Weight of Freight: Size Matters – owners and charterers adjust to a changing tanker market
From 1967 until the oil crisis of 1973 there were orders for about 80 very large crude carriers (VLCC) and 40 ultra large crude carriers (ULCC), according to engine manufacturer Wartsila. This boom was followed by the total collapse of the newbuild market for these tankers until the middle of the 1980s. Since then, over 400 VLCC have been ordered, but it took more than 20 years before the next ULCC contract was signed.
The new TI class of ULCCs were delivered in the early 2000s, but within a decade most had been converted to floating production, storage and offloading (FPSO) vessels (FSOs) for use in the Mideast Gulf and southeast Asia. Prizing quantity over flexibility, these ships were wider than the new Panama Canal locks (begun in 2007 and completed in 2016), and could not travel through the Suez Canal unless on a ballast voyage.
Their massive capacity of more than 3mn barrels of crude oil reflected climbing global oil demand – almost double what it was in 1973 – and China’s arrival as the world's largest importer of crude oil. Some forecasters now predict oil demand will peak in 2030, reducing the need for supertankers, but other forces have seen shipowners and others return to newbuilding markets for VLCCs in recent months.
Pandemics, infrastructure projects, price wars and actual wars have moved and lengthened trade flows in the last four years, making larger vessels more attractive because of their economies of scale. These have impacted the make-up of the global tanker fleet in other ways as well, such as prompting a small recovery in interest in small Panamax tankers, which have long been sliding out of existence.
The role of vessel size in tanker freight markets is sometimes underappreciated. In the wake of the G7+ ban on imports of Russian crude and oil and products, and attacks on merchant shipping in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden by Yemen’s Houthi militants, flows of crude oil have had to make massive diversions. Russian crude oil is flowing now to India and China rather than to Europe, while Europe’s imports of oil, diesel and jet fuel from the Mideast Gulf are taking two weeks longer, going around the Cape of Good Hope to avoid Houthi attacks. This has pushed up tonne-miles – a measure of shipping demand – to record levels. Global clean Long Range 2 (LR2) tanker tonne-miles rose to a record high in May this year, data from analytics firm Kpler show, while tonne-miles for dirty Aframax tankers rose to a record high in May last year. It has also supported freight rates.
High freight rates have brought smaller vessels into competition with larger tankers, at the same time as long routes have increased the appeal of larger ships. The Atlantic basin appears to be key site for increases in production (from the US, Brazil, Guyana and even Namibia), and an eastward shift in refining capacity globally will further entrench these long routes and demand for economies of scale.
Aframax and LR2 tankers are the same sized ships carrying around 80,000-120,000t of crude oil or products. LR2 tankers have coated tanks, which allows them to carry both dirty and clean cargoes, and shipowners may switch their
LR2/Aframax vessels between the clean and dirty markets, with expensive cleaning, depending on which offers them the best returns. But an unusually high number of VLCCs – at least six – have also switched from dirty to clean recently. Shipowner Okeanis, which now has three of its VLCCs transporting clean products, said it had cleaned up another one in the third quarter.
A VLCC switching from crude to products is very rare. Switching to clean products from crude is estimated to cost around $1mn for a VLCC. It takes several days to clean the vessel's tanks, during which time the tanker is not generating revenue. But a seasonal slide in VLCC rates in the northern hemisphere this summer has made cleaning an attractive option for shipowners, while their economies of scale make the larger tankers more attractive to clean charterers as product voyages lengthen.
Argus assessed the cost of shipping a 280,000t VLCC of crude from the Mideast Gulf to northwest Europe or the Mediterranean averaged $10.52/t in June, much lower than the average cost of $67.94/t for shipping a 90,000t LR2 clean oil cargo on the same route in the same period. It is likely these vessels will stay in the products market, as cleaning a ship is a costly undertaking for a single voyage.
Typically, a VLCC will only carry a clean cargo when it is new and on its inaugural voyage, but just one new VLCC has joined the fleet this year, further incentivising traders to clean up vessels as demand for larger ones increases. This year has seen a jump in demand for new VLCCs, with 29 ordered so far. There were 20 ordered in 2023, just six in 2023 and 32 in the whole of 2021, Kpler data show. But the vast majority of these new VLCCs will not hit the water until 2026, 2027 or later because of a shortage of shipyard capacity.
Last year and 2024 also saw the first substantial newbuilding orders for Panamax tankers, also called LR1s, since 2017. Product tanker owner Hafnia and trader Mercuria recently partnered to launch a Panamax pool. The rationale may be that Panamax vessels can pass through the older locks at the Panama Canal, and so are not subject to the same draft restrictions imposed because of drought that has throttled transits and led to shipowners paying exorbitant auction fees to transit.
Aframaxes and MRs will remain the workhorses of crude and product tanker markets respectively, but the stretching and discombobulation of trade routes (which appear likely to stay) has already driven changes in which vessels are used and which are ordered. When these ships hit the water, they will join a tanker market very different to the one owners and charterers were operating in just four years ago.
Spotlight content
Related news
Mexico industrial production contracts in March
Mexico industrial production contracts in March
Mexico City, 13 May (Argus) — Mexico's industrial production contracted by 0.9pc in March from the previous month, as declines in mining and manufacturing were only partly offset by continued growth in construction. The drop was not enough to undo the 2.2pc increase in February — the sharpest monthly expansion in four years — as manufacturers ramped up output ahead of incoming US tariffs. The March industrial production index (IMAI), published by statistics agency Inegi, was higher than Mexican bank Banorte's forecast of a 1.4pc decline. Banorte noted signs of volatility affecting manufacturing and other sectors because of a complex trade outlook. Manufacturing contracted 1.1pc in March after expanding 2.9pc in February. The impact varied across subsectors, with metal goods down 5.5pc and transportation, including auto production, down 1.1pc. Volatility may ease in the coming months as US tariff policies become clearer and Mexican officials push to preserve the country's trade edge under US-Mexico-Canada (USMCA) free trade agreement rules, Banorte said. Construction expanded 0.8pc in March, following increases of 3.4pc in February and 0.5pc in January, driven by higher public investment tied to President Claudia Sheinbaum's economic plan, "Plan Mexico." Analysts see the plan as a catalyst for continued growth in construction this year, with measures including greater domestic content in public purchases, public-private participation in infrastructure projects and a target of $100bn in private infrastructure investment for 2025. These effects could be amplified by aggressive interest rate cuts from the central bank. Mining contracted by 2.7pc in March, returning to negative territory after a slight 0.1pc uptick in February. Oil and gas output also contracted 2.7pc after rising 1.0pc the month before, while non-oil mining contracted 4.3pc in March after a 0.6pc increase in February. By James Young Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
US inflation eases to 2.3pc in April
US inflation eases to 2.3pc in April
Houston, 13 May (Argus) — US inflation slowed in April, pulled lower by falling gasoline prices, while core inflation continued to show signs of mounting inflation pressures, as the new US administration's tariff policies have scrambled corporate and consumer investment and spending patterns. The consumer price index (CPI) slowed to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 2.3pc in April, down from 2.4pc in March and off from 2.8pc in February and the lowest rate since February 2021, the Labor Department reported Tuesday. Analysts surveyed by Trading Economics had forecast a 2.4pc rate for April. Core inflation, which strips out volatile food and energy, rose at an 2.8pc annual rate, unchanged from the prior month. The deceleration in inflation came a month after President Donald Trump began to levy tariffs on imports from China and on steel, aluminum and automobiles, starting in February. Several tariff deadlines were pushed back, including a three-month pause enacted this week on much steeper tariffs for most countries. The tariffs have prompted companies and consumers to pull back on investments and some purchases while shaking up financial markets, and heightening concerns of a global recession. The energy index fell by an annual 3.7pc in April, down from 3.3pc in March. Gasoline fell by 11.8pc after a 9.8pc decline. Piped natural gas rose by an annual 15.7pc following a 9.4pc gain. Food rose by an annual 2.8pc, slowing from 3pc. Eggs slowed to an annual 49.3pc after an annual 60.4pc, as avian flu has slashed supply. Shelter rose by an annual 4pc in March, matching the prior gain. Services less energy services rose by 3.6pc, slowing from 3.7pc in March. New vehicle prices edged up by an annual 0.3pc. CPI rose by a monthly 0.2pc in April after falling by 0.1pc in March. Core inflation rose by 0.2pc for the month following a 0.1pc gain in March. By Bob Willis Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
France mulls 1.5pc renewable H2 target for transport
France mulls 1.5pc renewable H2 target for transport
Paris, 13 May (Argus) — France has opened a consultation on a proposed 1.5pc renewable hydrogen quota for the transport sector by 2030, and hefty penalties to back this up. The country's ecological transition ministry has proposed a mechanism for reducing emissions in the transport sector called IRICC. This would replace the existing Tiruert system and would, among other measures, introduce specific quotas for use of renewable and low-carbon hydrogen. The proposed regulations set specific quotas for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reductions that fuel suppliers would have to meet across different transport sectors in 2026-35. In line with requirements of the EU's renewable energy directive (REDIII), it also sets specific sub-quotas for renewable fuels of non-biological origin (RFNBOs), which are effectively renewable hydrogen or derivatives. These would start at 0.1pc in 2026 and rise steadily to 1.5pc by 2030 and to 2pc by 2035. This does not factor in double-counting, which the EU rules allow, meaning the quotas should reflect the actual share of RFNBO supply delivered to the transport sector. France's target exceeds the minimum 1pc requirement under EU rules, which effectively constitute a minimum share of only 0.5pc when factoring in the possibility for double-counting. Some EU members have set more ambitious targets. Finland is aiming for a 4pc quota by 2030 . But others, like Denmark, are planning a less ambitious implementation of EU rules, which has drawn the ire of domestic hydrogen industry participants . France's proposed quota is not set in stone as it is seeking feedback on whether a 0.8pc quota would be preferable. The consultation text does not specify if Paris would allow renewable hydrogen used to make transport fuels in refineries to be counted towards the targets with or without a so-called correction factor. The document foresees specific targets for use of synthetic fuels "produced with low-carbon electricity" in the aviation and maritime sectors. For aviation these would be 1.2pc for 2030, 2pc for 2032 and 5pc for 2035 — broadly in line with mandates from the EU's ReFuelEU Aviation legislation. Crucially, these mandates can be fulfilled with renewable supply and with aviation fuels made with nuclear power. Unlike for other EU targets, the ReFuelEU Aviation rules provide this option, leaving France in a promising position to become a major producer of synthetic aviation fuels thanks to its large nuclear fleet. The EU has not yet set binding targets for synthetic fuels in the maritime sector, but the French proposal foresees quotas of 1.2pc for 2030 and 2pc for 2034. The new mechanism will arguably allow for trading of GHG emissions reduction and fuel supply credits, similar to Tiruert, although the consultation document does not detail this specifically. Hefty penalties Hefty penalties for non-compliance could ensure that obliged parties meet their quotas. The ministry is proposing a penalty of €80 ($89) for each GJ that fuel suppliers fall short of their RFNBO quotas. This would equate to around €9.60/kg, based on hydrogen's lower heating value of 120 MJ/kg. It is broadly in line with penalties set by the Czech Republic , but considerably higher than those in Finland. Crucially, the penalties would be in addition to potential fines for falling short of the larger GHG emissions reduction targets. Companies could additionally incur penalties of €700/tonne of CO2 they fail to avoid short of their requirements. Stakeholders can respond to the consultation until 10 June. By Stefan Krumpelmann and Pamela Machado Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Namibia expects first oil in 2029-30: Official
Namibia expects first oil in 2029-30: Official
Paris, 13 May (Argus) — Namibia expects first oil and gas from its offshore oil blocks as early as 2029, according to the country's petroleum commissioner Maggy Shino. Oil and gas production is on track to begin by that time, Shino said, with a first field development plan set to be received from TotalEnergies by July. The French major is a stakeholder in the Venus block, which it estimates to contain 750mn bl. The timeline announcement comes as Namibia seeks to accelerate the path to first oil, Shino said. Windhoek is streamlining licensing processes and is encouraging industry to contribute to upstream policymaking, she told the Invest in African Energies forum today. TotalEnergies, which discovered Venus in February 2022, plans to make a decision on whether to begin the development of the field next year. Its chief executive Patrick Pouyanne said he was negotiating with the Namibian government about the development but that discussions were still at an early stage. "It's a project which faces, fundamentally, some challenges, but it's feasible," Pouyanne told analysts on the company's first-quarter earnings call in April . Speaking at the conference, TotalEnergies' senior vice president for Africa, Mike Sangster, said the three wells the company has tested at Venus have demonstrated the need for a lot of gas reinjection, and he said it will be difficult to keep the cost of development down to Pouyanne's publicly-stated $20/bl. Besides upstream investment, Namibia is encouraging investors to consider port and pipeline infrastructure with a particular emphasis on the coastal town of Lüderitz in the southwest. Namibia's new president, Netumbo Nandi-Ndaitwah, placed the country's oil and gas industries under direct presidential control the day after her inauguration in March. Although details of the restructuring have yet to emerge, some stakeholders hope the move will speed up decision making. By George Maher-Bonnett Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
