Viewpoint: China coal supply may increase in 2019

  • Market: Coal
  • 02/01/19

China's domestic coal supplies are likely to increase this year, as the country brings more efficient, advanced coal capacity on line, while pressure to cut capacity at older mines tapers off.

Capacity increases at modern, efficient mines have been relatively modest over the past three years, but these expansions are likely to accelerate in 2019, with the government's new strategy envisaging the development of larger mines to replace those that have closed. At the same time China will slow its intense pace of cutting excess capacity to a more modest rate this year, as the country is set to achieve its 13th five-year target for capacity reductions ahead of schedule.

China may exceed its 2018 target for a 150mn t/yr reduction in coal capacity because a number of provinces and regions have over-delivered on targeted closures of outdated coal mines. Its second-biggest coal-producing province, Shanxi, reduced capacity by 23.3mn t/yr in 2018, the Shanxi government said in mid-December. This was 900,000 t/yr more than its capacity-reduction target set early last year. And eastern China's Shandong province had eliminated 4.85mn t/yr of capacity by the end of November, more than the targeted reduction of 4.65mn t/yr for 2018.

China reduced its coal production capacity by at least 690mn t/yr in 2016-18, with 250mn t/yr removed in 2017 and 290mn t/yr in 2016. This means that mine closures should now slow, because no more than 110mn t/yr needs to be cut in 2019 to reach the 800mn t/yr reduction target set for the 13th five-year period of 2016-20.

A slower pace of closures means more emphasis is likely to be placed on building bigger mines than those being retired. Since February 2018, China's top economic planning agency, the NDRC, has allowed some new mines to have 300pc more capacity than the outdated mines they are replacing, in cases where power generators have more than a 50pc share in mining firms, or vice versa.

The government initially limited the capacity of new mines to that of those they replaced, mainly because this was part of China's coal capacity elimination strategy announced in 2016 to address overcapacity. But the government loosened this restriction in 2017 to allow capacity replacement across provinces at 130pc of closed capacity.

China had approved 800mn t/yr of new capacity by the end of August 2018, exceeding the amount of outdated capacity that has been closed since 2016 and equaling the 13th five-year capacity reduction target.

Rail system planner and operator China Railway has laid out a plan to increase rail capacity for transporting coal, focusing on lines that serve the key coal-producing regions of Inner Mongolia and Xinjiang, Shanxi and Shaanxi provinces, major coal-handling coastal ports and Yangtze river ports. This could help improve domestic supply by removing bottlenecks caused by limited rail capacity in peak coal demand periods.

China Railway plans to upgrade the Tanghu, Wari and Menghua lines — which connect Shanxi and Inner Mongolia to ports in northern China — to heavy-haul railways that can ship more than 10,000t on each train by 2020. And it will raise the capacity of the Ningxia and Houyue lines — which connect Shaanxi to eastern China's Jiangsu province and Shanxi to central China's Henan province, respectively — by 12mn t/yr.

China Railway has not given a timetable for the capacity rises, but analysts expect the capacity to ship coal out of Inner Mongolia to increase next year.

China's coal production increased on the year in most months in 2018, except for a fall of 2pc in July. Output reached 3.21bn t in January-November, up by 5.4pc from the same period a year earlier (see chart).

Stronger Chinese output poses downside risks to demand in the global seaborne coal market, as it would subdue the country's demand for imports. The biggest year-on-year increase in the country's coal imports in 2014–18 came in 2016, when it rose by 38.5mn t to 170mn t, as domestic production fell by 325mn t to 3.3bn t.

China coal production vs growth in imports mn t

Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
28/03/24

Crane barge arriving at Baltimore bridge tonight

Crane barge arriving at Baltimore bridge tonight

Houston, 28 March (Argus) — The first major piece of equipment capable of beginning to clear the blocked Port of Baltimore, Maryland, is expected to arrive onsite tonight. The Chesapeake 1000 crane barge, capable of lifting 1,000 short tons with its a 231ft-long boom, is expected to arrive at the site of the collapsed Francis Scott Key Bridge near Baltimore at 11pm ET on 28 March, the US Coast Guard (USCG) told Argus . Both the crane and the tug pulling it, Atlantic Enterprise , are owned by Donjon Marine. It is currently the only crane on route to the collapsed bridge, the USCG said. There is no official timetable for the reopening of the port after the Interstate 695 highway bridge over the Patapsco River was hit in the early hours of 26 March by a container ship and collapsed, with the debris and ship blocking the waterway. The operator of the ship, Maersk, has contracted with marine salvage company Resolve Marine to refloat the vessel and remove it from the area, according to the USCG. It is not clear who has contracted for the Chesapeake 1000. Despite the inbound crane, it could take weeks or even months to clear debris and reopen the waterway under the collapsed bridge according to a engineering professor at the nearby Johns Hopkins University. By Nathan Risser Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Read more
News

'Weeks, months' to reopen Baltimore waterway: professor


28/03/24
News
28/03/24

'Weeks, months' to reopen Baltimore waterway: professor

Houston, 28 March (Argus) — It could take weeks or even months to clear debris and reopen the waterway under the collapsed Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, Maryland, according to a engineering professor at the nearby Johns Hopkins University. As of Wednesday, there was no official timetable for the reopening of the Port of Baltimore after a major highway bridge over the Patapsco River was hit in the early hours of 26 March by a container ship and collapsed, with the debris and ship blocking the waterway. "I'd be shocked if it's weeks, but I don't think it'll take even a year" to clear the waterway, structural engineer and Johns Hopkins professor Benjamin Schafer said Wednesday. He expects the rebuild of the bridge to take significantly longer. "I've lived through quite a few civil infrastructure projects and they're rarely less than 10 years. So I think that's what we're looking at," Schafer said. He noted that it took five years to build the original Francis Scott Key Bridge and seven years to repair the Sunshine Skyway Bridge in Tampa Bay, Florida, after a similar collapse in 1980. Still, "this is definitely not a national supply chain crisis," John Hopkins operations management professor Tinglong Dai said Wednesday. "The effect will be mostly local, mostly minimal and mostly temporary." The bridge collapse and port closure is also unlikely to trigger a global supply chain crisis, he said. The Port of Baltimore is an important but "niche" port specializing in automobile imports and exports, Dai added. "The supply chain has evolved...I have already seen a lot of rerouting happening." Automakers started adjusting their supply routes away from the top port for US vehicle imports the day of the collapse, including General Motors, Ford and Mercedes-Benz. Baltimore is also a major port for coal exports, which may start to shift to terminals to the south in Hampton Roads, Virginia. Freight rates for ships that carry coal could see increases in global markets Other commodities like asphalt and caustic soda that move through the port will see challenges, while organic agriculture imports may see less problems due to seasonal flows. By Nathan Risser Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Hampton Roads may have space for Baltimore coal exports


27/03/24
News
27/03/24

Hampton Roads may have space for Baltimore coal exports

Houston, 27 March (Argus) — Terminals in Hampton Roads, Virginia, may have some available capacity to take rerouted coal shipments from Baltimore, Maryland, despite increasing exports from a year earlier for the seventh consecutive month in February. Coal loadings at Hampton Roads reached an estimated 3.31mn short tons (st) (3mn metric tonnes) last month, rising 7.8pc from February 2023, according to the Virginia Maritime Association. Still, historic Hampton Roads export data going back to 1993 showed that combined shipments from the three terminals in the region peaked at 5.48mn st in April 2012, which is nearly 66pc higher than last month's exports. This suggests that Hampton Roads terminals may have capacity to load additional coal volumes that were originally booked to ship out of terminals upstream from the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, which collapsed on Tuesday morning, closing the Port of Baltimore for an indefinite period of time. The two Baltimore coal terminals cut off by the bridge collapse, Consol Energy's Consol Marine Terminal and CSX's Curtis Bay Coal Piers, have a combined export capacity of about 34mn st. Railroad Norfolk Southern (NS), which operates the Lamberts Point terminal at Hampton Roads, said today it is working with impacted international customers and port partners to "provide alternate routing solutions." "Ports on the east coast are resilient and have the capacity to serve the flow of freight," NS said. Lamberts Point terminal handled 1.19mn st of coal in February, a 20pc jump from February 2023. Despite this increase, that is still down from the 2.18mn st exported from the terminal in April 2012. Dominion Terminal Associates (DTA) exported 1.24mn st of coal in February from the Hampton Roads area, which is down 30pc from April 2012, while exports from the nearby Pier IX terminal were down 53pc to 727,023st last month. DTA's co-owners, Alpha Metallurgical Resources and Arch Resources, and Pier IX's owner Kinder Morgan all did not respond for immediate comment. By Anna Harmon Hampton Roads coal exports in 2012 st Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

RMKO, Atlas to develop Sumatra coal crushing plant


27/03/24
News
27/03/24

RMKO, Atlas to develop Sumatra coal crushing plant

Manila, 27 March (Argus) — Indonesian coal mining contractor RMKO has partnered with domestic producer Atlas Resources to develop a coal crushing plant and other supporting mining infrastructure in south Sumatra. The crushing plant and other facilities are targeted for completion by the second half of this year, said RMKO, which is a subsidiary of coal logistics firm RMK. The plant will be built at Atlas' Mutara hub, which consists of five separate concessions in the Musi Rawas and Musi Banyuasin regency in south Sumatra and has coal reserves totalling 85mn t. Atlas has already acquired a road construction permit that will connect Mutara to the Sriwijaya Bara logistics jetty 137km away. The coal crushing plant is expected to boost coal transportation from mines to clients outside the region, the company said. RMKO will construct and operate the coal crushing plant that will have a capacity of 650 t/hr. Other services will include stockpile management, loading services and plant maintenance. The 36bn rupiah ($2.28mn) plant will be funded by RMK with Atlas paying back the investment through coal production equivalent to 200,000 t/month for five years, as well as the cost of operations and maintenance services, RMKO said. By Antonio delos Reyes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Baltimore bridge collapse forces freight changes


26/03/24
News
26/03/24

Baltimore bridge collapse forces freight changes

Washington, 26 March (Argus) — Vessel traffic in and out of the Port of Baltimore, Maryland, has been suspended indefinitely in the wake of a container ship collision early today that brought down the Francis Scott Key Bridge, an accident that will force the rerouting of coal, car and light truck shipments. The prolonged closure of one of the largest ports on the US east coast could have a ripple effect on trade flows across much of the US, as shippers grapple for alternatives in the absence of a certain reopening timeline. Search and rescue efforts are still ongoing in the Patapsco River, after the 116,851dwt Dali headed to Colombo, Sri Lanka, slammed into a bridge support. The crew had lost control of the vessel. The Dali is owned by Grace Ocean and managed by Synergy Marine Group. The Maryland Port Administration said it does not know how long it will take for the shipping channel to be cleared and for traffic to resume. Shipping companies are bracing for a closure of at least two weeks, but many expect the clean-up effort could take significantly longer. President Joe Biden vowed the federal government will provide whatever resources are needed to get the port "up and running again as soon as possible." The port is a major trade hub for steam and coking coal, automobiles and scrap metal. Many market sources are still trying to determine whether the disruption will be dramatic enough to move prices. But coal markets were already being affected today. Baltimore is home to two key coal export terminals: eastern US railroad CSX's Curtis Bay Coal Piers and coal producer Consol Energy's Consol Marine Terminal. The facilities are upstream of the bridge, meaning ships will not be able to serve them until the route reopens. The terminals handle thermal and coking coal from Northern and Central Appalachia. They have a combined export capacity of 34mn short tons (30.8mn metric tonnes). The two terminals loaded 2.4mn t of coal in February, up from 2.1mn t a year earlier, according to analytics firm Kpler, mostly exports to India and China. An India-based trader said that the suspension of coal exports will probably raise prices in India, as brick kilns enter the peak production season in the summer. Buyers could look to petroleum coke as a substitute, but the higher sulphur content may not be appealing to some users despite the higher calorific value. Prices for deliveries to northern Europe are also likely to rise given that the Netherlands, Germany and Belgium combined are the second-largest market for North Appalachian coal. April API 2 futures rose by $2/t to $113.30/t. The incident has added a "level of volatility [which] could have big implications," a European paper broker said. The lack of information has prompted some coal producers to hold off on activating force majeure clauses in their contracts. Curtis Bay is served only by CSX, while CSX and fellow eastern carrier Norfolk Southern serve Consol. CSX said it is in contact with existing coal customers and contingency plans are being implemented. The railroad at this point intends to keep Curtis Bay open but will continue to assess the circumstances moving forward. Norfolk Southern did not respond to questions. Some scheduled Baltimore coal exports may be redirected to the other three eastern US coal export terminals in Hampton Roads, Virginia, but such reroutings likely will entail increased costs. Not all coal mines will be able to shift terminals. Such decisions will depend on available capacity in Hampton Roads. Exports from the three terminals in January reached a five-year high , signaling somewhat limited capacity. Mine location and railroad access may also determine whether coal can be rerouted, an industry source said. But some producers do not have much of a choice about trying to send coal to Hampton Roads. They may need the cash so will be forced into a decision. The producers most vulnerable to delays may be Consol and Arch Resources. Arch's Leer coking coal mine may be in the best position because it co-owns Dominion Terminal Associates in Hampton Roads with Alpha Metallurgical Coal Resources. The sudden lack of export capacity could put a floor under US coal prices, which have mostly been falling since last year amid low domestic demand. The competition to replace Baltimore coal exports could prevent further cuts, another coal trading source said. Metals sources say the accident will have only isolated effects on the global ferrous scrap market, but many market participants are still assessing the situation. The port is the 10th largest ferrous scrap export port in the US, and over the last five years an average of 44,000 metric tonnes/month of ferrous scrap was exported from Baltimore, according to US Department of Commerce data. But the port closure is likely to affect other freight. Baltimore is the nation's top handler of automobile traffic. Motor vehicles and parts accounted for about 42pc of all Baltimore port imports and 27pc of all exports, according to state data. The Port of Baltimore handled 847,158 cars and light trucks in 2023. "It's too early to say what impact this incident will have on the auto business — but there will certainly be a disruption," said John Bozzella, chief executive of industry trade group Alliance for Automotive Innovation. Dry bulk freight rates likely unaffected Several sources told Argus Baltimore's closure is unlikely to have a major impact on dry freight rates despite short-term interruptions to coal transports. "We are in the shoulder months with less demand for thermal coal," a shipbroker said, suggesting mild global temperatures means the collapse "may not have too much of an impact" on freight markets overall. Vessel traffic in ports such as Charleston, South Carolina, and Savannah, Georgia, may increase on diversions from Baltimore. Kpler identified 17 vessels that will likely be impacted because they are either in the Port of Baltimore or were expected to load there in the coming days. By Abby Caplan, Gabriel Squitieri, Luis Gronda, Evan Millard and Brad MacAulay Port of Baltimore coal terminals Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more