Yara curtails 2023 European ammonia production by 19pc

  • : Fertilizers, Natural gas
  • 24/03/25

Europe's largest fertiliser producer Yara operated its European ammonia plants at nearly a fifth below their capacity last year, despite its weighted-average gas costs more than halving compared with 2022.

Yara curtailed 19pc — or 890,000t — of its ammonia production capacity last year, while it curbed its finished fertiliser production capacity by 15pc, it said in its annual report released last week. This was distinctly below ammonia curtailments of 35pc in 2022, when the firm insisted it "will not produce or sell at negative margins".

Yara's European plants have an average efficiency rate of roughly 36mn Btu per tonne of ammonia produced, according to ArgusConsulting estimates, which implies that 890,000t of lost ammonia production is equivalent to about 786mn m³ of gas demand. That said, the firm prioritised production at its most efficient plants such as Sluiskil in the Netherlands and Brunsbuttel in Germany, from which it exported to its less efficient sites where production ran at lower rates.

Yara curtailed nearly a fifth of its ammonia capacity, despite its European weighted-average gas cost more than halving to $14.90/mn Btu from $31.80/mn Btu in 2022. Prices were still much higher than in previous years — they were lowest at just $3.60/mn Btu in 2020 (see prices graph).

Yara's global ammonia production edged down to 6.39mn t in 2023, from 6.51mn t in 2022. And it stayed well below a 2019 peak of 8.48mn t in 2019, suggesting the firm has moved more towards imports to bolster its own production, rather than prioritising strong run rates at its facilities.

Yara operates in a "world of volatility" because of military conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, which affect global supply chains, the firm said. "Strengthened operational flexibility" remains a priority in this context, it said.

The firm has warned repeatedly of geopolitical risks associated with an influx of Russian fertiliser output fed by gas that is much cheaper than in Europe. "Vladimir Putin is using fertilisers as a weapon of war," Yara said. "We're sleepwalking into repeating the same mistake with fertilisers as we did with Russian energy imports," Yara's chief executive Svein Tore Holsether told Argus in February.

But Yara expects higher European production in 2024, as gas prices have continued to come down while fertilisers prices have held firm. Assuming stable gas purchases, gas costs in the first and second quarters could be $320mn and $100mn lower, respectively, than in the same period last year, Yara said in February. The firm suggested its European ammonia assets could run at or above 90pc of capacity.

In regions with "efficient gas markets", Yara seeks exposure to spot market prices "unless exceptional market circumstances clearly give reason for deviation", it said. But in regions without such "efficient" gas markets, the firm prefers entering longer-term contracts "if favourable gas prices are obtainable". Yara has a "high" risk appetite for exposure to gas prices because securing access to, and stable supply of, favourably-priced gas is "imperative to our operations and competitiveness", the firm said. "All of our European gas contracts are hub-based, and we are well positioned to cover the risk of spot exposure," Yara said. At the same time, up to 70pc of its European plants can operate on imported ammonia.

Yara's largest gas suppliers are Engie, Shell, Equinor, India's Gail, and Trinidad and Tobago's national gas company, it said. The firm consumed just under 6bn m³ globally in 2023, down from a peak of 6.87bn m³ in 2019 (see gas consumption graph).

Yara weighted-average gas costs $/mn Btu

Yara global gas consumption bn m³

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

24/05/10

Inundações podem prejudicar logística no Sul do Brasil

Inundações podem prejudicar logística no Sul do Brasil

Sao Paulo, 10 May (Argus) — Enchentes sem precedentes no estado do Rio Grande do Sul devem criar uma situação logística ainda mais caótica no país e podem reduzir o uso de fertilizantes na safra de soja 2024-25 do estado. Chuvas intensas atingem o estado desde 29 de abril, culminando nas piores enchentes já registradas no Rio Grande do Sul. As enchentes alcançaram a área central do estado, fechando os portos de Pelotas e Porto Alegre, que movimentam commodities agrícolas, incluindo grãos, oleaginosas e fertilizantes. Os níveis elevados de água devem chegar até o Sul do estado, alcançando o porto de Rio Grande. Os três portos do Rio Grande do Sul movimentaram cerca de 44,8 milhões de toneladas (t) em 2023, sendo o porto de Rio Grande o maior deles, respondendo por pelo menos 42,6 milhões de t, de acordo com dados portuários. O perfil geográfico do estado e um canal particularmente estreito para o escoamento das águas até o mar sugerem que o pior ainda está por vir na parte Sul do estado. Os níveis de água devem aumentar na Lagoa dos Patos, um lago que recebe águas de diversos rios e desemboca no Oceano Atlântico. Porém, as operações estão acontecendo normalmente no porto de Rio Grande até 9 de maio. A Associação Nacional dos Exportadores de Cereais (Anec) projeta que 343.250t de soja e 131.778t de farelo de soja sejam embarcados na semana encerrada em 11 de maio, de acordo com o cronograma de embarques do porto. Os embarques entre 28 de abril e 4 de maio — que representam os dias em que as chuvas atingiram seu pico e o estado começou a inundar — totalizaram 183.559t e 133.424t de soja e farelo de soja, respectivamente. Dados de lineup da agência marítima Williams mostram que as exportações de soja devem totalizar 838.600t, quase o dobro do volume projetado na semana anterior. O tempo médio estimado de espera para embarque aumentou para 3 dias, em comparação com 2 dias estimados em 29 de abril. O porto de Rio Grande foi o 5º maior exportador de soja em 2023, com 3,8 milhões de t embarcadas no ano passado, de acordo com a Agência Nacional de Transportes Aquaviários (Antaq). O tempo de espera para descarga de fertilizantes está em torno de 1 dia, estável em comparação com a semana anterior. O porto de Rio Grande foi o 3º maior em termos de volumes de importação de fertilizantes no 1º trimestre de 2024, de acordo com dados da agência marítima Unimar. O porto de Paranaguá, no Paraná, recebeu 2 milhões de t de fertilizantes, seguido de Santos e Rio Grande, com 1,9 milhão de t e 990.640t, respectivamente. Dados de lineup para maio e junho apontam que Rio Grande deve receber 540.900t e 66.375t de fertilizantes, respectivamente. Os navios com destino a Rio Grande podem ser direcionados para outros portos, especialmente para São Franciso do Sul, em Santa Catarina, e Paranaguá, de acordo com participantes de mercado. Mesmo que os volumes de fertilizantes sejam descarregados conforme planejado inicialmente, o escoamento para as áreas agrícolas pode ficar comprometido. O principal acesso ao porto, a rodovia BR-116, já está parcialmente bloqueada, dificultando o fluxo de caminhões no estado. Os motoristas já buscam trechos curtos para transportar mercadorias, uma vez que os trechos longos os obrigam a procurar alternativas que elevam ainda mais o percurso, considerando que há cerca de 88 bloqueios parciais ou totais em rodovias no estado até 9 de maio. A empresa de logística Rumo também interrompeu parcialmente as operações no Rio Grande do Sul em 6 de maio. A empresa possui um terminal de grãos no porto de Rio Grande e uma malha ferroviária de cerca de 7.220km na região Sul do Brasil, que inclui os estados do Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Catarina e Paraná. Empresas de fertilizantes que atuam no Rio Grande do Sul relataram que estão tentando mover seus produtos para armazéns longes dos rios. Considerando a produção agrícola, os volumes que já foram colhidos e estavam armazenados em silos, estão encharcados agora. Com a previsão de mais danos, agricultores do Rio Grande do Sul podem se sentir desencorajados a investir em tecnologias e fertilizantes para a próxima safra de soja 2024-25. Mais chuvas para o fim de semana O Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia (Inmet) espera que as chuvas se intensifiquem novamente no Rio Grande do Sul, começando nesta sexta-feira, entre as regiões Centro-Norte e Oeste do estado. Os níveis de chuva devem diminuir até 12 de maio, mas podem ultrapassar 100mm antes disso. As áreas litorâneas das regiões Norte e Sul de Santa Catarina também devem ser afetadas, de acordo com o Inmet. Por Renata Cardarelli e Nathalia Giannetti Envie comentários e solicite mais informações em feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . Todos os direitos reservados.

Lack of infrastructure to hamper VLAC development


24/05/10
24/05/10

Lack of infrastructure to hamper VLAC development

London, 10 May (Argus) — Development of a very large ammonia carrier (VLAC) market could be delayed by a lack of terminal infrastructure to allow discharge of 40,000-60,000t cargoes, said Steem1960 ammonia shipbroker Lisa Maria Assmann at the Argus Clean Ammonia conference in Tokyo. Around 40 VLACs are scheduled to hit the water between 2026 and 2028, when an uptake in clean ammonia trade is likely to be pushed by public tenders from South Korea and Japan. "VLACs cannot discharge these large volumes using the existing infrastructure," Assmann said. "We have storages that are much smaller than that, terminals with draft issues, LOA (length overall) issues. With all these problems, I do not see these large volumes being discharged in a speedy manner in the short-term, not before 2035-40 at least." In the larger segment of gas carriers, the very large gas carriers (VLGCs) built between 2009 and 2022 cannot carry ammonia cargoes, according to the shipbroker. These vessels were built when there were no expectations of carrying ammonia at such volumes, and the capability was not included to save costs at that time. "By 2030 we may have about 150 VLGCs available to carry ammonia, either at 86pc or 95pc capacity, but that is still a discussion for the future because we still do not have the infrastructure in place for the discharge," Asmann said. Ship-to-ship transfers from larger to smaller vessels could be a solution in the medium term, Assmann said, but she pondered that even then there are regulation issues that would hamper its widespread use. By Yohanna Pinheiro Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

India's Chhara LNG terminal to start operations by Oct


24/05/10
24/05/10

India's Chhara LNG terminal to start operations by Oct

Mumbai, 10 May (Argus) — Indian state-run refiner Hindustan Petroleum (HPCL) will start up its 5mn t/yr Chhara LNG import terminal by October, a company official said in an investor call today. This follows commissioning delays after the firm faced difficulty in unloading its first cargo last month. The 160,000m³ Maran Gas Mystras vessel failed to unload at the terminal because of a "swell in the rough sea beyond permittable limit," the official added. The facility is set to be closed from 15 May-15 September because of the monsoon season. The firm will be ready to receive LNG cargoes from October as its pipeline that begins at the terminal and stretches over 40km to Gundala village in Gujarat is now complete, the official said. The pipeline is further connected to Gujarat State Petronet's city gas distribution network to Somnath district, a total stretch of 86.6km. The LNG vessel that arrived in mid-April at the terminal was left stranded for over a week as it could not achieve mooring mode after berthing, because of inclement weather and the lack of a breakwater facility at the terminal, a source close to the matter told Argus . Rough weather and sea conditions caused the vessel to hit the fenders, resulting in damage. Almost five loading arms were also broken before the whole operation was abandoned on 18 April, the source added. The fender acts as a buffer or cushion between the ship hull and the dock, and prevents damage as a result of contact between the two surfaces. HPCL is building a breakwater facility at the terminal which is required to ensure safe LNG tanker berthing during India's monsoon season. No specific timeline has been given for building the breakwater, but the terminal will be able to operate year-round once it is completed. Indian state-controlled refiner IOC brought in the distressed vessel through a tender seeking approximately 80mn m³ of regasified LNG for delivery to the 17.5mn t/yr Dahej terminal at around $8.40/mn Btu on a des equivalent. HPCL also has not awarded a tender that is seeking another early-May delivery cargo , which closed on 19 April. Commissioning of the Chhara LNG terminal has been delayed since September 2022 owing to pipeline issues. The terminal is the country's eighth LNG import facility, which would lift total regasification capacity to 52.7mn t/yr from 47.7mn t/yr currently. By Rituparna Ghosh Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Korea's Kogas seeks short-term, long-term LNG from 2025


24/05/10
24/05/10

Korea's Kogas seeks short-term, long-term LNG from 2025

Singapore, 10 May (Argus) — South Korea's major importer Kogas is seeking short-term and long-term LNG through two separate tenders. The firm is seeking at least 700,000 t/yr of LNG for delivery over 2025-27, through a tender that will close on 3 June. Offers can be linked to a northeast Asian spot LNG price, Brent or Henry Hub. Kogas is also separately seeking 700,000 t/yr, 1.4mn t/yr or 2.1mn t/yr of LNG over a duration of 7-15 years, starting from 2027 or 2028. The firm is seeking offers on a fob or des basis, although it has specified a minimum vessel size of 135,000m³ for fob offers. Offers can be linked to either Brent or Henry Hub, and the deadline for submission is at 12am Korea time (3pm GMT) on 10 June. The firm's latest long-term requirement comes on the heels of another long-term agreement that it signed with BP just last month, for up to 9.8mn t of LNG over 11 years from mid-2026. This also comes after South Korea's trade, industry and energy ministry (Motie) announced on 2 May that Kogas will continue to seek new term import contracts for the super-chilled fuel, to stabilise prices and meet higher domestic gas demand. The renewed focus on securing term supply has come at an interesting time with spot LNG prices in a downward trend since late last year, right in the middle of the winter season when prices typically peak. The front half-month of the ANEA — the Argus assessment for spot LNG deliveries to northeast Asia — was last assessed at $10.165/mn Btu on 10 May, a drop of 40pc since prices peaked on 23 October 2023. More LNG importers are also seeking term volumes over 2025-27, which is widely deemed to be a period during which LNG supply could be tighter as it is just before the new US liquefaction capacity fully hits the market. Higher nuclear availability in South Korea over the upcoming northern hemisphere summer season could weigh on LNG demand over the season. The country may also further trim its LNG use in the years to come, as it increases its reliance on nuclear power generation. By Rou Urn Lee Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Japan’s J-Power steps up coal-fired power phase-out


24/05/10
24/05/10

Japan’s J-Power steps up coal-fired power phase-out

Osaka, 10 May (Argus) — Japanese power producer and wholesaler J-Power is stepping up efforts to halt operations of inefficient coal-fired power plants, while pushing ahead with decarbonisation of its existing plants by using clean fuels and technology. J-Power plans to scrap the 500MW Matsushima No.1 coal-fired unit by the end of March 2025 and the 250MW Takasago No.1 and No.2 coal-fired units by 2030, according to its 2024-26 business strategy announced on 9 May. It also aims to decommission or mothball the 700MW Takehara No.3 and the 1,000MW Matsuura No.1 coal-fired units in 2030. The combined capacity of the selected five coal-fired units accounts for 32pc of J-Power's total thermal capacity of 8,412MW, all fuelled by coal. While phasing out its ageing coal-fired capacity, J-Power is looking to co-fire with fuel ammonia at the 2,100MW Tachibanawan coal-fired plant sometime after 2030 and ensure it runs on 100pc ammonia subsequently. The company plans to increase the mixture of biomass at the 600MW Takehara No.1 unit, along with the installation of a carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology after 2030. The CCS technology will be also applied to the 1,000MW Matsuura No.2 unit, which is expected to co-fire ammonia, after 2030. J-Power plans to use hydrogen at the 1,200MW Isogo plant sometime after 2035. The company is also set to deploy integrated coal gasification combined-cycle and CCS technology at the 500MW Matsushima No.2 unit and the 150MW Ishikawa No.1 and No.2 units after 2035. The company aims to cut carbon dioxide emissions from its domestic power generation by 46pc by the April 2030-March 2031 fiscal year against 2013-14 levels before achieving a net zero emissions goal by 2050. This is in line with Tokyo's emissions reduction target. The company aims to expand domestic annual renewable output by 4TWh by 2030-31 compared with 2022-23, along with decarbonising thermal capacity. Its renewable generation totalled 10.4TWh in 2023-24. Tokyo has pledged to phase out existing inefficient coal-fired capacity by 2030, which could target units with less than 42pc efficiency. The country's large-scale power producers have reduced annual power output from their inefficient coal-fired fleet by 13TWh to 103TWh in 2022-23 against 2019-20, according to a document unveiled by the trade and industry ministry on 8 May. It expects such power generation will fall further by more than 60TWh to 39.700TWh in 2030-31. Global pressure against coal-fired power generation has been growing. Energy ministers from G7 countries in late April pledged to phase out "unabated coal power generation" by 2035 or "in a timeline consistent with keeping a limit of 1.5°C temperature rise within reach, in line with countries' net zero pathways". By Motoko Hasegawa Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more