• 2024年8月14日
  • Market: Chemicals, Polymers

近年来,再生塑料市场正由传统的低价替代向环保减碳等方面推动的高品质回收与再利用转变。阿格斯就大家比较关心的几个问题在由拾柴环境主办的第二届硬塑回收峰会前对国龙环保董事长郭家万和拾柴的创始人王韧进行了访谈:

  • 中国再生塑料出口前景
  • 再生塑料的食品接触应用
  • 欧盟一次性塑料指令中的“镜像条款”等

您认为出口市场对您的产品有多少需求(以及针对哪些产品 - rPET、rHDPE、 rPP? 包装等级? ) ...主要出口市场是什么?

国龙郭家万:再生塑料市场应用主要是国际品牌客户的需求,大品牌企业对环保再生产品的使用,是主动履行社会责任,通过企业的行动推动废旧塑料的回收利用。在中国市场上 国际品牌企业在这两年来一直在测试,小批量试用再生塑料,在东南亚港澳市场上开始投送再生塑料包装产品,也有很多国际品牌企业生产基地在中国,他们的出口产品基本开始使用再生塑料,在日化领域是以rHDPE、rPP为主,在食品包装上是以rPET为主而且都是需要达到食品级要求,并需要取得FDA、EFSA认证!


大多数参与者都在关注回收的食品接触材料,但中国目前不允许在食品接触应用中使用回收材料。在这种情况下,中国回收商应如何发展业务?热解是否是中国回收商的合适途径?

拾柴环境王韧:目前,中国PET回收企业的高价值产品应用主要方向是纺织纤维,工业丝和其他非食品级应用,食品级rPET产品也可以满足一些个人护理产品的特殊需求,其他食品级rPET供应还包括出口中国香港和海外市场。
热裂解在中国还在探索阶段,今年国内宣布了几个商业化项目的建设,但其运行仍有待时日,仍需市场验证。今年8月27-28日我们在上海会有一个国际硬质聚烯烃回收峰会,其中就有化学回收和热解的相关议题,大家有兴趣的可以关注参与。


欧盟正在考虑在《一次性塑料指令》中加入“镜像条款”。这意味着,欧盟外的回收商向欧盟出口材料并希望这些材料计入欧盟再生含量目标时,将被要求达到与欧洲回收商相同的原料、工艺和环境标准。你预计这一政策会如何发展?你认为这会对你的业务产生什么影响?


国龙郭家万:对于国龙再生塑料来说是没有难度的,因为国龙再生的工艺技术,生产设备,环境标准都是与欧洲相同的,也是使用消费后PCR原料,这几年来,我们经过了二十多家国际品牌公司对产品的检测,验厂,生产环境等各项要求测试,安全达到他们的要求,镜像条款对于国龙再生来说是可以做到的。但对于中国很多再生企业恐怕一定的限制。如果欧盟推动这个政策,也许会通过验厂验证“一企一策”的认证许可。

作为国内回收行业的领先企业,国龙未来的发展目标是什么,近期是否有计划投资化学法回收领域?

国龙郭家万:国龙再生经过十年的发展,现在已经建立了相当大的产能,为一系列不同的用途生产回收材料(见表)。我们成功实施了涵盖食品级和工业级产品的全产业链商业模式。

 Recycling type  Capacity (t/yr)
 Food-grade rPET    60,000
 Food-grade rHDPE   20,000
 Food-grade rPP    20,000
 Pipe grade recyclates   80,000
 Industrial grade  rHDPE    20,000


您是否预计在不久的将来中国食品包装市场将开始发展再生材料市场(即法规变化)?您预计中国还会出现哪些法规变化来支持回收行业?

拾柴环境王韧:中国正在研究包装应用再生材料的安全性,这不仅仅包括再生塑料,还包括再生金属,比如易拉罐是否可以使用再生铝。本地市场也在等待相关的文件出台。
目前,国家已经出台以旧换新政策,反向发票开票政策等等,都对回收行业扩大起到促进作用,相信在垃圾分类领域,可能将是后期政府政策出台的方向。当然,建立完整的回收体系需要更多实施战略,以及更多时间来摸索发展路径和进行建设。

Related news

News
24/10/04

RECOUP 2024: Carbon the topic for the future

RECOUP 2024: Carbon the topic for the future

Carbon emissions, UK legislation and the role of industry in helping consumers to choose correctly were front of mind at last week's RECOUP conference, write Will Collins and Chloe Kinner London, 4 October (Argus) — The plastic supply chain needs to become less carbon intensive to preserve its environmental advantage compared with other materials, and supporting the recycling industry through a challenging period will play a central role, delegates heard at last week's RECOUP conference in Peterborough, UK. Plastic currently has a competitive advantage compared with many competing packaging materials when viewed through life cycle analysis of carbon emissions, particularly because its light weight reduces pollution during transport and its barrier properties lessen wastage. But this may not last forever, said Kinza Sutton from sustainable packaging organisation Plastipak, and with carbon set to be "the big topic of the future" the industry needs to focus today on reducing emissions linked to production, which she said are responsible for around two thirds of those generated over the whole lifecycle. But several speakers also emphasised the need to consider environmental gains in the context of the UK and Europe's competitiveness on the global stage. Stuart Hayward-Higham, innovation officer of waste management firm Suez, said "governments in the UK and Europe need to be conscious of the administrative burden on businesses", and called for regulators to align standards with neighbouring countries to boost efficiency and ensure a level playing field. Ermis Panagiotopoulos of global PET producer and recycler Indorama added environmental legislation has contributed to uncompetitive energy and raw materials prices in Europe, which make other regions more attractive to international companies as an investment. Participants suggested combining regulations with protective measures such as extending the carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) to include plastics, could help to ensure Europe's competitiveness. Recycling to reduce emissions Increasing recycling and the uptake of recyclates in plastic products is one of the most effective ways to reduce carbon emissions linked to plastic raw materials. But Recoup chairman Jim Armstrong highlighted the need to support the UK recycling industry. "We need infrastructure to convert the materials that we will collect, that is part of the circle. The UK recycling industry is really under pressure at the moment. The idea there's a whole queue of financial investors waiting to invest in UK recycling, that's just not true at the moment", he said. The price of plastic waste bales in the UK has fallen incrementally throughout the year, amid slow demand for domestic and export sales and a drop in the value of Packaging Recovery Notices (PRNs), which recyclers generate by processing packaging waste and which are intended to contribute to investment. And on the downstream side of the recycling industry, Biffa Polymers mothballed a 25,000t/yr mechanical recycling plant in northeast England in June owing to "extremely challenging market conditions", while Viridor announced in August it would not proceed with plans to build a chemical recycling plant in Sunderland, citing delays to UK legislation . Robbie Staniforth from packaging compliance scheme Ecosurety noted a number of incoming measures that should help UK plastic recyclers, including extended producer responsibility (EPR) and a deposit return scheme (DRS) for PET bottles. But he said the UK's plastic packaging tax (PPT), which is intended to support demand for recyclates, needs improvement. Regarding PPT, Kinza Sutton said Plastipak had expected it to drive more use of recycled material, but in fact its recycled content had dropped by 5pc since 2022. "The plastics tax [has] driven cost increases, and we've seen the average recycled content come down. We were seeing high levels of 51pc or 100pc, we're seeing a lot less of that now, companies are just reverting back down to 30pc [the minimum threshold to avoid paying PPT]". Engaging the customer Customers may support more re-use and recycling, but it is the industry's responsibility to help them make the right choices and minimise the necessary sacrifice to convenience and the cost burden, delegates heard. Gavin Ellis, co-founder of environmental organisation Hubbub, said research had shown consumers spend just two seconds on average deciding which bin to use for items of waste packaging, making clear labelling vital. A consistent approach between brands, outlets and collection systems is also important, he said. James Bull, head of packaging at Tesco, said retailers need to change products carefully, with an awareness that people have grown to rely on convenience and may be resistant to changes such as a move to a more reuse-based system. And Andrew Murray from appliance manufacturer Beko said new regulations should take into account the financial capabilities of consumers. Many households already cannot afford essential appliances, he said, making any measures that would increase the cost of the cheapest models potentially problematic. Despite the short-term challenges the industry is facing the sentiment at the event was optimistic for plastics recycling in the UK and Europe. Participants see the opportunity the industry has to lead consumers along the path to a more sustainable packaging supply chain model of reduced consumption and systems with more focus on reuse and recycling with the support of legalisation. Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Dockworkers end US port strike


24/10/03
News
24/10/03

Dockworkers end US port strike

Houston, 3 October (Argus) — US dockworkers have ended a port strike that had shut container terminals from Maine to Texas, after their union late Thursday struck a tentative agreement on wages. The International Longshoremen's Association (ILA) has agreed to extend its contract with the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX) until 15 January to provide time for negotiating the remaining outstanding issues, the ILA said in a statement. The USMX includes containership owners, terminal operators and port associations. "Effective immediately, all current job actions will cease and all work covered by the master contract will resume," the ILA said. The strike, which started on 1 October, had forced containership operators to queue up outside US east coast ports. Major container shipping agencies such as Maersk had initiated surcharges for US east coast and Gulf coast-bound containers later in October. By Jack Kaskey Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Argent to start production at new glycerine refinery


24/10/03
News
24/10/03

Argent to start production at new glycerine refinery

London, 3 October (Argus) — Biofuels producer Argent Energy is expected to commence production at its new glycerine refinery in early October, a source told Argus . The new Argent refinery, which is located at its Port of Amsterdam site, is Europe's largest facility dedicated to producing bio-based, technical-grade refined glycerine. The facility has a production capacity of 50,000 t/yr and will upgrade crude glycerine into 99.7pc technical-grade glycerine to supply the European chemical market, the company said. Technical-grade refined glycerine can be used in the production of epichlorohydrin, polyether polyol and anti-freeze, among other applications. Additionally, its use as a feedstock for biofuels generation, such as marine fuels, is being studied as it could offer a cheaper alternative to LNG and distillates. The Netherlands has the largest marine fuel sector in the EU. "Our entrance into the chemical market is driven by our goal to maximise product value and support the circular economy. By upgrading glycerine from our processes into a technical-grade product, we're giving the chemical industry a bio-based option they can confidently use in their own products," Argent Energy chief executive Louise Calviou said. The glycerine produced in Argent's new facility will be made via the biodiesel production route, with the product being certified under International Sustainability and Carbon Certification (ISCC) guidelines. Argent Energy currently has a capacity of 190,000 t/yr for waste-based biodiesel, with sites in Amsterdam and northwest England. The company plans to soon triple biofuel production at its Amsterdam site alone. By George Barsted and Carolina A. Palma Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

California textile recovery bill signed into law


24/10/02
News
24/10/02

California textile recovery bill signed into law

Houston, 2 October (Argus) — California governor Gavin Newsom (D) signed a bill into law on 28 September that will establish the US's first extended producer responsibility (EPR) textile recycling program. The law (SB 707) requires producers of apparel or textile articles in California to create a producer responsibility organization (PRO) that will handle and recycle textiles and apparel across the state, under the supervision of California's Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle). SB 707 is the first EPR system for clothing that has passed in the US and leaves a lot of leeway to the PRO and CalRecycle in implementing the law. It provides relatively few details about how the EPR program will work and does not set any minimum recycled targets. The law was written by California State Senator Josh Newman (D) and was supported by textile industry participants and recyclers. "To achieve (our corporate goal of becoming a circular business by 2030), we must partner with policymakers to support efforts in creating more circular systems for textiles and other products," IKEA US Sustainability Manager Mardi Ditze said following the bill's passage. "We applaud Senator Newman for leading a collaborative process with industry stakeholders on SB 707 and support efforts to increase textile circularity in California and across the US." The PRO is required to provide free textile recycling drop-off centers for residents of California, and CalRecycle is authorized to impose monetary penalties against producers for violations of the program's requirements under the bill. Producers will be expected to join an approved PRO by 1 July 2026, and the EPR system is planned to begin enforcement on 1 July 2030. By Hadley Medlock Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Unilateral action can tackle plastic waste: OECD


24/10/02
News
24/10/02

Unilateral action can tackle plastic waste: OECD

London, 2 October (Argus) — Only stringent global measures addressing production and waste management combined can come close to eliminating plastic leakage into the environment by 2040, a new OECD report says. The report — Policy Scenarios for Eliminating Plastic Pollution by 2040 — projects the impact of different policy measures, ranging from business as usual, through measures only aimed at boosting collection and recycling or only enacted in developed countries, up to global measures targeting both upstream production and downstream waste management. It concludes that global plastic production will grow by 69pc by 2040 — versus a 2020 baseline — if the current policy environment is maintained, whereas the recycling rate would only increase by around 5pc, resulting in a 50pc increase in the leakage of plastic into the environment. Combining measures aimed at curbing plastic demand — including production caps, development of re-use systems and increased design-for-recycling — with policies aimed at boosting collection and recycling of plastic waste could reduce virgin plastic production, boost recycling rates above 40pc and reduce leakage to near zero. In a scenario where OECD members enact measures across the supply chain while non-OECD nations focus on downstream measures, virgin plastic production would rise only slightly by 2040, from 2020, the report says. But it projects that there would still be more than 10mn t/yr of plastic waste leaking into the environment, compared with 20mn t in 2020. Furthermore, the report concludes that enacting measures across the supply chain will be the most cost-effective way of limiting the environmental impact of plastic waste. This is because upstream measures such as design-for-recycling will reduce the cost of improving collection and recycling, which will be higher in many non-OECD countries where existing waste management infrastructure is more limited. Global measures across the supply chain would cost 0.37pc of gross domestic product (GDP) in OECD countries and 0.62pc of GDP in non-OECD economies by 2040, the report projects, compared with over 0.5pc and nearly 1pc, respectively, if only downstream measures were implemented. "These costs exclude the avoided costs of inaction and should be considered in the context of vastly improved environmental outcomes", the report notes. Shaping the debate The release of the report comes ahead of the fifth and final scheduled round of UN negotiations to develop a binding global treaty to tackle plastic waste, which will begin in South Korea in November. In past sessions, there has been ongoing debate about the scope that the treaty should take. Some delegates, especially from countries with a reliance on plastic-producing industries, have so far favoured a focus on downstream measures and opposed caps on virgin plastic production. A recent change of tack from the US in support of production caps surprised many observers, but its impact on discussions will depend on how much leverage it is willing to use to convince others to follow suit. Discussions during the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee on Plastic Pollution on 25 September in New York showed member countries are still far apart in terms of policy agreements, with frustration sometimes visible from a few diplomats about the lack of progress in certain areas. Negotiations up to this point indicate that achieving the OECD's ideal scenario for tackling plastic waste will be extremely challenging. By Will Collins Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.