S Korea coal imports drop amid voluntary restrictions
South Korean thermal coal imports fell on the year in April amid a likely drop in coal-fired generation, driven in part by voluntary restrictions on the use of state-owned coal-fired plants.
South Korea's thermal coal imports, including lignite, decreased by 14pc — or 1.1mn t — on the year to 6.7mn t in April, according to customs data. This was a 10-year low for the month and down from particularly strong receipts in March, when imports rose by nearly a third on the year to 8.7mn t.
Generation data for April are not yet available, but an increase in capacity restrictions is likely to have cut coal burn compared with April 2020.
About 16GW of state-owned Kepco's coal-fired capacity was unavailable in April, according to Argus analysis of Korea Power Exchange (KPX) data, up from 12.3GW a year earlier. Of this, around 1.6GW was owing to voluntary restrictions among the five Kepco utilities.
Based on the Kepco capacity available, Argus estimates that South Korea's coal-fired generation may have dropped by 13pc — or 2.6GW — on the year to 17.9GW last month. This assumes that the available Kepco capacity was run at an 89pc load — the 2018-20 seasonal average — and that private coal-fired generation was flat at 2.1GW.
With nuclear availability also down on the year, gas-fired generation is likely to have grown strongly in April, potentially by around 4.5GW on the year to 17.4GW, according to Argus estimates. State-run gas incumbent Kogas' sales to the power sector rose by nearly three-quarters on the year to 1.4mn t in April, the company said today, which may suggest even stronger growth in gas burn and so lower output from coal-fired plants.
Gas-fired generation costs were generally lower on the year in April but coal-fired costs rose, which, in addition to the voluntary restrictions, weighed on coal burn and supported gas-fired generation.
The implied tax-inclusive generation cost for a 55pc-efficient gas-fired plant in April was around 83¢/MWh lower on the year at $63.02/MWh, according to Argus analysis based on Kogas' power-sector tariff. But the implied cost for a 38pc coal-fired unit rose by nearly $16/MWh on the year to $54.95/MWh, based on Argus' NAR 5,800 kcal/kg cfr South Korea coal assessment, which rose by more than $35/t on the year to $89.98/t.
Rising gas prices and hotter summer to support coal demand
A year-on-year decline in South Korean nuclear availability in May-July is likely to boost power-sector demand for fossil fuels, especially if power demand continues to recover from last year's Covid-19 disruption and if the summer is hotter than average.
Voluntary restrictions will limit the upside potential for coal-fired generation, but demand for the fuel may still be supported by the nuclear shortfall, with new coal-fired capacity additions and rising gas prices also a potential tailwind for coal burn.
Construction of state-owned utility Korea Midland Power's (Komipo) 1GW Shin-Seocheon unit 1 is scheduled to be completed in June, while the 1.04GW Goseong-HI unit 1 is expected to start commercial operations this month.
Goseong-HI unit 1 could lift South Korea's coal-fired power generation to around 19.6GW in May, according to Argus analysis based on Kepco coal-fired availability and assuming an 80pc average load at the new unit. This would be only marginally lower than May 2020's 19.7GW coal-fired generation.
In addition, rising spot and oil-linked LNG prices in South Korea could make coal increasingly competitive for power during the peak summer months, when capacity restrictions are expected to be at their lowest.
But beyond July, nuclear availability is expected to grow on the year in August-December, weighing on demand for fossil fuels. The increase in nuclear generation could be particularly strong if Korea Hydro and Nuclear Power's (KHNP) new 1.4GW Shin-Hanul unit 1 starts up as planned in July-August.
Without the new unit, Argus estimates that KHNP's nuclear output could average 19.3GW in the third quarter, up by around 3.3GW on the year.
Coal import mix shifts towards Australia
Firmer freight costs and strong competition from Chinese buyers for non-Australian coal cut South Korean imports of Colombian coal last month, the biggest driver of the overall downtrend.
South Korea did not import any thermal coal from Colombia last month, compared with receipts of 920,200t a year earlier.
Imports from Indonesia and Russia also fell on the year amid stronger competition from Chinese buyers and firm prices, while receipts from Australia rose by 155,800t to nearly 3mn t. But imports from Australia fell sharply in April compared with March — they may have been stronger last month were it not for weather-related rail disruption and broken shiploaders at Newcastle, which significantly slowed loadings.
Related news posts
Indonesia’s UNTR raises 1Q coal production, sales
Indonesia’s UNTR raises 1Q coal production, sales
Manila, 25 April (Argus) — Indonesian coal services and heavy equipment manufacturer United Tractors' (UNTR) coal output and sales increased in the January-March quarter from a year earlier, partly helped by steady demand and favourable weather conditions. UNTR's mining services company Pamapersada Nusantara (PAMA) reported that coal production for its contracted clients was at 32.3mn t in the first quarter, a 21pc increase from a year earlier. Overburden removal at the contracted mines rose by 17pc on the year to 286.3mn bank m³ (bcm). Thermal coal sales from UNTR's own Tuah Turangga Agung (TTA) mine rose by 40pc to 3.2mn t during the quarter from a year earlier. UNTR increased sales volumes to partly offset the impact of the downtrend in prices in the market on its financials. UNTR did not give the production data for its own mine but added that the output should remain stable in the next quarter on forecasts of dry weather ahead. The company's heavy equipment sales fell by 37pc year-on-year to 1,126 units. This was because of a drop in demand in the domestic market following the fulfilment of backlogged deliveries in 2023, it said. By Antonio delos Reyes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Barge delays at Algiers lock near New Orleans
Barge delays at Algiers lock near New Orleans
Houston, 24 April (Argus) — Barges are facing lengthy delays at the Algiers lock near New Orleans as vessels reroute around closures at the Port Allen lock and the Algiers Canal. Delays at the Algiers Lock —at the interconnection of the Mississippi River and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway— have reached around 37 hours in the past day, according to the US Army Corps of Engineers' lock report. Around 50 vessels are waiting to cross the Algiers lock. Another 70 vessels were waiting at the nearby Harvey lock with a six-hour wait in the past day. The closure at Port Allen lock has spurred the delays, causing vessels to reroute through the Algiers lock. The Port Allen lock is expected to reopen on 28 April, which should relieve pressure on the Algiers lock. Some traffic has been rerouted through the nearby Harvey lock since the Algiers Canal was closed by a collapsed powerline, the US Coast Guard said. The powerline fell on two barges, but no injuries or damages were reported. The wire is being removed by energy company Entergy. The canal is anticipated to reopen at midnight on 25 April. By Meghan Yoyotte Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Baltimore to temporarily open 4th shipping channel
Baltimore to temporarily open 4th shipping channel
Cheyenne, 24 April (Argus) — The Port of Baltimore is preparing to open another, deeper temporary shipping channel this week so at least some of the vessels that have been stranded at the port can depart. The new 35-ft deep Fort McHenry Limited Access Channel is scheduled to be open to commercially essential vessels from 25 April until 6am ET on 29 April or 30 April "if weather adversely impacts vessel transits," according to a US Coast Guard Marine Safety Information Bulletin. The channel will then be closed again until 10 May. The channel also will have a 300-ft horizontal clearance and 214-ft vertical clearance. This will be the fourth and largest channel opened since the 26 March collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge. The Unified Command has said that the new limited access channel should allow passage of about 75pc of the types of vessels that typically move through the waterway. Vessels that have greater than 60,000 long tons (60,963 metric tonnes) of displacement will likely not be able to move through the channel and those between 50,000-60,000 long tons of displacement "will be closely evaluated" for transit. There were seven vessels blocked from exiting the port as of 27 March, including three dry bulk carriers, one vehicle carrier and one tanker, according to the US Department of Transportation. Two of the bulk carriers at berth in Baltimore are Kamsarmax-sized coal vessels, data from analytics firm Kpler show. The US Army Corps of Engineers still expects to reopen the Port of Baltimore's permanent 700-foot wide, 50-foot deep channel by the end of May. The Key Bridge collapsed into the water late last month when the 116,851dwt container ship Dali lost power and crashed into a bridge support column. Salvage teams have been working to remove debris from the water and containers from the ship in order to clear the main channel. By Courtney Schlisserman Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
EU adopts sustainability due diligence rules
EU adopts sustainability due diligence rules
Brussels, 24 April (Argus) — The European parliament has formally approved a Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), which will require large EU companies to make "best efforts" for climate change mitigation. The law will mean that relevant companies will have to adopt a transition plan to make their business model compatible with the 1.5°C temperature limit set by the Paris climate agreement. It will apply to EU firms with over 1,000 employees and turnover above €450mn ($481mn). It will also apply to some companies with franchising or licensing agreements in the EU. The directive requires transposition into different EU national laws. It obliges member states to ensure relevant firms adopt and put into effect a transition plan for climate change mitigation. Transition plans must aim to "ensure, through best efforts" that business models and company strategies are compatible with transition to a sustainable economy, limiting global warming to 1.5°C and achieving climate neutrality by 2050. Where "relevant", the plans should limit "exposure of the company to coal-, oil- and gas-related activities". Despite a provisional agreement, EU states initially failed to formally approve the provisional agreement reached with parliament in December, after some member states blocked the deal. Parliament's adoption — at its last session before breaking for EU elections — paves the way for entry into force later in the year. Industry has obtained clarification, in the non-legal introduction, that the directive's requirements are an "obligation of means and not of results" with "due account" being given to progress that firms make as well as the "complexity and evolving" nature of climate transitioning. Still, firms' climate transition plans need to contain "time-bound" targets for 2030 and in five-year intervals until 2050 based on "conclusive scientific" evidence and, where appropriate, absolute reduction targets for greenhouse gas (GHG) for direct scope 1 emissions as well as scope 2 and scope 3 emissions. Scope 1 refers to emissions directly stemming from an organisation's activity, while scope 2 refers to indirect emissions from purchased energy. Scope 3 refers to end-use emissions. "It is alarming to see how member states weakened the law in the final negotiations. And the law lacks an effective mechanism to force companies to reduce their climate emissions," said Paul de Clerck, campaigner at non-governmental organisation Friends of the Earth Europe, pointing to "gaping" loopholes in the adopted text. By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more