No imminent Iraqi Kurdistan crude restart: KRG official

  • Spanish Market: Crude oil
  • 16/02/24

A restart of crude exports from the semiautonomous Kurdistan region of northern Iraq will not be coming "any time soon," according to a senior official.

Speaking on the sidelines of the Munich Security Conference today, Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) leader Bafel Talabani told Argus the situation between the federal government in Baghdad and Erbil, which has contributed to the shut-in, is "very delicate." At this point even the smallest mis-step "could impact" the situation, he said.

The PUK is one of the main political parties in the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG), sharing power with the Kurdish Democratic Party (KDP).

The pipeline that transports northern Iraqi crude to Turkey for onward export was shut in March 2023 after Ankara lost an arbitration case with Baghdad. Production in the KRG territory was around 470,000 b/d prior to the pipeline closure. Around 400,000 b/d of this was marketed by the KRG and around 70,000 b/d by Iraqi state-owned marketer Somo.

Turkey said in early October that the pipeline is ready to resume operations and that the delay in restarting is down to internal Iraqi politics. The KRG has held a number of meetings with federal government officials since the pipeline's closure, but major disagreements over international oil firms' (IOC) contracts and the KRG's commitments to trading companies have prevented a restart.

Baghdad has been studying an amendment to its federal budget that would enable it to pay IOCs working in Iraqi Kurdistan, Iraqi prime minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani said in December. This would see a compromise between Baghdad and Erbil over the recovery cost for oil produced in Iraqi Kurdistan. Iraq's budget law requires the federal government to pay an average of $8/bl as recovery cost for oil produced in Iraq outside the Kurdistan region, al-Sudani said. But the KRG says production costs in the north are around $30/bl.

Keep pushing

The IOCs operating in the Kurdistan region have for some months been urging the US to help persuade Baghdad to resume exports from the north of the country, through the Association of the Petroleum Industry of Kurdistan (Apikur), an industry body representing them. The association renewed this call to US officials attending the Munich Security Conference.

Apikur "urgently requests US congressional action to facilitate the reopening of the Iraq-Turkey pipeline," it said. "This vital conduit… has been closed due to political disagreements, [and] is directly affecting US interests and the global energy market, and threatening the region's economic and security stability."

The dispute appears to be complicating matters for Baghdad when it comes to its commitments under the Opec+ deal. Argus assessed Iraqi production at 4.22mn b/d in January, which, while down 110,000 b/d on December, was still 220,000 b/d above its 4mn b/d quota for the month. Opec's secondary sources, of which Argus is one, assessed Iraqi output at 4.19mn b/d, and Baghdad officially reported its output at 3.979mn b/d, below its January target. But this probably excludes output from the Kurdistan region. Argus estimated production in the region at around 200,000 b/d, which has all be directed for internal consumption because of the halt to exports.

Baghdad this week vowed to comply with its output quota going forward, and pledged "to compensate for the increase in production in January over the next four months."


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

10/05/24

California fuel retailers fear regulatory scrutiny

California fuel retailers fear regulatory scrutiny

Houston, 10 May (Argus) — US fuel retailers like neither the regulatory precedent being set in California nor how the transition to renewable fuels is being managed, but companies sticking it out in the Golden State may reap rewards. California governor Gavin Newsom (D) in March last year signed SB X1-2 into law, allowing the California Energy Commission (CEC) to gather a broad range of profit data from refiners and set a maximum gross gasoline refining margin in an effort to avoid price spikes at the pump. "Unfortunately in California there is no shortage of bad policies that are being proposed," California Fuels and Convenience Alliance director Alessandra Magnasco said this week in a legislative affairs meeting at fuel retailer trade association SIGMA's conference in Austin, Texas. She worries that if CEC fails to make progress in capping margins at the refiner level, they will look further downstream and regulate retailers. The alliance is opposed to what it sees as burdensome reporting requirements mandated by SBX 1-2 that were rushed through the legislature. "They are doing it in a way to leave out industry," Magnasco said. The CEC this week approved further reporting requirements for refiners in the state, mandating they file maintenance schedules with the commission at least 120 days in advance of planned work and within two business days after the start of unplanned shutdowns. "Every bad idea we face has generally been socialized in California first," David Fialkov, vice president of government affairs for US fuel retailer trade association NATSO, said during the SIGMA session. The increased adoption of renewable diesel in California is also causing headaches for fuel supply managers. "I can't even tell my customers which specific terminal might have traditional diesel versus renewable or if they're going to have both," said Deborah Neal, director of price risk management for fuel supplier World Kinect during another SIGMA panel discussion. The introduction of renewable diesel to the California market was done without a specific time line or transition plan, Neal said. "It's messy to say the least." The regulatory environment in California has also dampened appetite for mergers and acquisition activity in the eyes of bankers doing the deals. Gas station buyers who are looking to consolidate smaller assets are not looking at California if they are not already invested there, Matrix Capital Markets' co-head of downstream energy investment banking Cedric Fortemps said at SIGMA. "The operating and legal dynamics are completely different than other parts of the country," Fortemps said. But for companies already operating in California, there is limited out-of-state competition and high barriers to entry. Those companies are keen to grow their existing operations, Fortemps said. By Nathan Risser Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Nigeria offers 12 oil blocks in 2024 licensing round


10/05/24
10/05/24

Nigeria offers 12 oil blocks in 2024 licensing round

Lagos, 10 May (Argus) — Nigeria has offered 12 oil blocks in a new licensing round. It plans to complete it in tandem with a previous round for seven blocks that stalled following last year's change in government. The 12 blocks in the new round were carefully selected to attract international investors with financial resources and technical expertise and are spread across three geological terrains, upstream regulator NUPRC's chief executive Gbenga Komolafe said. Norwegian geophysical services company PGS, which is providing seismic data support for the licensing round, said two of the blocks on offer are onshore in the Niger delta, six are on the continental shelf and the other four are in deep water. The round will span nine months and conclude with ministerial consent and contracting in January 2025. Entry fees will be competitive as part of government measures to support the commercial viability of investments, according to Komolafe. "The era of front-loaded, huge signature bonuses is over," he said. Nigeria's oil minister Heineken Lokpobiri echoed Komolafe's point about minimal barriers to entry but noted that the round is designed to bind successful bidders to strict timelines, suiting investors that are "able to do exploration almost immediately". Lokpobiri also revealed that Nigeria plans to award licences for seven offshore blocks offered in a 2022 licensing round in tandem with the 2024 round. "The 19 oil blocks presented for bidding are strictly reserved for capable investors," he said. The round for the seven offshore blocks started in December 2022 and had been scheduled to be completed in May 2023. NUPRC said in April last year that the schedule had been pushed back to July because of concerns about concluding "the bid process before transition to the new government". President Bola Tinubu's administration took office on 29 May last year but progress on the 2022 licensing round stalled. Tinubu has set a target to raise Nigeria's crude production to 2.6mn b/d by 2027. The country's current target under the Opec+ agreement is just 1.5mn b/d. Nigeria started an international roadshow for the new licensing round in the US on 7 May in Houston, Texas, and the next stop is scheduled for Miami, Florida on 14 May. By Adebiyi Olusolape Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US delays return of SPR crude until 2026


09/05/24
09/05/24

US delays return of SPR crude until 2026

Washington, 9 May (Argus) — President Joe Biden's administration has delayed by up to two years a requirement for oil companies and traders to return about 15.3mn bl of crude that have been loaned out from the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR). Oil companies and traders were initially scheduled to return up to 19mn bl of crude to the SPR from June-September and to return up to 8mn bl of additional crude over the following year. The US Department of Energy (DOE) loaned out most of that crude in 2022 because of supply shortages related to the war in Ukraine and a temporary shutdown of the Keystone pipeline. DOE had loaned the crude using a mechanism called an "exchange," under which companies agree to return the crude to the SPR at a later date, along with an in-kind payment in exchange for the loan. But over the last two months, DOE has modified at least nine contracts with ExxonMobil, Shell and other companies that had borrowed the crude, delaying the return of about 15.3mn bl of the borrowed crude to the SPR until 2026, according to contract modifications Argus Media obtained after filing a request under the Freedom of Information Act. DOE said it delayed the return of the exchange crude in support of a separate SPR program, where it has directly purchased more than 27mn bl of crude that will be added the SPR's Big Hill storage site in Texas. That purchase program will inject about 3mn bl/month to the SPR through the first nine months of this year, and DOE last week restarted efforts to buy more crude for the SPR for delivery starting in October. "These actions strategically moved back exchange returns to take advantage of stable crude oil market windows to directly purchase oil at a good price for taxpayers, while having consistently available capacity to drawdown in the event of an emergency," DOE said. The nine contract modifications were signed between 26 March and 16 April, at a time when Nymex WTI spot prices briefly surged past $80/bl, to the highest price in more than five months. Delaying the return of the exchanges will effectively free up crude that would otherwise have been injected into the SPR in June-September, during the peak of the summer driving season. Nearly all of the revised contracts will delay the return of "all remaining exchange oil" until July-October 2026. Republicans have repeatedly attacked the administration's management of the SPR, which they argue is dangerously low after Biden ordered the emergency sale of 180mn bl of crude from the reserve in 2022 in response to the war in Ukraine. Republicans have pushed the administration to prioritize refilling the SPR, which is at about half of its design capacity with 367.2mn bl of crude, given the value the reserve could have in mitigating supply shortages. US energy secretary Jennifer Granholm, in congressional testimony in March, said the administration was carrying out a plan to refill the SPR to "essentially where we would have been" if the emergency sales had never happened. DOE has already been able to cancel 140mn bl of congressionally mandated SPR sales and lined up the purchases of more than 30mn bl of crude. DOE also has said it "accelerated" the return of 4mn bl of crude exchanges. By Chris Knight SPR crude injections from exchanges mn bl Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Vertex to pause Mobile renewable fuels refining


09/05/24
09/05/24

Vertex to pause Mobile renewable fuels refining

Houston, 9 May (Argus) — US specialty refiner Vertex plans to pause renewable fuels production at its 88,000 b/d Mobile, Alabama, refinery by the end of the year, returning a converted hydrocracker to produce what it says are wider-margin fossil fuel products. Vertex completed the conversion of the Mobile refinery and produced its first barrels of renewable diesel (RD) in May last year , having bought the refinery from Shell in 2022 . The company plans to use a third quarter turnaround to convert its renewable hydrocracker back to petroleum fuels production and to be up and running by the end of the year, after facing significant macro headwinds for renewable fuels, the company said on an earnings call today. The decision to return to full fossil fuels production is ultimately a near-term financial decision for the company which has an outstanding $196mn term loan, management said on an earnings call Thursday. The time line for a return to petroleum product production is contingent on permitting approvals and a successful completion of the turnaround and catalyst change in the unit. Vertex plans to sell its renewable feedstock inventories prior to the conversion. Vertex said it will retain the flexibility to return to renewable fuels processing should market conditions improve for the fuels, but does not believe headwinds to renewable markets will abate in at least the next year and a half. Conventional crude and other feedstock throughputs at the Mobile refinery were 64,000 b/d in the first quarter, down from 71,000 b/d in the same three months of 2023. Renewable throughputs were 4,000 b/d in the most recent quarter. The company expects 68,000-72,000 b/d of conventional crude and other feedstock throughputs in the second quarter and 2,000-4,000 b/d of renewable throughputs. Vertex reported a first quarter loss of $18mn compared to profits of $54mn in the first quarter of 2023. By Nathan Risser Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Australia’s ANZ bank to end new gas, oil lending


09/05/24
09/05/24

Australia’s ANZ bank to end new gas, oil lending

Sydney, 9 May (Argus) — Australia-based bank ANZ has updated its oil and gas policy, with it to no longer provide direct financing to new or expanding upstream oil and gas projects. The bank declared its new policy as part of its 2024 half-year results released on 7 May, saying it would also decline to integrate new customers primarily focused on upstream oil and gas. ANZ said that while it believes gas plays a "material and important part in meeting Australia's current energy needs and will do so for the foreseeable future", it will instead collaborate with energy customers to help finance their transition away from fossil fuels. The bank has a 26pc greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction by 2030 goal and committed in 2020 to exit all lending to companies with exposure to thermal coal, either through extraction or power generation by 2030 as part of lending criteria to support the 2015 UN Paris climate agreement target of net zero GHG emissions by 2050. ANZ has however promised to consider exceptions on a case-by-case basis, if any national energy security issues arise. Australia's banks have been under sustained pressure by environmental groups to exit lending to fossil fuel projects, as upstream gas firms also face shareholder rebellions over climate action plans. But Australia's federal government has conceded gas will likely be needed post-2050 as a firming power source for renewables and industrial feedstock for some sectors. But investment in upstream exploration has been extremely low in recent years, with imports of LNG likely in southern Australia from about 2026 to meet demand for industrial users and power generation. By Tom Major Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more