EU adopts sustainability due diligence rules

  • : Coal, Crude oil, Natural gas
  • 24/04/24

The European parliament has formally approved a Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), which will require large EU companies to make "best efforts" for climate change mitigation.

The law will mean that relevant companies will have to adopt a transition plan to make their business model compatible with the 1.5°C temperature limit set by the Paris climate agreement. It will apply to EU firms with over 1,000 employees and turnover above €450mn ($481mn). It will also apply to some companies with franchising or licensing agreements in the EU.

The directive requires transposition into different EU national laws. It obliges member states to ensure relevant firms adopt and put into effect a transition plan for climate change mitigation. Transition plans must aim to "ensure, through best efforts" that business models and company strategies are compatible with transition to a sustainable economy, limiting global warming to 1.5°C and achieving climate neutrality by 2050. Where "relevant", the plans should limit "exposure of the company to coal-, oil- and gas-related activities".

Despite a provisional agreement, EU states initially failed to formally approve the provisional agreement reached with parliament in December, after some member states blocked the deal. Parliament's adoption — at its last session before breaking for EU elections — paves the way for entry into force later in the year.

Industry has obtained clarification, in the non-legal introduction, that the directive's requirements are an "obligation of means and not of results" with "due account" being given to progress that firms make as well as the "complexity and evolving" nature of climate transitioning.

Still, firms' climate transition plans need to contain "time-bound" targets for 2030 and in five-year intervals until 2050 based on "conclusive scientific" evidence and, where appropriate, absolute reduction targets for greenhouse gas (GHG) for direct scope 1 emissions as well as scope 2 and scope 3 emissions.

Scope 1 refers to emissions directly stemming from an organisation's activity, while scope 2 refers to indirect emissions from purchased energy. Scope 3 refers to end-use emissions.

"It is alarming to see how member states weakened the law in the final negotiations. And the law lacks an effective mechanism to force companies to reduce their climate emissions," said Paul de Clerck, campaigner at non-governmental organisation Friends of the Earth Europe, pointing to "gaping" loopholes in the adopted text.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

24/05/13

APA defers FID for Australian gas pipeline's stage 3

APA defers FID for Australian gas pipeline's stage 3

Sydney, 13 May (Argus) — Australian pipeline operator APA has deferred a final investment decision (FID) for stage 3 of its planned east coast grid expansion, given potential rule changes for the South West Queensland pipeline (SWQP). APA is pushing back the FID by about 6-12 months to the first-half of 2025, and was likely initially planning to make the FID this year. The operator postponed the FID because of recent action by the Australian Energy Regulator (AER), which said it might recommend rule changes for the SWQP. A review was announced in February and is not expected to be completed until November at the earliest, APA said. The firm opposes any further regulation of the SWQP , maintaining that it does not return excessive profits. APA said the lack of a single arbitration case involving the facility since such a regime was instituted in 2017 is evidence that its customers accept present arrangements. "We've probably got around six to 12 months at the very most for us to work through and hopefully there's no change to regulation, but basically the time frame is we need to get started pretty much early next year on building stage 3," APA's chief executive Adam Watson said on 9 May. If the AER decides to make the lightly regulated SWQP subject to reference price regulation, an access arrangement would need to be determined which will take 2-3 years to complete, APA said. This means any changes would be instituted in the fiscal year to 30 June 2028. The SWQP can carry 440 TJ/d (11.75mn m³/d) in a westerly direction from Wallumbilla to the Moomba hub, from where gas can enter the APA-operated Moomba-Sydney and Epic Energy-owned Moomba-Adelaide pipelines for transport to southeastern facilities. Expanding the capacity of pipelines allowing the north-south transit of gas is considered critical to avoiding shortfalls owing to the depletion of Gippsland basin fields this decade. Stage 1 of APA's east coast grid expansion was completed in 2023, with stage 2 also now operational in line with guidance. These two stages increased capacity by 25pc, allowing about 50 TJ/d more gas to flow on the SWQP to southern markets, with similar increased volumes expected from stages 3 and 4. By Tom Major Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

California refineries required to report turnarounds


24/05/10
24/05/10

California refineries required to report turnarounds

Houston, 10 May (Argus) — Refiners in California starting in June must file maintenance schedules with the state's energy commission at least 120 days in advance of planned work, and diagnostic reports within two days of unplanned shutdowns. The new reporting requirements, part of the SB X1-2 bill passed in March 2023, take effect following an 8 May meeting of the California Energy Commission (CEC) where the measures were finalized. The CEC will now be able to gather a broad range of data from refiners and set a maximum gross gasoline refining margin in an effort to avoid price spikes at the pump. If companies identify a need for maintenance less than 120 days before the planned work, a report to the CEC is required within two business days of the discovery, according to the reporting form posted in the SB X1-2 docket. The reporting form includes space for a description of the work, unit level details and information on the expected effect of a turnaround on transportation fuel inventories at the refinery. The same information will be required for unplanned maintenance, with a report to be sent to the CEC within two business days of the initial outage or lowered rates, and within two business days of the completion of work or return to normal throughputs. The additional information will aide the CEC in analyzing refiner margins and determine whether a margin cap and subsequent penalties are warranted, according to the commission. Industry groups think many of the reporting requirements are burdensome and politically motivated , often requesting information unnecessary to determine margins. Marine import reporting on horizon At the same 8 May business meeting, the CEC moved closer to finalizing a requirement for importers of foreign and domestic refined products and renewable fuels to report shipments at least four days before delivery. The reporting form includes information on vessel routes, costs and products shipped. The CEC approved for the marine reporting requirements to be submitted to the state's Office of Administrative Law for a 10-day review before a targeted 20 May start date. By tracking import data, the CEC aims to build a more accurate picture of what drives retail fuel prices and refiner margins in the state. "In many cases these forms request information that has questionable or no relevance at all to the CEC's efforts to minimize or prevent price spikes," said Sophie Ellinghouse, general counsel for trade group the Western States Petroleum Association, during public comments on the marine reporting requirements at the 8 May meeting. By Nathan Risser Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Mexican power outages enter fourth day


24/05/10
24/05/10

Mexican power outages enter fourth day

Mexico City, 10 May (Argus) — Mexican power grid operator Cenace issued its fourth consecutive day of operating alerts amid the heatwave gripping the country. Net electricity demand reached 47,321MW early today, with deployed electricity capacity slightly below at 47,233 MW, according to Cenace. Since 7 May, Cenace has declared emergency operating alerts as demand exceeded generation capacity during peak evening hours, prompting the grid operator to preemptively cut electricity supply across different states to maintain grid integrity. Power outages have lasted up to several hours in Mexico City and in major industrial states as power demand has outstripped supply by up to 1,000MW. Peak demand this week hit 49,000MW, just below last year's historic peak of 53,000MW during atypical temperatures in June. "We are very concerned about the unprecedented outages detected across 21 states, a situation that affects the normal functioning of Mexican companies," national business chamber Coparmex said. Peak electricity demand typically rises in June-July but temperatures this week have risen as high as 48°C (118° F) across some states. Mexico City reported a record high of 34.3°C on 9 May and high temperatures are forecast to continue into next week, Mexico's national weather service said. The inability of Mexico's grid to respond to increased demand is because of insufficient power generation capacity, non-profit think-tank the Mexican institute for competitiveness (Imco) said this week. "Despite the energy ministry's forecast that 22,000MW of new power capacity would enter service by 2026, only 1,483MW had entered service as of 2022" since late 2018, Imco said. President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador's administration pledged to build new generation capacity, including five gas-fired, combined-cycle plants, but recognized this week that delays had contributed to the power outages. "We have an electricity generation deficit because some of the combined-cycle plants were delayed, but we are working on it and it will soon be resolved," Lopez Obrador said on 9 May. Lopez Obrador's government has also curtailed private sector power development during his administration. Mexico needs to upgrade and expand its transmission network, industry associations say. "In order to resolve this problem, we believe that a reopening of the electricity market to the private sector is imperative," Mexico's wind energy association, Amdee, said. Mexico has 87,130MW of installed capacity, with 39.5pc from combined-cycle gas-fired power plants and 31pc in renewable power, including wind, solar, hydroelectric, geothermal and biomass, according to the latest statistics from the energy ministry. By Rebecca Conan Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Petrobras to expand free gas market footprint


24/05/10
24/05/10

Petrobras to expand free gas market footprint

Rio de Janeiro, 10 May (Argus) — Petrobras said today it will offer new types of natural gas contracts in Brazil's open market with more flexibile and competitive terms, but provided no details on the planned offers. The company also announced new commercial contract models for gas sales to state distributors, offering price reductions for current contracts of up to 10pc. The reduction will be connected to the distributors performance, Petrobras said, without providing more detail. The move by the state-controlled giant is significant given the 2021 gas market liberalization as aimed at increasing competition at every step of the value chain beyond just Petrobras. But progress has been slow in cutting Petrobras' market share, lowering prices, and increasing market transparency. The 2021 gas law covers the full lifecycle of natural gas, from production to transportation, processing to storage, and sales. A key provision aimed at promoting competition in the upstream, midstream, and downstream sectors, particularly transportation and distribution. Yet, three years later, there is little sign of downstream customers migrating to the free market, despite some moves such as those from Delta Geração, Acelen, Gerdau, Tradener, and others. The number of free market commercial contracts does not exceed ten, according to a lawyer specialized in the energy market. By Betina Moura Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

California fuel retailers fear regulatory scrutiny


24/05/10
24/05/10

California fuel retailers fear regulatory scrutiny

Houston, 10 May (Argus) — US fuel retailers like neither the regulatory precedent being set in California nor how the transition to renewable fuels is being managed, but companies sticking it out in the Golden State may reap rewards. California governor Gavin Newsom (D) in March last year signed SB X1-2 into law, allowing the California Energy Commission (CEC) to gather a broad range of profit data from refiners and set a maximum gross gasoline refining margin in an effort to avoid price spikes at the pump. "Unfortunately in California there is no shortage of bad policies that are being proposed," California Fuels and Convenience Alliance director Alessandra Magnasco said this week in a legislative affairs meeting at fuel retailer trade association SIGMA's conference in Austin, Texas. She worries that if the CEC fails to make progress in capping margins at the refiner level, they will look further downstream and regulate retailers. The alliance is opposed to what it sees as burdensome reporting requirements mandated by SBX 1-2 that were rushed through the legislature. "They are doing it in a way to leave out industry," Magnasco said. The CEC this week approved further reporting requirements for refiners in the state, mandating they file maintenance schedules with the commission at least 120 days in advance of planned work and within two business days after the start of unplanned shutdowns. "Every bad idea we face has generally been socialized in California first," David Fialkov, vice president of government affairs for US fuel retailer trade association NATSO, said during the SIGMA session. The increased adoption of renewable diesel in California is also causing headaches for fuel supply managers. "I can't even tell my customers which specific terminal might have traditional diesel versus renewable or if they're going to have both," said Deborah Neal, director of price risk management for fuel supplier World Kinect during another SIGMA panel discussion. The introduction of renewable diesel to the California market was done without a specific time line or transition plan, Neal said. "It's messy to say the least." The regulatory environment in California has also dampened appetite for mergers and acquisition activity in the eyes of bankers doing the deals. Gas station buyers who are looking to consolidate smaller assets are not looking at California if they are not already invested there, Matrix Capital Markets' co-head of downstream energy investment banking Cedric Fortemps said at SIGMA. "The operating and legal dynamics are completely different than other parts of the country," Fortemps said. But for companies already operating in California, there is limited out-of-state competition and high barriers to entry. Those companies are keen to grow their existing operations, Fortemps said. By Nathan Risser Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more