Overview
Demand for biofuels is increasing significantly, driven by the need to decarbonise road transport as part of the energy transition. Global biofuels output is expected to rise by more than 3mn b/d in the next five years, and such rapid growth means that new challenges and opportunities are constantly emerging. Keeping on top of the ever-changing biofuels landscape requires accurate pricing, insightful analysis and access to the latest data.
The Argus biofuels solution provides in-depth pricing and market analysis across the entire global renewable fuel supply chain, from original feedstock to finished fuel, with prices and key insights into regional biodiesel, ethanol and feedstock markets.
Biofuels market intelligence
Learn more about how Argus provides transparency into the global biofuels markets to help you make confident, informed decisions

Latest biofuels news
Browse the latest market moving news on the global biofuels industry.
US soybean crush margins slip below $3/bu
US soybean crush margins slip below $3/bu
St Louis, 1 July (Argus) — Soybean crushing margins on the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) slipped below $3/bushel (bu) on Tuesday for the first time in nearly three months, falling by 31pc from a record high in early June. Across July-delivered CBOT soybean, soybean meal, and soybean oil contracts crushing margins fell to $2.88/bu as of 30 June, the lowest for front month margins on CBOT since 9 April and down from a record $4.18/bu on 3 June. Margins have come under pressure from lower soybean meal values, which have fallen by 5pc since 3 June to settle to $304.70/short ton (st) as of 30 June. But most of the downward pressure has come from falling soybean oil values, which have fallen by 16pc to $0.67/lb from a 1 June peak of $0.79/lb. Soybean futures have fallen as well, down by 3.2pc from the 3 June crushing margins peak to $11.17/bu as of Tuesday's settlement. But the weight of falling soybean oil values was more than enough to pull crushing margins lower. Short-term struggle Soybean crushing margins have fallen in recent weeks as soybean oil prices followed crude oil lower , while imports of other feedstocks have added supply pressure. The US and Iran have continued to work towards resolving their conflict and restoring global crude oil flows — despite some setbacks — with global crude oil prices trending lower as a result. Rebounding imports of tallow and used cooking oil since the start of 2026 have also weighed on demand for domestic feedstocks. Favorable import economics kept the feedstock arbitrage widely open through the first half of the year, prompting renewable diesel producers, particularly in coastal markets, to secure large volumes of waste-based feedstocks. Domestic feedstock prices initially continued to rise, as imported cargoes typically take several months to reach US ports. Those volumes are now beginning to arrive, increasing feedstock availability and creating congestion in some key demand centers, while storage tanks are filling. The outlook for imports during the remainder of the year may hinge on trade policy. President Donald Trump is expected to finalize new tariff measures in late July, when the temporary 10pc global tariff framework expires, a decision that could significantly influence feedstock import flows for the balance of 2026. A comeback in the making? While soybean crush margins face several near-term headwinds, how much lower they can fall remains a question. US demand for soybean oil is still expected to grow throughout this year as biofuel producers work to fulfill expanded US renewable fuel blending obligations and capitalize on a recently adjusted 45Z biofuel producers tax credit that heavily favors the use of domestic biofuel feedstocks. US soybean oil consumption for biofuel production reached a record 1.28bn lbs in March, up 54pc from a year earlier, underscoring strong demand from the sector. The US has set biomass-based diesel mandates for 2026 at 5.53bn USG, including volumes reallocated from small refinery exemptions, raising the overall requirement by 65pc from 2025 levels. Domestic renewable diesel plants are operating at near-maximum capacity to meet the higher mandates, as reflected in stronger generation of biomass-based diesel (D4) Renewable Identification Numbers (RINs) in May, according to the US Environmental Protection Agency. D4 RIN generation totaled 736mn credits in May, up 22pc from the same month a year earlier. Soybean prices could also struggle in the months ahead. The US Department of Agriculture this week revised up its US soybean planted area estimate for 2026, and the outlook for this year's soybean yields remains positive . Export demand for the 2026-27 marketing year has started to build , but with a limited outlook following the US and China trade agreement in October of last year it is not clear that foreign demand will add sufficient support to push crushing margins lower should increased soybean oil demand begin to lift crushing margins again. If soybean crushing margins come under additional pressure, they would still have ample room to move lower before it would curtail the record crushing rates seen in the US during recent months. From 2021 through 2025 US soybean crush margins averaged $1.51/bu, leaving plenty of room for lower returns to drive crushing volumes. By Ryan Koory and Jamuna Gautam Chicago Board of Trade soybean crush margins $/bu Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Agrardieselrückvergütung gilt auch für HVO
Agrardieselrückvergütung gilt auch für HVO
Hamburg, 1 July (Argus) — Land- und forstwirtschaftliche Betriebe können die Agrardieselrückvergütung für HVO in Anspruch nehmen, so wie für andere Dieselkraftstoffe auch — entscheidend ist dabei jedoch nicht die Norm, sondern die steuerliche Deklaration bei Inverkehrbringung. Grundsätzlich kann HVO unter die Agrardieselrückvergütung fallen, wenn es als Dieselkraftstoffäquivalent eingeordnet und entsprechend mit dem regulären Energiesteuersatz für Diesel von 47,04 €/100 l versteuert wird, so der Zoll. Die Norm für die Rückvergütung ist dabei nicht maßgeblich — während fossiler Diesel nach DIN EN 590 spezifiziert ist, gilt für paraffinische Kraftstoffe wie HVO100 die Norm DIN EN 15940. Einzelne Marktteilnehmer haben gegenüber Argus Unsicherheit bezüglich der steuerlichen Einordnung und der daraus resultierenden Förderfähigkeit von HVO100 geäußert. In der Praxis bedeutet dies, dass insbesondere HVO100 förderfähig sein kann. Biogene Produkte, welche allerdings nicht als Dieselkraftstoff klassifiziert sind, sind hingegen von der Rückvergütung ausgeschlossen. Dies betrifft auch HVO, wenn es als Heizöläquivalent genutzt wird. Die Agrardieselrückvergütung selbst ermöglicht land- und forstwirtschaftlichen Betrieben, sich einen Teil der Energiesteuer auf eingesetzten Dieselkraftstoff erstatten zu lassen. Der Entlastungssatz liegt derzeit bei rund 21,48 €/100l. Voraussetzung ist der nachweisliche Einsatz des Kraftstoffs in begünstigten Maschinen und Fahrzeugen sowie eine entsprechende Antragstellung. Von Marcel Pott Senden Sie Kommentare und fordern Sie weitere Informationen an feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . Alle Rechte vorbehalten.
Trump, USDA finalize regenerative feedstock rule
Trump, USDA finalize regenerative feedstock rule
Houston, 29 June (Argus) — US president Donald Trump on 25 June signed an executive order mobilizing federal agencies to support farmers in utilizing regenerative farming practices through significant investment, a reduction in red tape, and finalized regenerative feedstock rule standards. US Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins concurrently announced the US Department of Agriculture's (USDA) final regenerative feedstock rule , intended to "help farmers voluntarily capture new value from regenerative agricultural practices through biofuel markets." Rather than mandating regenerative agricultural practices, farmers who voluntarily decide to utilize them will have the opportunity to "earn premium prices, lower their input costs, improve soil health, and strengthen the long-term profitability of their operations." The final regenerative feedstock rule has set five high-level parameters connecting these practices to the corn, soybean, sorghum, and spring canola markets for biofuels production. The standards pertain to which crops and entities are qualified, how climate benefits are quantified, how regenerative grain will be tracked through the supply chain, which specific practices qualify as regenerative, and who will verify program requirements. The USDA formally published its technical guidelines for the production of regenerative agricultural biofuel feedstocks on 29 June, effective immediately. The department intends to expand premium market opportunities as participation increases. The exact financial benefit of prioritizing regeneratively-produced feedstocks on a biofuel producer's claim to the "45Z" clean fuel production tax credit remains unclear until the Department of Energy incorporates the new standards into its model for tracking greenhouse gas emissions. The USDA also released its updated feedstock carbon intensity calculator (FD-CIC) to assist farmers in quantifying their employed regenerative practices when marketing their biofuels feedstocks to eligible producers. The department added that 68pc of corn farmers and 70pc of soybean farmers have already implemented at least one form of regenerative agriculture, defined as "a conservation management approach that emphasizes natural resources through improved soil health, water management, and natural vitality for the productivity and prosperity of American agriculture and communities." Trump's ‘Advancing Regenerative Agriculture and Strengthening American Farm Resilience' executive order also encourages Rollins and the USDA to maximize the $700mn in funding dedicated to the regenerative pilot program in December 2025 and develop new public-private partnerships that "bring new capacity to producers interested in adopting regenerative practices." By Thompson Corpus Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Biofuel groups come to EPA's defense in RFS lawsuit
Biofuel groups come to EPA's defense in RFS lawsuit
Houston, 26 June (Argus) — Several renewable fuel industry groups filed motions to intervene in support of the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in an ongoing lawsuit filed against the agency regarding biofuel blending mandates. The Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) sued the EPA this year arguing the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) targets for blending biofuels with conventional road fuels pose potential harm to endangered species, along with extensive environmental and ecological risk via large scale agricultural production and supply chains required to produce biofuels. The suit filed through the DC Circuit Court of Appeals cites the recently finalized "Set Rule 2" that went into effect in March, which set mandated volumes of products like ethanol and biomass-based diesel products for 2026 and 2027. The CBD case was consolidated with others lawsuits filed by other environmental groups and trade groups, including the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers, who argue that the RFS poses an undue burden to the US' oil and gas industry — particularly small refineries. Multiple biofuel industry groups filed motions this week to intervene in support of the EPA. The Clean Fuel Alliance America, which represents producers of biodiesel, renewable diesel, and other D4-generating products, claims the RFS mandates make a positive impact on biofuel supply chains. The group notes in its filing that soybean prices are at two-year highs because of the RFS, which supports the entire agriculture sector supply chain. The Renewable Fuels Association, which largely supports domestic ethanol producers, argued in its filing that the production and profitability of its member companies would be directly harmed by a decrease in the volumes required by the Set 2 Rule. Growth Energy, which represents a range of industry stakeholders across low carbon fuels and agriculture, argued the EPA's RFS helps lower retail fuel prices, reduce emissions, and boosts energy security. "Under the Set 2, the RFS continues to work as Congress intended," chief executive Emily Skor said. "EPA has again finalized RVOs that advance important energy security, environmental, and economic development goals. EPA has also again finalized RVOs that pose no real threat to the continued operation of small refineries." No timeline for oral arguments has been set by the DC Circuit Court of Appeals at this time. By Matthew Cope Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Spotlight content
Browse the latest thought leadership produced by our global team of experts.
Explore our biofuels products
Key price assessments
Argus prices are recognised by the market as trusted and reliable indicators of the real market value. Explore some of our most widely used and relevant price assessments.




