Asset sales, downstream lift Shell profit: Update

  • Market: Crude oil, Natural gas
  • 30/04/15

Adds detail throughout

Shell increased its profit in the first quarter, despite lower oil and gas prices, thanks to strong downstream results, lower costs, asset sales and a tax regime change in the UK.

This is the first set of Shell's quarterly results after the company announced earlier this month a deal to acquire UK-listed BG group, due for completion early next year.

Shell's profit increased by 7pc to $4.76bn compared with the first quarter of 2014. But excluding one-off items, it fell by 56pc to $3.25bn. The positive impact of one-off items on this quarter's profit included upstream asset sales and a $600mn credit thanks to tax regime changes in the UK North Sea, while in the same period last year the company wrote off $2.58bn in its downstream division.

Shell's operating cash flow dropped by 49pc to $7.11bn. The company divested $2.2bn of assets in the first quarter, including interests in onshore blocks and facilities in Nigeria, but noted that "a huge contribution" from asset sales for the rest of the year is unlikely.

"In what is clearly a difficult industry environment, we continue to take steps to further improve competitive performance by redoubling our efforts to drive a sharper focus on the bottom line in Shell," said chief executive Ben van Beurden. "Part of this sharper focus is the sale of non-strategic assets... In parallel we continue to reduce our operating costs and capital spending; and by deferring and reshaping new projects, we can achieve further efficiencies and savings in the global supply chain."

The company's operating costs in the quarter — excluding one-off items — fell by about $1.1bn, or some 10pc from the same period of 2014. Most of the reduction came from a stronger dollar, with the rest from the company's cost-cutting moves, and "there is more to come" this year, according to chief financial officer Simon Henry.

Shell expects 2015 organic capital investment budget to be $33bn or less, some $2bn below last year's level and its previous guidance for this year. Capital investment for the first quarter amounted to $6.8bn.

The company said it continues to "curtail capital investment, retaining attractive options for the medium term, whilst balancing affordability, growth and returns". Shell has delayed a final investment decision on the full development of the Majnoon field in Iraq into 2017 or later and "re-phased the development pace of the Carmon Creek heavy oil development in Canada on phases 1 and 2, looking to optimise the design and likely re-tender some parts of the project to bring costs down". The company has also continued to reduce spending on shale resources, cutting it by about 20pc to $3.2bn.

The firm's oil and gas production fell by 2pc on year to 3.17mn b/d of oil equivalent (boe/d) in the first quarter, largely because of divestments since the first quarter of 2014. Oil output rose by 4pc to 1.54mn b/d and gas production fell by 8pc.

"New field start-ups and the continuing ramp-up of existing fields, in particular Bonga NW in Nigeria, Gumusut Kakap in Malaysia, and Mars B and Cardamom in the Gulf of Mexico, contributed some 137,000 boe/d to production for the first quarter 2015, which more than offset the impact of field decline," the company said.

Shell's upstream division made a quarterly profit of $2.54bn, down by 53pc on the year. But excluding one-off items it dropped by 88pc to $675mn because of lower oil and gas prices and lower contributions from trading. The fall in profit was partially offset by lower costs, "new high-margin liquids production volumes from new deep-water projects and improved operational performance, despite the impact of planned maintenance at Pearl GTL."

But Shell's Upstream Americas business lost more than $1bn in the quarter, with lower oil prices cutting earnings by $2bn year on year, given the high price sensitivity of its deepwater and heavy oil activities. Shell's shale business remained loss-making because of lower prices, despite showing "huge improvements" in performance, Henry said. "Actual costs have come down, but the macro environment around the Americas performance is just a lot tougher at the moment".

The company's downstream business made a quarterly profit of $2.51bn compared with a loss of $1.01bn in January-March of 2014 thanks to strong refining margins around the world, lower costs and higher trading contributions. But "the refining boom is probably already running down in April", according to Henry. ""We are already seeing lower margins, although not yet as low as they were in the recent past".

Shell said that its second-quarter results will be impacted by "some 160,000 boe/d as a result of divestments, and approximately 100,000 boe/d associated with the impact of curtailment and underground storage reinjection at NAM" compared with the same period of 2014. In addition, 140,000 boe/d of production will be affected compared with the second quarter of last year because of planned maintenance, mainly at "Pearl GTL in Qatar, Deepwater Gulf of Mexico, and heavy oil in Canada".

The company expects its second-quarter operating cash flow to be impacted by divestment tax payments of up to $1bn.

kr/et



Send comments to feedback@argusmedia.com

Request more information about Argus' energy and commodity news, data and analysis services.

Copyright © 2015 Argus Media Ltd - www.argusmedia.com - All rights reserved.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
27/03/24

Louisiana pipeline crossing bill nears vote: Update

Louisiana pipeline crossing bill nears vote: Update

Updates scheduled timing of vote in first paragraph. New York, 27 March (Argus) — The Louisiana state senate is scheduled to vote next week on a bill seeking to clarify pipeline servitude rights and expedite pipeline crossing disputes, advancing legislation promoted by three natural gas pipeline companies involved in a legal battle with US midstream giant Energy Transfer. Natural gas transmission projects by Williams, Momentum Midstream and DT Midstream — which aim to connect growing production out of the prolific Haynesville shale to a wave of new LNG export terminals along the US Gulf coast — have been put on hold while legal proceedings between Energy Transfer and DT Midstream play out. All three companies' proposed pipelines would cross Energy Transfer's own Tiger pipeline in northern Louisiana. The three pipeline companies' projects propose an excessive number of crossings over the Tiger line, an attorney for Energy Transfer argued in a Louisiana senate committee last week, and Energy Transfer has the servitude rights to stop them. But Energy Transfer's "unique" interpretation of the civil code on pipeline crossings is hurting the economy of Louisiana, the author of the bill , Louisiana senator Alan Seabaugh (R), said last week. By blocking the construction of new pipelines out of the Haynesville, Energy Transfer is eliminating jobs and taxes that would be created by new infrastructure, he said. Moreover, by arguing its servitude rights extend above and below its existing pipeline "to the center of the earth," Energy Transfer is "asserting a right that nobody has ever asserted before," Seabaugh said. The Seabaugh bill clarifies that, unless explicitly stated otherwise in a contract, pipeline servitude rights extend only to the physical space occupied by the pipeline and any space necessary to maintain it. The contract stipulating Energy Transfer's servitude rights for the Tiger pipeline is silent on the subject of that vertical, underground space, according to bill supporters. "This really isn't about pipeline crossings — this is about controlling market share," said Jimmy Faircloth, attorney for Momentum Midstream. But the pipeline industry has been amicably working together for decades to allow for reciprocal crossings, Energy Transfer attorney Kay Medlin said. By ripping up this convention over a dispute involving so many crossings, and forcing an expedited legal proceeding for something which "is not a minor process," the Seabaugh bill threatens an industry "that ain't broke," she said. "This legislation will break it, and you will likely spend years trying to fix it, if you ever can," Medlin said. The Seabaugh bill is a companion to two bills which passed 100-0 and 99-0, respectively, in the Louisiana House of Representatives on 21 March. Those bills seek to clarify the law on pipeline crossings and to expedite proceedings on pipeline crossing disputes. By Julian Hast Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Read more
News

Baltimore bridge collapse to raise retail fuel prices


27/03/24
News
27/03/24

Baltimore bridge collapse to raise retail fuel prices

Houston, 27 March (Argus) — The collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, Maryland, is more likely to increase regional gasoline prices than diesel due to additional freight costs and certain route restrictions. Suppliers in the region have so far signaled that the effect on broader markets will be minimal, but regional prices will likely rise, especially as peak summer demand season begins with Memorial Day weekend in late May. The bridge closure could pose more problems for gasoline supply than diesel, since gasoline cannot be transported through the Fort McHenry (I-95) and Baltimore Harbor (I-895) tunnels — the two other major roads that cross the Patapsco River at Baltimore — while there are no restrictions on diesel, according to the Maryland Transportation Authority (MTA). Fuel wholesaler Global Partners said yesterday that it would like to see hours of service waivers for trucking in the region to minimize fuel supply disruption to customers, but the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) is yet to issue one. Elevated retail prices are likely to be limited to the immediate Baltimore area but could spill over into neighboring markets should trucking markets remain tight due to rerouting, market sources told Argus . Fuel markets in eastern Maryland can be supplied by PBF's 171,000 b/d Delaware City, Delaware, refinery and two further plants in Pennsylvania — Monroe Energy's 190,000 b/d Trainer refinery and PBF's 160,000 b/d Paulsboro refinery. To the north, United Refining runs a 65,000 b/d plant in Warren, Pennsylvania, and along the Atlantic coast Phillips 66 operates the 259,000 b/d Bayway refinery in Linden, New Jersey. PBF, Monroe and United did not immediately respond to a request for comment on whether the bridge collapse is affecting refinery operations. Phillips 66 declined to comment on commercial activities. Still, the five nearby refineries — representing all the Atlantic coast's 850,000 b/d of crude processing capacity — are unlikely to see their operations curtailed by limits in shipping products to Maryland. With no refinery in the state of Maryland, most fuels are delivered to Baltimore by Gulf coast refiners on the Colonial Pipeline. Global Partners, which operates a terminal just west of the collapsed bridge, said yesterday it is primarily supplied by the pipeline and expects product flows to continue. Several terminals in the Baltimore Harbor and the nearby Port Salisbury can also receive small vessels and barges of road fuels from Delaware and Pennsylvania, according to the Maryland Energy Administration (MEA). The Port of Baltimore — which remains closed since the collapse — took delivery of 24,000 b/d of gasoline and under 2,000 b/d of distillates from barges and small vessels in 2019, about three percent of the Atlantic coast's refining capacity. "A closure of the Port of Baltimore while the Colonial Pipeline is open would not significantly disrupt fuel supply," the MEA wrote in a 2022 analysis of liquid fuels supply in the state. By Nathan Risser Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Louisiana pipeline crossing bill nears senate vote


27/03/24
News
27/03/24

Louisiana pipeline crossing bill nears senate vote

New York, 27 March (Argus) — The Louisiana state senate is scheduled to vote tonight on a bill seeking to clarify pipeline servitude rights and expedite pipeline crossing disputes, advancing legislation promoted by three natural gas pipeline companies involved in a legal battle with US midstream giant Energy Transfer. Natural gas transmission projects by Williams, Momentum Midstream and DT Midstream — which aim to connect growing production out of the prolific Haynesville shale to a wave of new LNG export terminals along the US Gulf coast — have been put on hold while legal proceedings between Energy Transfer and DT Midstream play out. All three companies' proposed pipelines would cross Energy Transfer's own Tiger pipeline in northern Louisiana. The three pipeline companies' projects propose an excessive number of crossings over the Tiger line, an attorney for Energy Transfer argued in a Louisiana senate committee last week, and Energy Transfer has the servitude rights to stop them. But Energy Transfer's "unique" interpretation of the civil code on pipeline crossings is hurting the economy of Louisiana, the author of the bill , Louisiana senator Alan Seabaugh (R), said last week. By blocking the construction of new pipelines out of the Haynesville, Energy Transfer is eliminating jobs and taxes that would be created by new infrastructure, he said. Moreover, by arguing its servitude rights extend above and below its existing pipeline "to the center of the earth," Energy Transfer is "asserting a right that nobody has ever asserted before," Seabaugh said. The Seabaugh bill clarifies that, unless explicitly stated otherwise in a contract, pipeline servitude rights extend only to the physical space occupied by the pipeline and any space necessary to maintain it. The contract stipulating Energy Transfer's servitude rights for the Tiger pipeline is silent on the subject of that vertical, underground space, according to bill supporters. "This really isn't about pipeline crossings — this is about controlling market share," said Jimmy Faircloth, attorney for Momentum Midstream. But the pipeline industry has been amicably working together for decades to allow for reciprocal crossings, Energy Transfer attorney Kay Medlin said. By ripping up this convention over a dispute involving so many crossings, and forcing an expedited legal proceeding for something which "is not a minor process," the Seabaugh bill threatens an industry "that ain't broke," she said. "This legislation will break it, and you will likely spend years trying to fix it, if you ever can," Medlin said. The Seabaugh bill is a companion to two bills which passed 100-0 and 99-0, respectively, in the Louisiana House of Representatives on 21 March. Those bills seek to clarify the law on pipeline crossings and to expedite proceedings on pipeline crossing disputes. By Julian Hast Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US breaks $79/bl ceiling in latest SPR purchase


27/03/24
News
27/03/24

US breaks $79/bl ceiling in latest SPR purchase

Washington, 27 March (Argus) — President Joe Biden's administration has exceeded a price ceiling that has guided when the US government would buy crude to refill the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR), with the latest crude purchase hitting a price of $81.32/bl. The US Department of Energy (DOE) six months ago adopted a new strategy for replenishing the SPR, with a plan to use consistent monthly purchases to replace some of the 180mn bl of crude that Biden sold from the reserve in 2022 after the start of the Russia-Ukraine conflict. For months, DOE has said it would continue to buy crude so long as it was a "good deal for taxpayers," which the agency defined as a purchase price not to exceed $79/bl. But the agency's latest crude purchase, for nearly 2.8mn bl of sour crude for delivery in September, came at a cost of $225.6mn, an average price of $81.34/bl, according to data DOE recently published on its website. The crude contracts went to Macquarie Commodities Trading, Sunoco Partners Marketing & Terminals and Total's Atlantic Trading & Marketing. DOE, asked for comment about why it purchased crude in excess of its price target, said there would "likely be news coming later today." Before this week, the administration had largely adhered to its $79/bl price target to buy 24.7mn bl of crude for delivery to the SPR from January through August, with the exception of a $79.10/bl purchase for January delivery. DOE reiterated the price ceiling on 14 March, when it announced a new solicitation to buy crude, and last year had called off multiple crude solicitations when prices came in too high. DOE has previously increased its price ceiling based on shifts in the oil market. DOE in 2022 had initially targeted a purchase price of $67-$72/bl, resulting in the purchase of 6.3mn bl of crude last summer at an average price of $72.67/bl. But after rising prices put that target out of reach, DOE raised its price ceiling to $79/bl. The SPR held 363mn bl of crude as of 22 March, according to federal data. By the end of this year, as a result of crude purchases, the reserve is expected to "be back to essentially where we would have been had we not sold during the invasion of Ukraine," US energy secretary Jennifer Granholm said on 20 March, after accounting for the cancellation of 140mn bl of congressional mandated crude sales that were scheduled through 2031. With the latest crude purchase, DOE will have signed contracts to buy 32.4mn bl of crude at an average price of nearly $77/bl, of which more than 19mn bl has yet to be delivered to the SPR. Another 20mn bl of crude that oil companies and traders borrowed from the SPR in 2022 is set to be returned by year-end, which would push inventories in the reserve to above 400mn bl. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

South Sudan crude output halves on pipeline blockage


27/03/24
News
27/03/24

South Sudan crude output halves on pipeline blockage

London, 27 March (Argus) — South Sudan's crude production has almost halved to around 80,000 b/d because of a blockage at a pipeline in war-torn Sudan, South Sudan's oil ministry undersecretary William Anyak Deng told Argus today. A blockage along the Chinese-led Petrodar Pipeline is currently preventing around 100,000 b/d of South Sudan's heavy sweet Dar Blend grade from reaching Sudan's Bashayer terminal on the Red Sea for export, Deng said. But production of South Sudan's medium sweet Nile Blend grade has not been impacted, as this is transported to Bashayer through the separate Greater Nile oil pipeline which remains online, he said. His comments come after Sudan earlier this month warned major oil exporting companies in South Sudan that his country could no longer carry out its obligation to transport their crude . Dar Petroleum Operating Company (DPOC) — a consortium including China's state-controlled CNPC and Sinopec and Malaysia's state-owned Petronas — produces Dar Blend but has had to all but cease output, Deng said. Nile Blend production is split between the South Sudan-based firms Sudd Petroleum Operating Company (SPOC) and Greater Pioneer Operating Company (GPOC) and currently running at around 80,000 b/d, he added. South Sudan's crude production stood at around 150,000 b/d in February, according to Argus estimates. The blockage is a result of gelling issues — solidifying crude — in the Petrodar Pipeline, which Sudanese and South Sudanese engineers are struggling to resolve. This is because of a lack of diesel that is used to heat the crude or dilute it to help it flow, Deng said. "We are working to resolve the problem right now. There is mechanical work that is ongoing, we are trying to flush out the oil," he added. But the pipeline has been suffering from leaks and pressure drops for months, with repairs complicated by the ongoing civil war in Sudan between the army and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces. Deng said it was becoming increasingly difficult to get permission from the warring parties in Sudan to move workers, equipment and spare parts to maintain infrastructure. He also said South Sudan has been sending diesel to Sudan to help with repair work given the closure of Sudan's 100,000 b/d Khartoum refinery which has come under repeated fire since the civil war began last year. Sudan also typically produces around 50,000 b/d of mostly Nile Blend crude, but this is thought to have been impacted by the civil war. Crude exports from Sudan's Bashayer port averaged 130,000 b/d in 2023 and hit 168,000 b/d in January, according to Kpler. But exports have only averaged about 75,000 b/d since February. Landlocked South Sudan is entirely reliant on Sudan to export its crude and depends on oil sales for more than 90pc of government revenues. Any prolonged disruption to exports would put the country's economy in a precarious position. By Aydin Calik Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more