Trump launches tariff action against China: Update

  • Market: Crude oil, Metals, Natural gas
  • 15/06/18

Adds details on tariffs

US president Donald Trump's administration today escalated its trade dispute with China, imposing broad tariffs and prompting retaliation from Beijing that could affect some US energy exports.

The 25pc US tariff will apply on $34bn/yr of imports beginning on 6 July, selected from an assortment of 818 industrial and technology product categories. The US Trade Representative's (USTR) office eliminated some items from the list it proposed in March, in response to lobbying by US companies.

But the USTR today proposed another 284 categories for a 25pc tariff, worth another $16bn/yr. Tariffs on these products will kick in following a public hearing process later this summer.

The goal is to target $50bn/yr of imports from China - a number based on an assessment of economic harm the US says it has suffered as a result of "unfair practices related to the acquisition of American intellectual property and technology" and restrictions on US companies' operations in China.

The items on the additional, yet-to-be-finalized list, include locomotives, electric vehicle storage batteries, integrated circuits and other items that the USTR says benefit from Chinese industrial policies.

The two countries have held high-level talks in recent weeks to prevent the dispute from escalating. Beijing has pledged to reciprocate with its own 25pc tariff on 106 items imported from the US, including propane and some petrochemical products.

The Chinese commerce ministry, following Trump's announcement, said it will proceed with the retaliatory tariffs. "China does not want to fight a trade war. But China has to respond strongly, in the face of the short-sighted behavior by the US," the ministry said.

Bilateral trade negotiations last month yielded a preliminary agreement from Beijing to boost exports of oil, LNG and other energy commodities from the US to $50bn-$60bn/yr from about $8bn last year. But the Chinese commerce ministry said today that the US decision invalidates "all the economic and trade achievements" discussed in recent trade talks.

"The US will pursue additional tariffs if China engages in retaliatory measures," Trump said today. But he added that he is still willing to negotiate with Chinese president Xi Jinping, "a wonderful friend."

The tariff action announced today, the planned Chinese retaliation and additional US measures could eventually encompass $150bn/yr of mutual trade. The prospect of an escalating trade war is worrying US oil and natural gas producers.

The decision to proceed with tariffs followed a discussion among Trump's cabinet members yesterday at the White House. The president's team is split on the need for tariffs. Treasury secretary Steven Mnuchin led the first round of talks with China, announcing last month that the countries would put the trade war on hold and negotiate an increase in exports of US energy and agricultural commodities. But Trump overruled him, sending commerce secretary Wilbur Ross to China to press for specific commitments, even though US officials said it would take months to work out details.

US companies, industry groups and Republican members of Congress voiced opposition to the tariffs but expressed support for Trump's policy of tackling what the US broadly views as unfair trade practices. "Imposing tariffs places the cost of China's unfair trade practices squarely on the shoulders of American consumers, manufacturers, farmers, and ranchers. This is not the right approach," US Chamber of Commerce president Tom Donohue said today.

"I am concerned that these new tariffs will, instead, hurt American manufacturers, farmers, workers, and consumers," House of Representatives Ways and Means Committee chairman Kevin Brady (R-Texas) said today.

And Trump's former economic adviser Gary Cohn warned that the tariff action would diminish the positive effect of the tax cuts enacted late last year. "We are a consumer-driven economy, so if you start putting tariffs on products that consumers buy, they are going to buy less products. They are going to have to make tough decisions, or they are going to go into further debt. We have seen what happens when consumers go into debt."

But Trump pushed back against the criticism of his action on China, and his decision to impose tariffs on imported steel and aluminum from the EU, Canada and Mexico.

"We need protection - everyone is taking advantage of us," Trump said today.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
28/03/24

Centaurus' Jaguar Ni mine in Brazil eyes 2027 output

Centaurus' Jaguar Ni mine in Brazil eyes 2027 output

Singapore, 28 March (Argus) — Australian mining company Centaurus Metals said that its Jaguar nickel sulphide project in Brazil is undergoing a feasibility study and aims to start production in mid-2027. Jaguar, bought from Brazilian mining firm Vale in 2020 , is estimated to hold 109mn t of 0.87pc grade nickel for an estimated 948,900t of contained nickel. The nickel product will be largely targeted at the Atlantic market, with expectations that demand will strengthen in the region. "Demand for nickel we believe is not going away. And if you look at what's going to happen in the US and European markets in particular, nickel will probably be a bigger part of the battery composition than anywhere else," Centaurus' managing director Darren Gordon said at the Tribeca Futures Commodities conference held in Singapore on 26 March. "There's a huge amount of nickel that still needs to come into the market." Many Australian mining firms have struggled with a slump in global nickel prices earlier in the year because of a supply glut caused by increased volumes from Indonesia, coupled with a slowdown in demand. Several Australian mines have halted operations , while other processing facilities were placed on care and maintenance programmes . But Centaurus is hopeful that Jaguar will be able to compete on a cost and environmental basis with Indonesian supplies. "Nickel is going to continue be supplied out of Indonesia in very large ways so we are going to compete on costs. And we think that when we deliver the feasibility study, we will be able to demonstrate that we can compete on costs. But overlay on that, we have this very low carbon footprint associated with our project," Gordon added. Centaurus said Jaguar is one of the lowest carbon footprint nickel project globally, following a review done by a metals and mining ESG research company. Once operational, greenhouse gas emissions from the project are forecast to be 7.27t of carbon dioxide/t of nickel equivalent, which is assessed to be lower than 94pc of other global nickel production. By Sheih Li Wong Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Read more
News

Louisiana pipeline crossing bill nears vote: Update


27/03/24
News
27/03/24

Louisiana pipeline crossing bill nears vote: Update

Updates scheduled timing of vote in first paragraph. New York, 27 March (Argus) — The Louisiana state senate is scheduled to vote next week on a bill seeking to clarify pipeline servitude rights and expedite pipeline crossing disputes, advancing legislation promoted by three natural gas pipeline companies involved in a legal battle with US midstream giant Energy Transfer. Natural gas transmission projects by Williams, Momentum Midstream and DT Midstream — which aim to connect growing production out of the prolific Haynesville shale to a wave of new LNG export terminals along the US Gulf coast — have been put on hold while legal proceedings between Energy Transfer and DT Midstream play out. All three companies' proposed pipelines would cross Energy Transfer's own Tiger pipeline in northern Louisiana. The three pipeline companies' projects propose an excessive number of crossings over the Tiger line, an attorney for Energy Transfer argued in a Louisiana senate committee last week, and Energy Transfer has the servitude rights to stop them. But Energy Transfer's "unique" interpretation of the civil code on pipeline crossings is hurting the economy of Louisiana, the author of the bill , Louisiana senator Alan Seabaugh (R), said last week. By blocking the construction of new pipelines out of the Haynesville, Energy Transfer is eliminating jobs and taxes that would be created by new infrastructure, he said. Moreover, by arguing its servitude rights extend above and below its existing pipeline "to the center of the earth," Energy Transfer is "asserting a right that nobody has ever asserted before," Seabaugh said. The Seabaugh bill clarifies that, unless explicitly stated otherwise in a contract, pipeline servitude rights extend only to the physical space occupied by the pipeline and any space necessary to maintain it. The contract stipulating Energy Transfer's servitude rights for the Tiger pipeline is silent on the subject of that vertical, underground space, according to bill supporters. "This really isn't about pipeline crossings — this is about controlling market share," said Jimmy Faircloth, attorney for Momentum Midstream. But the pipeline industry has been amicably working together for decades to allow for reciprocal crossings, Energy Transfer attorney Kay Medlin said. By ripping up this convention over a dispute involving so many crossings, and forcing an expedited legal proceeding for something which "is not a minor process," the Seabaugh bill threatens an industry "that ain't broke," she said. "This legislation will break it, and you will likely spend years trying to fix it, if you ever can," Medlin said. The Seabaugh bill is a companion to two bills which passed 100-0 and 99-0, respectively, in the Louisiana House of Representatives on 21 March. Those bills seek to clarify the law on pipeline crossings and to expedite proceedings on pipeline crossing disputes. By Julian Hast Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Baltimore bridge collapse to raise retail fuel prices


27/03/24
News
27/03/24

Baltimore bridge collapse to raise retail fuel prices

Houston, 27 March (Argus) — The collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, Maryland, is more likely to increase regional gasoline prices than diesel due to additional freight costs and certain route restrictions. Suppliers in the region have so far signaled that the effect on broader markets will be minimal, but regional prices will likely rise, especially as peak summer demand season begins with Memorial Day weekend in late May. The bridge closure could pose more problems for gasoline supply than diesel, since gasoline cannot be transported through the Fort McHenry (I-95) and Baltimore Harbor (I-895) tunnels — the two other major roads that cross the Patapsco River at Baltimore — while there are no restrictions on diesel, according to the Maryland Transportation Authority (MTA). Fuel wholesaler Global Partners said yesterday that it would like to see hours of service waivers for trucking in the region to minimize fuel supply disruption to customers, but the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) is yet to issue one. Elevated retail prices are likely to be limited to the immediate Baltimore area but could spill over into neighboring markets should trucking markets remain tight due to rerouting, market sources told Argus . Fuel markets in eastern Maryland can be supplied by PBF's 171,000 b/d Delaware City, Delaware, refinery and two further plants in Pennsylvania — Monroe Energy's 190,000 b/d Trainer refinery and PBF's 160,000 b/d Paulsboro refinery. To the north, United Refining runs a 65,000 b/d plant in Warren, Pennsylvania, and along the Atlantic coast Phillips 66 operates the 259,000 b/d Bayway refinery in Linden, New Jersey. PBF, Monroe and United did not immediately respond to a request for comment on whether the bridge collapse is affecting refinery operations. Phillips 66 declined to comment on commercial activities. Still, the five nearby refineries — representing all the Atlantic coast's 850,000 b/d of crude processing capacity — are unlikely to see their operations curtailed by limits in shipping products to Maryland. With no refinery in the state of Maryland, most fuels are delivered to Baltimore by Gulf coast refiners on the Colonial Pipeline. Global Partners, which operates a terminal just west of the collapsed bridge, said yesterday it is primarily supplied by the pipeline and expects product flows to continue. Several terminals in the Baltimore Harbor and the nearby Port Salisbury can also receive small vessels and barges of road fuels from Delaware and Pennsylvania, according to the Maryland Energy Administration (MEA). The Port of Baltimore — which remains closed since the collapse — took delivery of 24,000 b/d of gasoline and under 2,000 b/d of distillates from barges and small vessels in 2019, about three percent of the Atlantic coast's refining capacity. "A closure of the Port of Baltimore while the Colonial Pipeline is open would not significantly disrupt fuel supply," the MEA wrote in a 2022 analysis of liquid fuels supply in the state. By Nathan Risser Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Louisiana pipeline crossing bill nears senate vote


27/03/24
News
27/03/24

Louisiana pipeline crossing bill nears senate vote

New York, 27 March (Argus) — The Louisiana state senate is scheduled to vote tonight on a bill seeking to clarify pipeline servitude rights and expedite pipeline crossing disputes, advancing legislation promoted by three natural gas pipeline companies involved in a legal battle with US midstream giant Energy Transfer. Natural gas transmission projects by Williams, Momentum Midstream and DT Midstream — which aim to connect growing production out of the prolific Haynesville shale to a wave of new LNG export terminals along the US Gulf coast — have been put on hold while legal proceedings between Energy Transfer and DT Midstream play out. All three companies' proposed pipelines would cross Energy Transfer's own Tiger pipeline in northern Louisiana. The three pipeline companies' projects propose an excessive number of crossings over the Tiger line, an attorney for Energy Transfer argued in a Louisiana senate committee last week, and Energy Transfer has the servitude rights to stop them. But Energy Transfer's "unique" interpretation of the civil code on pipeline crossings is hurting the economy of Louisiana, the author of the bill , Louisiana senator Alan Seabaugh (R), said last week. By blocking the construction of new pipelines out of the Haynesville, Energy Transfer is eliminating jobs and taxes that would be created by new infrastructure, he said. Moreover, by arguing its servitude rights extend above and below its existing pipeline "to the center of the earth," Energy Transfer is "asserting a right that nobody has ever asserted before," Seabaugh said. The Seabaugh bill clarifies that, unless explicitly stated otherwise in a contract, pipeline servitude rights extend only to the physical space occupied by the pipeline and any space necessary to maintain it. The contract stipulating Energy Transfer's servitude rights for the Tiger pipeline is silent on the subject of that vertical, underground space, according to bill supporters. "This really isn't about pipeline crossings — this is about controlling market share," said Jimmy Faircloth, attorney for Momentum Midstream. But the pipeline industry has been amicably working together for decades to allow for reciprocal crossings, Energy Transfer attorney Kay Medlin said. By ripping up this convention over a dispute involving so many crossings, and forcing an expedited legal proceeding for something which "is not a minor process," the Seabaugh bill threatens an industry "that ain't broke," she said. "This legislation will break it, and you will likely spend years trying to fix it, if you ever can," Medlin said. The Seabaugh bill is a companion to two bills which passed 100-0 and 99-0, respectively, in the Louisiana House of Representatives on 21 March. Those bills seek to clarify the law on pipeline crossings and to expedite proceedings on pipeline crossing disputes. By Julian Hast Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Automakers divert away from blocked Baltimore port


27/03/24
News
27/03/24

Automakers divert away from blocked Baltimore port

Pittsburgh, 27 March (Argus) — Automakers are adjusting their supply routes following yesterday's collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge at the Port of Baltimore, the busiest US port for auto shipments. The Port of Baltimore handled 847,158 autos and light trucks last year, more than any other US port, according to the Maryland state data, with imports accounting for about 75pc of the volume, the Alliance for Automotive Innovation said. With vessel traffic in and out of the port suspended indefinitely automakers said they will reroute deliveries though other east coast ports. This includes General Motors, which said it still expects minimal impact on its operations. Ford said it has already secured shipping alternatives where workarounds are necessary, but did not share details. For Mercedes-Benz, Baltimore is among its busiest ports for imports. The company said it has flexibility to adjust its supply routes and noted ports in Charleston, South Carolina, and Brunswick, Georgia, as other top import locations. The port closure has no effect on Mercedes vehicle exports or parts supply at its Tuscaloosa, Alabama plant, the company said. Volkswagen Group, which includes the Audi and Porsche brands, said it received about 100,000 vehicles last year through Baltimore to ship to US dealers in the Mid-Atlantic and northeast, but its operations will not be limited since its facility is located on the seaboard side of the bridge, at Sparrows Point. Volkswagen said it may see some trucking delays from highway rerouting, however. Toyota relies on the Port of Baltimore primarily for vehicle exports, but said it is not the company's main North American port. Stellantis, maker of numerous brands including Chrysler and Jeep, said it has begun discussions with transportation providers to ensure an uninterrupted flow of vehicles. The US imported 723,435 cars and light trucks in January, up from 634,228 a year earlier, according to customs data. Mexico supplied just over one-third or 2.97mn of the total number of US vehicle imports in 2023, followed by Japan and Canada, with 17.3pc and 16.3pc, respectively. By James Marshall Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more