Weight of Freight: TMX spurs new Aframax, VLCC trade in Pacific basin
The first three months of Canada's Trans Mountain Expansion (TMX) have sent a surge of crude to refiners in California and China, shifting tanker demand in the Pacific basin.
The 590,000 b/d TMX project nearly tripled the capacity of Trans Mountain’s pipeline system to 890,000 b/d when it opened on 1 May, linking Alberta's oil sands to Canada's west coast for direct access to lucrative Pacific Rim markets, where buyers are eager for heavy sour crude.
Between 20 May, when the first TMX cargo began loading, and 20 August, about 165,000 b/d of Vancouver crude exports landed at ports on the US west coast, primarily in California, up from about 30,000 b/d in that same span last year, according to data from analytics firm Kpler.
The freight rate for a Vancouver-US west coast Aframax shipment averaged $1.98/bl for Cold Lake between 1 May and 20 August. This ranged from a low of $1.50/bl from 1-3 May when shipowners repositioned to the region in anticipation of TMX to a high of $2.32/bl from 13-14 June, according to Argus data.
The new oil flow into the US west coast has displaced shipments from farther afield in Ecuador and Saudi Arabia. Crude exports from those countries into the US west coast averaged 110,000 b/d and 25,000 b/d, respectively, between 20 May and 20 August, down from 155,000 b/d and 135,000 b/d over the same stretch in 2023, according to Kpler.
The growth of the Vancouver market, which benefits from its proximity to California, has reduced tonne-miles, a proxy for tanker demand, into the US west coast. This has outpaced slightly lower crude demand, which fell in part due to Phillips 66 halting crude runs at its 115,000 b/d refinery in Rodeo, California, in February to produce renewable fuels, as well as weaker-than-expected road fuel demand this summer.
Tonne-miles for US west coast crude imports fell by 14pc to 106bn between 20 May and 20 August 2024 compared with the same period a year earlier, Vortexa data show, while overall crude imports declined just 8.6pc to 1.37mn b/d, according to Kpler.
PAL-ing around with VLCCs
Though much of Vancouver’s exports have been shipped to the US west coast, Canadian producers have found ready buyers in Asia-Pacific as well, where about 160,000 b/d of Vancouver exports went between 20 May and 20 August, compared with none a year prior, Kpler data show.Buyers and sellers have displayed a preference for using ship-to-ship transfers onto very large crude carriers (VLCCs) at the Pacific Area Lightering zone (PAL) off the coast of southern California, rather than sending Aframaxes directly to refineries in east Asia. Of the 30 Vancouver-origin Aframax cargoes that have landed in China, South Korea and India, 19 were transferred onto VLCCs at PAL, Kpler data show. Seven cargoes were sent directly to east Asia on time-chartered Aframaxes — the majority by Suncor — and just four were sent using spot tonnage, likely due to the expensive economics of trans-Pacific Aframax shipments.
The Vancouver-China Aframax rate between 1 May and 20 August averaged $5.90/bl, with a low of $4.94/bl from 19-20 August and a high of $6.41/bl from 1-10 May and again from 4-12 June, according to Argus data.
Over the same time, the cost to reverse lighter, or transfer, three 550,000 bl shipments of Cold Lake crude from Vancouver onto a VLCC at PAL averaged about $8.055mn lumpsum, or $4.92/bl, with a low of $4.35/bl from 8-13 August and a high of $5.45/bl on 22 May, according to Argus data. This includes $150,000 ship-to-ship transfer costs at PAL, 15 days of VLCC demurrage and three days of Aframax demurrage for each reverse lightering.
VLCC costs could change preferences
Though it may have been cheaper to load TMX crude on VLCCs at PAL since May, volatility in the VLCC market — which often falls to yearly lows in summer before climbing to seasonal highs in the winter — could entice traders to opt for direct Aframax shipments if VLCCs hit their expected peak in the winter.
VLCC costs for shipments from the US west coast to China are influenced by the VLCC markets in the Mideast Gulf and Brazil, where ships look for their next voyage after discharging on the US west coast.
For now, Vancouver-loading Aframax rates are under pressure from the reemergence of VLCCs in what had become an Aframax trade in Thailand, boosting Aframax supply in the Pacific and pulling the class’s rate to ship crude from Vancouver to the US west coast to its lowest level in more than three months on 19 August.
In mid-July, VLCCs resumed discharging via single point mooring (SPM) at Thailand's port of Map Ta Phut for the first time since January 2022, ship-tracking data from Vortexa show. Prior to the SPM's return to service, VLCCs could discharge cargoes only by lightering onto smaller Aframaxes, which would then unload at a different berth in the port.
This created demand for about eight Aframax lighterings each month, but with VLCCs in Thailand again able to discharge directly, that demand is effectively halted, putting downward pressure in the broader southeast Asia Aframax market.
Since July, two Aframaxes have left the southeast Asia market for Vancouver, according to ship tracking data from Kpler: the Eagle Brisbane, which previously was used in lightering operations at Map Ta Phut, and the Blue Sea, which recently hauled fuel oil from nearby Singapore to China.
Spotlight content
Related news
US starts emergency crude release from SPR
US starts emergency crude release from SPR
Washington, 21 March (Argus) — President Donald Trump's administration has started the first shipments of crude released from the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) as part of a targeted 172mn bl emergency drawdown of crude from reserves. The initial crude shipments began on Friday, the same day the US Department of Energy (DOE) awarded contracts to eight companies to take 45.2mn bl of sweet and sour crude from three SPR storage sites in Texas and Louisiana. DOE has scheduled the crude deliveries from 1 April to 31 May, with the possibility of early deliveries. The drawdown began at "record speeds", nine days after Trump approved the release in coordination with the IEA as part of a global 400mn bl drawdown meant to reduce oil prices, DOE assistant secretary of hydrocarbons Kyle Haustveit said. The contracts will eventually add millions of barrels of crude back to the SPR "at no cost to taxpayers", he said. Shell, Marathon Petroleum and BP were among the companies that DOE awarded "exchange contracts", a type of loan under which they can take out crude from the SPR in exchange for returning the borrowed amount, plus an in-kind payment. DOE said the companies will return 55mn bl of crude to the SPR under the contracts, nearly 22pc more crude than they borrowed. The contracts are financially viable because crude markets are in backwardation, with WTI crude futures for delivery in April trading close to $98/bl, compared with less than $72/bl in much of 2028. The administration last week offered to release up to 86mn bl in the initial phase of its drawdown, but DOE on Friday had only awarded contracts for 45.2mn bl, slightly more than half of the volume offered. Although exchange contracts would ensure the SPR will be refilled at a later date, their complexity can make them slower to execute than emergency sales. DOE had offered exchanges of sweet and sour crude from three SPR storage sites. The agency fully subscribed its offer to release 10mn bl of sweet crude from the Bayou Choctaw SPR storage site in Louisiana. But out of the 42mn bl and 34mn bl of sour crude offered from the Bryan Mound and West Hackberry SPR storage sites, DOE only awarded contracts for 15.7mn bl and 19.5mn bl of sour crude, respectively, the agency said. DOE has not said when the crude will be returned, but its solicitation allowed for crude to be returned to the SPR from 1 November 2026 through 30 September 2028. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Iran says ready to discuss Hormuz passage with Japan
Iran says ready to discuss Hormuz passage with Japan
London, 21 March (Argus) — Tehran is ready to discuss passage through the strait of Hormuz with Japan and other countries that have not attacked Iran, Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araqchi has told Japan's Kyodo News, according to a post on his Telegram channel. "We have not closed this strait," Araqchi said. "From our perspective, the strait is open. It is closed only to the ships of our enemies — the countries that are attacking us. For other countries, ships can pass through the strait. Of course, there is a security issue. We are ready, if contacted, to provide safe passage for them. We will talk with them to find a way to ensure safe transit. We are prepared to provide safe passage. They only need to contact us so that we can discuss how this route can be arranged." Araqchi added that he "certainly" meant Japan when referring to countries whose ships could pass through the strait. Japanese shipowners maintain some of the world's strictest safety standards and were among the first to halt operations in the Mideast Gulf when the war began at the end of February, as well as in the Red Sea when attacks on shipping by Yemen's Houthi rebels started in 2023. In an earlier interview on 15 March with CBS' Face the Nation, Araqchi said Tehran had been approached by "a number of countries" seeking safe passage through the strait. "This is up to our military to decide," he said. In practice, most tankers that have transited the strait in recent weeks have been Iranian. The 296,068 dwt Cuma left the Mideast Gulf fully laden and is signalling China as its destination, according to trade analytics platform Vortexa. It is unclear when the vessel crossed the strait, but its current position suggests it departed Iran after the US–Israeli strikes on 28 February . The 317,534 dwt Stream (Kharg Island–Ningbo), the 317,536 dwt Serena (Kharg Island–Dongjiakou), and the 298,414 dwt Nora (Kharg Island–Ningbo) have also recently passed Hormuz laden with Iranian crude, Vortexa data show. Late on Friday, the US issued a sanctions waiver for Iranian crude , including crude aboard sanctioned vessels, allowing the sale, delivery and offloading of Iranian oil loaded on or before 20 March until 19 April. As most other Mideast Gulf crude shipments remain unable to pass through the strait, Asian buyers are increasingly turning to another recently issued OFAC waiver covering Russian crude . The first Russian cargo since 2021 departed for the Philippines earlier this week. The 115,191 dwt Sara Sky left Kozmino on 16 March carrying Espo Blend crude and is expected to arrive in Bataan on 23 March, according to Kpler and Vortexa. A second Espo cargo left Kozmino for Bataan on 17 March aboard the 109,672 dwt Tiger Wings , although Vortexa notes that Bataan is listed only as a "declared destination". By Andrey Telegin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Gulf producers urge US to tackle Hormuz closure head-on
Gulf producers urge US to tackle Hormuz closure head-on
Dubai, 21 March (Argus) — Mideast Gulf oil producers are urging the US to address the disruption to oil flows through the strait of Hormuz "straight on", warning that interim measures such as tapping into Iran's so-called "oil-on-water" risk strengthening Tehran's position while leaving regional producers exposed, senior Gulf officials have told Argus. "The issue is not supply. The 140mn bl figure discussed by US officials on oil-on-water does not indicate the full picture," one senior Gulf official said. "Oil-on-water today includes production from Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Kuwait and Iraq, as well as from our western oil company partners in joint ventures, loaded on tankers stuck within the strait." The US Treasury Department's sanctions enforcement arm, the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), issued a licence late on Friday allowing the sale, delivery and offloading of Iranian crude loaded into tankers on or before 20 March, until 19 April. The OFAC licence also allows the import of Iranian crude into the US for further resale. There are no conditions attached to payments for such cargoes. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent estimated on 19 March there were 140mn barrels of Iranian oil at sea , without providing further detail. These US efforts to stabilise markets by leaning on floating storage volumes are viewed in Mideast Gulf capitals as a temporary fix, senior Gulf officials said, that fails to address directly the core issue — the effective disruption of the world's most critical energy transit chokepoint. Gulf officials warned that such measures risk creating an uneven dynamic in which Iranian crude continues to flow — primarily to China — while exports from US-aligned Gulf producers remain constrained. "China is the most obvious buyer of Iranian crude, but what about Japan, or South Korea — our buyers and US allies?" the senior Gulf official asked, noting that interdicting Iranian flows is not straightforward and that Tehran has developed sufficient mechanisms to bypass sanctions and retain access to revenues. A second senior Gulf official said producers in the region cannot accept an outcome where "Iran takes the strait of Hormuz hostage," describing such a scenario as a structural shift in global energy markets. Gulf capitals are increasingly concerned that Washington could move to wind down the conflict before securing a durable resolution on maritime access, leaving Iran with de facto control over traffic through the strait. "Nobody in the Mideast Gulf asked for this war, but now that we find ourselves in the midst of it, the US should sort this out," the first official said. "The US should finish the job and not forget about its allies in the region," both officials said separately. US president Donald Trump said late on Friday that he has no plans to end the war quickly, telling reporters that "you don't do a ceasefire when you're obliterating the other side." But he also signalled that Washington is "very close" to achieving key military objectives as it considers winding down operations — messaging that has added to unease in Gulf capitals. The comments follow a week of the most extensive damage yet to energy infrastructure across the Mideast Gulf. For Mideast Gulf officials, reopening the strait of Hormuz remains the only viable path to restoring market balance and preventing Iran from exerting sustained influence over global oil prices. "The US needs to find a solution, and it is faced with three options," the first Gulf official said. "A compromise with Iran over freedom of passage, alignment with Iran's dictates, or the use of force." Concern in Gulf capitals is growing, and an outcome in which Iran exercises control over the strait of Hormuz is creating a perception that they have been left behind. This, in turn, could complicate relations between the US and its regional allies, the senior Gulf officials said. By Bachar Halabi Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
US LNG sector sees risks from surge in prices
US LNG sector sees risks from surge in prices
Washington, 20 March (Argus) — The spike in LNG prices triggered by the war in Iran is prompting concerns from export project developers about the possibility of future demand destruction if prospective buyers lose confidence in the fuel. Iranian attacks on ships near the strait of Hormuz and missile strikes on Qatar's 77mn t/yr Ras Laffan LNG export terminal have driven prices up sharply. LNG delivered to northwest Europe in May topped $20/mmBtu this week, more than twice the price from before the war. That could mean a windfall for many LNG producers, but industry officials say the return of price volatility makes it harder to pitch governments on the long-term deals needed for such capital-intensive projects. "The volatility in price is probably the biggest risk for industry," said Ben Dell, managing partner at US private equity firm Kimmeridge on Friday at an event held by the US Trade and Development Agency. LNG prices have yet to hit the record highs seen in 2022 after Russia's invasion of Ukraine, but countries are already taking dramatic steps to reduce energy use in response. The IEA on Friday released recommendations to reduce demand-side energy use, including lower vehicle speed limits, working from home and avoiding jet travel. "If we end up more weeks or months in — we are already cutting bone — we will be cutting really deep bone," US LNG developer Excelerate Energy general counsel Alisa Newman Hood said. "We need LNG to be dependable in order for [governments] to depend on it and not end up in demand destruction." The attacks on the Ras Laffan LNG terminal could increase the value of LNG assets outside of the Middle East that "now appear to have lower operating risk, especially if an ultimate ceasefire agreement appears tenuous", investment bank TD Cowen said in a note to clients on Friday. US gas industry officials believe at least three large-scale LNG projects will soon reach FID but say more capacity may be needed. "I really think we ought to start today with more of a wartime mindset," LNG Allies executive director Fred Hutchison said. President Donald Trump's administration has championed the growth of US LNG, including by tapping federal financing and insurance authorities. The US Export-Import Bank (EXIM) last week said the proposed $14bn Delfin floating LNG project off Louisiana was a "potential" transaction it was reviewing.The US credit export agency has already provided loans and insurance to support US exports for LNG projects in Mozambique and Turkey, but it has yet to extend credit or insurance directly to US LNG export terminals. "We're looking at some potential LNG projects, for example, that will be exporting more cargoes and more molecules abroad," EXIM Bank vice president of global business development Ben Todd said at the event. "One area where EXIM Bank has seen absolutely increased demand is supporting the physical cargoes themselves." By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.