European fertilizers face new EU challenges

  • Market: Fertilizers, Metals
  • 28/06/18

The EU fertilizer industry faces a series of challenges from Brussels, including reform of EU agricultural support, increased emission and environmental standards, trade defence measures, and the conclusion of an investigation into Russian state-controlled Gazprom's trading practices.

Argus spoke to Jacob Hansen, director general of European fertilizer manufacturers' lobbying organisation Fertilizers Europe.

Are you happy with the European Commission's decision in the Gazprom competition case?

Gazprom was not playing by the rules. It was a nightmare dealing with a Gazprom that used its dominant position on the market. The commission's decision on Gazprom's trading practices shows how the firm played EU national markets against each other and had different prices for different countries while not allowing sales between EU states. That is anti-competitive. But even if good for the future, the commission's decision, by not imposing a fine, does not correct past damage. Most importantly, it will not correct dual pricing with lower gas prices for Russian firms and higher prices for export. Dual pricing enables Russian producers of downstream products, like fertilizers, to compete at unfair cheap prices on the EU market. That puts EU fertilizer producers at a major disadvantage. We want the commission to apply other enforcement tools to reform Russian domestic gas prices and ensure a level playing field for European fertilizers.

Farmers are calling for EU anti-dumping duties on Russian fertilizer to be lifted. Do you see that happening?

The commission is currently reviewing duties on imports of ammonium nitrate from Russia. We do not know when the commission will present their verdict but they now have to make a decision on the duties, possibly after the summer. If those duties were ever removed, it would be extremely difficult for the EU fertilizer industry to compete with Russian firms, as ammonium nitrate is a core product in the EU. There clearly still is dumping. This has not changed.

We are a very energy-intensive sector and very concerned by gas prices going up in Europe. It hits our bottom line. Some 3-4pc of total EU gas consumption goes to fertilizers. On top of that, we also have Russia on our doorsteps — so carbon leakage is never far away. Russian fertilizer firms have an artificially low, non-market based gas price. EU anti-dumping duties on Russian fertilizer products compensate for that very cheap gas price in Russia.

The commission's long-term emissions-reduction strategy could look at specific sectors, including fertilizers. Do you expect more challenges here?

It is good that the commission looks at what reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) means at sector level. And there is a role for our industry in de-carbonising Europe. If you move to a hydrogen-based economy, then you will need to store energy. Ammonia is very energy-intensive and can be used as energy storage. The missing link on the way to a de-carbonised economy is ammonia via the fertilizer industry. So you will need a local ammonia industry in Europe to store energy. As an industry, we are examining the steps by which we can play a role.

Is your industry able to make even greater emissions reductions?

As a sector, we have made huge steps forward on reducing nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions. We did that technically by abatement or end-of-pipe technology in most of the plants. For carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, it is difficult as we are already very efficient. We also use natural gas as a raw material in itself. Over the past ten years, our benchmark improvement has been around 0.2pc/yr. And energy efficiency gains are quite small, if you consider that new fertilizer plants are expected to last for 30-40 years. And once again, due to higher gas prices, there have not been many new plants in Europe.

Are you happy with the commission's common agricultural policy (CAP) financing proposal and its tougher conditions, also on use of fertilizers.

The new CAP will have a greater environmental focus. I am happy with that. The new CAP will have a farmer sustainability tool for nutrient management. This does not just mean mineral fertilizers but also manure. We are ready to work together with farmers on how to use mineral fertilizers better. I expect farmers to become more tuned in to quality fertilizers as opposed to bulk fertilizers. But volume is not going to grow. In some countries, such as Germany, there might be a reduction. In southeast Europe, we could see greater volumes, as these countries are often not producing so much per hectare, partly due to their fertilizer use. Applying balanced N, P and K fertilization is also necessary to prevent nitrogen loss.

Do you have open issues as EU states and the European Parliament negotiate the final text of the revised fertilizers regulation?

We have three main issues. On cadmium, we do not accept any limit below 60mg/kg P2O5 for two reasons. It would not deliver additional environmental improvements and would also leave the European phosphate fertilizer market to Russian competitors. We have to be able to source from other places than Russia. The second issue is the continuous use of industrial by-products in mineral fertilizers. We serve the whole economy. The way the original draft regulation was phrased, we would have to obtain individual approval for by-products. We need a procedure that is not too bureaucratic. The third issue is the quality of fertilizers, and we are disappointed by the low levels of nutrient content proposed. And it is not acceptable that mineral fertilizers were not as precisely defined as organic fertilizers.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
28/03/24

Crane barge arriving at Baltimore bridge tonight

Crane barge arriving at Baltimore bridge tonight

Houston, 28 March (Argus) — The first major piece of equipment capable of beginning to clear the blocked Port of Baltimore, Maryland, is expected to arrive onsite tonight. The Chesapeake 1000 crane barge, capable of lifting 1,000 short tons with its a 231ft-long boom, is expected to arrive at the site of the collapsed Francis Scott Key Bridge near Baltimore at 11pm ET on 28 March, the US Coast Guard (USCG) told Argus . Both the crane and the tug pulling it, Atlantic Enterprise , are owned by Donjon Marine. It is currently the only crane on route to the collapsed bridge, the USCG said. There is no official timetable for the reopening of the port after the Interstate 695 highway bridge over the Patapsco River was hit in the early hours of 26 March by a container ship and collapsed, with the debris and ship blocking the waterway. The operator of the ship, Maersk, has contracted with marine salvage company Resolve Marine to refloat the vessel and remove it from the area, according to the USCG. It is not clear who has contracted for the Chesapeake 1000. Despite the inbound crane, it could take weeks or even months to clear debris and reopen the waterway under the collapsed bridge according to a engineering professor at the nearby Johns Hopkins University. By Nathan Risser Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Read more
News

'Weeks, months' to reopen Baltimore waterway: professor


28/03/24
News
28/03/24

'Weeks, months' to reopen Baltimore waterway: professor

Houston, 28 March (Argus) — It could take weeks or even months to clear debris and reopen the waterway under the collapsed Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, Maryland, according to a engineering professor at the nearby Johns Hopkins University. As of Wednesday, there was no official timetable for the reopening of the Port of Baltimore after a major highway bridge over the Patapsco River was hit in the early hours of 26 March by a container ship and collapsed, with the debris and ship blocking the waterway. "I'd be shocked if it's weeks, but I don't think it'll take even a year" to clear the waterway, structural engineer and Johns Hopkins professor Benjamin Schafer said Wednesday. He expects the rebuild of the bridge to take significantly longer. "I've lived through quite a few civil infrastructure projects and they're rarely less than 10 years. So I think that's what we're looking at," Schafer said. He noted that it took five years to build the original Francis Scott Key Bridge and seven years to repair the Sunshine Skyway Bridge in Tampa Bay, Florida, after a similar collapse in 1980. Still, "this is definitely not a national supply chain crisis," John Hopkins operations management professor Tinglong Dai said Wednesday. "The effect will be mostly local, mostly minimal and mostly temporary." The bridge collapse and port closure is also unlikely to trigger a global supply chain crisis, he said. The Port of Baltimore is an important but "niche" port specializing in automobile imports and exports, Dai added. "The supply chain has evolved...I have already seen a lot of rerouting happening." Automakers started adjusting their supply routes away from the top port for US vehicle imports the day of the collapse, including General Motors, Ford and Mercedes-Benz. Baltimore is also a major port for coal exports, which may start to shift to terminals to the south in Hampton Roads, Virginia. Freight rates for ships that carry coal could see increases in global markets Other commodities like asphalt and caustic soda that move through the port will see challenges, while organic agriculture imports may see less problems due to seasonal flows. By Nathan Risser Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Mosaic plant sustains minor damage from fire


28/03/24
News
28/03/24

Mosaic plant sustains minor damage from fire

Houston, 28 March (Argus) — Florida-based phosphate and potash fertilizer producer Mosaic anticipates limited damage to a production plant near Tampa and minimal disruption to operations in the coming weeks following a brushfire on Monday. The brushfire ignited Monday evening during routine maintenance near Mosaic's Riverview phosphate production facility and was initially contained before rekindling Tuesday morning because of heavy winds. The fire was fully under control by Tuesday afternoon, according to local first responders. Mosaic told Argus on Tuesday the fire was not considered a threat to the facility initially, but now expects the plant sustained "limited damage to ancillary operations" and the impact could last between four to six weeks. The Riverview plant has a production capacity of 1.8mn metric tonnes (t) of processed phosphate products, and produces 30,000 t/week, according to Mosaic. The facility was producing phosphates primarily for exports to Brazil at the time of the fire, the company added. Smoke was observed Monday from the fire as a result of foam retardants used by local fire officials to cool the high-density polyethylene pipes. Polyethylene gas piping is often used for natural gas distribution. Natural gas flows delivered to the plant fell slightly Wednesday at 2.42mn cf/d, down from 2.45mn cf/d on Monday, once the fire was extinguished, according to data from Florida Gas Transmission. Flows at the plant on Thursday rebounded to 2.45mn cf/d, in line with expectations that affected phosphate output at the plant should only be temporary. By Taylor Zavala Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Europe plate: Imports weigh on EU prices


28/03/24
News
28/03/24

Europe plate: Imports weigh on EU prices

London, 28 March (Argus) — Plate prices in Europe tumbled this week on increased import activity, which has pushed European producers to adjust their offers down to remain competitive. The Argus fortnightly Italian plate assessment dropped by €22.50/t to €730/t ex-works today for S235 grades, while the northwest European plate assessment for the same specifications also dropped by €15/t to €765/t. In the south, for S275 material, re-rollers were heard quoting €740-750/t to small customers, with €720-730/t possible for larger volumes. The market remained split between suppliers willing to drop to the low €700s/t to collect orders, and others that preferred to remain firm at €740-750/t and wait for after the Easter holidays to see how the market develops. Two re-rollers confirmed this week that they are mulling extending their Easter break by a few days owing to weak purchasing activity in the market. The level of €710/t ex-works for S275 was also reported available for orders of 1,000t and above, but this could not be verified. Buying activity over the past two weeks remained poor, as market participants are purchasing what they need with no restocking activity occurring. A slight drop in slab prices has contributed to lower plate prices. Deliveries for the Italian domestic market remain for late April for commodity grades. To the rest of Europe, Italian producers were heard offering around €750/t on a ex-works basis for S235 material, without collecting any tonnage. One source said there were offers as high as €760-770/t ex-works Italy. In northern Europe, one mill was reported concluding sales to end-users working in the shipbuilding industry at €750-770 ex-works for S355 grades. The same producer tabled offers at around €780/t, but was quick to offer discounts. Orders from the supplier are expected to be delivered in six to seven weeks. One source estimated that for S235, integrated mills would be offering close to €780-800/t ex-works, while from re-rollers located in the Benelux area €750/t ex-works for the same grade could be easily achieved. One central European mill was also heard available to sell at €790-810/t ex-works for S235. Producers in the northwest are operating on April to May delivery depending on the mill and the product requested. Market participants agree that a rebound in market activity is only expected towards the latter part of April. On imports, over the past couple of weeks, Indonesian material was purchased by buyers across the continent, especially in southern Europe at €640/t cif levels for S275. One source estimated that sales from Indonesia totalled close to 60,000t over the past month. After this activity, Indonesian material was not reported available over the past seven days. One deal was also concluded this week at €710/t cfr north EU, for South Korean S355 material. From South Korea, offers for S275 were estimated over the €660/t cif Italy level this week, with no deals concluded. Indian material was offered at $710-720/t cfr Italy for S275, while one trader offered the same origin from port, free on truck at €730/t for S355. Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Turkey rebar: Market muted ahead of elections


28/03/24
News
28/03/24

Turkey rebar: Market muted ahead of elections

London, 28 March (Argus) — Turkish rebar prices were stable today, without a great deal of urgency shown by export buyers following a sustained uptick in scrap prices over the past few days. The domestic market remained subdued, as construction demand is still constrained by high borrowing costs and the ongoing depreciation of the domestic currency. Argus ' daily Turkish export assessment for rebar was unchanged at $590/t fob, with larger cargoes still available at this level. European, mostly Balkan, buyers have been making enquiries this week, with scrap prices inching steadily upwards over the past three weeks. But buyers have mostly been checking prices, and trade has remained thin. Rebar indications from suppliers were in a $590-605/t fob range, with most suppliers expecting at least $595/t fob. In the wire rod segment, material was available in a range of $605-625/t fob. The weekly wire rod assessment increased by $5/t to $600/t fob Turkey. In the domestic market, offers from most mills in the Marmara and Iskenderun regions were firm in a range of $610-620/t ex-works excluding value-added tax (VAT). But material remains available from Izmir mills and one Marmara mill at $595-600/t ex-works. While some buyers have made purchases in the run-up to the municipal elections on 30 March, restocking has been lacklustre, with a lack of firm signals from the construction sector. Argus ' daily Turkish domestic rebar assessment was unchanged at $600/t ex-works excluding VAT, with the lira equivalent also unchanged at TL23,4000/t ex-works including VAT. Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more