Opec ready to act as coronavirus hits oil price: Update

  • Market: Crude oil, Oil products
  • 27/01/20

Adds comments from Opec source and updates China imports total

Concern about the potential impact of the Chinese coronavirus outbreak on oil demand is putting mounting pressure on crude prices, outweighing Libyan supply disruptions and prompting reassurances from Saudi Arabia.

Saudi Arabia and other members of the Opec+ group of producer countries have the capability and flexibility to take "the necessary actions to support oil market stability", Saudi oil minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman said.

Deepening the group's output cuts is among the options, a senior Opec source said today. "There is a discussion. There are different issues, there are different options, that is [the] discussion between [ministers]. But they are really ready to do whatever is possible in order to make sure the market is stable," the source said, adding that the next two weeks are "very critical" in terms of observing market fundamentals.

Reassurances from Saudi Arabia and Opec have failed to stem a further slide in oil prices. The Ice front-month March Brent contract dipped to $58.50/bl earlier today, down by $2/bl from its close on 24 January. It is currently just below $59/bl, down by around 2.5pc. The drop comes despite Libya's oil sector facing its biggest disruptions since the 2011 fall of Muammar Gaddafi, with escalating conflict prompting the closure of most of its oil infrastructure and drastically cutting output to below 300,000 b/d from an estimated 1.1mn b/d in December.

Prince Abdulaziz insists that the fall in crude prices is being driven by psychological factors rather than fundamentals. Some market participants have adopted "extremely negative expectations" about the potential effect of the coronavirus outbreak "despite its very limited impact on global oil demand", he said. "Such extreme pessimism occurred back in 2003 during the Sars outbreak, although it did not cause a significant reduction in oil demand."

China's National Health Commission said today that the death toll from the virus had risen to 80 as of yesterday morning, from 17 on 23 January. The commission has so far received a total of 2,744 confirmed cases. Dozens of cases have been confirmed outside China, including in Thailand, Japan, the US and Australia. To limit the virus' spread, Chinese authorities have implemented travel restrictions and extended the lunar new year holidays.

Saudi Arabia is China's top crude supplier, with deliveries hitting a record high of 2mn b/d in November, bringing the January-November average to 1.67mn b/d, up by 54pc on the year. China imported around 10.7mn b/d of crude in December.

Opec+ is scheduled to discuss its production strategy at meetings in Vienna in early March. The group is unlikely to propose an emergency meeting unless market conditions worsen, the Opec source said.

Russian energy minister Alexander Novak raised concerns about Moscow's continued participation in the output restraint initiative after saying last month that the arrangement is "not eternal". But Russia is "there to stay", the Opec source said today. It is in "their interest to be part of the market management team".

By Iain Packham and Ruxandra Iordache


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
28/03/24

Stalling climate finance an energy security risk : WRI

Stalling climate finance an energy security risk : WRI

London, 28 March (Argus) — The "best bet" to achieving global energy security is through mitigation funding and multilateral cooperation, according to the World Resources Institute (WRI). WRI highlighted that governments are funding more domestic renewable energy projects but have increased oil and gas production in the name of "energy security" at home in the years following the Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The recent rebrand of energy transition funding to energy security funding has allowed some developed nations to justify domestic oil and gas licences and drag their feet on multilateral financial commitments. This is causing "real worry" among climate-vulnerable developing nations, WRI chief executive Ani Dasgupta said. He said that although the initial "shock" to the world's energy markets after the invasion of Ukraine "quickly went away", it has triggered "real worry among poorer countries that when push comes to shove, it won't be an even game, or have a fair outcome." Developing countries have long complained about the lack of access to climate funding. Richer nations have only recently met the $100bn/yr target in climate finance to developing countries agreed in 2009, while discussions on setting a new climate finance goal for 2025 at Cop 29 in Baku in November could prove difficult. President of the Republic of Congo (Brazzaville) Denis Sassou-Nguesso said last year that the $100bn/yr in climate financing to developing countries promised by rich countries "never reached us", adding that the annual UN Cop climate conferences have become little more than a talking shop. "Just after the invasion of Ukraine, every country started to think about energy security," Dasgupta said. "In theory, good things could have happened, countries could have concluded that their best bet to getting energy security is by going renewable". But it was not the case in key consumer countries or regions, Dasgupta pointed out. China bought the majority of Russian gas following the EU's withdrawal, he said, and has since upped production at coal-fired power stations despite an "extraordinary" acceleration towards renewables set for 2023-28, according to Paris-based energy watchdog IEA . In Europe, the UK and Norway continue to award new oil and gas licences . "In the US, the fossil fuel lobby argues that the best route to energy security is to invest more in fossil fuels". But the best route is to invest in more renewables, he said. "Even if the US produces a large amount of oil and gas, it is still a traded commodity, and so you have to pay a price for it that is set globally." The US special presidential co-ordinator for energy security Amos Hochstein has also suggested in September that a widening climate finance gap could ultimately threaten global security. "We have seen the percentage of dollars spent on the energy transition outside the OECD, in developing and middle income countries actually go down instead of up…" By Madeleine Jenkins Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Read more
News

ACT to partner with LR, Wartsila, and UECC on CNSL


28/03/24
News
28/03/24

ACT to partner with LR, Wartsila, and UECC on CNSL

London, 28 March (Argus) — Dutch supplier ACT Group is collaborating with classification society Lloyd's Register, Finnish engine manufacturer Wartsila, and Norwegian shipping firm United European Car Carriers (UECC) on the development and evaluation of cashew nut shell liquid (CNSL) as a biofuel in marine biodiesel blends. ACT confirmed the launch of a CNSL-based biofuel called "FSI.100", which has gone through extensive engine testing with various blend combinations. The CNSL-based biofuel has now received approval from engine manufactures to be blended as a 30pc component with marine gasoil (MGO) to form a marine biodiesel blend for the purpose of further sea trials. ACT confirmed that the FSI.100 product will benefit from lower acidity, and there is potential for the product to be compatible for blending with fuel oil. CNSL is an advanced biodiesel feedstock, making it a more appealing and price competitive option to buyers compared with other biodiesel feedstocks. The development follows a report by Lloyd's Register fuel oil bunkering analysis and advisory service (FOBAS) that pointed to a correlation between engine fuel pump and injector-related damage in vessels and the presence of "unestablished" CNSL in the utilised marine fuels. By Hussein Al-Khalisy Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Baltimore bridge collapse to raise retail fuel prices


27/03/24
News
27/03/24

Baltimore bridge collapse to raise retail fuel prices

Houston, 27 March (Argus) — The collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, Maryland, is more likely to increase regional gasoline prices than diesel due to additional freight costs and certain route restrictions. Suppliers in the region have so far signaled that the effect on broader markets will be minimal, but regional prices will likely rise, especially as peak summer demand season begins with Memorial Day weekend in late May. The bridge closure could pose more problems for gasoline supply than diesel, since gasoline cannot be transported through the Fort McHenry (I-95) and Baltimore Harbor (I-895) tunnels — the two other major roads that cross the Patapsco River at Baltimore — while there are no restrictions on diesel, according to the Maryland Transportation Authority (MTA). Fuel wholesaler Global Partners said yesterday that it would like to see hours of service waivers for trucking in the region to minimize fuel supply disruption to customers, but the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) is yet to issue one. Elevated retail prices are likely to be limited to the immediate Baltimore area but could spill over into neighboring markets should trucking markets remain tight due to rerouting, market sources told Argus . Fuel markets in eastern Maryland can be supplied by PBF's 171,000 b/d Delaware City, Delaware, refinery and two further plants in Pennsylvania — Monroe Energy's 190,000 b/d Trainer refinery and PBF's 160,000 b/d Paulsboro refinery. To the north, United Refining runs a 65,000 b/d plant in Warren, Pennsylvania, and along the Atlantic coast Phillips 66 operates the 259,000 b/d Bayway refinery in Linden, New Jersey. PBF, Monroe and United did not immediately respond to a request for comment on whether the bridge collapse is affecting refinery operations. Phillips 66 declined to comment on commercial activities. Still, the five nearby refineries — representing all the Atlantic coast's 850,000 b/d of crude processing capacity — are unlikely to see their operations curtailed by limits in shipping products to Maryland. With no refinery in the state of Maryland, most fuels are delivered to Baltimore by Gulf coast refiners on the Colonial Pipeline. Global Partners, which operates a terminal just west of the collapsed bridge, said yesterday it is primarily supplied by the pipeline and expects product flows to continue. Several terminals in the Baltimore Harbor and the nearby Port Salisbury can also receive small vessels and barges of road fuels from Delaware and Pennsylvania, according to the Maryland Energy Administration (MEA). The Port of Baltimore — which remains closed since the collapse — took delivery of 24,000 b/d of gasoline and under 2,000 b/d of distillates from barges and small vessels in 2019, about three percent of the Atlantic coast's refining capacity. "A closure of the Port of Baltimore while the Colonial Pipeline is open would not significantly disrupt fuel supply," the MEA wrote in a 2022 analysis of liquid fuels supply in the state. By Nathan Risser Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US breaks $79/bl ceiling in latest SPR purchase


27/03/24
News
27/03/24

US breaks $79/bl ceiling in latest SPR purchase

Washington, 27 March (Argus) — President Joe Biden's administration has exceeded a price ceiling that has guided when the US government would buy crude to refill the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR), with the latest crude purchase hitting a price of $81.32/bl. The US Department of Energy (DOE) six months ago adopted a new strategy for replenishing the SPR, with a plan to use consistent monthly purchases to replace some of the 180mn bl of crude that Biden sold from the reserve in 2022 after the start of the Russia-Ukraine conflict. For months, DOE has said it would continue to buy crude so long as it was a "good deal for taxpayers," which the agency defined as a purchase price not to exceed $79/bl. But the agency's latest crude purchase, for nearly 2.8mn bl of sour crude for delivery in September, came at a cost of $225.6mn, an average price of $81.34/bl, according to data DOE recently published on its website. The crude contracts went to Macquarie Commodities Trading, Sunoco Partners Marketing & Terminals and Total's Atlantic Trading & Marketing. DOE, asked for comment about why it purchased crude in excess of its price target, said there would "likely be news coming later today." Before this week, the administration had largely adhered to its $79/bl price target to buy 24.7mn bl of crude for delivery to the SPR from January through August, with the exception of a $79.10/bl purchase for January delivery. DOE reiterated the price ceiling on 14 March, when it announced a new solicitation to buy crude, and last year had called off multiple crude solicitations when prices came in too high. DOE has previously increased its price ceiling based on shifts in the oil market. DOE in 2022 had initially targeted a purchase price of $67-$72/bl, resulting in the purchase of 6.3mn bl of crude last summer at an average price of $72.67/bl. But after rising prices put that target out of reach, DOE raised its price ceiling to $79/bl. The SPR held 363mn bl of crude as of 22 March, according to federal data. By the end of this year, as a result of crude purchases, the reserve is expected to "be back to essentially where we would have been had we not sold during the invasion of Ukraine," US energy secretary Jennifer Granholm said on 20 March, after accounting for the cancellation of 140mn bl of congressional mandated crude sales that were scheduled through 2031. With the latest crude purchase, DOE will have signed contracts to buy 32.4mn bl of crude at an average price of nearly $77/bl, of which more than 19mn bl has yet to be delivered to the SPR. Another 20mn bl of crude that oil companies and traders borrowed from the SPR in 2022 is set to be returned by year-end, which would push inventories in the reserve to above 400mn bl. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

South Sudan crude output halves on pipeline blockage


27/03/24
News
27/03/24

South Sudan crude output halves on pipeline blockage

London, 27 March (Argus) — South Sudan's crude production has almost halved to around 80,000 b/d because of a blockage at a pipeline in war-torn Sudan, South Sudan's oil ministry undersecretary William Anyak Deng told Argus today. A blockage along the Chinese-led Petrodar Pipeline is currently preventing around 100,000 b/d of South Sudan's heavy sweet Dar Blend grade from reaching Sudan's Bashayer terminal on the Red Sea for export, Deng said. But production of South Sudan's medium sweet Nile Blend grade has not been impacted, as this is transported to Bashayer through the separate Greater Nile oil pipeline which remains online, he said. His comments come after Sudan earlier this month warned major oil exporting companies in South Sudan that his country could no longer carry out its obligation to transport their crude . Dar Petroleum Operating Company (DPOC) — a consortium including China's state-controlled CNPC and Sinopec and Malaysia's state-owned Petronas — produces Dar Blend but has had to all but cease output, Deng said. Nile Blend production is split between the South Sudan-based firms Sudd Petroleum Operating Company (SPOC) and Greater Pioneer Operating Company (GPOC) and currently running at around 80,000 b/d, he added. South Sudan's crude production stood at around 150,000 b/d in February, according to Argus estimates. The blockage is a result of gelling issues — solidifying crude — in the Petrodar Pipeline, which Sudanese and South Sudanese engineers are struggling to resolve. This is because of a lack of diesel that is used to heat the crude or dilute it to help it flow, Deng said. "We are working to resolve the problem right now. There is mechanical work that is ongoing, we are trying to flush out the oil," he added. But the pipeline has been suffering from leaks and pressure drops for months, with repairs complicated by the ongoing civil war in Sudan between the army and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces. Deng said it was becoming increasingly difficult to get permission from the warring parties in Sudan to move workers, equipment and spare parts to maintain infrastructure. He also said South Sudan has been sending diesel to Sudan to help with repair work given the closure of Sudan's 100,000 b/d Khartoum refinery which has come under repeated fire since the civil war began last year. Sudan also typically produces around 50,000 b/d of mostly Nile Blend crude, but this is thought to have been impacted by the civil war. Crude exports from Sudan's Bashayer port averaged 130,000 b/d in 2023 and hit 168,000 b/d in January, according to Kpler. But exports have only averaged about 75,000 b/d since February. Landlocked South Sudan is entirely reliant on Sudan to export its crude and depends on oil sales for more than 90pc of government revenues. Any prolonged disruption to exports would put the country's economy in a precarious position. By Aydin Calik Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more