Grupo Carso expande su huella en energía
En los últimos años Grupo Carso, dirigido por Carlos Slim, ha expandido sus operaciones en el sector de petróleo y gas natural, destacándose como uno de los pocos operadores que han fortalecido su presencia a pesar de las restricciones del presidente mexicano Andrés Manuel López Obrador a la inversión del sector privado.
A medida que los independientes y las grandes empresas petroleras han empezado a cerrar sus negocios en medio de la falta de nuevas oportunidades en subastas de la fase de exploración y producción, el Grupo Carso ha adquirido dos de los mayores contratos de aguas someras en los últimos 12 meses y ha expresado interés en hacer nuevas adquisiciones.
Durante una conferencia de prensa de cuatro horas en febrero, Slim confirmó el interés de la empresa en desempeñar "un papel más importante en el sector de los hidrocarburos y, finalmente, participar en los productos petroquímicos."
Slim, la persona más rica de México y director de un conglomerado que abarca desde las telecomunicaciones hasta la minería, también expresó su interés por "ser socio de alguien con experiencia" y por aumentar la participación de la empresa en el operador independiente estadounidense Talos Energy.
La división de energía de Grupo Carso, Carso Energy, tenía un papel marginal en el sector aguas arriba de México antes de esta administración, con derechos de producción y exploración de dos bloques terrestres asegurados tras la reforma energética de 2014.
A pesar de que los contratos se adjudicaron en 2017, los bloques 12 y 13 de Veracruz siguen en fase de exploración en medio de la falta de equipos de perforación disponibles y la presencia del crimen organizado en la zona, que ha impedido el acceso al emplazamiento, el operador informó al regulador de petróleo CNH el pasado diciembre.
Pero los dos bloques terrestres son pequeños en comparación con los bloques de aguas poco profundas que Grupo Carso compró el año pasado.
En septiembre, Grupo Carso completó la compra por $124 millones de una acción de 49.9pc en la filial mexicana de Talos Energy, involucrada también en el mega yacimiento de aguas superficiales de Zama que se está desarrollando con laparaestatal Pemex.
Con un pico pronosticado de producción de 180,000 b/d de crudo para 2026, el yacimiento sería el segundo campo de producción de crudo más importante de México según las cifras de enero.
El pasado diciembre, Carso Energy llegó a un acuerdo de $530 millones para adquirir el bloque de aguas someras 4 del conglomerado mexicano Petrobal en la cuenca sureste. El bloque es el tercer contrato de producción de crudo más alto, con una producción de 11,784 b/d en enero, según la CNH.
Inversiones en gas
En el sector del gas, Carso Energy también opera el gasoducto de gas natural Sasabe-Samalayuca de 472mn cf/d y es socio en las líneas estadounidenses de interconexión Waha-Presidio y Waha-San Elizario.
Pero mientras que la mayoría de las empresas del sector de la energía han visto un colapso de las oportunidades de inversión durante la administración de López Obrador, el Grupo Carso parece ser una de las pocas empresas del sector privado con las que el presidente permitirá que las empresas estatales Pemex y CFE hagan negocios.
CFE adjudicó directamente un nuevo contrato de gasoducto al operador en diciembre del año pasado, con un acuerdo para ampliar la línea de gas Sasabe-Samalayuca de 416km y 472mn cf/d de Sasabe, Sonora a Mexicali, Baja California.
López Obrador, a menudo crítico de las empresas del sector privado dentro del sector de la energía, incluso ha elogiado el papel creciente de Slim en el mercado del petróleo y el gas, celebrando su adquisición del contrato Petrobal por permitirle "permanecer en manos mexicanas."
Mirando hacia el futuro, los profundos bolsillos del Grupo Carso podrían convertirlo en un socio potencial para desarrollar el campo de gas de aguas profundas de Lakach tras la decisión de New Fortress Energy de retirarse el pasado mes de noviembre.
Pero el entorno de bajos precios del gas podría complicar el proyecto en el que Pemex ya ha invertido $1.4 mil millones, mientras que la falta de experiencia de Carso en aguas profundas plantea preguntas sobre su viabilidad como socio.
Carso Energy representó sólo 1.6pc de los Ps55.4 mil millones ($3.29 mil millones) totales de ventas del Grupo Carso durante el cuarto trimestre del año pasado, pero la estrategia de adquisición del grupo y el estatus favorecido frente a la administración podrían ver esa cuota aumentar en los próximos años.
| Proyectos de energía de Carso | ||
| Proyecto | Tipo de proyecto | Tamaño/capacidad |
| Bloque 12 | E&P en tierra | Fase de exploración |
| Bloque 13 | E&P en tierra | Fase de exploración |
| Zama | E&P en aguas someras | 180,000 b/d crudo en 2026 |
| Bloque 4 | E&P en aguas someras | 11,784 b/d crudo en enero |
| Sasabe-Samalayuca | Gasoducto | 472mn cf/d |
| Waha-Presidio | Gasoducto | 1.4 Bcf/d |
| Waha-San Elizario | Gasoducto | 1.1 Bcf/d |
| Grupo Carso | ||
Related news posts
Potential strike threatens Vancouver port again
Potential strike threatens Vancouver port again
Calgary, 13 May (Argus) — A labour dispute at the Canadian port of Vancouver could result in another work stoppage, less than a year after a strike disrupted the flow of more than C$10bn ($7.3bn) worth of goods and commodities ranging from canola and potash to coking coal. Negotiations between the British Columbia Maritime Employers Association (BCMEA) and the International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) Ship and Dock Foremen Local 514 union have stalled as the two sides try to renew an agreement that expired on 1 April 2023. A 21-day "cooling-off period" concluded on 10 May, giving the union the right to strike and the employers association the right to lock out the workers. A vote and 72-hour notice would first need to occur before either action is taken. The BCMEA filed a formal complaint to the Canada Industrial Relations Board (CIRB) the same day, which had to step in last year in another dispute. The BCMEA locked horns with ILWU Canada over a separate collective agreement in 2023 leading to a 13-day strike by the union in July. This disrupted the movement of C$10.7bn of goods in and out of Canada, according to the Greater Vancouver Board of Trade. Vancouver's port is the country's largest — about the same size as the next five combined — and describes itself as able to handle the most diversified range of cargo in North America. There are 29 terminals belonging to the Port of Vancouver. Terminals that service container ships endured the most significant congestion during last year's strike. Loadings for potash, sulphur, lumber, wood pellets and pulp, steel-making coal, canola, copper concentrates, zinc and lead concentrate, diesel and renewable diesel liquids and some agri-foods were also disrupted. The Trans Mountain-operated Westridge Marine Terminal responsible for crude oil exports on Canada's west coast was unaffected. A deal was eventually reached on 4 August. The strike spurred on proposed amendments to legislation in Canada that would limit the effect of job action on essential services. A bill introduced in Canada's Parliament in November would update the Canada Labour Code and CIRB Regulations accordingly. The bill has been progressing through the House of Commons, now having completed the second of three readings. By Brett Holmes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Chevron books Aframax for TMX cargo to California
Chevron books Aframax for TMX cargo to California
Houston, 13 May (Argus) — Chevron provisionally hired an Aframax to haul a cargo of crude from Vancouver, British Columbia, to the US west coast as the Trans Mountain Expansion (TMX) brings more oil to Canada's Pacific coast. Chevron put the Aframax Garibaldi Spirit on subjects for a Vancouver-US west coast voyage loading from 25 May at WS125, market participants said. That rate is equivalent to $11.16/t or $1.63/bl for heavy sour Cold Lake, according to Argus data. The US west coast historically has been the main destination for crude exported from Vancouver, with 96pc, or about 38,500 b/d, landing at ports in Washington and California in the 12 months ended 30 April, according to data from analytics firm Vortexa. Chevron purchased five cargoes from Vancouver for its 269,000 b/d refinery in El Segundo, California, during that span, most recently in February. The 590,000 b/d TMX project began commercial service on 1 May, tripling the capacity of the Trans Mountain pipeline system to 890,000 b/d. The line creates a larger link from Alberta's growing oil sands production to the west coast port of Vancouver and direct access to Pacific Rim markets, where buyers are eager for heavy sour crude . The first TMX cargo, 550,000 bl of Canadian Access Western Blend which Suncor booked on an Aframax in late April , will load between 18-24 May for June delivery in China. PetroChina and Unipec each control an Aframax near Canada's Pacific coast that would be available to load in Vancouver in the second half of May, though those ships could also be relet to deliver crude to the US west coast. The port of Vancouver's distance from many traditional Aframax trading routes may stretch the global fleet once TMX ramps up. The port cannot accommodate tankers larger than Aframaxes. By Tray Swanson Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Banks’ 2023 fossil fuel funding rises to $705bn: Study
Banks’ 2023 fossil fuel funding rises to $705bn: Study
London, 13 May (Argus) — Fossil fuel financing by the world's 60 largest banks rose to $705bn in 2023, up by 4.8pc from $673bn in 2022, with the increase largely driven by financing for the LNG sector. This brings the total funding for fossil fuels since the Paris agreement was signed in 2015 to $6.9 trillion. The 15th annual Banking on Climate Chaos (BOCC) report was released on 13 May by a group of non-governmental and civil society organisations including the Rainforest Action Network and Oil Change International, and it analyses the world's 60 largest commercial and investment banks, according to ratings agency Standard and Poor's (S&P). Funding had previously dropped in 2022 to $673bn from $742bn in 2021, but this was because higher profits for oil and gas companies had led to reduced borrowing. JPMorgan Chase was the largest financier of fossil fuels in 2023 at $40.9bn, up from $38.7bn a year earlier, according to the report. It also topped the list for banks providing financing to companies with fossil fuel expansion plans, with its commitments rising to $19.3bn from $17.1bn in 2022. Japanese bank Mizuho was the second-largest financier, increasing funding commitments to $37bn for all fossil fuels, from $35.4bn in 2022. The Bank of America came in third with $33.7bn, although this was a drop from $37.3bn a year earlier. Out of the 60 banks, 27 increased financing for companies with fossil fuel exposure, with the rise driven by funding for the LNG sector — including fracking, import, export, transport and gas-fired power. Developers have rallied support for LNG projects as part of efforts to boost energy security after the Russia-Ukraine war began in 2022, and banks are actively backing this sector, stated the report. "The rise in rankings by Mizuho and the prominence of the other two Japanese megabanks — MUFG [Mitsubishi UFG Financial Group] and SMBC [Sumitomo Mitsui Banking] — is a notable fossil fuel trend for 2023," the report said. Mizuho and MUFG dominated LNG import and export financing, providing $10.9bn and $8.4bn respectively, to companies expanding this sector. Total funding for the LNG methane gas sector in 2023 was $121bn, up from $116bn in 2022. Financing for thermal coal mining increased slightly to $42.2bn, from $39.7bn in 2022. Out of this, 81pc came from Chinese banks, according to the report, while several North American banks have provided funds to this sector, including Bank of America. Some North American banks have also rolled back on climate commitments, according to the report. Bank of America, for example, had previously committed to not directly financing projects involving new or expanded coal-fired power plants or coal mines, but changed its policy in late 2023 to state that such projects would undergo "enhanced due diligence" and senior-level reviews. The report also notes that most banks' coal exclusions only apply to thermal coal and not metallurgical coal. Total borrowing by oil majors such as Eni, ConocoPhillips, Chevron and Shell fell by 5.24pc in 2023, with several such as TotalEnergies, ExxonMobil and Hess indicating zero financing for the year. The BOCC report's finance data was sourced from either Bloomberg or the London Stock Exchange between December 2023 and February 2024. UK-based bank Barclays, which ranks ninth on the list with $24.2bn in fossil fuel funding, said that the report does not recognise the classification of some of the data. Its "financed emissions for the energy and power sectors have reduced by 44pc and 26pc respectively, between 2020-23," it said. In response to its increase in financing for gas power, "investment is needed to support existing oil and gas assets, while clean energy is scaled," the bank said. By Prethika Nair Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
FTC flexes muscles over US oil mergers
FTC flexes muscles over US oil mergers
New York, 13 May (Argus) — US antitrust regulator the Federal Trade Commission's insistence that the former chief executive of independent Pioneer Natural Resources, Scott Sheffield, be barred from ExxonMobil's board as a condition of approving their $64.5bn merger serves as a cautionary tale for other pending deals. The FTC alleged that Sheffield, a long-time industry leader who made Pioneer one of the biggest producers in the Permian, sought to collude with Opec. It cited hundreds of text messages in which he discussed pricing and output with officials from the oil cartel, as well as efforts to co-ordinate with other Texas producers. The fallout for other transactions still going through the approvals process may be limited, given the specific nature of the allegations against Sheffield, but the FTC's action shows the agency will not hesitate to demand concessions in order to wave deals through. Given heightened political sensitivities to fuel prices in an election year, that should put the industry on notice. At the very least, future reviews are likely to include requests to turn over any records — electronic or otherwise — that involve discussions with competitors or other oil-producing jurisdictions, according to former FTC chairman Bill Kovacic. "It's a reminder that conversations with your competitors about production levels and pricing levels are exceedingly unwise," Kovacic says. It was significant that the FTC did not tamper with the basic fundamentals of the Pioneer acquisition. "I suspect the former CEO is unhappy about being placed on the sidelines," he says. But it is also a "relatively inexpensive price to pay for getting this done". Under the leadership of Lina Khan, the FTC has taken a tougher line when it comes to mergers, and second requests for information have become the norm when it comes to oil deals. Chevron's planned $53bn acquisition of US independent Hess has been held up by such a request, even as a dispute over the target company's stake in a giant offshore find in Guyana has cast a cloud over the transaction. Diamondback Energy's announced $26bn takeover of Endeavor Energy Resources was also subject to a second request. Occidental Petroleum chief executive Vicki Hollub told analysts in February that "some of our teams felt like [the FTC] asked for everything" when going through the approval process for the company's $12bn purchase of CrownRock. But Occidental said this week that its teams are working "constructively" with the regulator, and that the deal is expected to close in the third quarter. Consolidation over consumers? The rapid pace of consolidation in the US oil and gas sector since late last year has led to mounting calls for increased scrutiny on antitrust grounds. "Let's not kid ourselves, these mergers aren't just about efficiency or lowering costs," US Senate Democratic majority leader Chuck Schumer wrote in a letter signed by 50 Senate and House Democrats in March. They are about "buying out the competition so the newly consolidated industry can boost profits at the expense of consumers". Given long-serving company executives' preference to stick around after selling their firms, the FTC's action in relation to Pioneer could theoretically dissuade other ‘big-name' founders from going down the same road, consultancy Rystad senior analyst Matthew Bernstein says. On the other hand, the loss of control for family-owned operators has already served as a big enough obstacle for some companies that would otherwise be seen as takeover targets. As for Sheffield, Pioneer has said the FTC's complaint reflects a "fundamental misunderstanding" of US and global oil markets and "misreads the nature and intent" of his actions. Pioneer more than doubled its daily production between 2019 and 2023, playing its part in adding to domestic energy supply, the firm said. By Stephen Cunningham Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more