Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

US oil exports: WTI mixed while TMX rises

  • : Crude oil
  • 24/09/13

US light sweet waterborne spot crude prices were mixed over the week as Asian buying interest firms.

WTI loading 15-45 days forward at the US Gulf coast narrowed its discount to December Ice Brent by 50¢/bl to 93¢/bl. The free-on-board (fob) value weakened by 4¢/bl against the secondary coastal crude benchmark WTI Houston to a 26¢/bl midpoint premium as October-loading differentials were mostly unchanged due to a major industry event happening in Singapore this week.

Demand for WTI climbed a bit earlier in the week as Asia-Pacific refiners stepped up their purchases of October-loading WTI prior to the start of S&P's Asia Pacific Petroleum Conference (APPEC) conference this week in Singapore. It was unclear whether the pace of Asian buying would continue after this week.

Asian buyers typically seek WTI supplies around two weeks earlier than European customers. Prior to the spike in Asian buying of WTI, Chinese demand had been relatively weak, although delegates at the Singapore conference said this demand weakness was overstated.

Chinese oil demand growth is slowing but has not yet peaked, while growth in the use of naphtha and jet fuel is offsetting declines in motor fuel consumption, delegates heard at the Argus Asia-Pacific Oil Markets Forum on 10 September. The growth in the use of naphtha and jet fuel is offsetting declines in motor fuel consumption.

The slowdown in oil demand growth is attributed to signs of weakness in the Chinese economy and the country's push for electric vehicles. Despite the slowdown, some experts believe that the weakness in Chinese oil demand is being exaggerated, and they view China as a maturing market with lower growth like other OECD countries.

Elsewhere, tanker freight rates are expected to increase in the coming months due to a recovery in demand for dirty tankers, according to delegates at the Appec conference in Singapore. The rates for clean tanker freight fell in the third quarter due to competition from dirty tankers, but there has been a recent increase in demand for dirty tankers, hinting at a general recovery in the fourth-quarter rates.

Americas Pacific coast

Values for Canadian crude exported via the 590,000 b/d Trans Mountain Expansion (TMX) pipeline strengthened amid volatility in the underlying futures market.

Free-on-board (fob) High-tan crude exported from Vancouver strengthened 10¢/bl to a $10.53/bl discount to January Ice Brent, while Cold Lake fob Vancouver rose 20¢/bl to a $9.55/bl discount against the benchmark.

Ice Brent crude futures prices fell below $70/bl during the week, the first time since late 2021. This decline came after low Chinese crude imports in July and the delay by OPEC+ alliance members to increase output. Despite disruptions to Libyan crude output, the prices continued to fall. OPEC's research arm remains bullish on oil demand, while some trading firm executives suggested that prices may need to fall further to stimulate demand. Analysts and traders are factoring in the softness in China, the impending Federal Reserve easing cycle in the US, and mixed messages from OPEC.

Elsewhere, sections of the 622,000 b/d Keystone crude pipeline remain at reduced pressure since a spill nearly two years ago, but its operator is making strides to have those restrictions potentially removed.

TC Energy's Keystone pipeline is a major thoroughfare for Canadian heavy crude destined for the US midcontinent and Gulf coast, but a rupture in December 2022 took the cross-border pipeline off line for more than three weeks.

Service was mostly restored in the months following the incident, but more crude could likely be moved down the line if pressure restrictions are lifted.

Canada's west coast now exports more Canadian crude than the US Gulf coast after the startup of the TMX pipeline. Lifted restrictions on the Keystone pipeline could potentially disrupt crude flows through TMX.

Planned US crude export cargoes
Tanker nameSizeChartererDestinationLaycan
Asia-Pacific
Front ForthVLCCPhillips 66China7-14 September 2024
C. EarnestVLCCMercuriaChina7-14 September 2024
KhuraisVLCCUnipecChina10-14 September 2024
IlmaVLCCSK EnergySouth Korea15 September 2024
Legio X EquestrisVLCCAramco TradingSingapore15 September 2024
Plata GloryVLCCPhillips 66Taiwan and/or South Korea19 September 2024
SeamajestySuezmaxShellSingapore19 September 2024
Dht SundarabansVLCCExxonMobilSingapore24 September 2024
Yasa ScorpionVLCCUnpiecChina25-30 September 2024
BasrahVLCCUnipecChina30 September 2024
New CorollaVLCCHyundai Oil BankSouth Korea3-5 October 2024
Front AltaVLCCShellSouth Korea5 October 2024
Cosflying LakeVLCCBPSingapore8 October 224
Celeste NovaVLCCChevronSouth Korea8 October 224
Landbridge GloryVLCCEquinorAsia-Pacific13 October 2024
Front TanaVLCCSK EnergySouth Korea13 October 2024
HillahVLCCPTTNingbo, China15 October 2024
Sinokor TBNVLCCOccidental PetroleumAsia-Pacific16 October 2024
Europe
AndromedaVLCCBPEurope8-14 September 2024
Seaways EndeavorVLCCExxonMobilEurope14 September 2024
Levantine SeaAframaxChevronEurope15 September 2024
SeatributeAframaxBPEurope15 September 2024
Yuan Bei HaiSuezmaxEquinorEurope15 September 2024
ArcticSuezmaxBPEurope18 September, 2024
Aegean HorizonSuezmaxVitolEurope18-19 September 2024
Morning HopeVLCCExxonMobilEurope21 September 2024
Eagle VeracruzVLCCExxonMobilEurope27 September 2024
Cobalt NovaVLCCBPEurope13-17 October 2024
Americas and misc.
Front ShanghaiSuezmaxEnergy TransferPorto Sudeste, Brazil13-14 September 2024
Green AdventureAframaxChevronEast Coast Canada15 September 2024
Seaways FrioSuezmaxPetrobrasBrazil21 September 2024
Select US crude cargoes in transit
Tanker nameSizeLoading windowDestinationETA
Asia-Pacific
Houston VoyagerVLCC22-24 July 2024Maoming, ChinaAlongside
SeavoiceVLCC20-24 July 2024Ulsan, South Korea15 September 2024
Dht PantherVLCC11-16 July 2024Kaohsiung, Taiwan16 September 2024
ArsanVLCC19-25 July 2024Daesan, South Korea16 September 2024
Dht OspreyVLCC23-27 July 2024Taoyuan, Taiwan17 September 2024
Xin Long YangVLCC29 July 2024 - 3 August 2024Paradip, India20 September 2024
MaximVLCC26-29 July 2024Kaohsiung, Taiwan22 September 2024
HalcyonVLCC2-6 August 2024South Korea27 September 2024
Cap VictorSuezmax5-7 August 2024Mumbai, India28 September 2024
Advantage VerdictVLCC12-16 August 2024Singapore5 October 2024
Cosnew LakeVLCC13-18 August 2024Yeosu, South Korea9 October 2024
DHT RedwoodVLCC15-18 August 2024Asia-Pacific10 October 2024
MaharahVLCC15-21 August 2024Daesan, South Korea12 October 2024
Maran ThaleiaVLCC16-21 August 2024China13 October 2024
Vl BrilliantVLCC21-26 August 2024Kaohsiung, Taiwan17 October 2024
Dias IVLCC23-27 August 2024Geoje, South Korea17 October 2024
AmphitriteVLCC27-31 August 2024Singapore19 October 2024
Great LadyVLCC30 August - 3 September 2024Singapore25 October 2024
DijilahVLCC3-6 September 2024Mumbai, India27 October 2024
Europe
Ithaki DFAframax27-28 August 2024Fos, France16 September 2024
SeagraceSuezmax29-31 August 2024Immingham, United Kingdom17 September 2024
Minerva NounouAframax30-31 August 2024Rotterdam, The Netherlands17 September 2024
AchilleasSuezmax30-31 August 2024Rotterdam, The Netherlands18 September, 2024
Eagle VenturaVLCC28 August - 4 SeptemberRotterdam, The Netherlands20 September 2024
Nordic ZenithSuezmax30 August - 2 SeptemberWilhelmshaven, Germany21 September 2024
HortenVLCC31 August - 5 September 2024Rotterdam, The Netherlands22 September 2024
DrepanosAframax3-5 September 2024Immingham, United Kingdom23 September 2024
AtlanticSuezmax29 August - 1 September 2024Trieste, Italy23 September 2024
Sola TSAframax6-8 September 2024A Coruña, Spain24 September 2024
Front UllSuezmax5-7 September 2024Wilhelmshaven, Germany25 September, 2024
Atlantic EmeraldAframax7-9 September 2024Spain26 September 2024
Crude ZephyrusSuezmax3-4 September 2024Ancona, Italy26 September 2024
GrimstadAframax9-11 September 2024Rotterdam, The Netherlands29 September 2024
Nordic VegaSuezmax3-4 September 2024Porvoo, Finland29 September 2024
Minerva LibraAframax7-9 September 2024Milazzo, Italy30 September 2024

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

25/05/20

Shell CEO defends 'resilient investment strategy'

Shell CEO defends 'resilient investment strategy'

London, 20 May (Argus) — Shell chief executive Wael Sawan defended the company's "resilient investment strategy" at its annual shareholder meeting today, as directors faced a barrage of questions from climate-focused investors. A resolution calling for more details on Shell's LNG strategy gained over 20pc support, a level consistent with climate-related votes in previous years . But absent this year were the disruptive climate protests that have marked past meetings. This was partly due to Shell's choice of venue, London's Heathrow Airport, which has a five-year High Court injunction banning environmental protests on site. Still, climate-conscious shareholders dominated the discussion. One questioned how Shell could justify expanding oil and gas operations when the IEA's net zero emissions by 2050 scenario suggests no new oil and gas projects are needed. Shell's chairman Andrew Mackenzie responded that the IEA's scenario is just one of many and includes conditional commitments made by governments that may not materialise. "We see a phase of continuing growth, particularly in the use of gas and especially in LNG, that we think is appropriate to invest in," he said. Sawan pointed out that most of the net present value from Shell's oil and gas projects will be realised before 2040, "and so this is a very resilient investment strategy that we are offering our shareholders". He also highlighted that Shell has $20bn of capital invested in low-carbon alternatives such as biofuels, hydrogen and electric vehicle charging. "It is in our interest... to see that market grow," he said. A key focus was Resolution 22, filed by the Australasian Centre for Corporate Responsibility (ACCR), which called on Shell to explain how its LNG strategy aligns with its climate goals. "We believe that shareholders still don't have the information that they need to properly assess the risks associated with this strategy," said the ACCR's Sarah Brewin. The scale of Shell's uncontracted LNG out to 2050 exposes the company and its shareholders to "significant risk should prices fall and demand soften", she said. The company's LNG outlook "is highly optimistic and increasingly out of step with global trends", she added. Shell's board opposed the resolution, arguing that its strategy is based on a range of scenarios — including one exploring the impact of AI on energy demand. Its 2025 LNG Outlook, based on Wood Mackenzie data, forecasts a 60pc rise in global LNG demand by 2040, driven by economic growth in Asia and decarbonisation in heavy industry and transport. While the resolution did not pass, Shell said it will prepare a note within six months detailing its LNG market outlook, its LNG business strategy and how these align with its climate commitments. By Jon Mainwaring Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Brazil to walk tightrope in Cop 30 fossil fuel talks


25/05/20
25/05/20

Brazil to walk tightrope in Cop 30 fossil fuel talks

Rio de Janeiro, 20 May (Argus) — Brazil is arguing that its developing country status allows it to consolidate its position as a major crude producer and is likely to lean on developed countries during much-awaited discussions on moving away from fossil fuels at the UN Cop 30 climate conference in November. Attempts to reach an ambitious outcome on mitigation — cutting greenhouse gas emissions — and actions to move away from fossil fuels were quashed at Cop 29 in Baku last year, and all eyes are on Brazil to bridge divides on this issue . Cop 30 president-designate Andre Correa do Lago has failed to address fossil fuels in his two letters outlining priorities for the summit, but members of the Cop 30 team have indicated the issue will be on the agenda. With geopolitical tensions and energy security questions redirecting government priorities away from the energy transition, the outlook is more challenging than when Cop parties agreed the global stocktake (GST) conclusion on fossil fuels and energy in 2023 . But Brazil is well-placed to take the lead. It is a respected player in climate discussions and has one of the cleanest energy mix — 49pc of its energy and 89pc of its electricity comes from renewables. Its own mitigation efforts prioritize slashing deforestation, which accounts for the lion's share of Brazil's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Non-profit World Resources Institute Brazil describes the emissions reduction target in Brazil's nationally determined contribution (NDC) — climate plan — as "reasonable to insufficient" and notes that energy emissions are expected to increase by 20pc in the decade to 2034. Its NDC avoids any concrete steps towards winding down crude. After you The government's view on fossil fuels is that Brazil's developing country status, the oil and gas industry's importance in its economy and comparatively low fossil fuel emissions justify pushing ahead with oil production. Correa do Lago said earlier that Belem was picked as a venue for Cop 30 to show that Brazil is still a developing country, adding that any decision on oil and gas should be taken by Brazil's citizens. President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva said that oil revenue will fund the energy transition. It is a position that has earned Brazil accusations of hypocrisy from environmentalists at home and abroad, but which also places it as a possible model for other hydrocarbon-producer developing countries. Brazil's diplomatic tradition of pragmatically balancing seemingly opposing positions could serve it well here, said Gabriel Brasil, a senior analyst focused on climate at Control Risks, a consultancy. He does not see Brazil's attempt to balance climate leadership with continued oil production as hurting its standing among fellow parties or energy investors. Civil society stakeholders hope pre-Cop meetings will help bring clarity on how Brazil might broach the fossil fuel debate. Indigenous groups, which are set to be given more space at Cop, are demanding an end to fossil fuel extraction in the environmentally sensitive Foz do Amazonas offshore basin. Meanwhile, Brazilian state-owned Petrobras moved one step closer to being authorized to begin offshore drilling there . During meetings of the UN climate body — the UNFCCC — in Panama City this week, the Cop 30 presidency will present ideas for the summit "with a focus on the full implementation of the GST". But it has to wait for countries to update their NDCs to gauge what is achievable on mitigation. Only 20 have submitted new NDCs so far, with the deadline pushed back to September. Brazil's own NDC gives some clues. It welcomes the launch "of international work for the definition of schedules for transitioning away from fossil fuels in energy systems" and reiterates that developed countries should take the lead. And a report commissioned by Brazil's oil chamber IBP and civil society organization ICS to be given to negotiators ranks Brazil as a "mover" in the transition away from oil and gas, ahead of "adapters" like India and Nigeria but behind "front-runners" Germany and the US. The research develops the idea of a country-based transition plan, using criteria such as energy security and institutional and social resilience, as well as oil and gas relevance. By Constance Malleret 2023 Brazil emissions sources Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Libyan crude returns to Asia after one-month hiatus


25/05/20
25/05/20

Libyan crude returns to Asia after one-month hiatus

London, 20 May (Argus) — Libyan crude is once again heading to Asia-Pacific after exports to the region came to a complete halt in April — the first such pause since August 2020, according to Argus tracking data. The Suezmax Sea Sapphire departed Libya's Zueitina port on 15 May with around 1mn bl of light sweet crude bound for Thailand's Ko Sichang terminal, where it is expected to arrive on 26 June, according to Vortexa and Kpler. It marks the first Libyan crude cargo to load for Asia-Pacific since March, and flows to the region averaged 76,000 b/d in the first three months of this year. Despite favourable arbitrage conditions in April — the Brent-Dubai EFS more than halved on the month to 30¢/bl in March when April-loading cargoes were trading — no Libyan crude was loaded for the region last month. Buyers in Asia-Pacific appear to have opted for light sour Caspian CPC Blend instead. Shipments of the Caspian grade to Asia-Pacific hit a two-year high of 541,000 b/d in April, supported by weaker price differentials. But with eastbound arbitrage shipments now less workable, most May and June-loading CPC Blend supplies are heading to Europe, according to traders. This may have prompted Asia-Pacific refiners to turn back to Libyan grades. Thailand has been a regular buyer of Libyan crude, taking 16 cargoes in 2022 and nine in 2023, according to Argus tracking data. The Sea Sapphire is already the third Libyan cargo to load this year, matching the total for the whole of 2024. A second Suezmax cargo of Libyan crude is scheduled to depart Marsa al-Hariga on 27 May and arrive at China's Ningbo port on 24 June, although the fixture remains unconfirmed. Despite renewed interest from Asia-Pacific, Libya's overall crude exports are scheduled to fall by 9pc on the month in May to 1.13mn b/d across its 12 grades, according to provisional loading programmes. By Ellanee Kruck Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US budget bill not enough of permitting fix: CEO


25/05/19
25/05/19

US budget bill not enough of permitting fix: CEO

Washington, 19 May (Argus) — Republican efforts to unilaterally overhaul federal pipeline permitting through a filibuster-proof budget bill will not provide the certainty needed to make major investments in new energy infrastructure, an industry executive said today. Republicans in the US House of Representatives will vote as early as this week on a bill that would offer fast-tracked approval of new pipelines and immunity from some lawsuits, in exchange for a fee of up to $10mn. But that bill, along with attempts by the White House to expedite project approvals by executive order, fall short of what industry officials would like to see on permitting, US midstream operator Howard Energy Partners chief executive Mike Howard said. "Permit reform through an executive order or a reconciliation bill, that doesn't give me the confidence to go spend billions of dollars on new infrastructure," Howard said at a conference held by the news publisher RealClear. "You have to have an act of Congress that both sides of the aisle agree to and make real laws." Energy industry officials have good reason to be skeptical that permitting provisions in the budget bill will remain intact over the years it can take to plan, permit and build large-scale energy infrastructure. Wind and solar developers, oil companies and others making investments based on the clean energy tax credits that Democrats passed through the Inflation Reduction Act now face a risk those credits will be gutted by the Republican budget bill . A bipartisan permitting deal would probably be far harder to negotiate if Republicans succeed in using the pending budget bill to dismantle the clean energy spending in the Inflation Reduction Act, given that any agreement would need to fast-track pipelines in exchange for faster approval of electric transmission lines needed for renewables. Pipeline officials say they are continuing to push for permitting legislation, along with other fixes to expedite projects. "We spend more money on our permitting process than we spend on the steel in modern pipeline projects today, so we are a lot more focused now on the regulatory process and really getting streamlined because we think there's a tremendous amount of value in getting that resolved," US gas infrastructure company Williams chief executive Alan Armstrong said today in an interview on CNBC. Last week, US gas producer EQT's chief executive Toby Rice said there needs to be "significant reform" on permitting to offer the industry the confidence needed to start investing again in new pipelines, after a series of major projects were blocked over the last five years. "We're going to have to have more conversations with the pipeline guys," Rice said at an event held by the US Energy Association. "We've had executives that have lost billions of dollars proposing pipelines and having them blocked, canceled or opposed." By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US House panel votes down Republican megabill


25/05/16
25/05/16

US House panel votes down Republican megabill

Washington, 16 May (Argus) — A key committee in the US House of Representatives voted today to reject a massive budget bill backed by President Donald Trump, as far-right conservatives demanded deeper cuts to clean energy tax credits and social spending programs. The House Budget Committee failed to pass the budget reconciliation bill in a 16-21 vote, with four House Freedom Caucus members — Ralph Norman (R-South Carolina), Chip Roy (R-Texas), Josh Brecheen (R-Oklahoma) and Andrew Clyde (R-Georgia) — voting no alongside Democrats. A fifth Republican voted no for procedural reasons. The failed vote will force Republicans to consider major changes to the bill before it comes up for a vote on the House floor as early as next week. Republican holdouts say the bill would fall short of their party's promises to cut the deficit, particularly because it would front-load increased spending and back-load cuts. The bill is set to add $3.3 trillion to the deficit, or $5.2 trillion if temporary provisions were permanent, according to estimates from the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. Some critics of the bill said the proposed cut of $560bn in clean energy tax credits is not enough, because the bill would retain some tax credits for new wind and solar projects. "A lot of these credits have been in existence for 30 or 40 years, and you talk about giveaways, we want to help those who really need help," Norman said ahead of his no vote. "That's the heart of this. Sadly, I'm a no until we get this ironed out." Negotiations will fall to House speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana), who can only lose three votes when the bill comes up for a vote by the full House. But stripping away more of the energy tax credits enacted in the Inflation Reduction Act could end up costing Johnson votes among moderates. More than a dozen Republicans on 14 May asked to pare back newly proposed restrictions on the remaining clean energy tax credits. Ahead of the failed vote, Trump had pushed Republicans to support what he calls the "Big Beautiful Bill". In a social media post, he said "Republicans MUST UNITE" in support of the bill and said the party did not need "GRANDSTANDERS". The failed vote has parallels to the struggles that Democrats had in 2021 before the implosion of their push to pass their sprawling "Build Back Better" bill, which was later revived as the Inflation Reduction Act. Republicans say they will work over the weekend on a compromise. The House Budget Committee has scheduled another hearing at 10pm on 18 May to attempt to vote again on the budget package, but any changes to the measure would occur later, through an amendment released before the bill comes up for a vote on the House floor. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more