Weight of Freight: TMX spurs new Aframax, VLCC trade in Pacific basin
The first three months of Canada's Trans Mountain Expansion (TMX) have sent a surge of crude to refiners in California and China, shifting tanker demand in the Pacific basin.
The 590,000 b/d TMX project nearly tripled the capacity of Trans Mountain’s pipeline system to 890,000 b/d when it opened on 1 May, linking Alberta's oil sands to Canada's west coast for direct access to lucrative Pacific Rim markets, where buyers are eager for heavy sour crude.
Between 20 May, when the first TMX cargo began loading, and 20 August, about 165,000 b/d of Vancouver crude exports landed at ports on the US west coast, primarily in California, up from about 30,000 b/d in that same span last year, according to data from analytics firm Kpler.
The freight rate for a Vancouver-US west coast Aframax shipment averaged $1.98/bl for Cold Lake between 1 May and 20 August. This ranged from a low of $1.50/bl from 1-3 May when shipowners repositioned to the region in anticipation of TMX to a high of $2.32/bl from 13-14 June, according to Argus data.
The new oil flow into the US west coast has displaced shipments from farther afield in Ecuador and Saudi Arabia. Crude exports from those countries into the US west coast averaged 110,000 b/d and 25,000 b/d, respectively, between 20 May and 20 August, down from 155,000 b/d and 135,000 b/d over the same stretch in 2023, according to Kpler.
The growth of the Vancouver market, which benefits from its proximity to California, has reduced tonne-miles, a proxy for tanker demand, into the US west coast. This has outpaced slightly lower crude demand, which fell in part due to Phillips 66 halting crude runs at its 115,000 b/d refinery in Rodeo, California, in February to produce renewable fuels, as well as weaker-than-expected road fuel demand this summer.
Tonne-miles for US west coast crude imports fell by 14pc to 106bn between 20 May and 20 August 2024 compared with the same period a year earlier, Vortexa data show, while overall crude imports declined just 8.6pc to 1.37mn b/d, according to Kpler.
PAL-ing around with VLCCs
Though much of Vancouver’s exports have been shipped to the US west coast, Canadian producers have found ready buyers in Asia-Pacific as well, where about 160,000 b/d of Vancouver exports went between 20 May and 20 August, compared with none a year prior, Kpler data show.Buyers and sellers have displayed a preference for using ship-to-ship transfers onto very large crude carriers (VLCCs) at the Pacific Area Lightering zone (PAL) off the coast of southern California, rather than sending Aframaxes directly to refineries in east Asia. Of the 30 Vancouver-origin Aframax cargoes that have landed in China, South Korea and India, 19 were transferred onto VLCCs at PAL, Kpler data show. Seven cargoes were sent directly to east Asia on time-chartered Aframaxes — the majority by Suncor — and just four were sent using spot tonnage, likely due to the expensive economics of trans-Pacific Aframax shipments.
The Vancouver-China Aframax rate between 1 May and 20 August averaged $5.90/bl, with a low of $4.94/bl from 19-20 August and a high of $6.41/bl from 1-10 May and again from 4-12 June, according to Argus data.
Over the same time, the cost to reverse lighter, or transfer, three 550,000 bl shipments of Cold Lake crude from Vancouver onto a VLCC at PAL averaged about $8.055mn lumpsum, or $4.92/bl, with a low of $4.35/bl from 8-13 August and a high of $5.45/bl on 22 May, according to Argus data. This includes $150,000 ship-to-ship transfer costs at PAL, 15 days of VLCC demurrage and three days of Aframax demurrage for each reverse lightering.
VLCC costs could change preferences
Though it may have been cheaper to load TMX crude on VLCCs at PAL since May, volatility in the VLCC market — which often falls to yearly lows in summer before climbing to seasonal highs in the winter — could entice traders to opt for direct Aframax shipments if VLCCs hit their expected peak in the winter.
VLCC costs for shipments from the US west coast to China are influenced by the VLCC markets in the Mideast Gulf and Brazil, where ships look for their next voyage after discharging on the US west coast.
For now, Vancouver-loading Aframax rates are under pressure from the reemergence of VLCCs in what had become an Aframax trade in Thailand, boosting Aframax supply in the Pacific and pulling the class’s rate to ship crude from Vancouver to the US west coast to its lowest level in more than three months on 19 August.
In mid-July, VLCCs resumed discharging via single point mooring (SPM) at Thailand's port of Map Ta Phut for the first time since January 2022, ship-tracking data from Vortexa show. Prior to the SPM's return to service, VLCCs could discharge cargoes only by lightering onto smaller Aframaxes, which would then unload at a different berth in the port.
This created demand for about eight Aframax lighterings each month, but with VLCCs in Thailand again able to discharge directly, that demand is effectively halted, putting downward pressure in the broader southeast Asia Aframax market.
Since July, two Aframaxes have left the southeast Asia market for Vancouver, according to ship tracking data from Kpler: the Eagle Brisbane, which previously was used in lightering operations at Map Ta Phut, and the Blue Sea, which recently hauled fuel oil from nearby Singapore to China.
Spotlight content
Related news
Double trouble for Caracas
Double trouble for Caracas
Earthquake recovery takes centre stage, but the same uncertainties about upstream investment wait in the wings, write Carla Bass and Carlos Camacho Caracas, 10 July (Argus) — Venezuela's twin earthquakes in late June left crude and natural gas production infrastructure largely intact, despite killing thousands, even as they shifted the political ground in ways that are still emerging. The country's oil operations are concentrated in the Orinoco heavy oil belt east of Caracas and around Lake Maracaibo to the west — outside areas hardest hit by the quakes, such as the city of La Guaira. The destruction killed more than 3,800, a count that is expected to rise as thousands are still missing. The earthquakes came as Venezuela is trying to rebuild its economy and oil industry in the wake of the US' 3 January incursion.Crude production is continuing apace, most operators say. It climbed to 1.2mn b/d in June from about 1.1mn b/d in prior months, with the government aiming for 3mn b/d in 2030. Efforts to attract inward investment are also expected to continue as planned, industry sources say, although progress here was already slow as investors await greater certainty about operating in the country. Interim president Delcy Rodriguez says oil regulations she approved this week will help provide "resources for the recovery and reconstruction of our country" after the quake. The regulations are meant to implement reforms passed earlier this year to allow firms other than PdV to operate oil fields. They also simplify taxes and trim the state's share of earnings and production — Caracas' take from crude production projects has fallen to 20-35pc for most projects, down sharply from an earlier standard of 83.33pc — and create more defined royalty tiers. But Rodriguez must first get to grips with a country where many citizens want basic disaster recovery to take priority over oil contracts. Disapproval of the Rodriguez administration rose to 63pc in an AtlasIntel-Bloomberg poll conducted on 26-20 June, following the quakes, up from 59pc a month earlier. And 65pc disapprove of the government's earthquake response, according to the same poll. Pressure release The disaster could buy Rodriguez's regime a temporary reprieve from political pressure or catalyse a democratic transition, according to consultancy Teneo's political analyst Nicholas Watson. Most officials who worked under former president Nicolas Maduro — including some wanted by the US for drug trafficking — remain in place. But the US has said it is prioritising stability before moving to free elections. The US has indicated it will reinforce the status quo. This includes not opening a path for opposition leader Maria Corina Machado to visit Venezuela after the disaster, although President Donald Trump later indicated this could change. He has still expressed solidarity with Rodriguez and committed to continue disaster recovery aid, while cutting humanitarian assistance to many other countries. But in any case, investor uncertainty will do more to delay upstream development than earthquake recovery. Both existing and hopeful new producers have lined up to sign initial agreements, but "the push now is to turn those into contracts", one industry source said. Contract models included in the reform are workable if not perfect, industry sources say, but the energy ministry will still have a high level of discretion. Potential newer entrants are also wary about commercialisation of production, which involves selling, for example, lighter crude to PdV and receiving potentially heavier crude or fuel oil as payment in kind. Cash flow also remains a problem. Disbursements of oil revenue that must go via a US Treasury Department fund could be more frequent, some operators say. For now, some Venezuelans' main energy concern is having natural gas supplies for cooking turned back on as pipeline and building inspections continue, if the building was lucky enough to stand. Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Opec+ production rebound at risk from renewed war
Opec+ production rebound at risk from renewed war
London, 10 July (Argus) — Opec+ crude production staged a partial recovery in June, but the gains are at risk as renewed fighting between the US and Iran threatens to cripple exports through the strait of Hormuz. Opec+ production rose by 2.25mn b/d on the month to 31.95mn b/d in June, the highest since the US-Iran war began on 28 February, Argus estimates. But overall output was still around 7.2mn b/d lower than levels before the war began. The June increase was driven by the Mideast Gulf members that were able to ramp up exports through the strait of Hormuz following the US-Iran interim peace deal on 18 June. Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Kuwait, Iran and Bahrain collectively increased production by 2.17mn b/d. But the recovery is under serious threat with the US and Iran exchanging fire across the Mideast Gulf this week. Any further escalation could even reverse some of the production gains that several key Opec+ members have made in recent weeks. The US-Iran war had devastating initial consequences for Opec+ production, which fell by a record 8.1mn b/d in the month following the conflict. Unable to export through Hormuz due to the threat of attacks on shipping, key members such as Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Kuwait had to curtail large parts of their output. But production rose last month as exports through the strait rose, albeit at levels well below pre-war flows. Saudi output increased by 520,000 b/d on the month to 7.09mn b/d in June, although this was still 3.79mn b/d below pre-war production. Iraq boosted output by 600,000 b/d to 2.15mn b/d as it ramped up exports from its Basrah port inside the Mideast Gulf and increased domestic consumption. Kuwait increased its output by 940,000 b/d to 1.52mn b/d and said production in the last 10 days of June was closer to 2mn b/d. Iran's production rose by 100,000 b/d to 2.75mn b/d after the US removed a blockade on its exports and issued a sanctions waiver for its oil sales as part of the interim peace deal. This waiver was revoked this week, which could affect Tehran's ability to ramp up production in the weeks ahead. And in its second month after leaving Opec, the UAE significantly increased both its exports and production. Output rose by 1.71mn b/d to a record 3.82mn b/d in June, around 360,000 b/d above the quota that the UAE would have probably had for the month if it had remained a member of the alliance. The UAE's rapid increase in output to well above pre-war levels has raised questions about a potential market share war between itself and Mideast Gulf Opec members as production recovers. Wound up Opec+ members remained around 7.14mn b/d below their target in June, despite the production rebound. Seven core members of the alliance have raised their collective production ceiling in recent months to prepare the ground to boost output significantly once the strait of Hormuz fully reopens. Saudi Arabia, Russia, Iraq, Kuwait, Kazakhstan, Algeria and Oman agreed on 5 July to a further 188,000 b/d rise in their collective target for August, leaving just 188,000 b/d of voluntary cuts in place, which could be fully unwound in September. If shipping through Hormuz recovers and a permanent end to the war can somehow be agreed, the relaxation of the targets could see the group eventually exceed its pre-war output. That is a big if. There is also the question of Russia's production, which was 760,000 b/d below target in June due to repeated Ukrainian attacks on its energy infrastructure. Further Russian output losses cannot be ruled out as long as the Ukraine war continues. By Aydin Calik Opec+ crude production mn b/d Jun May* Target† ± target Opec 8 13.96 11.82 20.28 -6.32 Non-Opec 9 12.79 12.81 13.61 -0.82 Opec+ 17 26.75 24.63 33.89 -7.14 Total Opec+ 31.95 29.70 na na *revised †includes extra cuts agreed in Apr 23 Opec wellhead production mn b/d Jun May Target† ± target Saudi Arabia 7.09 6.57 10.29 -3.20 Iraq 2.15 1.55 4.35 -2.20 Kuwait 1.52 0.58 2.63 -1.11 Algeria 1.00 0.98 0.99 0.01 Nigeria 1.65 1.59 1.50 +0.15 Congo (Brazzaville) 0.30 0.28 0.28 +0.02 Gabon 0.21 0.22 0.18 +0.03 Equatorial Guinea 0.04 0.05 0.07 -0.03 Opec 8 13.96 11.82 20.28 -6.32 Iran 2.75 2.65 na na Libya 1.35 1.32 na na Venezuela 1.10 1.10 na na Total Opec 11^ 19.16 16.89 na na †includes extra cuts agreed in Apr 23 ^Iran, Libya and Venezuela are exempt from production targets Non-Opec crude production mn b/d Jun May* Target† ± target Russia 9.00 9.00 9.76 -0.76 Oman 0.92 0.95 0.83 +0.09 Azerbaijan 0.44 0.44 0.55 -0.11 Kazakhstan 1.86 1.86 1.60 +0.26 Malaysia 0.34 0.35 0.40 -0.06 Bahrain 0.04 0.03 0.20 -0.16 Brunei 0.06 0.05 0.08 -0.02 Sudan 0.01 0.01 0.06 -0.05 South Sudan 0.12 0.12 0.12 -0.00 Total non-Opec 12.79 12.81 13.61 -0.82 *revised †includes extra cuts agreed in Apr 23 Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
India’s ONGC to expand crude strategic storage
India’s ONGC to expand crude strategic storage
New Delhi, 10 July (Argus) — India's state-owned Oil and Natural Gas (ONGC) is set to add 1.75mn t (12.83mn bl) of strategic petroleum reserve capacity to the country's existing reserves in Mangalore, strengthening overall oil storage to cushion against supply shocks in future. The addition will be above Mangalore's existing 1.5mn t underground cavern managed by Indian state-run Strategic Petroleum Reserves (ISPRL), the firm said in an exchange filing on 9 July, and this will take the total capacity in the region to 3.25mn t (23.8mn bl). The company further added that the new project is of "national importance," and is being developed in accordance with directives from the oil ministry. ONGC is set to invest its own capital as part of the project, in contrast to state-owned refiners only building commercial storage previously. But the timeline and the nature of procurement for filling the reserve is still uncertain. New Delhi has been mulling increasing the country's crude and LPG reserves to meet at least a month's worth of domestic demand after supply shocks emerged because of the de facto closure of the strait of Hormuz. Abu Dhabi's state-owned Adnoc is also looking to double its crude storage in India, to up to 4mn t (30mn bl), as part of a collaboration with ISPRL. Adnoc has nearly 2.05mn t of crude storage in India that includes 800,000t in Mangalore and 1.25mn t in Padur underground storage. By Rituparna Ghosh Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
IEA warns return to war will upend oil market recovery
IEA warns return to war will upend oil market recovery
London, 10 July (Argus) — The IEA warned today that the recent escalation in hostilities between the US and Iran could once again upend global supply and demand balances. In its latest Oil Market Report (OMR), the IEA trimmed its forecast for this year's demand decline and raised its supply outlook. But both projections hinge on tanker flows through the strait of Hormuz continuing to recover. The Paris-based watchdog warned that a return to conflict could jeopardise the partial recovery in global oil supply and demand that has been underway since mid-June, when the US and Iran struck an interim peace deal. Global oil demand has been recovering from its May low of 97.9mn b/d, down by 5.3mn b/d on the year, as increased exports through the strait of Hormuz are absorbed by pent-up Asian demand, the IEA said. Lower oil prices and a brighter economic outlook are also supporting oil use, it said. As a result, the agency said oil demand was set to decline by around 1mn b/d to 103.5mn b/d in 2026, around 70,000 b/d less than its estimate last month. It kept its projection for a 2mn b/d increase in global oil demand in 2027. The IEA said global oil supply rebounded by around 4.1mn b/d to 98.8mn b/d in June as Mideast Gulf producers partially restored output after the US-Iran framework agreement. Higher Mideast Gulf exports through the strait and greater use of routes that bypass the waterway lifted regional exports by 6.5mn b/d on the month to 16.1mn b/d, though they remained 8.3mn b/d below February levels. If exports continue to improve, the IEA said global oil supply would decline by 3.7mn b/d to 102.6mn b/d in 2026, around 210,000 b/d higher than last month's OMR, before rebounding by 7.5mn b/d in 2027. The IEA's balances imply a supply deficit of around 900,000 b/d in 2026 and a surplus of 4.6mn b/d in 2027. But the recovery in product supplies was lagging the rebound in crude flows, the agency said, as loadings from key Mideast Gulf refineries had yet to resume. It also noted that Ukrainian attacks on Russian refineries and export infrastructure had further tightened product markets. Global observed oil stocks rose by 21mn bl in June, their first increase since the Iran war began, as higher oil on water more than offset draws from onshore tanks. By Aydin Calik Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.