Weight of Freight: TMX spurs new Aframax, VLCC trade in Pacific basin
The first three months of Canada's Trans Mountain Expansion (TMX) have sent a surge of crude to refiners in California and China, shifting tanker demand in the Pacific basin.
The 590,000 b/d TMX project nearly tripled the capacity of Trans Mountain’s pipeline system to 890,000 b/d when it opened on 1 May, linking Alberta's oil sands to Canada's west coast for direct access to lucrative Pacific Rim markets, where buyers are eager for heavy sour crude.
Between 20 May, when the first TMX cargo began loading, and 20 August, about 165,000 b/d of Vancouver crude exports landed at ports on the US west coast, primarily in California, up from about 30,000 b/d in that same span last year, according to data from analytics firm Kpler.
The freight rate for a Vancouver-US west coast Aframax shipment averaged $1.98/bl for Cold Lake between 1 May and 20 August. This ranged from a low of $1.50/bl from 1-3 May when shipowners repositioned to the region in anticipation of TMX to a high of $2.32/bl from 13-14 June, according to Argus data.
The new oil flow into the US west coast has displaced shipments from farther afield in Ecuador and Saudi Arabia. Crude exports from those countries into the US west coast averaged 110,000 b/d and 25,000 b/d, respectively, between 20 May and 20 August, down from 155,000 b/d and 135,000 b/d over the same stretch in 2023, according to Kpler.
The growth of the Vancouver market, which benefits from its proximity to California, has reduced tonne-miles, a proxy for tanker demand, into the US west coast. This has outpaced slightly lower crude demand, which fell in part due to Phillips 66 halting crude runs at its 115,000 b/d refinery in Rodeo, California, in February to produce renewable fuels, as well as weaker-than-expected road fuel demand this summer.
Tonne-miles for US west coast crude imports fell by 14pc to 106bn between 20 May and 20 August 2024 compared with the same period a year earlier, Vortexa data show, while overall crude imports declined just 8.6pc to 1.37mn b/d, according to Kpler.
PAL-ing around with VLCCs
Though much of Vancouver’s exports have been shipped to the US west coast, Canadian producers have found ready buyers in Asia-Pacific as well, where about 160,000 b/d of Vancouver exports went between 20 May and 20 August, compared with none a year prior, Kpler data show.Buyers and sellers have displayed a preference for using ship-to-ship transfers onto very large crude carriers (VLCCs) at the Pacific Area Lightering zone (PAL) off the coast of southern California, rather than sending Aframaxes directly to refineries in east Asia. Of the 30 Vancouver-origin Aframax cargoes that have landed in China, South Korea and India, 19 were transferred onto VLCCs at PAL, Kpler data show. Seven cargoes were sent directly to east Asia on time-chartered Aframaxes — the majority by Suncor — and just four were sent using spot tonnage, likely due to the expensive economics of trans-Pacific Aframax shipments.
The Vancouver-China Aframax rate between 1 May and 20 August averaged $5.90/bl, with a low of $4.94/bl from 19-20 August and a high of $6.41/bl from 1-10 May and again from 4-12 June, according to Argus data.
Over the same time, the cost to reverse lighter, or transfer, three 550,000 bl shipments of Cold Lake crude from Vancouver onto a VLCC at PAL averaged about $8.055mn lumpsum, or $4.92/bl, with a low of $4.35/bl from 8-13 August and a high of $5.45/bl on 22 May, according to Argus data. This includes $150,000 ship-to-ship transfer costs at PAL, 15 days of VLCC demurrage and three days of Aframax demurrage for each reverse lightering.
VLCC costs could change preferences
Though it may have been cheaper to load TMX crude on VLCCs at PAL since May, volatility in the VLCC market — which often falls to yearly lows in summer before climbing to seasonal highs in the winter — could entice traders to opt for direct Aframax shipments if VLCCs hit their expected peak in the winter.
VLCC costs for shipments from the US west coast to China are influenced by the VLCC markets in the Mideast Gulf and Brazil, where ships look for their next voyage after discharging on the US west coast.
For now, Vancouver-loading Aframax rates are under pressure from the reemergence of VLCCs in what had become an Aframax trade in Thailand, boosting Aframax supply in the Pacific and pulling the class’s rate to ship crude from Vancouver to the US west coast to its lowest level in more than three months on 19 August.
In mid-July, VLCCs resumed discharging via single point mooring (SPM) at Thailand's port of Map Ta Phut for the first time since January 2022, ship-tracking data from Vortexa show. Prior to the SPM's return to service, VLCCs could discharge cargoes only by lightering onto smaller Aframaxes, which would then unload at a different berth in the port.
This created demand for about eight Aframax lighterings each month, but with VLCCs in Thailand again able to discharge directly, that demand is effectively halted, putting downward pressure in the broader southeast Asia Aframax market.
Since July, two Aframaxes have left the southeast Asia market for Vancouver, according to ship tracking data from Kpler: the Eagle Brisbane, which previously was used in lightering operations at Map Ta Phut, and the Blue Sea, which recently hauled fuel oil from nearby Singapore to China.
Spotlight content
Related news
US aims to contain Greenland fallout on market
US aims to contain Greenland fallout on market
Washington, 20 January (Argus) — President Donald Trump's administration is rushing to stave off a potential trade war with Europe and its negative effects on financial markets, as the UK and EU have pushed back on his bid to annex Denmark's Greenland territory. Trump has threatened to impose a 10pc tariff on US imports from the UK and seven members of the EU from 1 February, unless they agree to his demand for the US takeover of Greenland. The UK appears to rule out retaliatory measures, but EU leaders will meet on 22 January to agree on the bloc's response. The European parliament is preparing to freeze work on implementing laws for the EU-US trade deal agreed to last summer. US stock and financial markets fell in Tuesday morning sessions. But US treasury secretary Scott Bessent, speaking at the Davos Economic Forum in Switzerland, urged his EU counterparts to desist from retaliatory measures. He blamed the downward trend in US financial markets on the contagion effect from a sharp fall in Japan's government bond markets on Monday. "I tell everyone, 'sit back, take a deep breath, do not retaliate'", Bessent said at the forum. "The president will be here tomorrow, and he will get his message across." Trump is scheduled to arrive in Davos on Wednesday to address the forum and hold meetings with EU leaders. California governor Gavin Newsom (D), who is also at Davos, on Tuesday urged the European leaders to take a tougher stand against Trump. Newsom said his message to the EU leaders is to "get off your knees and grow a spine," adding that "there's no diplomacy with Donald Trump." The White House has not released any details on how Trump's tariff threat against select EU members will be carried out and whether energy commodities will continue to be exempted from tariffs. So far there are no executive orders from Trump on implementing tariffs starting 1 February. Bessent also defended Trump's designs on Greenland, reiterating the president's argument that the US needs to take over the island's security to prevent Russia and China from attacking it. Bessent asserted that "this has been in the minds of American presidents for more than 150 years". The French foreign ministry on Monday said that the US explanation for needing to annex Greenland is the equivalent of arguing that "if there were a fire someday, firefighters would intervene — so better burn the house now." By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
US private firms on parade for Trump’s Venezuela push
US private firms on parade for Trump’s Venezuela push
New York, 19 January (Argus) — The privately held US oil producers that were most vocal in their support of President Donald Trump's push to rebuild Venezuela's crippled energy infrastructure at a recent White House meeting may struggle to match their initial enthusiasm with firm action. While smaller operators, including wildcatters, went to great lengths to tell Trump how quickly they could make inroads and help to revive the South American nation's ailing oil sector — citing their nimble approach and record of working in other high-risk countries — the reality on the ground may be different. Privately held firms were the biggest group represented among the two dozen or so executives summoned to the White House for talks with Trump on the future of Venezuela's oil industry. But they are likely to face the same challenges as their larger peers, which had made their reservations all too clear. Those concerns surround the lack of a legal and commercial framework as well as an unstable security situation following the capture of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro. With the Maduro regime still otherwise largely intact and no change at state-owned oil company PdV, there is "not going to be any change in business practices down there", the University of Houston energy economist Ed Hirs warns. Firms will need assurances about the safety of their workers and equipment before investing. "They need to have a guarantee that they can get their money out," Hirs says. The same obstacles that inform the go-slow approach being taken by some leading US oil companies — most notably major ExxonMobil, which Trump threatened to sideline from his plans following its warning that Venezuela is at present "uninvestible" — could mitigate against any early action. Fellow major Chevron was the sole US company to offer specific pledges to ramp up production at the meeting, but it has first-mover advantage, having stayed in Venezuela when others left almost 20 years ago. Short-term efforts may be limited to preparations to send in teams to assess current infrastructure. Risky business Still, that did not stop independents from assuring Trump they were keen to help bring back Venezuelan oil production, which has slumped by 70pc since the late 1990s. "We are ready to go to Venezuela," Denver-based Armstrong Oil & Gas founder Bill Armstrong said. "It's prime real estate." The firm controls 8mn offshore acres in the Caribbean, adjacent to Venezuela. Aspect Holdings chairman Alex Cranberg told Trump how his company had been an early mover in Iraqi Kurdistan, despite being warned it was not safe to be there at the time — a bet that had paid off. "Venezuela has a tremendous amount of opportunity," Cranberg said. "What you're doing by putting the US in control of the cash flow coming out of the country is giving companies like ours the confidence to say we can kickstart this production." Hilcorp founder Jeff Hildebrand also said he was fully committed and ready to go into Venezuela. And Bryan Sheffield, managing partner of private equity firm Formentera Partners, said: "There is a lot of shale there — a lot of upside." It was left to Harold Hamm, founder of North Dakota-focused Continental Resources and Trump's long-term oil industry confidant, to inject a note of caution. Venezuela "excites me as an explorationist", Hamm told Trump. "It's a very exciting country, a lot of reserves." But he went on to say that there would be challenges involved, although the industry "knows how to handle that". But until there is clarity around contract sanctity and security, few firms may be willing to actually put boots on the ground. "The devil is in the details and the details have yet to be hammered out," Hirs says. By Stephen Cunningham Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
IMF warns of major risk to growth from US-EU tensions
IMF warns of major risk to growth from US-EU tensions
London, 19 January (Argus) — The IMF has upgraded its global economic growth forecast for 2026 but warned an escalation in trade tensions between the US and Europe is a "major risk." US president Donald Trump on 17 January threatened tariffs on several European countries in a bid to acquire the Danish territory of Greenland. This has raised concerns about a potential trade war between Europe and the US. "If we were to enter a phase in which there would be escalation and tit-for-tat policies… that would certainly have even more of an adverse effect on the economy, both through direct channels, but also through confidence, investment, and potentially through a repricing by [financial] markets," IMF chief economist Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas said at the launch of the IMF's World Economic Outlook Update (WEO) today. The IMF raised its global growth forecast for 2026 by 0.2 percentage points to 3.3pc, citing improvements in the US and China, and kept its projection for 2027 unchanged at 3.2pc. It puts 2025 economic growth at 3.3pc, from a previous 3.2pc. IMF forecasts are used by many economists to model oil demand projections. The IMF has repeatedly upgraded its growth projections since April 2025 and now sees 2025 and 2026 growth higher than when US-led tariff disruptions started in early 2025. The outlook's economic assumptions are current as of 31 December so do not take into account the US' latest tariff threat against European countries. It assumes an effective tariff rate of 18.5pc for US imports from the rest of the world. Any change to this would be a major risk," Gourinchas said. "This is something that could materially impact growth if we have higher levels of tariffs, if we have higher levels of geopolitical tension." The IMF said the US-led investment boom in AI and strong fiscal stimulus in China and Germany was offsetting economic losses associated with higher tariffs. But Gourinchas warned that debt financing in the AI sector was becoming more prevalent, and this could "amplify shocks if returns failed to materialise." He said any correction in AI stock market valuations would have far reaching negative effects or the global economy. The IMF said fiscal discipline is weakening across the globe, particularly in advanced economies. "The risk here [is] that countries will be unable to face the significant challenges ahead in terms of population aging, climate transition, national security or ability to support the economy, should a large shock occur," Gourinchas said. By Aydin Calik Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
US tackles protection of Venezuelan oil funds
US tackles protection of Venezuelan oil funds
Washington, 19 January (Argus) — US president Donald Trump's administration plans to protect future Venezuelan oil export revenue from seizure by US-based creditors, which hold billions of dollars in claims against Caracas and state-owned PdV. US actions have introduced a new twist in the years-long saga to auction off PdV-owned refiner Citgo as part of a court-mandated sale. An executive order Trump signed on 9 January extends a prohibition on seizing US-based Venezuelan property to the proceeds from sales of Venezuelan crude and other energy commodities. The US administration has said it plans to market Venezuelan energy commodities on behalf of Caracas with proceeds held in bank accounts controlled by the US treasury. US-facilitated sales of Venezuelan crude cargoes had netted $500mn as of 14 January, with additional sales "expected in the coming days and weeks", a US official said. Venezuelan crude cargoes sold under US-facilitated transactions are commanding higher prices than before the forced removal of the country's president, Nicolas Maduro, two weeks ago, US energy secretary Chris Wright says. Trump earlier this month made Wright responsible for managing the sale of 30mn-50mn bl of floating and onshore Venezuelan crude. Venezuelan interim president Delcy Rodriguez, whom Trump on 14 January described as a "terrific person" for her co-operation with US demands, would potentially be able to draw on at least some of those proceeds. But the US administration has not explained how it will disperse the funds. Washington since 2019 has blocked Venezuelan funds in the US, including its central bank reserves, nominally to deny access to Maduro. But this has also frustrated US oil producers, bondholders, mining firms and other companies, which have advanced claims against Caracas worth more than $25bn. The most advanced legal cases brought forward by creditors has resulted in a decision by the US District Court for the District of Delaware to sell Citgo for $5.9bn. ConocoPhillips has registered three claims totalling almost $12bn and could see some of them satisfied if Citgo is sold. But a US appeals court, which expects to take up a possible appeal against the Delaware decision and 22 other legal cases brought forward against Caracas, has asked the Trump administration whether the government change in Venezuela could influence the appeals process. The administration has yet to respond. Sympathy for expropriators Trump last year justified the US military build-up that culminated in Maduro's capture on 3 January by citing the need to restore the property of US companies that Venezuela had expropriated. But the Trump administration has asserted authority over Caracas following Maduro's ouster, and Trump now shows far less willingness to help US firms seek restitution. "We're not going to look at what people lost in the past, because that was their fault," Trump told ConocoPhillips chief executive Ryan Lance during a meeting with oil company chiefs at the White House on 9 January. Trump advised Lance to "write off" the $12bn expropriation claim, suggesting that "you'll make it back, one way or another". The possibility of future losses is a factor holding back large US firms, despite Trump's lobbying for them to resume business in Venezuela. "We've had our assets seized there twice," ExxonMobil chief executive Darren Woods told Trump on 9 January. "And so you can imagine to re-enter a third time would require some pretty significant changes from what we've historically seen here and what is currently the state." Trump two days later complained that ExxonMobil was "playing too cute". By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.