Argus recently launched a calculated assessment for reformulated gasoline in Group Three. This move comes following recent changes that were made in gasoline specifications for the Denver, Colorado, area in 2024.
Summertime conventional gasoline sales in Denver, Colorado ended on 7 November 2023 when the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) mandated reformulated gasoline for the metropolitan area during the summer season. The shift in specifications was first announced by the EPA ruling in November 2022 when it found the region was not meeting federal ozone standards. Reformulated gasoline burns cleaner than its conventional counterpart but is also a more expensive fuel to produce.
For the winter months, Denver gasoline prices will likely change little from years past. The Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) levels for reformulated gasoline will likely closely mimic those seen in Group Three’s conventional gasoline market for the southern portion of the midcontinent.
But come summer – which is defined as 1 June through 15 September – Denver area retailers will be required to sell 7.4 RVP reformulated gasoline, as opposed to a prior requirement of 7.8 RVP conventional fuel. This is expected to widen Denver's premium to conventional prices in nearby regions.
Denver reformulated gasoline's premium to sub-octane gasoline prices in adjacent states such as Oklahoma and Kansas should be similar to spreads between Gulf coast CBOB and Gulf coast RBOB. Denver's reformulated gasoline supply will come from a combination of shipments from the midcontinent and Gulf coast markets, as well as from Suncor's 103,000 b/d refinery in nearby Commerce City, Colorado.
Group Three RBOB Methodology
Prices for Regular RBOB are published year-round for 10,000 bl on a fob Tulsa, Oklahoma basis.
Prices are calculated by applying the spread between the prompt Argus Regular Texas Destination RBOB and Regular Colonial CBOB from the US Gulf coast markets to the respective prompt Magellan suboctane V grade price. The use of the spread value mitigates the end-of-summer shift in Colonial RVP specifications.
Your Go-To Source for Reliable Road Fuel Prices
As a trusted source in the industry, Argus delivers accurate, timely pricing for gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, RINs, ethanol, and more. Our data equips buyers, sellers, and refiners with the precision necessary to operate confidently in the dynamic market.
Explore our services and discover how we can support your business in mastering market dynamics.
Author: Paul Dahlgren, Editor, Refined Products Americas – Gasoline Markets
Spotlight content
Related news
Commodity rail shippers push for more train data
Commodity rail shippers push for more train data
Houston, 11 December (Argus) — Industrial shippers of commodities like grain and petrochemicals want federal regulators to widen the scope of proposed rules that would require Class I railroads to report more data on their on-time service performance. US rail regulator the Surface Transportation Board (STB) in September put the industry on notice that it intends to issue rules to require that each of the six biggest railroads, including Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern, report two new categories of performance data to the agency. The first would benchmark railroads' shipments against their original estimated time of arrival (OETA) and the second would measure "industry spot and pull" data, or ISP, to determine whether shipments are picked up and delivered within their planned service window. The board action aims to address rail shippers' long-running concerns that unpredictable rail service is a wild card in their supply chains, as many shippers rely nearly completely on rail to get their goods to market. The American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM), an industry group that lobbies for US refiners and petrochemical manufacturers, applauded the STB for working to address "chronic freight rail service failures." The OETA is meant to track a carrier's targeted arrival time when it dispatches a cargo and then flag the percentage of weekly shipments that reach their destinations no later than 24 hours after an intended target, the STB said in its proposal. The AFPM, whose members include companies like Dow, Occidental Chemical and Ineos who collectively ship about 2.5mn carloads a year, said OETA data should be broken out by region, terminal, and corridor "to reveal localized bottlenecks often masked by system averages." As proposed, the STB's OETA measurement would apply to manifest train service, where trains haul an assortment of railcar types, and not to unit trains, which exclusively haul one railcar type or bulk commodity, such as coal, grain or crude. Grain shippers and the US Department of Agriculture disagreed with the STB's decision to exclude unit train shipments from the OETA measurement. The National Grain and Feed Association, whose members include Archer Daniels Midland, Bunge and other biofuels makers, said that late unit train deliveries of commodities like grain, ethanol or coal "can result in proportionally greater harm to the shipper/receiver" than smaller manifest shipments. The USDA agreed that unit train shipments should be included in the OETA measurement, and pointed out that about 75pc of US railed corn and soybean shipments in 2023 traveled in trains hauling more than 75 railcars, which would not be captured by manifest shipment data. Demand for agricultural products is highly seasonal, and missed delivery windows "can halt processing lines, disrupt export programs, and force shippers to carry excess private car inventory to buffer uncertainty," the agency said. The Association of American Railroads (AAR), which lobbies on behalf of Class I railroads, pushed back on industry requests to widen the OETA to include unit train shipments, and told the STB that several railroads do not currently generate the metrics. Adding the reporting requirements "would add regulatory burden, waste resources, and misrepresent service on the network," the AAR said. By Chris Baltimore Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
German B7 diesel premiums surge on quota rise
German B7 diesel premiums surge on quota rise
Hamburg, 11 December (Argus) — Traders in Germany are offering B7 diesel for January at a €10-17/100l ($11.70-19.92/100l) premium to December prices, a record high for the period, as a result of an increase in Germany's CO2 levy and greenhouse gas (GHG) quota. The offered premium is significantly higher than Argus ' estimates of €8.50/100l for B7 diesel (see chart) for the period, likely because traders have priced in some market uncertainty as they were waiting for the transposition of the EU's Renewable Energy Directive (RED III) into national law. The vote by the German federal cabinet yesterday to implement RED III should provide some clarity on the legal framework for 2026, although some grey areas remain. The GHG quota will rise to 12pc in 2026 from 10.6pc currently, requiring companies to submit more GHG certificates when selling fossil fuels. The vote confirmed market participants' expectation that advanced fuels can no longer be double-counted towards fulfilling the GHG quota. The removal of this double-counting provision could make blending biofuels more attractive and raise prices for both biofuels and GHG certificate transfers. Market participants also expect a decline in biofuel imports from Asia-Pacific, as some imports from the region are unlikely to meet the criteria to generate European GHG certificates. This is because of the planned cancellation of the 'legitimate-expectations' rule, which currently protects buyers of illegitimate GHG certificates from having them revoked. Lower Asia-Pacific volumes will affect biofuels' availability in Europe and likely support prices. Some uncertainty about the specific design of the sub-quota for renewable fuels of non-biological origin (RFNBOs), such as e-fuels and green hydrogen has also been lifted. A November draft included a penalty of around €120/GJ for non-compliance with the RFNBO sub-quota, instead of the previously proposed €70/GJ. The cabinet meeting on 10 December confirmed this higher penalty. But some traders remain uncertain on which price to use for the CO2 levy next year, with some using a CO2 price of €68/t of CO2e for their calculations — the price set for companies unsuccessful in a new CO2 auction system for the levy. The CO2 levy will transition next year from a fixed-price model, currently at €55/t of CO2e, to an auction system where the price of an emission allowance can fluctuate between €55/t and €65/t. One emission allowance corresponds to one tonne of CO2 equivalent. Companies that are unsuccessful in auctions can subsequently buy emission allowances at a fixed price of €68/t. The price could also be even higher in the secondary market for companies that do not participate in auctions. But there is some uncertainty about the auction process. The auctions will not start until next summer and the specific CO2 costs will not be fully clear until then. Some traders are so planning additional cash reserves to cover any increases in payments. This is also why some fuel suppliers are still holding back on announcing January prices because of these regulatory uncertainties, further increasing market uncertainty. But the cabinet decision yesterday could push traders to finalise their pricing for January. Reported premiums for heating oil are between €2.50/100l and €4.50/100l, which is roughly in line with Argus ' calculations. By Marcel Pott CO2 levy per 100l € Kosten pro t CO2 B0/HE B7 E5 E10 45 € 12,04 11,21 10,43 10,07 55 € 14,72 13,70 12,75 12,31 65 € 17,40 16,19 15,07 14,55 68 € 18,20 16,93 15,76 15,22 B7 with 6.8l FAME; E5 with 4.8l ethanol and E10 with 9.66l ethanol GHG compliance costs per 100l € B0 B7 E5 E10 2025 9,13 9,70 6,83 6,74 2026 16,33 14,99 11,68 10,72 Compliance with the GHG quota through blending and purchasing certificates, compliance with the RFNBO mandate through penalty Cumulative costs of GHG quota and CO₂ levy Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Supply surplus masks regional market tightness: IEA
Supply surplus masks regional market tightness: IEA
London, 11 December (Argus) — A large global oil surplus is masking regional tightness in crude and products markets, the IEA said today. In its final Oil Market Report (OMR) for 2025, the IEA said oil prices have only fallen modestly despite the large supply overhang because of "diverging dynamics" across crude, NGLs and products in different regions. This disconnect "notably reflects the high share of exports subject to sanctions (15pc of crude and 11pc of products), lengthening of supply routes and a tight refining system," it said. The IEA's global oil supply and demand balances imply a 3mn b/d supply surplus in the fourth quarter of 2025, and more than 3.8mn b/d in 2026. While oil on water has been rising and inventories building in China — global observed inventories rose by 1.4mn b/d in October, to a four-year high, and preliminary data show a further increase in November — there has been a notable absence of stock builds in key Atlantic basin pricing hubs, the IEA said, which is supporting prices and keeping crude futures in backwardation. In products markets, refinery outages and a coming EU ban on imports of products derived from Russia crude has led to three-year high refining margins in November, the IEA said. This trend could continue in 2026 given "limited spare refining capacity outside of China." The IEA said NGLs are increasingly comprising a large share of the overall liquids supply surplus, limiting the overhang's effect on crude prices. The IEA upgraded its 2025 consumption growth forecast by 50,000 b/d to 830,000 b/d, based on an improving macroeconomic outlook and subsiding anxieties about trade tariffs. This would bring overall demand in 2025 to 103.92mn b/d. The IEA's first oil demand growth forecast for 2025, made in April 2024, had consumption growing by 1.15mn b/d. The IEA also upgraded its 2026 demand growth forecast by 90,000 b/d to 860,000 b/d, which would bring total demand to 104.79mn b/d. The IEA lowered its supply growth projection for 2025 by 100,000 b/d to 3.05mn b/d and for 2026 by 30,000 b/d to 2.45mn b/d. These were mainly because of disruptions to supplies in sanctioned countries such as Russia and Venezuela, the IEA said. This leaves supply forecast at 106.18mn b/d in 2025 and 108.63mn bd in 2026. The IEA said Russia's crude output fell by 210,000 b/d in November to 9mn b/d, which is 500,000 b/d below its Opec+ target for the month. Russia's oil exports fell by about 400,000 b/d in November to 6.9mn b/d, "as buyers assessed the implications and risks associated with more stringent sanctions." Venezuela's crude output fell by 150,000 b/d to 860,000 b/d "as sanctions and rising geopolitical tensions with the US limited the country's ability to market its oil," the IEA said. By Aydin Calik Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Japanese, Chinese firms partner on marine biodiesel
Japanese, Chinese firms partner on marine biodiesel
Tokyo, 11 December (Argus) — Japanese shipping firm Mitsui OSK Lines (Mol), trading house Marubeni and Chinese state-controlled fuel supplier Sinopec Zhejiang Zhoushan Petroleum have signed an initial agreement to establish a long-term supply chain for marine biodiesel. Sinopec and Marubeni will ensure a stable supply of biodiesel and develop infrastructure infrastructures including ports to store, deliver and supply the fuel, Mol said said on 11 December. Meanwhile, the Japanese shipping firm will use the biodiesel that Sinopec and Marubeni procure in China. China is a key supplier of biodiesel feedstocks, and Marubeni holds the largest share in marine fuel sales to Japanese shipowners in China, Mol said. Biodiesel is a "drop-in" fuel, which is compatible with existing engines on vessels. Mol considers biodiesel as key to significantly cutting CO2 emissions, given that it aims to cut greenhouse gas emissions from its transportation by 45pc in 2035 compared with 2019 levels, before achieving net-zero emissions in 2050. By Kohei Yamamoto Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.