Energy security under threat as Asia tensions rise

  • Market: Crude oil, Natural gas, Oil products
  • 04/08/21

How China's disputes with its regional rivals and the US pan out will dictate the future of global energy trade, writes Kevin Foster

A crude cargo shipped from the Mideast Gulf to northeast Asia passes through the most dynamic — and potentially unstable — part of the globe. Tankers leaving the Gulf head south of Gwadar port in Pakistan's unstable Balochistan province, the terminus of the troubled China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, before passing by major importer India and Myanmar (Burma), where civil unrest is threatening China's oil pipeline links to the Indian Ocean. Transiting the narrow, pirate-ridden strait of Malacca, cargoes then move north through the contested waters of the South China Sea and the Taiwan strait to discharge at ports in China, Japan or South Korea, in the shadow of North Korea's nuclear weapons.

Around 9mn b/d of crude is shipped every day from the world's biggest oil producing region to the top importer, passing by countries that account for almost half of global crude import demand, but which are also home to rising nationalism, festering territorial conflicts and intensifying superpower competition between the US and China for primacy in Asia. What is the risk of one of these flashpoints igniting a wider conflict — and what would it mean for energy trade and demand if it did?

China rising

Local conflicts notwithstanding, the common theme driving regional instability is China's attempt to carve out a place in the world commensurate with its economic heft. The world's second-largest economy and top energy importer is operating within global economic and political structures shaped by the US after World War 2, when China was mired in civil war. And as China moves towards regaining the top spot in the global economy that it occupied for much of the past 1,000 years, it is increasingly attempting to shape those structures to its own benefit.

"China has gone through the stages of standing up and getting rich and is now advancing to the stage of becoming strong," says Yan Xuetong, dean of the institute of international relations at the country's Tsinghua University. Beijing's efforts to shift the regional balance of power in its favour are seen nowhere more clearly than in the South China Sea, where the risks of a conflict over energy resources or control of sea lanes have intensified sharply in recent years (see map).

China claims sovereignty over large parts of the sea, including in areas also claimed by a total of six other littoral nations. Naval clashes over disputed oil and gas reserves, tensions over US "freedom of navigation" operations to challenge what Washington calls "unlawful" maritime claims, and rival claimants' construction of military bases on contested islands together led US secretary of state Tony Blinken to say in July that "nowhere is the rules-based order under greater threat than in the South China Sea".

Beijing denies that freedom of navigation is threatened and claims to have recently driven off a US warship that was "violating its sovereignty" by passing near disputed territory. Any military clash between US and Chinese vessels could have major repercussions for energy flows — about 10mn b/d of crude and 100mn t/yr of LNG pass through the South China Sea, along with 30pc of global seaborne trade. Meanwhile, the sea's estimated energy resources of up to 11bn bl of oil and 190 trillion ft³ (5.4 trillion m³) of gas lie largely undeveloped as a result.

Dire straits

A potentially bigger flashpoint lies to the north, in Taiwan. On any given day, around 7mn bl of crude passes along Taiwan's east and west coasts, while Chinese and Taiwanese naval and air forces face off across the Taiwan strait. Beijing, which sees Taiwan as an "inalienable part of China", has stepped up its military activity in the strait since the 2016 election of Taiwanese president Tsai Ing-wen, who opposes unification with the mainland. In July, Chinese president Xi Jinping promised a "complete reunification" with Taiwan during a major speech marking the centenary of the Chinese Communist Party, adding to Beijing's increasingly aggressive rhetoric. Foreign forces bullying China will "smash their heads bloody" against a great wall of steel built by the Chinese people, Xi says.

China could invade Taiwan within the next six years, the US' top military commander in Asia-Pacific, admiral Philip Davidson, warned a US Senate committee this year. Other observers play down the risks of armed conflict, arguing that the likely international condemnation — and potential for economic sanctions against Beijing — could derail China's carefully managed economic rise and lead to upheaval in oil imports.

The US could respond to any Chinese blockade of Taiwan with a counter-blockade of its own, including by "interfering… in the Indo-Pacific region and the [Mideast Gulf] with a lot of Chinese access to oil and other raw materials", US research group Brookings senior fellow Michael O'Hanlon told think-tank the Centre for Strategic and International Studies in July.

A new defence bill moving through the US Congress commits the country's armed forces to maintaining the ability to deny a "fait accompli" against Taiwan, in an attempt to deter China from using military force — suggesting tensions will only rise further in the short term. And should China decide to take Taiwan by force, the risks of a wider conflict appear to be increasing. Japan's deputy prime minister, Taro Aso, recently hinted that Tokyo might come to Taiwan's aid in the event of an attack — remarks that Beijing described as "extremely wrong and dangerous".

Energy vulnerability

Energy importers in the region are trying to manage the rising risks by diversifying their supply sources, although with limited success. China is increasingly sensitive to the risks that stem from its heavy oil and gas import dependence. Its latest five-year plan includes a section on energy security for the first time, and refers to the importance of securing "critical chokepoints" along import routes.

Beijing has sought to reduce its reliance on seaborne imports through a huge programme to build or expand its overland oil and gas pipeline links with Russia, central Asia and Myanmar. Cross-border pipelines supplied only about 7pc of China's crude imports last year. And the pipelines bring their own security risks.

Beijing has strengthened its ties with Moscow and many of its central Asian neighbours in recent years, helped in part by its booming energy trade, as well as by investments under its huge Belt and Road Initiative. But turmoil in Myanmar following this year's military coup threatens the security of China's Burma Road pipelines, which carried 200,000 b/d of Mideast Gulf crude to China last year. And Beijing's ambitions to further bypass the strait of Malacca by securing access to Pakistan's Indian Ocean port of Gwadar have been plagued by problems, including a militant attack in July that killed nine Chinese workers.

Other regional importers have even fewer alternatives to seaborne imports. South Korea — where imports cover more than 90pc of energy and natural resource needs — has focused on strengthening energy ties with exporters such as the US and countries in the Middle East, its foreign ministry says. India is scrambling to diversify oil imports and boost domestic supplies, with minimal success. The increased tension in the Taiwan strait, along with US-China rivalry in the South China Sea, has also highlighted the risks to energy security in Japan, which relied on Middle East suppliers for 92pc of its 2.5mn b/d of crude imports last year (see table). Policy advisers to Japanese premier Yoshihide Suga are urging the government to look for alternatives to the main import routes through the strait of Malacca and the South and East China seas.

Pivot points

Big energy importers have another option to reduce risk — cutting oil and gas imports altogether through a transition to cleaner energy sources. Japan's total fuel demand could fall by 50pc by 2040, according to the country's biggest refiner, Eneos, while oil's share of China's energy mix could drop to as low as 3pc by 2050, from 18pc now, as part of the government's commitment to achieve carbon neutrality by 2060, according to Tsinghua University estimates.

The energy transition will not eliminate security risks entirely, with the emergence of an international market for hydrogen hinting at one potential future for global commodity trade. But China's dominant position in global rare earth supplies provides a sharp contrast to its dependence on imported crude and gas, while the localised nature of renewables such as solar and wind could also reshape supply dynamics.

Looming over Asia-Pacific is the US, in the role of guarantor of stability and freedom of sea lanes that it has played since 1945. But Washington has overstretched its military power after two decades of conflict in Iraq and Afghanistan, and its commitment to safeguarding its faraway allies looks shakier after four years of "America First" policies under former president Donald Trump.

"We have historically a strong position in Asia [but] that position has slipped and we are at risk," White House Indo-Pacific co-ordinator Kurt Campbell says. "China wants to reshape the operating system of Asia." Trump's successor Joe Biden is acting to repair damaged bilateral relationships with Asian allies such as Japan and South Korea to promote a multilateral front against China, as his administration embraces as tough a line towards Beijing as Trump's did.

Despite the change in rhetoric under Biden, questions remain about US engagement in Asia. Former president Barack Obama's "pivot to Asia" was stalled by a competing US security focus on Russia and the Middle East, creating the perception of a growing security vacuum. Biden is keen to avoid the same trap by seeking an equilibrium in relations with Russia and ending the US' combat role in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The growth in trade between the US and China — notwithstanding periods of turmoil under Trump — as well as within Asia-Pacific itself, still holds out hope that economic integration will outweigh political rivalries. The shale boom resulted in the US strengthening its energy trade with east Asia over the past decade — even as political relations grew increasingly uncertain — and US oil and gas exports through the Panama Canal bypass many of the flashpoints that threaten Asia-Pacific trade with the Mideast Gulf. China has imported more than 500,000 b/d of US crude in the past 12 months. And US-China trade totalled almost $560bn in 2020, up by more than 20pc from 10 years earlier.

Conscious decoupling

But history has another warning. While the rise of China could herald the end of the post-1945 global political system, some observers see a more worrying analogy for modern-day Asia-Pacific in the build-up to World War 1. China's challenge to US primacy echoes the dynamics between Germany and Great Britain that sparked that conflict, and trade between those countries was also on the rise ahead of the start of hostilities.

Whether a similar disaster can be avoided a century later in east Asia could become the most important question for global energy trade. And Washington's policies to decouple its economy from that of China — accelerating as US actions to limit investment flows to China find a counterpart in Beijing's move to cut off access to western finance for its own technology sector — may already be eroding the stabilising effect of financial and economic interdependence.

South China Sea energy trade exposure, 2020
ToFrom
Crude '000 b/d*
Middle EastW AfricaEuropeS America
China5,1221,4323751,436
Japan2,218103244
Singapore554620106
Other3,60031958104
Natural gas (as LNG) bn m³
Middle EastAfricaIndonesiaMalaysia
China13.04.97.48.3
Japan14.62.03.014.8
South Korea18.71.43.76.7
Taiwan7.30.71.61.0
Other8.01.90.71.9
*includes condensates

South China Sea territorial claims

China's estimated seaborne oil trade

China-Myanmar crude infrastructure

Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
28/03/24

Crane barge arriving at Baltimore bridge tonight

Crane barge arriving at Baltimore bridge tonight

Houston, 28 March (Argus) — The first major piece of equipment capable of beginning to clear the blocked Port of Baltimore, Maryland, is expected to arrive onsite tonight. The Chesapeake 1000 crane barge, capable of lifting 1,000 short tons with its a 231ft-long boom, is expected to arrive at the site of the collapsed Francis Scott Key Bridge near Baltimore at 11pm ET on 28 March, the US Coast Guard (USCG) told Argus . Both the crane and the tug pulling it, Atlantic Enterprise , are owned by Donjon Marine. It is currently the only crane on route to the collapsed bridge, the USCG said. There is no official timetable for the reopening of the port after the Interstate 695 highway bridge over the Patapsco River was hit in the early hours of 26 March by a container ship and collapsed, with the debris and ship blocking the waterway. The operator of the ship, Maersk, has contracted with marine salvage company Resolve Marine to refloat the vessel and remove it from the area, according to the USCG. It is not clear who has contracted for the Chesapeake 1000. Despite the inbound crane, it could take weeks or even months to clear debris and reopen the waterway under the collapsed bridge according to a engineering professor at the nearby Johns Hopkins University. By Nathan Risser Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Read more
News

'Weeks, months' to reopen Baltimore waterway: professor


28/03/24
News
28/03/24

'Weeks, months' to reopen Baltimore waterway: professor

Houston, 28 March (Argus) — It could take weeks or even months to clear debris and reopen the waterway under the collapsed Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, Maryland, according to a engineering professor at the nearby Johns Hopkins University. As of Wednesday, there was no official timetable for the reopening of the Port of Baltimore after a major highway bridge over the Patapsco River was hit in the early hours of 26 March by a container ship and collapsed, with the debris and ship blocking the waterway. "I'd be shocked if it's weeks, but I don't think it'll take even a year" to clear the waterway, structural engineer and Johns Hopkins professor Benjamin Schafer said Wednesday. He expects the rebuild of the bridge to take significantly longer. "I've lived through quite a few civil infrastructure projects and they're rarely less than 10 years. So I think that's what we're looking at," Schafer said. He noted that it took five years to build the original Francis Scott Key Bridge and seven years to repair the Sunshine Skyway Bridge in Tampa Bay, Florida, after a similar collapse in 1980. Still, "this is definitely not a national supply chain crisis," John Hopkins operations management professor Tinglong Dai said Wednesday. "The effect will be mostly local, mostly minimal and mostly temporary." The bridge collapse and port closure is also unlikely to trigger a global supply chain crisis, he said. The Port of Baltimore is an important but "niche" port specializing in automobile imports and exports, Dai added. "The supply chain has evolved...I have already seen a lot of rerouting happening." Automakers started adjusting their supply routes away from the top port for US vehicle imports the day of the collapse, including General Motors, Ford and Mercedes-Benz. Baltimore is also a major port for coal exports, which may start to shift to terminals to the south in Hampton Roads, Virginia. Freight rates for ships that carry coal could see increases in global markets Other commodities like asphalt and caustic soda that move through the port will see challenges, while organic agriculture imports may see less problems due to seasonal flows. By Nathan Risser Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Baltimore probe includes potential contaminated fuel


28/03/24
News
28/03/24

Baltimore probe includes potential contaminated fuel

New York, 28 March (Argus) — Federal authorities are examining whether the containership that crashed into the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, Maryland, was burning contaminated marine fuel at the time of the incident. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) said it will collect a sample of the fuel on board the 116,851-dwt container vessel Dali as part of its investigation into why the ship lost power and hit the bridge support early on 26 March, taking down the span. "That sample will be taken, and we will analyze the quality, any sort of contaminants, we will look at viscosity," NTSB chair Jennifer Homendy said this week. "That will be part of our investigation." Shipboard power is generally generated by turbines connected to the same engines driving propulsion. There are a number of issues related to fuel that could have led to a loss of power on the ship, according to Wajdi Abdmessih, chief executive at Seahawk Services, a marine fuel testing company based in New Jersey. The fuel on the ship could have been contaminated, as was the case last year when contaminated very low-sulphur fuel oil was found on a number of ships fueld through a Houston, Texas, bunkering operation, or it could have been a compatibility issue with the vessel's engine, where the fuel was not optimized for the equipment. "If the vessel switches between different types of fuels, compatibility and stability issues could occur, which may cause a problem with the engine," Abdmessih said. "Unstable fuel could cause increased sludging and high sediment, which could clog the filter and cause fuel starvation and engine downturns." Singapore-based Synergy Marine Group, which manages Dali , said it is taking part of this investigation but declined to comment possible causes of the accident, including possible fuel contamination. The pilots on board the vessel lost control because of a loss of propulsion, according to the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA), which is assisting in the investigation because Dali was sailing under the Singapore flag. An issue with the ship's propulsion and auxiliary machinery was discovered during its June 2023 inspection in San Antonio, Chile , according to Equasis, a vessel information database. The problem involved the vessel's gauges and thermometers, according to the data. Its most recent inspection was in September 2023, but there are no indications of issues from the inspection. The vessel's next inspection was due in June 2024, the MPA said. By Luis Gronda Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Mosaic plant sustains minor damage from fire


28/03/24
News
28/03/24

Mosaic plant sustains minor damage from fire

Houston, 28 March (Argus) — Florida-based phosphate and potash fertilizer producer Mosaic anticipates limited damage to a production plant near Tampa and minimal disruption to operations in the coming weeks following a brushfire on Monday. The brushfire ignited Monday evening during routine maintenance near Mosaic's Riverview phosphate production facility and was initially contained before rekindling Tuesday morning because of heavy winds. The fire was fully under control by Tuesday afternoon, according to local first responders. Mosaic told Argus on Tuesday the fire was not considered a threat to the facility initially, but now expects the plant sustained "limited damage to ancillary operations" and the impact could last between four to six weeks. The Riverview plant has a production capacity of 1.8mn metric tonnes (t) of processed phosphate products, and produces 30,000 t/week, according to Mosaic. The facility was producing phosphates primarily for exports to Brazil at the time of the fire, the company added. Smoke was observed Monday from the fire as a result of foam retardants used by local fire officials to cool the high-density polyethylene pipes. Polyethylene gas piping is often used for natural gas distribution. Natural gas flows delivered to the plant fell slightly Wednesday at 2.42mn cf/d, down from 2.45mn cf/d on Monday, once the fire was extinguished, according to data from Florida Gas Transmission. Flows at the plant on Thursday rebounded to 2.45mn cf/d, in line with expectations that affected phosphate output at the plant should only be temporary. By Taylor Zavala Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Long-term contracts needed to stabilise gas prices: MET


28/03/24
News
28/03/24

Long-term contracts needed to stabilise gas prices: MET

London, 28 March (Argus) — Germany and Europe need more LNG and business-to-business long-term contracts to even out supply shocks and stabilise gas prices, even as demand is unlikely to reach historical heights again, chief executive of Swiss trading firm MET's German subsidiary Joerg Selbach-Roentgen told Argus . Long-term LNG contracts have a "stabilising effect" on prices when "all market participants know there is enough coming", Selbach-Roentgen said. He is not satisfied with the amount of long-term LNG supply contracted into Germany, arguing that stabilisation remains important even now that the market has "cooled down" after the price shocks of 2022. Long-term contracts are important for the standing of German industry, Selbach-Roentgen said — not to be reliant on spot cargoes is a matter of global competitiveness for the industrial gas market, he said. The chief executive called for more long-term contracts in other areas as well, such as for industrial offtakers, either fixed price or index-driven. Since long-term LNG contracts are concluded between wholesalers and producers, the latter need long-term planning security for their projects, which usually leads to terms of about 20 years. But long-term LNG contracts in general do not represent a major risk for MET nor for industrial offtakers in Europe, Selbach-Roentgen said. LNG is a more flexibly-structured "solution" to expected demand drops in regard to the energy transition as the tail end can be shipped to companies on other continents such as Asia if European demand wanes, he said. Gas demand is not likely to recover to "historical heights" again, mostly driven by industrials "jumping ship", Selbach-Roentgen said. When talking to large industrial companies, the discussion is often about the option that they might divert investments away from the German market as the price environment is "not attractive enough" for them any longer in terms of planning security, the chief executive said. This trend started out of necessity in reaction to the price spikes but may now be connected to longer-term "strategic" considerations, he said. In addition, industrial decarbonisation — as well as industrial offtakers' risk aversion because of the volatile gas market following Russian gas supply curtailments — leads companies to invest less into longer-term gas dependencies in Germany, Selbach-Roentgen said. In addition, MET advocates for a green gas blending obligation of 1-2pc green gas or hydrogen, in line with legislative drafts under discussion by the German government. This has already met with interest by offtakers, despite uncertainties around availability and prices, and would provide a regulatory framework that allows firms to prepare for the energy transition, Selbach-Roentgen said. By Till Stehr and Rhys Talbot Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more