Weight of Freight: TMX spurs new Aframax, VLCC trade in Pacific basin
The first three months of Canada's Trans Mountain Expansion (TMX) have sent a surge of crude to refiners in California and China, shifting tanker demand in the Pacific basin.
The 590,000 b/d TMX project nearly tripled the capacity of Trans Mountain’s pipeline system to 890,000 b/d when it opened on 1 May, linking Alberta's oil sands to Canada's west coast for direct access to lucrative Pacific Rim markets, where buyers are eager for heavy sour crude.
Between 20 May, when the first TMX cargo began loading, and 20 August, about 165,000 b/d of Vancouver crude exports landed at ports on the US west coast, primarily in California, up from about 30,000 b/d in that same span last year, according to data from analytics firm Kpler.
The freight rate for a Vancouver-US west coast Aframax shipment averaged $1.98/bl for Cold Lake between 1 May and 20 August. This ranged from a low of $1.50/bl from 1-3 May when shipowners repositioned to the region in anticipation of TMX to a high of $2.32/bl from 13-14 June, according to Argus data.
The new oil flow into the US west coast has displaced shipments from farther afield in Ecuador and Saudi Arabia. Crude exports from those countries into the US west coast averaged 110,000 b/d and 25,000 b/d, respectively, between 20 May and 20 August, down from 155,000 b/d and 135,000 b/d over the same stretch in 2023, according to Kpler.
The growth of the Vancouver market, which benefits from its proximity to California, has reduced tonne-miles, a proxy for tanker demand, into the US west coast. This has outpaced slightly lower crude demand, which fell in part due to Phillips 66 halting crude runs at its 115,000 b/d refinery in Rodeo, California, in February to produce renewable fuels, as well as weaker-than-expected road fuel demand this summer.
Tonne-miles for US west coast crude imports fell by 14pc to 106bn between 20 May and 20 August 2024 compared with the same period a year earlier, Vortexa data show, while overall crude imports declined just 8.6pc to 1.37mn b/d, according to Kpler.
PAL-ing around with VLCCs
Though much of Vancouver’s exports have been shipped to the US west coast, Canadian producers have found ready buyers in Asia-Pacific as well, where about 160,000 b/d of Vancouver exports went between 20 May and 20 August, compared with none a year prior, Kpler data show.Buyers and sellers have displayed a preference for using ship-to-ship transfers onto very large crude carriers (VLCCs) at the Pacific Area Lightering zone (PAL) off the coast of southern California, rather than sending Aframaxes directly to refineries in east Asia. Of the 30 Vancouver-origin Aframax cargoes that have landed in China, South Korea and India, 19 were transferred onto VLCCs at PAL, Kpler data show. Seven cargoes were sent directly to east Asia on time-chartered Aframaxes — the majority by Suncor — and just four were sent using spot tonnage, likely due to the expensive economics of trans-Pacific Aframax shipments.
The Vancouver-China Aframax rate between 1 May and 20 August averaged $5.90/bl, with a low of $4.94/bl from 19-20 August and a high of $6.41/bl from 1-10 May and again from 4-12 June, according to Argus data.
Over the same time, the cost to reverse lighter, or transfer, three 550,000 bl shipments of Cold Lake crude from Vancouver onto a VLCC at PAL averaged about $8.055mn lumpsum, or $4.92/bl, with a low of $4.35/bl from 8-13 August and a high of $5.45/bl on 22 May, according to Argus data. This includes $150,000 ship-to-ship transfer costs at PAL, 15 days of VLCC demurrage and three days of Aframax demurrage for each reverse lightering.
VLCC costs could change preferences
Though it may have been cheaper to load TMX crude on VLCCs at PAL since May, volatility in the VLCC market — which often falls to yearly lows in summer before climbing to seasonal highs in the winter — could entice traders to opt for direct Aframax shipments if VLCCs hit their expected peak in the winter.
VLCC costs for shipments from the US west coast to China are influenced by the VLCC markets in the Mideast Gulf and Brazil, where ships look for their next voyage after discharging on the US west coast.
For now, Vancouver-loading Aframax rates are under pressure from the reemergence of VLCCs in what had become an Aframax trade in Thailand, boosting Aframax supply in the Pacific and pulling the class’s rate to ship crude from Vancouver to the US west coast to its lowest level in more than three months on 19 August.
In mid-July, VLCCs resumed discharging via single point mooring (SPM) at Thailand's port of Map Ta Phut for the first time since January 2022, ship-tracking data from Vortexa show. Prior to the SPM's return to service, VLCCs could discharge cargoes only by lightering onto smaller Aframaxes, which would then unload at a different berth in the port.
This created demand for about eight Aframax lighterings each month, but with VLCCs in Thailand again able to discharge directly, that demand is effectively halted, putting downward pressure in the broader southeast Asia Aframax market.
Since July, two Aframaxes have left the southeast Asia market for Vancouver, according to ship tracking data from Kpler: the Eagle Brisbane, which previously was used in lightering operations at Map Ta Phut, and the Blue Sea, which recently hauled fuel oil from nearby Singapore to China.
Spotlight content
Related news
Riyadh discloses damage to key Aramco facilities
Riyadh discloses damage to key Aramco facilities
Washington, 9 April (Argus) — Saudi Aramco's East-West pipeline and its Manifa and Khurais oil fields have suffered significant damage from recent Iranian attacks, Saudi oil ministry said on Thursday, according to state news agency Spa. An attack on a pumping station on the East-West pipeline cut capacity by 700,000 b/d, the ministry said. The pipeline became Saudi Arabia's primary export outlet after Iran shut down navigation through the strait of Hormuz, and it reached a full 7mn b/d capacity in late March. Further attacks cut production capacity at Manifa and Khurais by 300,000 b/d each, the ministry said. It did not detail when either of the disclosed attacks took place and whether any of them occurred after the announcement of a ceasefire between the US and Iran on 7 April. Tehran has been targeting energy facilities in Saudi Arabia and other Mideast Gulf states since coming under attack from the US and Israel on 28 February. Iranian attacks also have targeted Aramco's Satorp, Ras Tanura, Samref and Riyadh refineries, "directly affecting exports of refined products to global markets," according to the ministry. An attack on the Juaymah facility has curbed exports of LPG and NGL. An Aramco security staff member was killed and seven members of facilities' staff were injured during those attacks, the ministry said. "The continuation of these attacks leads to reduced supply and slows recovery, thereby affecting the security of supply for consuming countries and contributing to increased volatility in oil markets," it said. "This has already negatively impacted the global economy, particularly with the depletion of a significant portion of operational and emergency inventories, which has affected the availability of supplies and limited the ability to respond to this." Iran and Mideast Gulf countries reported attacks on their energy facilities in the initial hours after the announcement of the 7 April ceasefire. The US has halted hostilities against Iran. Vessel traffic through the strait of Hormuz remains extremely constrained, despite Tehran's pledge to reopen it once the ceasefire took effect. "Let's be clear: The strait of Hormuz is not open," Abu-Dhabi's state-owned Adnoc chief executive Sultan al-Jaber said on Thursday. "Access is being restricted, conditioned and controlled." By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Iran war to cut global growth: IMF
Iran war to cut global growth: IMF
Washington, 9 April (Argus) — The IMF will reduce its forecast for global economic growth in its World Economic Outlook due out next week because of the severe energy supply shock caused by the war in Iran, executive director Kristalina Georgieva said on Thursday. Uncertainty over the course of the war — currently on hold until 21 April under a fragile truce — means that the IMF will have to outline a range of scenarios for global growth forecasts. But "even our most hopeful scenario involves a growth downgrade", Georgieva said in a speech at the Washington-based Council on Foreign Relations that previewed next week's report. The IMF's most recent forecast, released in January , pegged global growth at 3.3pc for 2026 and 3.2pc next year. IMF forecasts are used by many economists to model oil demand projections. The expected downgrade to growth forecast reflects Mideast Gulf infrastructure damage, supply disruptions and loss of confidence for investors, Georgieva said. She cited damage to Qatar's Ras Laffan LNG export facility and other key regional infrastructure, noting that "even in a best case, there will be no neat and clean return to the status quo ante." The strait of Hormuz remains largely unpassable despite a ceasefire the US and Iran announced on 7 April that nominally called for it fully reopening. The terms of transit through Hormuz are a topic of negotiations between the US and Iran. "The fact is, we don't truly know what the future holds for transits through the strait of Hormuz or, for that matter, for the recovery of regional air traffic," Georgieva said. She referenced the lack of full recovery for commercial traffic through the Bab al-Mandeb strait in the Red Sea, even though large scale attacks by Yemen's Houthis there ceased for more than a year. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Shipowners shun Mideast Gulf despite peace efforts
Shipowners shun Mideast Gulf despite peace efforts
Singapore, 9 April (Argus) — The ceasefire in the US-Iran war has sparked cautious optimism among shipping market participants that more vessels could soon be able to exit the strait of Hormuz. But Mideast Gulf loadings are unlikely to return to pre-war levels anytime soon, given high costs, the difficulty of securing insurance and the risk of continued attacks. The two-week US-Iran ceasefire announced on 7 April may offer some hope for vessels currently stranded in the Mideast Gulf, a freight analyst observed. "Yet the reality has not changed — the risks remain substantial and real for shipowners". Attacks on commercial shipping have brought transits through the strait of Hormuz to a near standstill since the war broke out on 28 February, severely curtailing exports of crude, oil products, LNG, fertilizers and other commodities. The Asia-Pacific region is the most heavily exposed to the supply disruptions. Governments in the region, including the Philippines , Malaysia and Thailand have held talks with Iran to guarantee the safe passage of some vessels through the strait. But these agreements appear to facilitate only ship exits, with shipowners and traders unconvinced the government-to-government deals — or the ceasefire — provide sufficient assurance for them to resume new loadings from the Mideast Gulf, shipbrokers noted. No-one is currently willing to be the first to exit the strait, an official at a South Korean refiner said. Iran is charging shipowners a fee of $1/bl for their vessels to pass through the strait, Hamid Hosseini, spokesman for Iran's oil, gas and petrochemical products exporters' union, told Argus today. Tehran is proposing a regional solution to the crisis , under which the proceeds of the vessel fees would be shared with other countries as war reparations, according to a bill being discussed in the country's parliament. But it is unclear if this will help smooth transits through the strait. The failure of an Indian charterer to secure a vessel for an Iraqi cargo this week encapsulates the continuing uncertainty. Indian state-controlled refiner Bharat Petroleum (BPCL) sought a Suezmax vessel on 7 April to load from Basrah to west coast India from 13 April. "Fixing with an India-based charterer should have provided [shipowners] sufficient confidence", one shipbroker said — especially given the Indian government held talks with Iran over two weeks ago, while Tehran on 4 April exempted Iraq from any restrictions imposed in the strait of Hormuz. But BPCL received no offers, even from Indian shipowners, and subsequently withdrew the cargo on 8 April. "This cargo had all the hallmarks of a relatively ‘easy fixture' but the risks [for shipowners] clearly overshadowed any interest toward it", an India-based shipbroker said. At least two other Mideast Gulf cargoes had to be withdrawn last week because the charterers were unable to secure offers from shipowners, Argus shipping data show. Risks remain More cargoes have emerged from the Mideast Gulf since the ceasefire. But a number of barriers are continuing to deter most shipowners from considering future loadings from the Mideast Gulf. "Yes, shipowners are likely to get good freight for Mideast Gulf shipments, but whether they actually get paid at the end remains a question", said another shipbroker, who reported incurring "significant demurrage" on one of its ships trapped in the Mideast Gulf. The freight clause in the charter-party did not clearly specify payment responsibilities in the event of war, leaving the shipowner "frustrated and locked in a dispute with the charterer", the shipbroker said. Securing insurance cover for the vessel and its cargo is also problematic. War risk insurance remains highly restrictive , with cover available only on a selective basis and largely limited to a small number of insurers, including some state-backed schemes. Any cover offered typically requires strong guarantees, sources said. Additional war risk premiums (AWRP) for the Mideast Gulf are at around 0.85pc of a vessel's hull and machinery value, with some cases at 0.55–0.75pc with a 50pc no claim bonus (NCB). AWRP rates are unlikely to ease immediately despite the ceasefire announcement, which will add further costs for shippers above significantly elevated freight rates, market participants said. Such difficulties mean there is little incentive for shipowners to seriously consider Mideast Gulf loadings, especially when they have other options available. "Freight rates in other regions have surged because of the Middle East conflict", a freight analyst said, "and that has offered opportunities outside the region for shipowners to secure attractive freight rates without risks". The Argus Crude Tanker Index, a composite measure of global very large crude carrier (VLCC), Suezmax and Aframax freight rates, has risen by 54.6pc since the war started — from $7.17/bl on 27 February to $11.09/bl on 8 April, which is just 2¢/bl short of its all-time-high on 26 March. "Overall, the risk-to-reward ratio for Mideast Gulf loadings still seems highly unfavorable, even with a ceasefire in place. I could lose my ship and my crew to a stray missile" a shipowner said. "Why would I want to put myself in that situation, when so many other options are available to me?" By Sean Lui Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Iran eyes regional solution for Hormuz crisis
Iran eyes regional solution for Hormuz crisis
Dubai, 9 April (Argus) — Iran is proposing a regional solution to the strait of Hormuz crisis that would involve at least some of the countries bordering the Mideast Gulf, according to a bill currently under discussion in parliament. Part of that would involve charging a fee for vessels passing through the key waterway, with revenues from this available to all participating countries as 'war reparations'. " Dubbed the 'law of strategic action for peace and development of the Persian Gulf,' the Iranian bill would govern Tehran's oversight and management of traffic through Hormuz, which has been severely disrupted since the start of the US-Israeli war against Iran on 28 February. Tehran's subsequent threats to any and all vessels it deemed to be 'unfriendly' led to traffic through the strait dropping to around seven a day in March, compared with typical daily movement of more than 100 before the war according to Kpler data. Diplomatic engagement with several of what Tehran dubs 'friendly' countries has seen a slight pick-up in traffic through the strait, with more than 11 vessels crossing on average in the first eight days of April. Malaysia, Thailand, the Philippines and Iraq have all secured deals for passage with Tehran, and Islamabad last week said it had secured the safe passage of 20 Pakistani-flagged ships. This pick-up came as Iran began introducing something of a toll system, whereby vessels would pay Tehran a fee to transit the waterway safely — a process first revealed by Iranian parliament member Alaeddin Boroujerdi in mid-March . Speaking to Argus , Hamid Hosseini, spokesman for Iran's oil, gas and petrochemical products exporters' union, confirmed the toll mechanism remains in place. "Every very large crude carrier (VLCC) transiting the strait has been paying $2mn, in line with what has been under discussion in parliament," Hosseini said. The fee being charged is directly linked to the volume of oil on board, Hosseini said. "Ship owners are being asked to pay $1 per barrel, and that can be done in the local currency, rials, or cryptocurrency, but only after the vessel has received a permit from the IRGC," he said. Tidings for all This mechanism appears to form the basis of how Iran sees the future of the strait of Hormuz, and its role as the guardian and guarantor of the key waterway. "The Iranian government, in co-operation with the Iranian armed forces, is obliged to provide services, like navigation guidance and vessel inspection, as well as compliance and financial assessments," the bill says, specifying that vessels related to "warring countries" will, for the most part, be barred. "The armed forces will determine which vessels are considered belligerent, and which are not," the bill says, stating that final say will come from the Supreme National Security Council (SNSC), one of Iran's most powerful decision-making bodies. Chaired by the president, the SNSC is responsible for national security, defense and major foreign policy strategy, and has been deeply involved in formulating Iran's war effort. The bill reiterates vessels will need to pay a fee to transit Hormuz, either in rials or cryptocurrency, it says proceeds will not go to Iranian state coffers, but to what it calls a 'Persian Gulf Reconstruction and Development Fund' that regional countries can apply to join. "The resources in this fund will be considered war reparations for Iran and other member countries, and be used for the reconstruction and development needs of the member countries," the bill says. Gulf countries are yet to show appetite for this plan. Oman's transport, communications and information technology minister Said Al-Maawali on 8 April said the country is party to all international maritime conventions, which do not allow for the imposition of charges on passage. The Iranian bill has secured approval from parliament's national security council, but has not yet been brought to the parliament floor for a vote, Hosseini said. By Nader Itayim Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.