fossil fuel business, last year's report found. Those banks committed $347bn in 2023 to companies with fossil fuel expansion plans. Of the five banks providing the most fossil fuel finance in 2024, four were US banks — JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup and Wells Fargo. The 65 banks assessed in this year's report have committed $7.9 trillion in fossil fuel financing since 2016, when the Paris climate agreement took effect, the report found. Finance is at the core of climate negotiations like UN Cop summits. Developed countries are typically called upon at such events to provide more public climate finance to developing nations, but the focus is also shifting to private finance, as overseas development finance looks set to drop . But fossil fuel financing banks are increasingly facing the risk of targeted and more complex climate-related litigation, according to a recent report by the London School of Economics' centre for economic transition expertise (Cetex). Climate litigation is not currently adequately accounted for in financial risk assessment, with case filing and decisions negatively impacting carbon financiers, it said. "While early climate cases primarily targeted governments and big-emitting ‘carbon majors', cases against other firms have proliferated quickly," Cetex said. The report also showed that, based on a review of disclosures from 20 banks supervised by the European Central Bank, many banks across Europe recognise litigation risks as material in the context of climate and environmental factors but tend to not be specific about the risks incurred. By Georgia Gratton and Caroline Varin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Adding credits, CO2 removals to EU ETS ‘fatal’: Study


18/06/25
News
18/06/25

Adding credits, CO2 removals to EU ETS ‘fatal’: Study

London, 18 June (Argus) — Allowing the use of international carbon credits or carbon removals for compliance under the EU emissions trading system (ETS) risks undermining the environmental integrity of the scheme and hindering the bloc's achievement of its climate targets, warned a study by research body the Oeko-Institut published today. Under the three scenarios examined in the study, which was commissioned by non-governmental organisation Carbon Market Watch, the EU ETS's supply-demand balance does not need to be artificially adjusted before 2035. But beyond this date the total number of allowances in circulation could fall below zero, meaning sectors under the scheme would either need to be fully decarbonised by this date or shut down unless flexibility is introduced to the system. Any reforms to increase ETS supply should focus on the system's market stability reserve, the study found, a mechanism which absorbs a percentage of excess supply from circulation each year but can also release permits if supply falls too low. Changes to the scheme's linear reduction factor — the amount by which its supply cap falls annually — would achieve the same thing but risk weakening the system's ambition, and is more likely to be politically challenging, the study said. Some EU member states have expressed interest in allowing the use of international carbon credits issued under Article 6 of the Paris climate agreement for ETS compliance for this purpose, and the European Commission said last week it is taking the option into consideration , although any such use would entail only "very high integrity" credits representing a "very small proportion" of the bloc's climate action. But introducing Article 6 credits to the ETS "poses significant risks to the functioning and environmental integrity of the system", the study found, pointing to the past use of Clean Development Mechanism credits to offset some ETS obligations to which it attributed the "collapse" of the carbon price. Including carbon removals in the scheme would pose a similar risk, the study found, concluding it is "crucial" they remain in a separate framework. The European Commission is expected to publish a report next year examining their potential inclusion. The commission will also assess in 2031 the feasibility of linking the existing ETS to the EU ETS 2 for road transport and buildings, scheduled for launch in 2027, which could increase the liquidity of the two schemes. But such a link "cannot ease tension in the [ETS] market with certainty, and administrative barriers to the merger are high", the study warned. By Victoria Hatherick Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Brazil's Amazon Fund approves over R1bn in 1H


17/06/25
News
17/06/25

Brazil's Amazon Fund approves over R1bn in 1H

Sao Paulo, 17 June (Argus) — Brazil's Amazon Fund has approved about R1.19bn ($215mn) to finance projects submitted in the first half of 2025, about 25pc more than it financed in all of last year and double the financing in 2023. The fund — which issues grants to projects that prevent, monitor and combat deforestation while promoting conservation and sustainable development in the Amazon forest — invested more in the first six months of the year than it has in any year since project funding started in 2009, according to Brazil's development bank Bndes and environment ministry (MMA). The fund approved over R947mn last year and R584mn in 2023. The government reactivated the fund in 2023 — initially launched in 2008 — after four inactive years, when the administration of former president Jair Bolsonaro stopped backing new projects. The fund has released R2.7bn since 2009. The fund so far this year has directed R825mn to the Fortfisc deforestation program and R360mn to diverse projects aiming to combat and prevent deforestation. The most recent funding follows new approval standards on structuring and strategic projects. The Amazon Fund has R5.6bn under management in 133 assets, such as the Restaura Amazonia, which has been backing ecological and productive restoration projects for 16 years. Payments have also picked up in the first half this year, as it released R158mn from current approved programs to combat deforestation and boost revenue generation in traditional communities. This amount represents 75pc of last year's payments of R209mn and triple the 2023 payment of R51mn. Norway is the fund's largest donor, having pledged R3.5bn, followed by German development bank KfW with around R388mn and the US with R291mn. Other donors include the UK, Switzerland, Japan, Ireland and Denmark . Brazil is working to eliminate deforestation — both legal and illegal — by 2030, to meet its emissions reductions targets under the Paris climate agreement. Deforestation is one of Brazil's flagship issues for the UN Cop 30 summit, which it will host in northern Para state in November. By João Curi Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

LNG as a marine fuel demand could rise by 2035: Panel


17/06/25
News
17/06/25

LNG as a marine fuel demand could rise by 2035: Panel

New York, 17 June (Argus) — Demand for LNG as a marine fuel will increase within the next 10 years if supply is boosted by exports from the US and Russia, according to Danish bunker supplier Monjasa. An increase in US and Russian LNG exports would make it a more viable option in the marine fuel market compared with conventional bunker fuel, Monjasa chief executive, Anders Østergaard said today at the Marine Money convention in New York. "If more Russian and more American LNG would come into the global markets, then I truly believe — and we've seen that before the war between Russia and Ukraine — that the price of LNG would beat the price of both fuel oil and diesel oil," Østergaard said. Conventional marine fuels, such as high-sulphur fuel oil and very low-sulphur fuel oil, will remain the dominant fuels in the bunker market in the next 10 years like it is today, according to Østergaard. Demand for other potential alternative marine fuels, like ammonia and methanol, are not likely to pick up by 2035 because the cost to use those fuels is not competitive unless regulations to use those fuels are changed, he said. There is currently not much US LNG in the global market because of restrictions on export permits put in place during former US president Joe Biden's administration. President Donald Trump lifted the ban earlier this year and has been approving export licenses for proposed LNG terminals. The EU has relied less on Russian gas and oil imports since Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022 and it is proposing to phase out all gas and oil imports by January 2028. By Luis Gronda Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Countries adopt agenda at UN climate talks after delay


17/06/25
News
17/06/25

Countries adopt agenda at UN climate talks after delay

London, 17 June (Argus) — Countries have adopted the agenda of the UN Bonn climate talks after an extra day of negotiations, following disagreements over the inclusion of items on climate finance and climate-related trade measures, which caused delays. The adopted agenda was a compromise, in which the two agenda items were not included, but will be addressed in other ways. The topic of trade measures — in effect carbon border adjustment mechanisms (CBAM) — will be discussed under other relevant agenda items. For the climate finance topic, which refers to developed countries' obligations to provide climate finance to developing nations, Bonn chairs will hold consultations and report back at the UN Cop 30 climate summit, set for November. The Bonn technical negotiations — halfway-point talks before Cop conferences each year — were scheduled to begin on 16 June, but the plenary was suspended as parties failed to agree on the agenda. The outgoing Azeri Cop 29 presidency oversaw further negotiations on the agenda. In the talks' opening plenary, which re-started today, India's representative said that the country was "extremely disappointed" with developed countries' "reluctance" to discuss "legal obligations" for climate finance. India will return to the topic at Cop 30, the country's representative said — echoed by Tanzania. The EU's representative welcomed the agenda's adoption. "It is hard to remain silent when our positions and our motivations are mischaracterised by our partners. This is a multilateral process in which the views of all parties must be respected… we work here together to reach compromises to allow us to move forward", he added. Finance remains a central issue in climate negotiations. At Cop 29 last year, almost 200 countries agreed on a new goal to provide $300bn/yr in climate finance to developing nations by 2035. The Cop 29 finance outcome was significantly lower than the trillions of dollars sought by developing countries, which expressed frustration at the time. But the text also called on "all actors… to enable the scaling up of financing to developing country parties for climate action from all public and private sources to at least $1.3 trillion/yr by 2035". Consultations on a roadmap to achieve that level will take place in Bonn. The EU's CBAM was a point of contention during the Cop 28 and 29 talks, with countries such as China and Brazil raising concerns about its impact on developing countries. The European Commission expects the CBAM, when fully phased in, to capture more than half of the emissions covered by the bloc's ETS. The scheme's full implementation starts on 1 January 2026, but its impact is already starting to be felt . By Georgia Gratton Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more