Mexico to cut ribbon on refinery despite delays

  • Market: Oil products
  • 30/06/22

Mexico's top officials will inaugurate the 340,000 b/d Olmeca refinery in Dos Bocas, Tabasco, tomorrow,

but when the first gallons of gasoline will flow from the highly anticipated facility is far from certain.

The ribbon cutting ceremony to be led by President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador on Friday from 11am-1pm ET will mark the start of trial runs of crude through the facility. But the event comes after a 24 June energy ministry (Sener) progress report that showed construction work still underway on the refinery's 184m (600-foot) main fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) unit. As late as 17 June critical equipment continued to arrive at the facility, based on Sener's status report.

The government has pledged that Olmeca will produce the first commercial batch of gasoline in early 2023, about six months after trial runs start, taking a step toward the president's goal of making Mexico self-sufficient in fuels. But non-government analysts predict commercial production may not happen until late 2023 or even until 2024.

Limits on crude supply are among the key reasons for delay. The refinery is near a port capable of receiving crude, but expansions of roads, rail lines and pipelines are well behind schedule, said Gonzalo Monroy with GMEC consulting.

Work has not started on a $300mn, 93-km (58 miles) rail line connecting Olmeca to the national rail system, according to the executive summary of the project. Lopez Obrador said this week the rail line is not vital to the refinery operations as most of the crude and products will be shipped through the Dos Bocas port.

But a cost-benefit study from the energy ministry says that by 2023 just 240,000 b/d of crude will be able to reach the refinery, 267,000 b/d by 2025, and 340,000 b/d by 2026 — putting full capacity four years into the future.

Leaving low-hanging barrels

While the ribbon-cutting will nominally let the president meet his long-promised completion date, by neglecting its existing refineries Mexico is leaving roughly 785,000 b/d of nameplate capacity — more than two Olmeca refineries — of existing crude processing capacity on the table.

Pemex's six current domestic refineries processed an average of 830,000 b/d for January-May, only 51pc of their 1.615mn b/d nameplate capacity. The refining system hit its peak in the fourth quarter of 1994, with a high of 1.385mn b/d, according to Sener's data, showing an almost continual decrease in processing capacity since the 1990s.

Crude throughput in the system averaged 612,000 b/d in 2018 — the last year of former president Enrique Pena Nieto's administration, before Lopez Obrador took office in December 2018.

Crude processing has increased on average to 640,000 b/d so far in nearly three years of the Lopez Obrador administration, which has boosted spending on maintenance programs to improve capacity. But accidents have still prevented higher processing rates. Pemex's industrial accidents rose by 56pc in the first quarter of this year from the same first quarter of 2021, including fires and explosions at refineries.

A lack of cokers has also prevented Pemex from processing an excess of high sulphur fuel oil (HSFO), a lower-value product harder to sell in international markets, after the International Maritime Organization sulfur cap regulation took effect in 2020. The high inventories of fuel oil have at times shut refineries, as the product occupies storage that is needed for more valuable products as gasoline and diesel.

Pemex has also routed money to Olmeca that could have gone to existing refinery maintenance and cokers. Olmeca's official budget has ballooned to $8.9bn from an original $8bn, but Pemex has indicated the final cost may be closer to $12.4bn, and independent estimates put it closer to $14-16bn.

Besides the cost and tight construction time-frame, environmental studies made prior to the start of the construction also warned of the high flooding risks. The president largely discounted the risks in an effort to deliver the promised refinery to his home state of Tabasco.

This is the first time Mexico has inaugurated a new refinery since the 330,000 b/d Salina Cruz in 1979.

The purchase of the 340,000 b/d Deer Park, Texas, refinery from its joint-venture partner Shell earlier this year expanded Pemex's dedicated capacity, but that deal pales in comparison to the point of pride that the new facility brings.

Yet the inauguration comes as Lopez's Obrador's refining goal seems even more quixotic than it did in 2018, when many countries looked at paring back capacity as part of the global move toward cleaner fuels. About 3mn b/d of refining capacity globally was lost since the start of the pandemic, followed by a surge in demand and sanctions on Russia. These conditions have put upward pressure on gasoline and diesel prices, and even pushed US president Joe Biden — a clean energy advocate — to call for an increase in refining output.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
28/03/24

Stalling climate finance an energy security risk : WRI

Stalling climate finance an energy security risk : WRI

London, 28 March (Argus) — The "best bet" to achieving global energy security is through mitigation funding and multilateral cooperation, according to the World Resources Institute (WRI). WRI highlighted that governments are funding more domestic renewable energy projects but have increased oil and gas production in the name of "energy security" at home in the years following the Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The recent rebrand of energy transition funding to energy security funding has allowed some developed nations to justify domestic oil and gas licences and drag their feet on multilateral financial commitments. This is causing "real worry" among climate-vulnerable developing nations, WRI chief executive Ani Dasgupta said. He said that although the initial "shock" to the world's energy markets after the invasion of Ukraine "quickly went away", it has triggered "real worry among poorer countries that when push comes to shove, it won't be an even game, or have a fair outcome." Developing countries have long complained about the lack of access to climate funding. Richer nations have only recently met the $100bn/yr target in climate finance to developing countries agreed in 2009, while discussions on setting a new climate finance goal for 2025 at Cop 29 in Baku in November could prove difficult. President of the Republic of Congo (Brazzaville) Denis Sassou-Nguesso said last year that the $100bn/yr in climate financing to developing countries promised by rich countries "never reached us", adding that the annual UN Cop climate conferences have become little more than a talking shop. "Just after the invasion of Ukraine, every country started to think about energy security," Dasgupta said. "In theory, good things could have happened, countries could have concluded that their best bet to getting energy security is by going renewable". But it was not the case in key consumer countries or regions, Dasgupta pointed out. China bought the majority of Russian gas following the EU's withdrawal, he said, and has since upped production at coal-fired power stations despite an "extraordinary" acceleration towards renewables set for 2023-28, according to Paris-based energy watchdog IEA . In Europe, the UK and Norway continue to award new oil and gas licences . "In the US, the fossil fuel lobby argues that the best route to energy security is to invest more in fossil fuels". But the best route is to invest in more renewables, he said. "Even if the US produces a large amount of oil and gas, it is still a traded commodity, and so you have to pay a price for it that is set globally." The US special presidential co-ordinator for energy security Amos Hochstein has also suggested in September that a widening climate finance gap could ultimately threaten global security. "We have seen the percentage of dollars spent on the energy transition outside the OECD, in developing and middle income countries actually go down instead of up…" By Madeleine Jenkins Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Read more
News

ACT to partner with LR, Wartsila, and UECC on CNSL


28/03/24
News
28/03/24

ACT to partner with LR, Wartsila, and UECC on CNSL

London, 28 March (Argus) — Dutch supplier ACT Group is collaborating with classification society Lloyd's Register, Finnish engine manufacturer Wartsila, and Norwegian shipping firm United European Car Carriers (UECC) on the development and evaluation of cashew nut shell liquid (CNSL) as a biofuel in marine biodiesel blends. ACT confirmed the launch of a CNSL-based biofuel called "FSI.100", which has gone through extensive engine testing with various blend combinations. The CNSL-based biofuel has now received approval from engine manufactures to be blended as a 30pc component with marine gasoil (MGO) to form a marine biodiesel blend for the purpose of further sea trials. ACT confirmed that the FSI.100 product will benefit from lower acidity, and there is potential for the product to be compatible for blending with fuel oil. CNSL is an advanced biodiesel feedstock, making it a more appealing and price competitive option to buyers compared with other biodiesel feedstocks. The development follows a report by Lloyd's Register fuel oil bunkering analysis and advisory service (FOBAS) that pointed to a correlation between engine fuel pump and injector-related damage in vessels and the presence of "unestablished" CNSL in the utilised marine fuels. By Hussein Al-Khalisy Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Baltimore bridge collapse to raise retail fuel prices


27/03/24
News
27/03/24

Baltimore bridge collapse to raise retail fuel prices

Houston, 27 March (Argus) — The collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, Maryland, is more likely to increase regional gasoline prices than diesel due to additional freight costs and certain route restrictions. Suppliers in the region have so far signaled that the effect on broader markets will be minimal, but regional prices will likely rise, especially as peak summer demand season begins with Memorial Day weekend in late May. The bridge closure could pose more problems for gasoline supply than diesel, since gasoline cannot be transported through the Fort McHenry (I-95) and Baltimore Harbor (I-895) tunnels — the two other major roads that cross the Patapsco River at Baltimore — while there are no restrictions on diesel, according to the Maryland Transportation Authority (MTA). Fuel wholesaler Global Partners said yesterday that it would like to see hours of service waivers for trucking in the region to minimize fuel supply disruption to customers, but the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) is yet to issue one. Elevated retail prices are likely to be limited to the immediate Baltimore area but could spill over into neighboring markets should trucking markets remain tight due to rerouting, market sources told Argus . Fuel markets in eastern Maryland can be supplied by PBF's 171,000 b/d Delaware City, Delaware, refinery and two further plants in Pennsylvania — Monroe Energy's 190,000 b/d Trainer refinery and PBF's 160,000 b/d Paulsboro refinery. To the north, United Refining runs a 65,000 b/d plant in Warren, Pennsylvania, and along the Atlantic coast Phillips 66 operates the 259,000 b/d Bayway refinery in Linden, New Jersey. PBF, Monroe and United did not immediately respond to a request for comment on whether the bridge collapse is affecting refinery operations. Phillips 66 declined to comment on commercial activities. Still, the five nearby refineries — representing all the Atlantic coast's 850,000 b/d of crude processing capacity — are unlikely to see their operations curtailed by limits in shipping products to Maryland. With no refinery in the state of Maryland, most fuels are delivered to Baltimore by Gulf coast refiners on the Colonial Pipeline. Global Partners, which operates a terminal just west of the collapsed bridge, said yesterday it is primarily supplied by the pipeline and expects product flows to continue. Several terminals in the Baltimore Harbor and the nearby Port Salisbury can also receive small vessels and barges of road fuels from Delaware and Pennsylvania, according to the Maryland Energy Administration (MEA). The Port of Baltimore — which remains closed since the collapse — took delivery of 24,000 b/d of gasoline and under 2,000 b/d of distillates from barges and small vessels in 2019, about three percent of the Atlantic coast's refining capacity. "A closure of the Port of Baltimore while the Colonial Pipeline is open would not significantly disrupt fuel supply," the MEA wrote in a 2022 analysis of liquid fuels supply in the state. By Nathan Risser Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

European bio-bunker March prices firm on uncertainty


27/03/24
News
27/03/24

European bio-bunker March prices firm on uncertainty

London, 27 March (Argus) — Marine biodiesel prices firmed in the second half of March across Europe as higher levels in underlying markets combined with supply uncertainty to lend support to blend prices, despite limited demand. Very-low sulphur fuel oil (VLSFO) firmed by $16/t to $585.58/t on a dob Amsterdam-Rotterdam-Antwerp (ARA) basis and $17.47/t to $628.17/t on a dob Gibraltar-Algeciras-Ceuta (GAC) basis during 14-26 March compared with the two weeks prior. Gains in the fossil market were mainly attributed to an increase in European refinery turnarounds as well as stronger crude values. The front-month Ice Brent crude futures 16:30 GMT marker averaged $86.07/bl on 14-16 March, an increase of $2.92/bl from 1-13 March. Rising fossil levels were accompanied by increases in the biodiesel spot barge market. Prices for advanced fatty acid methyl ester (Fame) 0°C cold-filter plugging point (CFPP) on a fob ARA barge basis averaged $1,407.15/t during the last two weeks of March, a $53.58/t rise from 1-13 March. Used cooking oil methyl ester (Ucome) barges firmed by $47.47/t to $1,316/t during the same timeframe. Biodiesel prices have firmed from long-term lows on the back of a reduction in European production and limited demand. Higher prices in underlying markets were accompanied by an emerging theme of biofuel supply uncertainty. Participants reported that European suppliers may look to steer away from Chinese-origin biodiesel as the EU's anti-dumping investigation continues, with a conclusion by early 2025 at the latest. This was compounded by chronic disruption in the Red Sea, historically the most utilised route on the east-west voyage, leading to traffic redirecting via the Cape of Good Hope and a subsequent increase in freight costs. The potential shift in supply routes can be supported by changes in product flows. Some 19,000t of Fame has been exported from China with a marked destination in Europe in March so far, an 80pc drop from February's 106,000t — according to Kpler data. This month's exports are just 10pc of the 184,000t exported from China to Europe in March last year, according to Kpler. Declining volumes from China were accompanied by an increase in Fame volumes exported from northwest Europe intra-continental to 409,000t in March from 364,000t a month prior. GTT data pointed to a 47pc decline in Chinese biodiesel exports in January-February, coinciding with an increase in Chinese exports of used cooking oil (UCO) with northwest Europe the main destination. Uncertainty in the supply import pool coincided with raised concerns around the presence of "unestablished" biodiesel feedstocks in bunker fuels. A report from Lloyd's Register fuel oil bunkering analysis and advisory service (FOBAS) highlighted a correlation between engine fuel pump and injector related damage in vessels and the presence of cashew nut shell liquid (CNSL) in marine fuels utilised by the vessels. CNSL is one of the cheaper advanced feedstocks and can be eligible for Dutch renewable tickets (HBE-G) — which can help make marine biodiesel blends more appealing and price competitive to buyers, as well as reduce production costs. But participants noted that during tests conducted by shipowners to assess the compatibility of CNSL with marine engines, technical and specification limitations emerged because of potentially high acidity and metal contents. This prompted shipowners and bunker suppliers to avoid fuels that contain CNSL, which may further constrict the pool of biodiesel supply that can be integrated into the maritime sector. Argus assessed the price of B30 Ucome dob ARA, a blend comprising 30pc Ucome and 70pc VLSFO, at $839.17/t during 14-26 March — an increase of just under $22/t from the 1-13 March average. B30 Advanced Fame 0°C CFPP dob ARA range averaged just over $785/t during 14-26 March, higher by $16.19/t from the two weeks prior. B100 Advanced Fame 0 levels rose by $16.62/t to $1,159.79/t in the second half of March. B24 dob Algeciras-Gibraltar firmed to $812.61/t in 14-26 March, an increase of $19.50/t from prices on 1-13 March. By Hussein Al-Khalisy Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Q&A: Singapore leads push for marine decarbonisation


27/03/24
News
27/03/24

Q&A: Singapore leads push for marine decarbonisation

Singapore, 27 March (Argus) — Argus spoke to Ashish Anilan, assistant director at classification society Bureau Veritas Marine & Offshore, about the expected trends and the impact of EU-led emissions compliance regulations on the Asian maritime sector this year. How will Singapore impact the push for maritime decarbonisation in the coming few years? Though Singapore's position as the world's largest bunkering hub attracts decarbonisation initiatives, its true impact hinges on concrete actions. Initiatives like the Singapore Green Plan 2030 translate sustainability goals into action plans. Recent expressions of interest in electric harbour craft and bunkering for cleaner fuels like methanol and ammonia demonstrate Singapore's commitment to clean energy solutions and alternative fuel adoption. Additionally, digital and green corridor initiatives foster regional collaboration, supply chain resilience and operational efficiency, all crucial for achieving broader sustainability goals. By embracing concrete action, Singapore is showing the way as a true leader in maritime decarbonisation and this can inspire other ports and hubs across the world. What are your expectations for 2024? The maritime sector in 2024 still faces continued fuel price volatility, increased scrutiny on alternative fuels and a push for infrastructure development. Policy-wise, the implementation of EU regulations and potential expansion of regional or international carbon pricing mechanisms are anticipated. At IMO we will see the first year of CII [Carbon Intensity Indicator] verification and conversations on market-based measures. Shipping is a "hard-to-abate" sector and the inherent fragmentation makes decarbonisation a harder challenge. Do you think mandates will drive the change or market economics? Despite being a highly fragmented and a "hard-to-abate" sector, the shipping industry presents a unique opportunity for cost-effective emissions reduction schemes and efficiency improvement plans. It is crucial to recognise that international shipping primarily functions as a commodity mover, and its decarbonisation plays a key role in both supply chain resilience and the life-cycle emissions footprint of the cargo it carries. While regulations and mandates can offer valuable measurement tools, market forces often drive the primary change, facilitated by commitments from cargo owners and incentives provided by financial institutions. Will t he implementation of EU ETS, CII ratings and the upcoming EU FuelMaritime regulations be a deterrent or pave the way for fuel adoption by shipowners in Asia? While the upcoming EU regulations will initially increase compliance costs for Asian shipowners and their charterers engaging in European trade, they will also create multifaceted pathways towards cleaner fuel adoption. The premium for the cleaner fuels will be justified by the penalties imposed by market-based-measures. Alongside cost-effective efficiency measures, a long-term strategy incorporating supply chain collaboration and effective cost sharing mechanisms will be essential for these regulations to truly help incentivise the energy transition. Additionally, the broader Asian market may benefit from the potential harmonisation of environmental regulations spurred by the European framework. By Mahua Chakravarty Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more