Opec output rises offset Russian fall in June
Opec+ production edged up in June ahead of planned cuts this month, as increased output from Opec members offset a fall in Russian supply.
Russian production fell for a third consecutive month to its lowest since May 2022, Argus estimates. This helped push output by the group's non-Opec members down by around 20,000 b/d on the month. But production by the 10 Opec members subject to targets was 60,000 b/d higher, leaving combined output up marginally at 36.76mn b/d (see table).
The eight Opec+ members that agreed to make additional cuts of 1.16mn b/d from May achieved a combined reduction of 1.06mn b/d in June, falling nearly 100,000 b/d short of their effective target. Algerian output dipped below its ceiling following a drop in exports, while the continued absence of seaborne Kirkuk exports kept Iraqi production below target for a second month. Saudi production fell below its implied target but most other producers were still pumping above their effective quotas, Argus estimates.
Saudi Arabia's production was just under its ceiling of 9.98mn b/d in June but is scheduled to fall to just under 9mn b/d this month and in August, following Riyadh's announcement that it is extending its 1mn b/d unilateral crude production cut for July into August. Algeria's production ceiling is scheduled to fall to around 940,000 b/d after it announced a production cut of 20,000 b/d for next month.
Overall Opec production rose last month thanks mainly to increases from Nigeria, Iraq, and Gabon. Iraqi production rebounded to its highest since March, when Kirkuk flows from the Kurdistan region in northern Iraq through Turkey first came to a halt. Kirkuk loadings at Turkey's Ceyhan terminal remain suspended, although around 10,000 b/d of the grade was trucked to Jordan in June.
Iraq's recovery followed a resumption in exports from the Qayarah oil field in Nineveh province. The field was recaptured from Islamist group Isis in 2017, but had been badly damaged after Isis set a number of oil wells on fire.
Nigerian production increased for a second month as Bonny Light output continued to rise steadily following Shell's lifting of a long-standing force majeure in March. Erha loadings more than doubled in June, after the grade's export operations were disrupted by strikes at ExxonMobil's Nigerian assets in April.
Notable success
Output by Opec producers without targets has mostly been on the up. Iranian crude production has passed the 3mn b/d mark, according to oil minister Javad Owji. Argus assessed the country's output at 2.91mn b/d in June, the highest since November 2018. Tehran's success in boosting output this year has been notable, given that talks to revive the 2015 nuclear deal have hit a brick wall and there has been no movement on sanctions relief.
Venezuelan production fell in June, according to the oil ministry, state-owned PdV and other industry sources, one of the first major drops since February. A loosening of some US sanctions late last year helped spur production this year, and even boosted optimism that the country could reach 1mn b/d by August, but major infrastructure constraints continue to hinder efforts.
A new threat has arisen to Libya's political stability and its crude production. Khalifa Haftar, head of the Tobruk-based Libyan National Army based in the east of the country, threatened on 3 July to use military force unless the politically fragmented country agreed a mechanism for the "fair" distribution of oil revenues by the end of August. Libya's oil minister Mohamed Oun said on 5 July that the oil revenue distribution mechanism demanded by Haftar would be "very difficult to implement".
Non-Opec crude production | mn b/d | |||
Jun | May* | May target | ± target | |
Russia | 9.45 | 9.50 | 10.48 | -1.03 |
Oman | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.84 | -0.03 |
Azerbaijan | 0.51 | 0.50 | 0.68 | -0.17 |
Kazakhstan | 1.60 | 1.58 | 1.63 | -0.02 |
Malaysia | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.57 | -0.23 |
Bahrain | 0.19 | 0.20 | 0.20 | -0.00 |
Brunei | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.10 | -0.05 |
Sudan | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | -0.00 |
South Sudan | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.12 | 0.04 |
Total non-Opec | 13.20 | 13.22 | 14.69 | -1.49 |
*revised |
Opec wellhead production | mn b/d | |||
Jun | May | May target | ± target | |
Saudi Arabia | 9.97 | 9.98 | 10.48 | -0.51 |
Iraq | 4.21 | 4.18 | 4.43 | -0.22 |
Kuwait | 2.56 | 2.57 | 2.68 | -0.12 |
UAE | 2.89 | 2.90 | 3.02 | -0.13 |
Algeria | 0.94 | 0.98 | 1.01 | -0.07 |
Nigeria | 1.36 | 1.28 | 1.74 | -0.38 |
Angola | 1.11 | 1.12 | 1.46 | -0.34 |
Congo (Brazzaville) | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.31 | -0.06 |
Gabon | 0.21 | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.03 |
Equatorial Guinea | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.12 | -0.06 |
Opec 10 | 23.56 | 23.50 | 25.42 | -1.86 |
Iran | 2.91 | 2.78 | na | na |
Libya | 1.18 | 1.18 | na | na |
Venezuela | 0.76 | 0.79 | na | na |
Total Opec 13* | 28.41 | 28.25 | na | na |
*Iran, Libya and Venezuela are exempt from production targets |
Opec+ production | mn b/d | |||
Jun | May* | May target | ± target | |
Opec 10 | 23.56 | 23.50 | 25.42 | -1.86 |
Non-Opec 9 | 13.20 | 13.22 | 14.69 | -1.49 |
Total | 36.76 | 36.72 | 40.10 | -3.35 |
*revised |
Related news posts
Opec leaves 2024-25 supply, demand forecasts unchanged
Opec leaves 2024-25 supply, demand forecasts unchanged
London, 14 May (Argus) — Opec has left its global oil supply and demand forecasts for 2024-25 unchanged. Demand is projected to rise by 2.25mn b/d to 104.46mn b/d this year and by a further 1.85mn b/d to 106.31mn b/d next year, the group said in its latest Monthly Oil Market Report (MOMR). Minor adjustments were made within the 2024 quarters, reflecting actual data received and expected short-term developments. But the overall growth figure for the full year is the same as last month , with an upwards adjustment in Chinese oil demand, mainly in the first quarter, offset by downward revisions for OECD Americas and the Middle East. Opec introduced a new section in last month's MOMR outlining a liquids supply forecast for all countries outside the wider Opec+ alliance. It expects non-Opec+ supplies to grow by 1.23mn b/d to 52.96mn b/d in 2024 and by another 1.1mn b/d to 54.06mn b/d in 2025. This is unchanged from its previous projection. This year's non-Opec+ supply growth is driven by production increases in the US, Canada and Norway. Next year is supported by a further rise in output in the US and Canada, as well as higher production in Latin America. The supply and demand projections leave the call on Opec+ crude at 43.2mn b/d this year, rising to 44mn b/d in 2025. Opec+ production was 41mn b/d in April, according to an average of secondary sources that includes Argus . By James Keates Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
TMX oil specs inappropriate: Valero, Chevron
TMX oil specs inappropriate: Valero, Chevron
Calgary, 13 May (Argus) — Crude quality specifications on the Trans Mountain Expansion (TMX) pipeline in western Canada are not narrow enough and may prevent buyers in California from taking crude shipped on the recently commissioned system, according to two US refiners. The 590,000 b/d TMX pipeline was placed into service on 1 May, a welcome addition for both producers in Alberta and refiners on the Pacific rim, but the upper limits allowed for crude on the line relating to vapor pressure and Total Acid Number (TAN) are problematic, Chevron and Valero said in letters to the Canada Energy Regulator (CER) on 10 May. The specifications, as set out by Trans Mountain's rules and regulations, were already in place for the original 300,000 b/d crude pipeline, or Line 1, which also carries refined products that require a higher vapor pressure. TMX, or Line 2, will primarily cater to heavy crude shippers. But the vapor pressure limit of 103 kPa at 37.8°C on the new line is nearly 40pc higher than tanks allow, according to Valero. "High vapor pressure crude oil simply cannot be accepted in United States internal floating roof tanks," wrote Valero. The current limits are "wholly inappropriate" and will result in crude being transported through TMX that is not suitable for the west coast market. Chevron concurred that the specifications exceed the limit for storage tanks at its own California refineries in Richmond and El Segundo. "Failure to amend the TAN specification and vapor limits for TMPL may prevent Chevron from purchasing or processing crude from [Trans Mountain] for our California refineries," the company wrote. The letters were in support of a 12 April complaint by Canadian Natural Resources (CNRL) to the CER, requesting the regulator intervene. Fellow oil sands producers Suncor, Imperial Oil, MEG Energy and ConocoPhillips also wrote in support, as did industry groups Explorers and Producers Association of Canada (EPAC) and Western States Petroleum Association (WSPA). Current rules state crudes must have a TAN of less than 1.3mg KOH/g to be considered a Low TAN Dilbit, but that is "inappropriately high," according to CNRL, and should be brought down to the same 1.1mg KOH/g threshold set by other export pipelines. Cenovus and Plains Midstream wrote that the CER did not need to intervene as this was a commercial matter. "This is effectively a commercial dispute that should be dealt with between the sophisticated commercial entities involved," said Plains. By Brett Holmes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Potential strike threatens Vancouver port again
Potential strike threatens Vancouver port again
Calgary, 13 May (Argus) — A labour dispute at the Canadian port of Vancouver could result in another work stoppage, less than a year after a strike disrupted the flow of more than C$10bn ($7.3bn) worth of goods and commodities ranging from canola and potash to coking coal. Negotiations between the British Columbia Maritime Employers Association (BCMEA) and the International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) Ship and Dock Foremen Local 514 union have stalled as the two sides try to renew an agreement that expired on 1 April 2023. A 21-day "cooling-off period" concluded on 10 May, giving the union the right to strike and the employers association the right to lock out the workers. A vote and 72-hour notice would first need to occur before either action is taken. The BCMEA filed a formal complaint to the Canada Industrial Relations Board (CIRB) the same day, which had to step in last year in another dispute. The BCMEA locked horns with ILWU Canada over a separate collective agreement in 2023 leading to a 13-day strike by the union in July. This disrupted the movement of C$10.7bn of goods in and out of Canada, according to the Greater Vancouver Board of Trade. Vancouver's port is the country's largest — about the same size as the next five combined — and describes itself as able to handle the most diversified range of cargo in North America. There are 29 terminals belonging to the Port of Vancouver. Terminals that service container ships endured the most significant congestion during last year's strike. Loadings for potash, sulphur, lumber, wood pellets and pulp, steel-making coal, canola, copper concentrates, zinc and lead concentrate, diesel and renewable diesel liquids and some agri-foods were also disrupted. The Trans Mountain-operated Westridge Marine Terminal responsible for crude oil exports on Canada's west coast was unaffected. A deal was eventually reached on 4 August. The strike spurred on proposed amendments to legislation in Canada that would limit the effect of job action on essential services. A bill introduced in Canada's Parliament in November would update the Canada Labour Code and CIRB Regulations accordingly. The bill has been progressing through the House of Commons, now having completed the second of three readings. By Brett Holmes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Chevron books Aframax for TMX cargo to California
Chevron books Aframax for TMX cargo to California
Houston, 13 May (Argus) — Chevron provisionally hired an Aframax to haul a cargo of crude from Vancouver, British Columbia, to the US west coast as the Trans Mountain Expansion (TMX) brings more oil to Canada's Pacific coast. Chevron put the Aframax Garibaldi Spirit on subjects for a Vancouver-US west coast voyage loading from 25 May at WS125, market participants said. That rate is equivalent to $11.16/t or $1.63/bl for heavy sour Cold Lake, according to Argus data. The US west coast historically has been the main destination for crude exported from Vancouver, with 96pc, or about 38,500 b/d, landing at ports in Washington and California in the 12 months ended 30 April, according to data from analytics firm Vortexa. Chevron purchased five cargoes from Vancouver for its 269,000 b/d refinery in El Segundo, California, during that span, most recently in February. The 590,000 b/d TMX project began commercial service on 1 May, tripling the capacity of the Trans Mountain pipeline system to 890,000 b/d. The line creates a larger link from Alberta's growing oil sands production to the west coast port of Vancouver and direct access to Pacific Rim markets, where buyers are eager for heavy sour crude . The first TMX cargo, 550,000 bl of Canadian Access Western Blend which Suncor booked on an Aframax in late April , will load between 18-24 May for June delivery in China. PetroChina and Unipec each control an Aframax near Canada's Pacific coast that would be available to load in Vancouver in the second half of May, though those ships could also be relet to deliver crude to the US west coast. The port of Vancouver's distance from many traditional Aframax trading routes may stretch the global fleet once TMX ramps up. The port cannot accommodate tankers larger than Aframaxes. By Tray Swanson Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more