Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest Market News

Yara curtails 2023 European ammonia production by 19pc

  • Spanish Market: Fertilizers, Natural gas
  • 25/03/24

Europe's largest fertiliser producer Yara operated its European ammonia plants at nearly a fifth below their capacity last year, despite its weighted-average gas costs more than halving compared with 2022.

Yara curtailed 19pc — or 890,000t — of its ammonia production capacity last year, while it curbed its finished fertiliser production capacity by 15pc, it said in its annual report released last week. This was distinctly below ammonia curtailments of 35pc in 2022, when the firm insisted it "will not produce or sell at negative margins".

Yara's European plants have an average efficiency rate of roughly 36mn Btu per tonne of ammonia produced, according to ArgusConsulting estimates, which implies that 890,000t of lost ammonia production is equivalent to about 786mn m³ of gas demand. That said, the firm prioritised production at its most efficient plants such as Sluiskil in the Netherlands and Brunsbuttel in Germany, from which it exported to its less efficient sites where production ran at lower rates.

Yara curtailed nearly a fifth of its ammonia capacity, despite its European weighted-average gas cost more than halving to $14.90/mn Btu from $31.80/mn Btu in 2022. Prices were still much higher than in previous years — they were lowest at just $3.60/mn Btu in 2020 (see prices graph).

Yara's global ammonia production edged down to 6.39mn t in 2023, from 6.51mn t in 2022. And it stayed well below a 2019 peak of 8.48mn t in 2019, suggesting the firm has moved more towards imports to bolster its own production, rather than prioritising strong run rates at its facilities.

Yara operates in a "world of volatility" because of military conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, which affect global supply chains, the firm said. "Strengthened operational flexibility" remains a priority in this context, it said.

The firm has warned repeatedly of geopolitical risks associated with an influx of Russian fertiliser output fed by gas that is much cheaper than in Europe. "Vladimir Putin is using fertilisers as a weapon of war," Yara said. "We're sleepwalking into repeating the same mistake with fertilisers as we did with Russian energy imports," Yara's chief executive Svein Tore Holsether told Argus in February.

But Yara expects higher European production in 2024, as gas prices have continued to come down while fertilisers prices have held firm. Assuming stable gas purchases, gas costs in the first and second quarters could be $320mn and $100mn lower, respectively, than in the same period last year, Yara said in February. The firm suggested its European ammonia assets could run at or above 90pc of capacity.

In regions with "efficient gas markets", Yara seeks exposure to spot market prices "unless exceptional market circumstances clearly give reason for deviation", it said. But in regions without such "efficient" gas markets, the firm prefers entering longer-term contracts "if favourable gas prices are obtainable". Yara has a "high" risk appetite for exposure to gas prices because securing access to, and stable supply of, favourably-priced gas is "imperative to our operations and competitiveness", the firm said. "All of our European gas contracts are hub-based, and we are well positioned to cover the risk of spot exposure," Yara said. At the same time, up to 70pc of its European plants can operate on imported ammonia.

Yara's largest gas suppliers are Engie, Shell, Equinor, India's Gail, and Trinidad and Tobago's national gas company, it said. The firm consumed just under 6bn m³ globally in 2023, down from a peak of 6.87bn m³ in 2019 (see gas consumption graph).

Yara weighted-average gas costs $/mn Btu

Yara global gas consumption bn m³

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

22/11/25

Cop: Cop 30 leaves fossil fuels out of final deal

Cop: Cop 30 leaves fossil fuels out of final deal

Belem, 22 November (Argus) — The UN Cop 30 climate summit concluded today without a deal on a plan to shift away from fossil fuels, but with a promise from the Brazilian Cop 30 presidency to oversee the creation of a roadmap on the issue. The presidency also pledged the creation of a roadmap on reversing deforestation. The roadmaps will sit outside Cop negotiations, although countries and organisations will be invited to submit input. Progress will be reported at Cop 31 in late 2026. At least 80 countries , including EU members, the UK, Latin American nations, island states and UN-designated least developed countries (LDCs) had pushed for the overarching Cop 30 text to address a shift away from fossil fuels, but options for a roadmap did not make the final decision. Instead, the main text agreed on the launch of a "global implementation accelerator", and the "Belém Mission to 1.5". These initiatives are aimed at "enabling ambition and implementation" of countries' climate plans and at keeping the 1.5°C temperature limit of the Paris Agreement in reach. This refers to the more ambitious goal of the Paris accord — to hold the global rise in temperature to below 2°C above pre-industrial levels, and preferably to 1.5°C. Other outcomes adopted today, including workstreams on a just energy transition and a mitigation — cutting emissions — work programme, neglected to mention a phase-out or shift away from fossil fuels. But countries did acknowledge that "the global transition towards low greenhouse gas emissions and climate-resilient development is irreversible and the trend of the future". The EU and other supporters of a roadmap for a transition away from fossil fuels did not oppose the main text today, even though some yesterday had signalled that they could, and the text was adopted swiftly. German environment minister Carsten Schneider said that opposing the text would have signalled a lack of cooperation from the international community. The main outcome text released today, dubbed ‘Mutirao' — a Portuguese term harnessed by the Cop 30 presidency to encourage engagement and action, that roughly translates to collective mobilisation — attempted to address four contentious items that had been left off the summit's official agenda. These comprised climate finance, unilateral trade measures, a response to countries' climate plans — collectively misaligned with Paris Agreement targets — and emissions reporting. Plenary suspension Other texts in the so-called political package were quickly adopted, but Colombia spoke out against the mitigation work programme — unless language on the transition away from fossil fuels was added. Correa do Lago suspended the plenary while the Cop 30 presidency sought a solution. Decisions ‘gavelled through', or adopted, at Cops cannot be revoked. But Correa do Lago said that countries will be able to discuss issues in June 2026 in Bonn, Germany, at interim climate talks hosted annually by UN climate body the UNFCCC. The intervention prompted stark responses from Saudi Arabia and Russia, which have opposed the addition of wording on fossil fuel throughout the summit, according to French climate minister Monique Barbut. Schneider also said calls for language on transitioning away from fossil fuels faced strong opposition from oil-producing countries. Colombia has led other nations in calling for a fossil fuel phase-out, and this week announced that it would co-host talks on the topic with the Netherlands in April. Its declaration at Cop 30 calling for a fossil fuel phase-out was signed by countries including hydrocarbon producers Australia, Mexico, and Denmark. Nigeria, the largest oil producer in Africa, said in response to Colombia in the closing plenary that "a successful transition cannot be imposed" and that it would not support anything that would lead to "a sudden economic contraction". The LDCs did not see the ambition they were looking for in Belem, the group's chair, and chief environment officer at Malawi's climate ministry Evans Njewa told Argus today. The group will start preparing for Cop 31 in Turkey and aim to get their demands over the line at Cop 32, he said. Cop 32 will be held in Ethiopia , an LDC. Adaptation trade-off While many nations pushed for stronger action on reducing emissions, developing nations called for increased finance for adaptation — adjusting to the effects of climate change where possible. Some European countries signalled they were concerned that if they did not agree to the text, some countries — including major oil producers — would have framed them as finance ‘blockers' for poorer developing nations. The Mutirao decision "calls for efforts to at least triple adaptation finance by 2035" — within the framework of the Cop 29 decision. It "urges developed country parties to increase the trajectory of their collective provision of climate finance for adaptation" to developing nations. Countries agreed at Cop 29 that developed nations would provide $300bn/yr in climate finance to developing countries by 2035. But at Cop 30 developing countries, led by the LDCs and small island developing states (Sids), pushed for adaptation finance to triple to $120bn/yr by 2030. On unilateral trade, the Mutirao document affirmed that countries should "cooperate to promote a supportive and open international economic system that would lead to sustainable economic growth and development". It also stated that "measures taken to combat climate change, including unilateral ones, should not constitute a means of arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination or a disguised restriction on international trade". This is likely to be welcomed by some developing nations. Several have used climate talks to raise their objection to the EU's carbon border adjustment mechanism. UNFCCC executive secretary Simon Stiell acknowledged the intense challenges in the shape of "stormy political waters" that the Cop process has faced this year. "But amid the gale-force political headwinds, 194 countries stood firm in solidarity — rock-solid in support of climate cooperation", Stiell said. By Caroline Varin, Georgia Gratton and Lucas Parolin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

FERC terminates ‘safe harbor’ rulemaking: Correction


22/11/25
22/11/25

FERC terminates ‘safe harbor’ rulemaking: Correction

Rewrites throughout to reflect FERC decision to terminate "safe harbor" rulemaking Houston, 22 November (Argus) — The US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is terminating a rulemaking to codify "safe harbor" language for companies that report natural gas and electricity transactions to price reporting agencies but said it remains committed to that policy. FERC has long maintained a presumption that companies submitting data to Argus and other price index developers do so in good faith and that it would not pursue enforcement actions against market participants that make "inadvertent reporting errors". In 2020, FERC proposed a rulemaking to codify the safe harbor policy to eliminate any concerns it might depart from that approach. FERC on 20 November voted unanimously to end the safe harbor rulemaking, noting that the number of companies providing data to index developers has increased since the rule was first proposed. "For over two decades the commission has neither investigated nor imposed penalties on any company for inadvertent reporting errors," FERC said. "We remain committed to the safe harbor policy, as it promotes robust, voluntary reporting to index developers." In 2022, FERC adopted a revised policy statement that allowed data providers to report monthly transactions to index developers without having to submit daily trades. At the same time, FERC deferred action on the safe harbor rulemaking, but it reiterated that the safe harbor policy "remains in effect". In addition, some developers have included fixed-price transactions from the Intercontinental Exchange and have demonstrated that they adhere to the commission's standards through a reapproval process for indexes to be referenced in jurisdictional tariffs. Argus , S&P Global Platts and Natural Gas Intelligence are among the price reporting agencies that publish natural gas indexes. By Jason Womack and Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Cop: Summit in overtime as countries deadlocked: Update


22/11/25
22/11/25

Cop: Summit in overtime as countries deadlocked: Update

Adds comments from a European delegation. Belem, 22 November (Argus) — Countries are unable to agree on including a so-called roadmap for a shift away from fossil fuels in an outcome decision for the UN Cop 30 climate summit, which has now moved into overtime. No closing plenary — which would allow countries to discuss and agree to any conclusions and decisions — was scheduled at the time of writing. The summit, which started on 10 November, was scheduled to finish today. It is taking place in Belem, northern Brazil. Discussions had not progressed during a meeting of all delegations earlier, which went on for more than four hours, Panama's special envoy for climate change Juan Carlos Gomez said. Country delegations are now meeting separately with the Cop 30 presidency and discussions are ongoing. A draft decision text released early on 21 November by the Cop 30 presidency contained no mention of moving away from fossil fuels, sparking disappointment from many delegations. More than 80 countries had called for a roadmap addressing a shift away from fossil fuels to be included in the summit's outcome. The Brazilian presidency is not ready to change the text, as it says that a majority of countries in the negotiations stands behind it, a European country delegation said. The text released this morning "is a Brics text — Saudi Arabia is happy and probably China and India can live with this, but this should not be acceptable for Europe", member of European Parliament Bas Eickhout told Argus . It is too weak on cutting emissions and moving away from fossil fuels, he said. "If it stays like this no deal is better than a bad deal", Eickhout said. Brazilian president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva "raised the stakes" and it is up to him to "deliver on it", Eickhout said. He noted that Lula is in South Africa for the G20 summit, so "might do some useful work there". Lula called on world leaders to overcome dependence on fossil fuels at a summit ahead of Cop 30. Europeans are increasingly isolated in their support for a text including mentions of fossil fuels, even on language that has been already agreed at previous summits, a European delegation said. And some fear that they could bear the responsibility for the summit's failure, it added. European countries would like to be able to hear countries positions in a plenary, but the presidency signalled that there will only be a closing plenary to agree the packages, according to the delegation. Developing nations have determined climate finance — specifically finance for adaptation, or adjusting to the effects of climate change — as their ‘red line' at this Cop. UN-designated groups small island developing states (Sids) and least developed countries (LDCs) have called for adaptation finance to triple to $120bn/yr by 2030. Sids and LDCs are the most vulnerable to the effects of climate change. The EU — the single largest climate finance donor — signalled multiple times today that it is ready to open a discussion on adaptation finance. The bloc has suggested that any increase must remain within the goal agreed at Cop 29 , of $300bn/yr in climate finance by 2035. But the EU wants to see ambition on mitigation — cutting emissions — in the Cop 30 outcome text first. "The biggest sticking point for us is ambition", UK energy minister Ed Miliband told reporters today. Support for language on transitioning away from fossil fuels at Cop 30 needs to grow beyond the countries already backing a roadmap, such as the EU, Latin American nations, some Sids and the UK. But other countries, typically large oil and gas producers, are seeking to restrain the fossil fuel discussion and frame it as a trade-off between mitigation and adaptation. Countries are working on "getting as far as we can in the time that we've got available. And also sending a message to the world that… 193 countries realise that working together to tackle this global problem is better than going it alone", Miliband said. By Caroline Varin and Lucas Parolin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Cop: Summit in overtime as countries remain deadlocked


21/11/25
21/11/25

Cop: Summit in overtime as countries remain deadlocked

Belem, 21 November (Argus) — Countries are unable to agree on including a so-called roadmap for a shift away from fossil fuels in an outcome decision for the UN Cop 30 climate summit, which has now moved into overtime. No closing plenary — which would allow countries to discuss and agree to any conclusions and decisions — was scheduled at the time of writing. The summit, which started on 10 November, was scheduled to finish today. It is taking place in Belem, northern Brazil. Discussions had not progressed during a meeting of all delegations earlier, which went on for more than four hours, Panama's special envoy for climate change Juan Carlos Gomez said. Country delegations are now meeting separately with the Cop 30 presidency and discussions are ongoing. A draft decision text released early on 21 November by the Cop 30 presidency contained no mention of moving away from fossil fuels, sparking disappointment from many delegations. More than 80 countries had called for a roadmap addressing a shift away from fossil fuels to be included in the summit's outcome. The text released this morning "is a Brics text — Saudi Arabia is happy and probably China and India can live with this, but this should not be acceptable for Europe", member of European Parliament Bas Eickhout told Argus . It is too weak on cutting emissions and moving away from fossil fuels, he said. "If it stays like this no deal is better than a bad deal", Eickhout said. Brazilian president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva "raised the stakes" and it is up to him to "deliver on it", Eickhout said. He noted that Lula is in South Africa for the G20 summit, so "might do some useful work there". Lula called on world leaders to overcome dependence on fossil fuels at a summit ahead of Cop 30. Developing nations have determined climate finance — specifically finance for adaptation, or adjusting to the effects of climate change — as their ‘red line' at this Cop. UN-designated groups small island developing states (Sids) and least developed countries (LDCs) have called for adaptation finance to triple to $120bn/yr by 2030. Sids and LDCs are the most vulnerable to the effects of climate change. The EU — the single largest climate finance donor — signalled multiple times today that it is ready to open a discussion on adaptation finance. The bloc has suggested that any increase must remain within the goal agreed at Cop 29 , of $300bn/yr in climate finance by 2035. But the EU wants to see ambition on mitigation — cutting emissions — in the Cop 30 outcome text first. "The biggest sticking point for us is ambition", UK energy minister Ed Miliband told reporters today. Support for language on transitioning away from fossil fuels at Cop 30 needs to grow beyond the countries already backing a roadmap, such as the EU, Latin American nations, some Sids and the UK. But other countries, typically large oil and gas producers, are seeking to restrain the fossil fuel discussion and frame it as a trade-off between mitigation and adaptation. Countries are working on "getting as far as we can in the time that we've got available. And also sending a message to the world that… 193 countries realise that working together to tackle this global problem is better than going it alone", Miliband said. By Caroline Varin and Lucas Parolin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Turkey could export more gas to Serbia this winter


21/11/25
21/11/25

Turkey could export more gas to Serbia this winter

London, 21 November (Argus) — Turkish state-run Botas could export gas to Serbia in the first quarter of 2026 to ease contract and supply pressure related to Russian gas, provided that Turkey has spare supply. Serbia's long-term agreement with Russia's Gazprom for 2.2bn m³/yr, which was initially set to expire on 31 May this year, was extended until 31 December. The parties have been negotiating over a new contract for most of this year, but have not agreed on pricing and a delivery schedule yet. Serbia expects the deal to be extended for a fourth time until the end of March to cover the heating period, Srbijagas chief executive Dusan Bajatovic said on 17 November. But if Russian supply stops because of contract issues, Serbia has alternative supply options, including Turkey, Bajatovic added. Gazprom deliveries through the onshore continuation of the 43mn m³/d Turkish Stream pipeline remain the main supply source for Serbia, Bosnia-Herzegovina and North Macedonia. These deliveries enter the Bulgarian grid at the Strandzha 2/Malkoclar point on the Turkish border and reach Serbia through the 38mn m³/d Kireevo/Zaychar point. Judging by net flows to Serbia from Bulgaria and further exports to Hungary, roughly 91 GWh/d, or 8mn m³/d, was delivered to Serbia on 1 January-20 November. That said, this includes volumes transported on further to Bosnia-Herzegovina at the Zvornik point. Turkey as an alternative supplier Utilisation of large Turkish regasification capacity could result in spare supply in Turkey and potential exports to Serbia, despite quickly growing domestic consumption. Turkey already exports gas to Serbia, but only via LNG trucks and in limited volumes. Firms have exported to Serbia only in September in 2025 — at 50,000m³ — while 140,000m³ was delivered by truck over the whole of last year. But there is enough spare capacity at the Turkish-Bulgarian border and the Kalotina/Dimitrovgrad and Kireevo/Zaychar points between Bulgaria and Serbia. Bulgartransgaz has received 1.6bn m³ of gas this year at Strandzha 1/Malkoclar on the Turkish border, which has entry capacity of about 4bn m³/yr, compared with 1.8bn m³ in all of 2024. If Botas and Srbijagas reach a gas agreement for January 2026 right after the currently expected expiry of Russian supply, Botas will have tariff advantage since it acts as both supplier and gas grid operator in Turkey. But Botas' trading arm would have to pay on paper at least €3.19/MWh to deliver gas to the Bulgarian side, according to its published tariffs for this gas year. And for monthly deliveries in January 2026 to the Kalotina/Dimitrovgrad point, Bulgarian system operator Bulgartransgaz quotes a combined transport, volume and balancing fee of €0.86/MWh, according to the operator's tariff calculator. If the gas goes to the Kireevo/Zaychar point, the price rises to €1.16/MWh, not including VAT. In Serbia, the entry fee to the grid for January is €1.07/MWh, while using the Kireevo/Zaychar route adds an average commodity fee of €0.15–0.20/MWh, according to traders. In any event, a potential supply deal would only be possible if Turkey has excess gas to export. Turkey has large sendout capacity , but rising consumption may make Turkey hesitant to enter into an export deal for a winter of uncertain severity. That said, if Turkey can utilise its 161mn m³/d of LNG regasification capacity during periods of sufficient pipeline supply, it could provide Serbia with the short-term supply flexibility it needs. Azerbaijan unlikely to increase exports to Serbia It is unlikely that Azerbaijan would increase deliveries to Serbia in the short term given the limited growth in domestic production and fully utilised export capacity to Europe. Bajatovic said Azerbaijan cannot send additional gas this winter. Azerbaijan produced a total of 38.2bn m³ of gas at its four fields in January-September 2025 , up by 3pc from 37.1bn m³ in the same period last year, based on the latest Azeri ministry data. This increase is in line with the scheduled capacity rise of the 10bn m³/yr Trans-Adriatic Pipeline (TAP) from January 2026 by 1.16bn m³/yr. But this additional capacity has already been allocated to Italian customers, leaving no excess supply for Serbia. Srbijagas and its Azeri counterpart Socar have a delivery contract for 400mn m³ during 2024–26, probably through the 1.8bn m³/yr Bulgaria-Serbia Interconnector, which passes through Kalotina/Dimitrovgrad. In addition, the sides signed a short-term agreement for an extra 1mn m³/d for delivery in the 2024–25 winter. Serbia received 272mn m³ of gas through the Kalotina/Dimitrovgrad point on 1 January-19 November this year, compared with 108mn m³ in all of 2024, according to Bulgartransgaz data. By Ugur Yildirim Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more