Japan coal imports recover in March, but outlook weak

  • Market: Coal
  • 21/04/20

Japan's thermal coal imports rose by 3.4pc on the year in March, supported by lower nuclear availability and stable power demand. But the outlook for coal burn remains weak amid a lockdown scheduled to end on 6 May and the prospect of stiffer competition from LNG imports.

Japan imported 9.9mn t of thermal coal last month, according to finance ministry data, up from 9.1mn t in February and 9.6mn t in March 2019. The year-on-year increase was driven by stronger receipts from Indonesia, Russia and Australia.

Indonesian supply rose by 29.9pc on the year to 1.4mn t, while Russian supply grew by 17.8pc to 1.2mn t. Australian imports rose by 1.9pc to as much as 7.1mn t, although this figure may include imports from Colombia, South Africa and Canada, which are not differentiated in preliminary data. Imports from the US fell by 15.7pc to 249,000t.

LNG imports fell by 0.3pc on the year to 7.2mn t in March, although imports were up by 8.5pc from February. LNG imports in January-March fell by 2.9pc on the year to 21.4mn t, while coal imports fell by 3.3pc to 28.7mn t.

Fossil fuel demand was probably supported by a 2.2GW year-on-year drop in Japanese nuclear availability last month. Lower nuclear availability reduced generation by 2.2GW on the year in the first quarter as a whole — the equivalent of 1.6mn t of additional NAR 5,800 kcal/kg coal burn in 42pc-efficient plants, or 550,000t of LNG use in 55pc gas-fired plants, assuming either fuel were to fully offset lower nuclear generation.

Coal burn has been supported by competitive prices against gas in recent years, but the oil price crash should improve the competitiveness of imported LNG in the coming months. While some US oil prices turned negative on 20 April, benchmark Brent crude has traded at $20-30/bl in recent weeks, down from $60/bl in January.

Given the prevalence of oil-indexation in Japanese long-term LNG contracts and the way these contracts are structured, a sustained spell of low oil prices should filter through to LNG import prices towards the end of this quarter (see chart).

Although generation costs for plants running oil-linked regasified LNG might not fall below those for competing coal-fired units, the spread between the two fuels is poised to narrow. There is also no shortage of spot LNG supply at historically low prices that are competitive with coal for power, so buyers that can increase their proportion of spot LNG purchases are likely to do so.

Power demand steady, for now

The outlook for power demand is weak, with Japan having declared a state of emergency until 6 May.

But demand in the past couple of weeks has remained close to recent seasonal averages in the Tokyo, Shikoku and Tohuku grid regions, which together have accounted for around 45pc of overall consumption.

Power demand in these three regions averaged 988 GWh/d on 1-20 April, down by just 4pc on the year.

Below-average temperatures across much of the country may have partially offset coronavirus-driven declines in demand from other sectors. Temperatures have a 40pc chance of remaining below normal on 18 April-17 May, according the Japan Meteorological Agency, although the impact of this is likely to be limited, as the winter heating season transitions into the summer cooling period.

Japan's electricity demand is likely to fall in the short term as offices, leisure facilities, shops and a number of industrial plants — such as steel and car manufacturers — shut down.

Government-affiliated think-tank the Institute of Energy Economics Japan said electricity demand in a city of 10mn people could fall by 39,300 MWh/d, or a quarter, if a complete lockdown is imposed.

Industrial power and steel demand are likely to be hit by a slowdown in manufacturing. Major carmakers have begun implementing output cuts at assembly plants, while the ministry of economy, trade and industry has projected steel demand from the domestic car sector at 2.6mn t in April-June, down by 8pc on the year and 6pc on the quarter.

J-Power has postponed maintenance at the 1.05GW unit 1 of its Tachibanawan coal-fired power plant. The unit was originally due to come off line for maintenance from 18 April to 25 June, and the works have yet to be rescheduled.

In the longer term, the 870MW Takahama 3 nuclear unit is now scheduled to come back on line on 22 December, following maintenance and counter-terrorism upgrades. Nuclear availability is scheduled at 5.2GW in May and 4.4GW in June, down by 27.7pc and 35.6pc on the year, respectively.

By Alex Thackrah

Japanese generation costs (55pc gas vs 40pc coal) $/MWh

7-day average power demand in Tokyo, Shikoku and Tohuku GWh

Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
27/03/24

RMKO, Atlas to develop Sumatra coal crushing plant

RMKO, Atlas to develop Sumatra coal crushing plant

Manila, 27 March (Argus) — Indonesian coal mining contractor RMKO has partnered with domestic producer Atlas Resources to develop a coal crushing plant and other supporting mining infrastructure in south Sumatra. The crushing plant and other facilities are targeted for completion by the second half of this year, said RMKO, which is a subsidiary of coal logistics firm RMK. The plant will be built at Atlas' Mutara hub, which consists of five separate concessions in the Musi Rawas and Musi Banyuasin regency in south Sumatra and has coal reserves totalling 85mn t. Atlas has already acquired a road construction permit that will connect Mutara to the Sriwijaya Bara logistics jetty 137km away. The coal crushing plant is expected to boost coal transportation from mines to clients outside the region, the company said. RMKO will construct and operate the coal crushing plant that will have a capacity of 650 t/hr. Other services will include stockpile management, loading services and plant maintenance. The 36bn rupiah ($2.28mn) plant will be funded by RMK with Atlas paying back the investment through coal production equivalent to 200,000 t/month for five years, as well as the cost of operations and maintenance services, RMKO said. By Antonio delos Reyes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Read more
News

Baltimore bridge collapse forces freight changes


26/03/24
News
26/03/24

Baltimore bridge collapse forces freight changes

Washington, 26 March (Argus) — Vessel traffic in and out of the Port of Baltimore, Maryland, has been suspended indefinitely in the wake of a container ship collision early today that brought down the Francis Scott Key Bridge, an accident that will force the rerouting of coal, car and light truck shipments. The prolonged closure of one of the largest ports on the US east coast could have a ripple effect on trade flows across much of the US, as shippers grapple for alternatives in the absence of a certain reopening timeline. Search and rescue efforts are still ongoing in the Patapsco River, after the 116,851dwt Dali headed to Colombo, Sri Lanka, slammed into a bridge support. The crew had lost control of the vessel. The Dali is owned by Grace Ocean and managed by Synergy Marine Group. The Maryland Port Administration said it does not know how long it will take for the shipping channel to be cleared and for traffic to resume. Shipping companies are bracing for a closure of at least two weeks, but many expect the clean-up effort could take significantly longer. President Joe Biden vowed the federal government will provide whatever resources are needed to get the port "up and running again as soon as possible." The port is a major trade hub for steam and coking coal, automobiles and scrap metal. Many market sources are still trying to determine whether the disruption will be dramatic enough to move prices. But coal markets were already being affected today. Baltimore is home to two key coal export terminals: eastern US railroad CSX's Curtis Bay Coal Piers and coal producer Consol Energy's Consol Marine Terminal. The facilities are upstream of the bridge, meaning ships will not be able to serve them until the route reopens. The terminals handle thermal and coking coal from Northern and Central Appalachia. They have a combined export capacity of 34mn short tons (30.8mn metric tonnes). The two terminals loaded 2.4mn t of coal in February, up from 2.1mn t a year earlier, according to analytics firm Kpler, mostly exports to India and China. An India-based trader said that the suspension of coal exports will probably raise prices in India, as brick kilns enter the peak production season in the summer. Buyers could look to petroleum coke as a substitute, but the higher sulphur content may not be appealing to some users despite the higher calorific value. Prices for deliveries to northern Europe are also likely to rise given that the Netherlands, Germany and Belgium combined are the second-largest market for North Appalachian coal. April API 2 futures rose by $2/t to $113.30/t. The incident has added a "level of volatility [which] could have big implications," a European paper broker said. The lack of information has prompted some coal producers to hold off on activating force majeure clauses in their contracts. Curtis Bay is served only by CSX, while CSX and fellow eastern carrier Norfolk Southern serve Consol. CSX said it is in contact with existing coal customers and contingency plans are being implemented. The railroad at this point intends to keep Curtis Bay open but will continue to assess the circumstances moving forward. Norfolk Southern did not respond to questions. Some scheduled Baltimore coal exports may be redirected to the other three eastern US coal export terminals in Hampton Roads, Virginia, but such reroutings likely will entail increased costs. Not all coal mines will be able to shift terminals. Such decisions will depend on available capacity in Hampton Roads. Exports from the three terminals in January reached a five-year high , signaling somewhat limited capacity. Mine location and railroad access may also determine whether coal can be rerouted, an industry source said. But some producers do not have much of a choice about trying to send coal to Hampton Roads. They may need the cash so will be forced into a decision. The producers most vulnerable to delays may be Consol and Arch Resources. Arch's Leer coking coal mine may be in the best position because it co-owns Dominion Terminal Associates in Hampton Roads with Alpha Metallurgical Coal Resources. The sudden lack of export capacity could put a floor under US coal prices, which have mostly been falling since last year amid low domestic demand. The competition to replace Baltimore coal exports could prevent further cuts, another coal trading source said. Metals sources say the accident will have only isolated effects on the global ferrous scrap market, but many market participants are still assessing the situation. The port is the 10th largest ferrous scrap export port in the US, and over the last five years an average of 44,000 metric tonnes/month of ferrous scrap was exported from Baltimore, according to US Department of Commerce data. But the port closure is likely to affect other freight. Baltimore is the nation's top handler of automobile traffic. Motor vehicles and parts accounted for about 42pc of all Baltimore port imports and 27pc of all exports, according to state data. The Port of Baltimore handled 847,158 cars and light trucks in 2023. "It's too early to say what impact this incident will have on the auto business — but there will certainly be a disruption," said John Bozzella, chief executive of industry trade group Alliance for Automotive Innovation. Dry bulk freight rates likely unaffected Several sources told Argus Baltimore's closure is unlikely to have a major impact on dry freight rates despite short-term interruptions to coal transports. "We are in the shoulder months with less demand for thermal coal," a shipbroker said, suggesting mild global temperatures means the collapse "may not have too much of an impact" on freight markets overall. Vessel traffic in ports such as Charleston, South Carolina, and Savannah, Georgia, may increase on diversions from Baltimore. Kpler identified 17 vessels that will likely be impacted because they are either in the Port of Baltimore or were expected to load there in the coming days. By Abby Caplan, Gabriel Squitieri, Luis Gronda, Evan Millard and Brad MacAulay Port of Baltimore coal terminals Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US bridge collapse may weigh on dry freight rates


26/03/24
News
26/03/24

US bridge collapse may weigh on dry freight rates

New York, 26 March (Argus) — The collapse of a major bridge in the Port of Baltimore, Maryland, will likely put downward pressure on dry bulk rates as ship traffic in and out of the port remains closed indefinitely. Market participants differ on the extent of any such market pressure, however. "We are in the shoulder months with less demand for thermal coal," a shipbroker said, suggesting mild global temperatures meant the collapse "may not have too much of an impact" on dry freight markets overall. Some coal suppliers will be able to load their cargoes at ports such as Hampton Roads, said two shipbrokers. This could partly mitigate any potential downward pressure on rates from suspended vessel traffic in Baltimore that would come from decreased cargo demand. But a third shipbroker doubted much US coal could be diverted to other east coast ports. Panamax rates would likely decline because "coal, unlike other commodities cannot easily pivot to alternate ports," she said. The loss of cargo could expand Panamax tonnage supply in the Atlantic, she said. "It is conceivable that Panamax intended for coal will now head south as long as they can present grain clean lengthening tonnage lists which will drive down rates." Meanwhile, vessel traffic in ports such as Charleston, South Carolina, and Savannah, Georgia, may increase on diversions across many shipping segments from Baltimore, according to market contacts. By Gabriel Squitieri and Luis Gronda Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Stuck Baltimore coal may raise prices in India, Europe


26/03/24
News
26/03/24

Stuck Baltimore coal may raise prices in India, Europe

London, 26 March (Argus) — The blocking of two coal terminals in the key Baltimore US coal export hub this morning following a bridge collapse will mostly hinder North Appalachian coal exports to India for the brick kiln industry. Most thermal coal exports from Baltimore's two coal terminals, Consol Marine Terminal (CNX) and Curtis Bay Piers, flow to India, with 12.4mn t shipped last year and 6.3mn t in 2022, US customs data show. Baltimore exported just over 900,000t to India in January, up from 364,000t a year earlier. The port did not provide a timeline as to when the terminals may resume coal exports as of 26 March. Suspended North Appalachian shipments will probably raise prices in India, as brick kilns enter the peak production season in the summer, an India-based trader said. The brick kiln industry typically consumes very-high calorific value NAR 6,900 kcal/kg North Appalachian coal. Buyers could look to petroleum coke as a substitute, but the higher sulphur content may not be appealing to some users despite the higher calorific value. US petroleum coke is currently more competitive than coal for Indian buyers, based on Argus spot price assessments. The price of cfr India 6.5pc sulphur coke averaged $3.74/mn Btu over 4-25 March, compared with $4.16/mn Btu for high-sulphur Illinois basin coal, the next cheapest alternative. North Appalachian coal averaged $4.86/mn Btu over the same period, down from $5.02/mn Btu in January. Some US coal is sold to India under term contracts on an API 2 index-linked price basis. Europe The Netherlands, Germany and Belgium are the second-largest market for North Appalachian coal, with close to 310,000t sent there from Baltimore terminals in January, up from just above 200,000t a year earlier. April API 2 futures rose sharply this morning to $115/t but had eased slightly to $114.50/t by noon. The incident has added a "level of volatility [which] could have big implications", a European paper broker said. In the physical market, an April-arrival 50,000t multi-origin cargo was bid at $125/t des Amsterdam-Rotterdam today, flat on yesterday. But most US material does not trade on these terms because of varying calorific value, sulphur and chlorine levels. Only around 50,000 t/month of US Scota coal is available, a European physical broker said, but this may be exported from Gulf coast ports, a different broker said. Scota — the standard coal trading agreement — is a set of terms and specifications used to trade NAR 6,000 kcal/kg coal in Europe. Some US North Appalachian cargoes were blended with metallurgical coal a year ago to reduce the calorific value and meet Scota contract specifications, but the high free-swelling index (FSI) content caused problems for power plants because this made it harder to burn as some particles do not ignite, creating more ash. Logistics North Appalachian coal producers could rail volumes around 250km south to the Hampton Roads port complex in Virginia, but this would add to railing costs. Hampton Roads typically handles Central Appalachian coal. Some North Appalachian coal is barged south to New Orleans when the eastern terminals at Baltimore and Hampton Roads become congested, according to a barge operator. The CNX Marine Terminal can store up to 1mn t and exported 19mn t of metallurgical and high calorific-value thermal coal last year, according to its full-year 2023 results. The 79,000t Klara Oldendorff is currently loading thermal coal at CNX Marine Terminal and the 79,000t Jy River is loading coal at Curtis Bay Piers. Some 22 ships are currently inside the port, of which 13 are expected to load coal. By Evan Millard Baltimore thermal coal exports mn t Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Baltimore bridge collapses after ship collision: Update


26/03/24
News
26/03/24

Baltimore bridge collapses after ship collision: Update

Adds details on coal terminals and exports at Baltimore London, 26 March (Argus) — A bridge across a major trading waterway in the US city of Baltimore, Maryland, has completely collapsed after being hit by a container ship early today, Tuesday. The Francis Scott Key bridge, which was carrying road traffic at the time, was hit at 01.30 local time (05:30 GMT) by the 2015-built 116,851dwt container vessel Dali , on route from Baltimore to Colombo, Sri Lanka. It was travelling outbound from Baltimore, according to the Baltimore City Fire Department, which is co-ordinating rescue efforts. The bridge collapsed into the river after the vessel hit one of its support columns, probably blocking the Patapsco river waterway. The Dali is sailing under the Singapore flag, is owned by Grace Ocean and managed by Synergy Marine Group. The fire department said at least seven people — all travelling on the bridge — are missing in the water. No casualties have been reported on the vessel. US governor Wes Moore has declared a state of emergency in the state of Maryland. The port of Baltimore handled 52.3mn t of ocean-going cargo last year, a record high, and is a major exporter of coal and automobiles. Ship tracker Marine Traffic shows several coastguard ships and tug boats near where the incident occurred, but no significant vessel queues yet. Baltimore port operations will be affected by the collapse, as a number of its terminals are upriver from the bridge. The port authority has yet to reply to a request for comment. The bridge collapse will have a particularly large effect on coal exports. The Port of Baltimore loaded 2.4mn t of coal in February, up from 2.1mn t a year earlier, according to analytics firm Kpler, mostly exports to India and China, and two of the US Atlantic coast's five coal terminals are in Baltimore. Railroad CSX's Curtis Bay Coal Piers and coal producer Consol Energy's Consol Marine Terminal, which have a combined 30.8mn t of export capacity, are upstream of the bridge, meaning ships will not be able to serve them — or others — until the route reopens. Both terminals take thermal and coking coal from Northern and Central Appalachia. Curtis Bay, which has throughput capacity of around 14mn short tons (st), is only served by CSX. Consol's facility, which has capacity of roughly 20mn (st), is served by CSX and Norfolk Southern, the other major eastern US railroad. The other three eastern US coal export terminals are at Hampton Roads, Virginia, which will mean increased costs to ship coal to them. A large northern Appalachian coal supplier said it is assessing the situation. "[We] don't know for how long it will be blocked," the supplier said, suggesting existing shipments will be delayed. The supplier said there was no update on a potential force majeure following the collapse. A number of other terminals and vessels may be blocked now. The JY River , the Klara Oldendorff , the Phatra Naree and a number of other vessels are in the estuary, including Trafigura-owned bitumen tanker Palanca Rio . The dry bulk Console Marine Terminal (CNX) and Curtis Bay Terminal (CSX) and a number of containership and other terminals including Rukert, Seagrit, Amports, Dundalk and Sparrows Point are probably blocked too. Companies including Consol Energy, Peabody and Xcoal use Baltimore's terminals to export coal, according to market participants. If the port is blocked for a significant time, Atlantic Panamax rates could be pushed down further — rates fell last week as demand from Brazilian agricultural exporters dropped because of heavy rains. The Panamax rate on the route from the US Atlantic coast to northwest Europe fell from the local maximum $16.40/t on 19 March to $15.30/t on 25 March. By Gavin Attridge, Andrey Telegin and Abby Caplan Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more