Ohmium leans on automotive synergies for electrolysers
US-based electrolyser maker Ohmium is developing proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolysers and is planning to hike output at its main factory in India, where it seeks to capitalise on advantages in manufacturing costs and access to a growing market for renewable hydrogen. Argus spoke to chief executive Arne Ballantine about the firm's technology, its growth strategy, and views on Indian and global hydrogen markets. Edited highlights follow:
What is your current and planned manufacturing capacity?
We used our most recent $250mn investment about a year ago to set up factory space for 2 GW/yr and brought in all the long lead tooling to support that. Now we'll fill up the factory as we need, buying the shorter lead pieces of equipment that might take only 6-8 weeks to buy. We'll probably be at 30-50MW in the last quarter of this year, tracking towards 10 times that by the end of next year. So, 500MW per quarter by the end of 2025, which is the full 2 GW/yr. And because we factory mass-produce our electrolysers, it's easy for us to add capacity — then we'll start looking at doubling capacity from there.
Why did you choose India for your factory?
India has a very robust automotive supply chain, and cars are perhaps one of the products in our world that have best captured high-volume manufacturing. We set up our supply chain to tie into this, so we're working with similar types of companies when we buy many of our materials and components, such as sheet metal enclosures [for the electrolysers]. We designed our product so the cabinets and all the components like pumps and plumbing are essentially at an automotive scale. That gives you a very good cost basis. In India now, the electronics business is starting to grow as well — not only consumer products, but all the way to the semiconductor chip level. There is a great talent pool of engineers and manufacturing folks to hire in order to build out your manufacturing base and there's also a wonderful set of suppliers.
What do your electrolysers cost today?
It depends on the order volume, but we certainly see Ohmium's total installed solution costing $1,200/kW or less, which on a total installed system basis is cost-competitive with alkaline. The equipment contains almost everything you need. You only have to add a few things at the end just to put it together. For this design, the added engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) cost is maybe as low as 10pc. Maybe in places like the US it might be 15pc, maybe 20pc. If you take the equipment cost and add maybe only 10pc or 15pc for EPC costs, you can stay below $1,200/kW. A big focus for us is to figure out how to keep the added EPC cost down.
Has the recent materials cost spike abated yet?
Everyone felt some increase in costs from inflation. There was a short blip in electronics during the Covid-19 pandemic that's largely over now and I don't see it coming back. If anything, I see the inverse as EVs [electric vehicles] are in a little downward cycle so a lot of power electronics are looking for a home, which is a good thing for electrolysers.
Can you cut costs further to compete with alkaline?
As I mentioned earlier, our total solution is cost-competitive with alkaline today on an apples-to-apples basis. We know exactly how to bring the cost down over time — I've worked on this for 24 years. It's not cost that keeps me up at night — it's how we help everyone to build out the electrolyser projects. PEM will win against any other technologies — it's the most efficient technology, and Ohmium makes the most efficient PEM. My co-founding team and I had experience with PEM, alkaline and solid oxide. We knew that alkaline would have limitations in coupling directly to renewables and the same challenge with solid oxide. You can cycle PEM up and down very hard, which is something you can't do with alkaline or solid oxide, and that is a huge added value — in fact, you need it in order to couple with renewables. Plus, PEM is very energy dense. We'll ship units this year containing 3MW, and those units will be 4MW next year, and we'll continue to increase that density.
Those are made up of 7-8 half-megawatt modules that we cluster together so you can still run the electrolyser if a single one fails and more easily fix it. Alkaline also involves extra costs to raise the purity of the hydrogen output, which is typically 99pc compared with PEM's 99.99. And purification steps usually have an 80-90pc yield and 10-20pc loss of the hydrogen product. In 2020 or 2022, developers' understanding of how to run these simulations was not as sophisticated, but in 2024, everybody knows.
What about scarce materials needed?
PEM's number-one challenge is strategic supply chain constraints, such as with precious metal and membranes, but we set out to tackle that from day one and we're now very vertically integrated. Things like catalyst layers and plate coatings we're producing ourselves, rather than using an external supply chain. At this point, there's only a tiny bit of iridium needed. Original-recipe PEM used in aerospace applications might have allowed for only 2GW based on global iridium mining, but with today's supply of iridium we could make 100GW of electrolysers if you asked us to.
Which countries and sectors are you seeing orders from first?
We've already installed two projects in the US, one in India — with another one about to install — two in Europe and one in the Middle East. We've been focused on opportunities in Europe and we see it really starting to accelerate now. There are opportunities in the US, but it has taken everyone a while to understand how the Inflation Reduction Act is going to play out, and I think that's very reasonably delayed things. We've done a fair amount of work in India because it's like a second home for us, where we have a lot of operations. And we've seen attractive things in the Middle East. We've started with those four markets, but we also see great opportunities in Australia and South America.
When will you start work under your deal with Indian state-controlled power utility NTPC and what's driving Indian demand?
We're starting to see the first NTPC projects, and I expect announcements in the second half of the year. We'll have to wait and see because India has policies to settle. Green hydrogen offers a chance to expand economies in countries that don't have native hydrocarbons. Refineries are a great example, because instead of using some hydrocarbons to make hydrogen, you can inject green hydrogen and then redeploy that 100-200MW of hydrocarbon value elsewhere in your economy. If India's goal is to put more energy into its economy and grow its total economy size, it can either import more hydrocarbons — which impacts its trade deficit — or, with relatively modest investment, set up 100-200MW of renewable hydrogen production at each refinery. India has been on that track since prime minister Modi made his Hydrogen Mission speech back in 2021.
Related news posts
EU commits €50mn to Namibian, South African H2 funds
EU commits €50mn to Namibian, South African H2 funds
Hamburg, 5 September (Argus) — The EU will contribute €50mn ($55mn) to renewable hydrogen investment funds in Namibia and South Africa. The funds will come from the bloc's Global Gateway international investment scheme, EU energy commissioner Kadri Simson said at the Global African Hydrogen Summit in Windhoek. "Investment will especially target private sector projects across the hydrogen value chain, such as the production, transportation and storage, as well as downstream industries," Simson said. Namibia's SDG Namibia Fund will receive €25mn, one of its managers, the Netherlands-headquartered Climate Fund Managers, said. This suggests the €50mn could be split equally between funds in Namibia and South Africa. The SDG Namibia Fund was launched in late 2022 with a target of raising $1bn in blended financing for renewable hydrogen projects and related infrastructure. It has received backing from Dutch state-owned Invest International and USAID Southern Africa Mobilizing Investment, and made a first investment late in 2023, supporting the Hyphen renewable hydrogen and ammonia project with an initial €23mn. South Africa's SA-H2 Fund is also targeting $1bn and is similarly backed by Invest International and other Dutch institutions. Simson announced two smaller support programmes in Windhoek. The EU together with the German government will provide €2.7mn for Namibia's planning efforts for expanding renewable hydrogen generation capacity and increasing access to this. It will grant €1.2mn to the Namibia Green Hydrogen Programme, a government-led initiative for drawing up regulations and support mechanisms for the sector. The EU plans to invest €1bn in Namibian renewable hydrogen and sustainable raw material value chains . The European Commission said last year that the bloc, its member states and European financial institutions would provide these funds as part of the Global Gateway initiative. By Stefan Krumpelmann Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Green projects struggle to access €724bn EU funds
Green projects struggle to access €724bn EU funds
Brussels, 2 September (Argus) — EU auditors today raised concerns about the ability of member states to make full use of the €724bn pot allocated to climate-related objectives under the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) — designed to mitigate the economic impact of the Covid pandemic — by the 31 August 2026 deadline. Auditors also highlighted significant compliance challenges facing hydrogen and renewable energy projects. Romania, for instance, had to remove a sub-measure for a hydrogen-ready and renewable gas distribution network, as it became evident the project would not be completed within the RRF's tight timeline. And Italy withdrew a project for offshore electricity generation infrastructure, including wave-based energy, over deadline concerns. "We are flagging risks, as EU countries had drawn down less than a third of the planned funds at the halfway point and made less than 30pc progress towards reaching their predefined milestones and targets," European Court of Auditors (ECA) member Ivana Maletic said. Maletic told Argus that no specific data are available yet on the progress of green deal, as opposed to other RRF projects, such as digitalisation. By the end of 2023, the ECA calculates that the European Commission had disbursed just €213bn, including €56.5bn in pre-financing. Beyond the challenge of meeting the 31 August 2026 completion deadline, some countries' administrative bottlenecks have also hindered progress. For example, Romania's failure to submit contracts for projects with a combined generation capacity of at least 300MW led to the partial suspension of a measure for combined heat and power generation in district heating systems. Another obstacle for projects is the 'do no significant harm' principle — a key component of EU sustainable finance legislation. The principle imposes strict criteria, typically excluding funding for companies deriving 1pc or more of their revenues from hard coal and lignite, 10pc from oil fuels, or 50pc from natural gas. Companies generating more than 50pc of their revenue from power generation with a greenhouse gas intensity exceeding 100g of CO2 equivalent/kWh would also normally be excluded from funding. By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
CCUS, hydrogen manage expectations ahead of Cop 29
CCUS, hydrogen manage expectations ahead of Cop 29
London, 2 September (Argus) — The final text from last year's UN Cop 28 climate summit in Dubai included a nod to carbon capture, use and storage (CCUS) and "low-carbon hydrogen" production — a first mention for both in Cop outcome texts and rare specificity. But these developing technologies have made little tangible progress since the conference, with few new commercial CCUS projects announced, while investment in hydrogen has slowed. Hydrogen industry participants are not predicting immediate strides forward for the sector at Cop 29, scheduled to take place in Baku, Azerbaijan, in November — industry association Hydrogen Europe is managing expectations for the event, and is already pinning hopes on next year's Cop 30, in Brazil. But it may benefit indirectly from the summit's higher-level initiatives, such as boosting energy transition finance and spurring bilateral carbon credit trading, they say. Baku may struggle to meet the high bar set at last year's Cop, which was described as a "historical moment" by industry group the Hydrogen Council. Perhaps in tacit recognition that hydrogen will be out of the limelight in Azerbaijan — which lacks robust ambitions for the technology — Hydrogen Europe has its hopes pinned on broader initiatives to give the sector a leg-up. Azerbaijan's aim to set up a climate fund bankrolled by fossil fuel companies and oil-producing country governments would be welcome, Hydrogen Europe chief executive Jorgo Chatzimarkakis says. Details of the potential fund are not clear, but it could back renewables, as well as supporting countries struggling to adapt to climate change. Progress at Cop 29 in finalising the details of the Paris Agreement's Article 6 — which allows countries to transfer carbon credits earned from cutting greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to help other countries meet their climate targets — would "benefit hydrogen big time", Chatzimarkakis adds. It could help to unlock projects in hydrogen-hopeful countries such as Namibia and Mauritania, which have plentiful sun, wind and space but lack straightforward access to finance, he says. For African countries, securing finance is the "single most critical challenge" in sustainable development, the African Climate Foundation says. The continent receives less than 3pc of global renewables investment and its governments will make a "concerted push" for more access to financing at Cop 29, the foundation's energy access and transitions programme manager, Sahele Fekede, says. Hydrogen's bubble deflating? But access to finance is only part of the battle, as several hydrogen-focused investment funds were already established at previous Cops, and governments have earmarked generous subsidy schemes for the sector. The biggest bottleneck this year appears to be commercially viable projects with confirmed customers. The industry has experienced sluggish progress over the past 12-18 months — far from the frenzy of projects and partnerships announced at Cop 27 in 2022, when hydrogen optimism ran high. Firms and governments have pulled back on hydrogen targets recently, but Cop 29 could see some new announcements. And a recent rise in hydrogen investment decisions in Europe, India and Canada, worth billions of dollars collectively, may mean the industry is turning a corner. Cop 29 offers the chance for "material advancements" for hydrogen in global technical standards and certification solutions, Hydrogen Council chief executive Ivana Jemelkova says. But 39 governments pledged to support mutual recognition of hydrogen certificates at Cop 28, so it is doubtful if anything more could be presented on this front in Baku. Key governments also endorsed the first set of technical standards to measure the CO2 footprint of different hydrogen plants at Cop 28 — a vital step to underpin certification. But work to expand this CO2 methodology to cover the midstream section is not expected until 2025-26. Implementing clear "demand drivers" must be the other "critical" talking point, Jemelkova says. Market participants see a lack of willingness to pay for clean hydrogen stifling investment decisions. In contrast, demand within the CCUS industry appears strong, with significant numbers of industrial emitters committing to capture CO2, and setting up pilot projects, while most oil and gas producers are diversifying to some extent into CO2 storage. But subsidy schemes are still under development in many countries and the sector's evolution is often hampered by logistical challenges — getting the capture, storage and transport elements ready simultaneously. The vast majority of CCUS and carbon capture and storage (CCS) facilities are at the planning stage, and many have not yet started construction. Of the almost 840 CCS facilities mapped by energy watchdog the IEA, just 51 are operational. Of these, 10 sequester the CO2 in dedicated storage, while the CO2 from a further six will be used. These 16 plants have announced a combined maximum capacity of 12.7mn t/yr CO2, IEA data show. Carbon capture controversy CCUS and CCS projects frequently attract criticism. They are used to justify continued fossil fuel use and delay action on cutting GHG emissions, non-governmental organisations (NGOs) say. The technology, while cautiously backed by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's overarching climate science reports, is not fully proven at scale for climate purposes, and can be energy-intensive. Oil-producing countries often cite the technology at climate talks, arguing the need to reduce emissions from oil and gas use rather than removing the source of those emissions. The specific language on CCUS in the Cop 28 outcome text is likely to have been included to mollify fossil fuel-producing countries. The EU was clear ahead of Cop 28, setting a firm position that CCS or CCUS should play a minor role in tackling climate change. Use of fossil fuels with CCUS should only be an option for "specific hard-to-abate sectors", EU climate commis sioner Wopke Hoekstra said. He doubled down during the summit, telling delegates that "we cannot CCS ourselves out of the space" to address climate change. But the bloc has since released a proposed carbon management strategy that leans heavily on CCUS to hit ambitious climate goals — although work would have started on the plan well before Cop 28. The EU aims to map potential CO2 storage areas and wants carbon capture to cover all industrial process emissions by 2040. Europe — including non-EU members Norway, Iceland and the UK — is by far the region furthest ahead, with significant CO2 storage potential and the resources to drive a nascent industry. The past year has seen some new CO2 storage licences awarded, and incremental progress on subsidy frameworks, but a lack of commercial agreements and concrete decisions persists, while start dates for existing developments have been pushed back. Both CCUS and hydrogen are developing industries and need substantial investment — from the private sector, but also public funding to de-risk an emerging market. Just five jurisdictions — the US, EU, Canada, Norway and the Netherlands — are responsible for 95pc of public funding for CCS and "fossil hydrogen" to date, NGO Oil Change International says, putting subsidies for the technologies at $30bn in total. Finance will be the "centrepiece" of Cop 29, and given previous mention in a Cop text, CCUS and hydrogen are both well positioned to receive energy transition funding. But the industries also need mandates, subsidies and widely used regulatory frameworks to advance. By Georgia Gratton, Pamela Machado and Aidan Lea Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
South Korea to require use of SAF for flights from 2027
South Korea to require use of SAF for flights from 2027
Singapore, 30 August (Argus) — South Korea said it plans to require all international flights departing from its airports to use a mix of 1pc sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) from 2027. This comes as more countries are adopting SAF mandates in accordance with the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA). Singapore earlier this year announced a 1pc SAF blending mandate from 2026 , with plans to increase to 3-5pc by 2030, subject to global developments and wider SAF availability and adoption. The Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy and the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport announced the 'SAF Expansion Strategy' on 30 August, which includes a target for South Korea to capture 30pc of the global blended SAF export market. While not explicitly stated in the statement, some South Korean refineries expect co-processed SAF to be allowed to meet the country's mandate, sources said. This is important as the country already produces small quantities of SAF via co-processing at existing refining facilities, with three of South Korea's four domestic refineries planning to produce SAF through co-processing by the end of this year . Key strategies The ministries outlined three key strategies to achieve the SAF consumption target — gradual expansion of domestic SAF demand, ensuring a stable domestic supply capacity, and establishing a SAF-friendly legal and institutional environment. Airlines can already refuel with SAF at Korean airports, making South Korea the 20th country to do so as part of their plan to increase domestic SAF demand. The country had tested six flights using 2-4pc imported blended SAF between South Korea and Los Angeles since August 2023. An incentive system is being developed to encourage public and private adoption of SAF, with benefits such as preferential allocation of transport rights, reduced airport facility usage fees and the introduction of airline carbon mileage system for passengers and other benefits. A mid- to long-term roadmap for the gradual expansion of domestic SAF demand will be prepared in early 2025, the ministries said. The country's strategy to secure stable domestic supply capabilities includes considering investment support for domestic SAF production such as tax credits. South Korea's four domestic refineries already plan to invest 4 trillion won ($3bn) in renewable fuels, including SAF by 2030, the ministries said. The government estimates a Hydrotreated Esters and Fatty Acids (HEFA) SAF plant with a production capacity of up to 250,000 t/yr will require an investment of approximately W1 trillion. The supply-side strategy also aims to ease regulations on waste recycling to increase the availability of domestic feedstocks for SAF production. Another strategy is to diversify feedstock and SAF production technology options, with pre-testing expected later this year. The government plans to explore alternative feedstock like microalgae and production pathways such as e-SAF, with a view to developing supply chains. South Korea plans to establish a national standard, certification and testing method for SAF with preparation planned for December 2024. By Deborah Sun Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more