Weight of Freight: TMX spurs new Aframax, VLCC trade in Pacific basin
The first three months of Canada's Trans Mountain Expansion (TMX) have sent a surge of crude to refiners in California and China, shifting tanker demand in the Pacific basin.
The 590,000 b/d TMX project nearly tripled the capacity of Trans Mountain’s pipeline system to 890,000 b/d when it opened on 1 May, linking Alberta's oil sands to Canada's west coast for direct access to lucrative Pacific Rim markets, where buyers are eager for heavy sour crude.
Between 20 May, when the first TMX cargo began loading, and 20 August, about 165,000 b/d of Vancouver crude exports landed at ports on the US west coast, primarily in California, up from about 30,000 b/d in that same span last year, according to data from analytics firm Kpler.
The freight rate for a Vancouver-US west coast Aframax shipment averaged $1.98/bl for Cold Lake between 1 May and 20 August. This ranged from a low of $1.50/bl from 1-3 May when shipowners repositioned to the region in anticipation of TMX to a high of $2.32/bl from 13-14 June, according to Argus data.
The new oil flow into the US west coast has displaced shipments from farther afield in Ecuador and Saudi Arabia. Crude exports from those countries into the US west coast averaged 110,000 b/d and 25,000 b/d, respectively, between 20 May and 20 August, down from 155,000 b/d and 135,000 b/d over the same stretch in 2023, according to Kpler.
The growth of the Vancouver market, which benefits from its proximity to California, has reduced tonne-miles, a proxy for tanker demand, into the US west coast. This has outpaced slightly lower crude demand, which fell in part due to Phillips 66 halting crude runs at its 115,000 b/d refinery in Rodeo, California, in February to produce renewable fuels, as well as weaker-than-expected road fuel demand this summer.
Tonne-miles for US west coast crude imports fell by 14pc to 106bn between 20 May and 20 August 2024 compared with the same period a year earlier, Vortexa data show, while overall crude imports declined just 8.6pc to 1.37mn b/d, according to Kpler.
PAL-ing around with VLCCs
Though much of Vancouver’s exports have been shipped to the US west coast, Canadian producers have found ready buyers in Asia-Pacific as well, where about 160,000 b/d of Vancouver exports went between 20 May and 20 August, compared with none a year prior, Kpler data show.Buyers and sellers have displayed a preference for using ship-to-ship transfers onto very large crude carriers (VLCCs) at the Pacific Area Lightering zone (PAL) off the coast of southern California, rather than sending Aframaxes directly to refineries in east Asia. Of the 30 Vancouver-origin Aframax cargoes that have landed in China, South Korea and India, 19 were transferred onto VLCCs at PAL, Kpler data show. Seven cargoes were sent directly to east Asia on time-chartered Aframaxes — the majority by Suncor — and just four were sent using spot tonnage, likely due to the expensive economics of trans-Pacific Aframax shipments.
The Vancouver-China Aframax rate between 1 May and 20 August averaged $5.90/bl, with a low of $4.94/bl from 19-20 August and a high of $6.41/bl from 1-10 May and again from 4-12 June, according to Argus data.
Over the same time, the cost to reverse lighter, or transfer, three 550,000 bl shipments of Cold Lake crude from Vancouver onto a VLCC at PAL averaged about $8.055mn lumpsum, or $4.92/bl, with a low of $4.35/bl from 8-13 August and a high of $5.45/bl on 22 May, according to Argus data. This includes $150,000 ship-to-ship transfer costs at PAL, 15 days of VLCC demurrage and three days of Aframax demurrage for each reverse lightering.
VLCC costs could change preferences
Though it may have been cheaper to load TMX crude on VLCCs at PAL since May, volatility in the VLCC market — which often falls to yearly lows in summer before climbing to seasonal highs in the winter — could entice traders to opt for direct Aframax shipments if VLCCs hit their expected peak in the winter.
VLCC costs for shipments from the US west coast to China are influenced by the VLCC markets in the Mideast Gulf and Brazil, where ships look for their next voyage after discharging on the US west coast.
For now, Vancouver-loading Aframax rates are under pressure from the reemergence of VLCCs in what had become an Aframax trade in Thailand, boosting Aframax supply in the Pacific and pulling the class’s rate to ship crude from Vancouver to the US west coast to its lowest level in more than three months on 19 August.
In mid-July, VLCCs resumed discharging via single point mooring (SPM) at Thailand's port of Map Ta Phut for the first time since January 2022, ship-tracking data from Vortexa show. Prior to the SPM's return to service, VLCCs could discharge cargoes only by lightering onto smaller Aframaxes, which would then unload at a different berth in the port.
This created demand for about eight Aframax lighterings each month, but with VLCCs in Thailand again able to discharge directly, that demand is effectively halted, putting downward pressure in the broader southeast Asia Aframax market.
Since July, two Aframaxes have left the southeast Asia market for Vancouver, according to ship tracking data from Kpler: the Eagle Brisbane, which previously was used in lightering operations at Map Ta Phut, and the Blue Sea, which recently hauled fuel oil from nearby Singapore to China.
Spotlight content
Related news
Opec sticks to strong oil demand growth forecast
Opec sticks to strong oil demand growth forecast
London, 15 July (Argus) — Opec has kept its global oil demand growth projection for 2025 and 2026 broadly unchanged for the fourth consecutive month, maintaining a more bullish view than other major forecasters. The group expects demand to rise by 1.29mn b/d to 105.13mn b/d in 2025, and by a further 1.28mn b/d to 106.42mn b/d in 2026, according to its latest Monthly Oil Market Report (MOMR) published today. These projections remain significantly higher than those from the IEA and the US Energy Information Administration (EIA). The IEA forecasts demand growth of 700,000 b/d in 2025 and 720,000 b/d in 2026, while the EIA sees increases of 800,000 b/d this year and 1.05mn b/d next year. Crude prices were volatile in the first half of 2025, driven by uncertainty over US trade policy and geopolitical tensions linked to the Israel-Iran conflict and the Russia-Ukraine war. Despite this, "physical market fundamentals remained robust, with global oil supply and demand broadly balanced", Opec said. The group also pointed to a year-on-year decline in OECD oil inventories in the first half of 2025, alongside strong crude intake by refiners ahead of the seasonal rise in summer demand. On the supply side, Opec left its forecast for non-Opec+ liquids output growth unchanged at 810,000 b/d in 2025 and 730,000 b/d in 2026. Opec+ crude production — including Mexico — rose by 349,000 b/d to 41.56mn b/d in June, based on an average of secondary sources including Argus . The group estimates the call on Opec+ crude at 42.5mn b/d in 2025 and 42.9mn b/d in 2026. By Aydin Calik Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Mexico to negotiate Trump’s tariffs: Sheinbaum
Mexico to negotiate Trump’s tariffs: Sheinbaum
Mexico City, 14 July (Argus) — Mexico believes it can reach a deal with US president Donald Trump after he said he would impose 30pc tariffs on goods imported from Mexico beginning on 1 August. Over the weekend Trump made public on his social media platform a letter sent to Mexican president Claudia Sheinbaum on Friday, threatening the new tariffs. The move could significantly disrupt crude flows from Mexico to the US, and refined product flows from the US to Mexico. Mexico's ministries of the economy, foreign affairs, finance, security and energy said in a statement Saturday that they met with their US counterparts on Friday to begin negotiations to head off the new tariffs before 1 August. The Mexican ministries called the new tariff plan "unfair treatment." With the working group— created by the US State Department — leading the talks, Sheinbaum said today she trusts a deal can be made before 1 August. It is not clear if the 30pc tariff threat applies to trade currently covered by the US-Mexico-Canada trade agreement (USMCA). A White House official said previously that a 35pc tariff against Canada would not include USMCA-covered trade, but that those terms could change. Mexico also has a plan should no deal be reached, Sheinbaum said, without specifying details. When previously threatened with tariffs, Sheinbaum discussed plans to bolster Mexico's economy to become more resilient in the face of disrupted trade with its top trade partner, as well as unspecified retaliatory tariffs. But Trump vowed to raise the tariffs even higher if Mexico was to retaliate with its own measures. In his initial letter to Sheinbaum, Trump repeated previous justifications for higher tariffs by pointing to Mexico's "failure" to stop criminal groups from smuggling fentanyl into the US. Trump recognized that Mexico is working on the issue but does not consider these efforts fruitful: "Mexico has been helping me secure the border, BUT, what Mexico has done is not enough," Trump wrote. Trump sent a similar letter threatening tariffs on Friday to European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen. The US has clinched only one limited trade deal, which keeps in place a 10pc tariff on US imports from the UK while granting a lower-tariff import quota for UK-made cars. Trump has announced a deal with Vietnam, setting tariffs at 20pc. By Cas Biekmann Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
US withdraws 300,000 bl of SPR crude for Exxon refinery
US withdraws 300,000 bl of SPR crude for Exxon refinery
Houston, 14 July (Argus) — The US Department of Energy has withdrawn 300,000 bl of crude from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) to loan to ExxonMobil, which has requested up to 1mn bl for its 522,500 b/d refinery in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, following a disruption to offshore crude supply. The crude was withdrawn this month from the SPR for the "Exxon Oil Exchange", according to a Department of Energy dashboard dated 11 July. It was unclear whether more withdrawals are planned under the exchange. ExxonMobil has recently warned suppliers of "serious quality issues" related to elevated levels of zinc in crude supplied by the Mars pipeline, which brings oil from a series of deepwater fields in the Gulf of Mexico to shore, according to market sources. In letters to suppliers, ExxonMobil said the crude quality issues were "... significantly affecting the operations at our Baton Rouge Refinery," and that it would stop accepting Mars crude "... in an effort to avoid further damages." The US Department of Energy said last week it had approved the SPR loan of up to 1mn bl to ExxonMobil to ensure a stable supply of transportation fuels in Louisiana and the US Gulf coast. The agency said the crude loan will support ExxonMobil's "restoration of refinery operations that were reduced due to an offshore supply disruption". Chevron, one of the producers that contributes crude to the Mars pipeline, said on Friday that it has "identified a potential contributing source to the Mars crude composition changes, which is associated with the start-up of a new well." In April Chevron started production at the new deepwater Ballymore field , which ties into the Mars system. The SPR's Bayou Choctaw site connects to refineries in Baton Rouge through the Capline pipeline. In 2021, the Department of Energy authorized a loan of up to 3mn bl from the SPR to ExxonMobil's refinery in Baton Rouge to address disruptions related to Hurricane Ida. ExxonMobil was initially scheduled to return the crude in 2022, but that deadline has been repeatedly pushed back, most recently requiring return of the crude by March 2026. By Eunice Bridges Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Canada vows to cut red tape to woo energy firms
Canada vows to cut red tape to woo energy firms
Calgary, 14 July (Argus) — Canada's federal government is courting energy companies with the passage of a new law designed to fast-track major projects, but some developers might have reservations after a decade of frustration under Liberal party rule. Prime minister Mark Carney has pushed Bill C-5 through parliament to spark investment and project development by promising faster approval times while circumventing onerous rules made by previous Liberal-led governments. Oil and gas firms see this as a positive step, but with the law comes familiar ambiguity. To be considered for the new "national interest projects" list, a project should strengthen Canada's autonomy, provide economic benefits, have a high likelihood of completion, be in the interests of indigenous groups and contribute to meeting Canada's climate change objectives. How well a project satisfies these requirements will be at the discretion of Carney's cabinet and requires a leap of faith for supporters and opponents to trust the new process. Developers can expect a tighter two-year time limit for a federal decision, but how quickly the government navigates indigenous and environmental aspects remains to be seen. Such a consultation was seen as crucial under former prime minister Justin Trudeau, and Carney plans to strike a balance between these aspects and economic development. "Bill C-5 doesn't reform Canada's burdensome regulatory system, which is preventing needed investment," think-tank the Fraser Institute says. "It simply lets politicians decide who gets around it." Some indigenous and environmental groups fear that their concerns about potential projects might be played down under the new fast-track process. Such groups were critical of the legislation, not only because of its implications, but because the bill was fast-tracked, meaning debate and study were truncated. Steel of a deal Oil-rich Alberta's premier, Danielle Smith, and counterparts from other provinces are letting Carney's plan play out — for now. "You can only talk the talk for so long before you start putting some real action around it," Smith says, adding that she wants Alberta's projects on Carney's fast-track list by the autumn. Projects to move energy flows to Canada's east are once again being contemplated, with Smith signing an initial agreement last week with Doug Ford, premier of Ontario, which has been feeling the force of US tariff action. The two leaders will study more oil and gas pipelines between the two provinces built using Ontario steel — a prospect not possible under Trudeau. "Carney is no Justin Trudeau," Ford says, adding that Carney, unlike his predecessor, is bringing "the business approach to the federal government". Free enterprise is Alberta's forte, with TD Economics projecting the province to be a key economy for energy growth in 2025-26. An estimated C$17bn ($12bn) will be invested in oil sands in 2027, up by 28pc from 2024, the Alberta Energy Regulator says. Smith hopes to maintain strong capital inflow by securing more pipeline options, having set a goal of doubling Alberta's oil output from 4mn b/d in 2024. An economic revival seems poised to unfold across Canada, with a proposed LNG export project in Baie-Comeau, Quebec, unveiled this month, just days after LNG Canada's 14mn t/yr west coast facility loaded its first cargo. Quebec premier Francois Legault confirmed his team has discussed the Baie-Comeau project with developers. Federal energy minister Tim Hodgson suggested last week that itcould be considered for the national interest list if Quebec and the developers brought it forward. The scheme is a notable departure for Quebec, which — along with the federal government — cancelled a proposed LNG project in Saguenay in 2021 for environmental reasons. By Brett Holmes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.