Belarusian opposition leader asks for US sanctions
Belarusian opposition leader Svetlana Tikhanovskaya is renewing calls for the US to expand its sanctions targeting Belarus' oil and fertilizer industries.
Tikhanovskaya, who met yesterday with US secretary of state Tony Blinken and other State Department officials in Washington, today said she asked for additional sanctions and was given assurances that the US administration will unveil "strong actions" against Belarusian president Alexander Lukashenko's government and state owned enterprises.
"We talked about sectoral sanctions because they are most powerful — they would hit the enterprises, they would hit Lukashenko's cronies," Tikhanovskaya said at a discussion hosted by Washington think tank the Atlantic Council. "They monopolized the potash, oil, steel and wood processing enterprises, and sectoral sanctions would hit the regime."
The US administration on 3 June resumed enforcing sanctions against nine Belarusian refining, petrochemical and fertilizer companies. That list affects the operator of the 240,000 b/d Novopolotsk refinery and Belarusian state-owned refining business Belneftekhim. Tikhanovskaya last month called on US lawmakers to also target the 323,000 b/d Mozyr refinery and state-owned potash producer Belaruskali, neither of which is affected by existing US sanctions.
US president Joe Biden on 25 May ordered new sanctions to be prepared against Belarus in coordination with the EU to protest the forced redirection of a Ryanair passenger flight to Minsk and the arrest of a Belarusian journalist aboard that aircraft. But the US has yet to act to match sanctions the EU unveiled last month against Belarusian entities and Russian businessman Mikhail Gutseriyev.
US officials normally do not comment on future sanctions targets, and the State Department did not address the prospect of additional sanctions in an official readout of meetings with Tikhanovskaya. "With partners like the EU, the UK and Canada, we continue to coordinate tools and economic pressure in support of the Belorussian people and to hold regime actors accountable for their abuses," US ambassador to Belarus Julie Fisher said today.
The Belarusian opposition leader is holding meetings with White House officials and members of Congress later today. "We want maximum pressure," Tikhanovskaya said, a term used frequently by former president Donald Trump's administration to describe its sanctions approach to Iran and Venezuela.
But the term — and the approach — has fallen out of favor in Washington since Biden took office.
The US administration is reviewing its existing sanctions programs to judge their efficacy after concluding that the maximum pressure campaigns against Iran and Venezuela have achieved little to no political results. Current and former US sanctions officials have criticized the recent practice of imposing sanctions as a purely punitive measure instead of using them to try to alter foreign governments' behavior.
Deputy treasury secretary Wally Adeyemo hosted former Democratic and Republican government officials to discuss possible sanctions tweaks. The group told Adeyemo that "US economic and financial sanctions are not an end to themselves but are most effective when employed in the context of a broader US government strategy to address a foreign policy or national security threat," the Treasury Department said. The meeting also "discussed the need to effectively calibrate sanctions to limit the unintended consequences on US businesses, foreign partners, and other third parties — including entities engaged in legitimate humanitarian activities."
Related news posts
Citgo auction result delayed amid last-minute motions
Citgo auction result delayed amid last-minute motions
Houston, 18 September (Argus) — The US court-appointed special master overseeing the auction of US refiner Citgo plans to object to a last-minute motion from the Venezuelan government to delay the sale process by four months. The Republic of Venezuela and state-owned oil company PdV filed a motion on Tuesday seeking a four-month pause in the sale of its refining subsidiary Citgo, which is being auctioned off to satisfy debts owed by PdV. Special master Robert Pincus said in a court filing today that he intends to object to Venezuela's motion for a pause. The last-minute motion from Venezuela comes days after the US District Court for the District of Delaware was expected to announce results of the winning bidder. The court asked for a second extension to the auction process in August, delaying announcing a successful bidder to on or about 16 September with a sale hearing on 7 November. But Pincus is now dealing with last-minute legal challenges filed last week outside of the Delaware courts by so-called "alter ego" claimants seeking to "circumvent" the Delaware court's sales process and "jump the line" for enforcing claims against PdV, the special master said in a filing last week. Bidders for Citgo's 804,000 b/d of refining capacity, terminals, retail fuel stations and other plants expect the assets to be sold free and clear of future claims by PdV creditors. Unresolved legal liabilities could lower the value bidders are willing to pay for Citgo, decreasing the pool of money available to those owed by PdV. By Nathan Risser Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
US seeks to purchase 6mn bl for SPR
US seeks to purchase 6mn bl for SPR
Washington, 18 September (Argus) — President Joe Biden's administration is trying to purchase 6mn bl of sour crude for delivery to the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) as part of a plan to issue solicitations when prices are "favorable for taxpayers." The US Department of Energy (DOE) today released a solicitation to purchase up to 6mn bl of sour crude for delivery in February-May to the SPR's Bayou Choctaw site in Louisiana. If the purchase is successful, it would be the largest single purchase since the Biden administration launched its crude purchase program in early 2023. The solicitation offers a chance for the administration to buy crude for the SPR at a lower price than earlier purchases. Nymex WTI crude futures for delivery in February settled at $68.41/bl on Tuesday. The lowest-priced crude purchase under Biden was a 1.7mn purchase at a price of $72/bl in June 2023, and the average purchase price is about $76/bl. Bids for the solicitation are due by noon ET on 25 September. DOE has already purchased more than 50mn bl of sour crude for the SPR, of which 30mn bl have already been delivered. On 9 September, DOE said it purchased 3.42mn bl of sour crude for the SPR's Bryan Mound storage site at a price of $72.46/bl from the trading firm Macquarie Commodities Trading. The crude will be delivered in January-March, adding to an earlier purchase of nearly 2.5mn bl that will be delivered to the Bryan Mound site over the same time frame. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
TMX is a fossil fuel subsidy of at least C$8.7bn: IISD
TMX is a fossil fuel subsidy of at least C$8.7bn: IISD
Calgary, 18 September (Argus) — Canada's newest crude pipeline to the country's west coast amounts to a fossil fuel subsidy of at least C$8.7bn ($6.4bn), a research and policy think-tank said. The federal government is unlikely to recover its C$34bn investment to construct the 590,000 b/d Trans Mountain Expansion (TMX) connecting oil producers in Alberta to the Pacific coast, qualifying the project as a major subsidy for the fossil fuel industry, according to the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) on Wednesday. This runs contrary to the government's policy to eliminate direct support for the oil and gas sector , a goal Justin Trudeau's Liberals said was achieved in 2023. The government was the first G20 country to hit this milestone, following a 2009 commitment by the group to reach the goal by 2025. The subsidy as it relates to TMX could be as high as C$18.7bn, the Canadian non-profit said, but noted the entire amount could still be recovered by increasing tolls and/or implementing a levy. This levy could be against either all producers, or all shippers, of crude in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin (WCSB), whether they use TMX or not, the IISD suggested. About 90pc of Canada's crude production comes from western Canada, with much of that derived from Alberta's oil sands region. "A levy in the range of C$1-2/bl . . . over a 10-year period would be sufficient to recover the entire cost of the subsidy and the loss to the Canadian taxpayer," according to the IISD. Alternatively, fixed tolls on TMX would need to be more than doubled to C$24.53/bl from C$11.37/bl to recover all capital costs for the line that went into service on 1 May this year, according to IISD's figures. Variable tolls would be added to this. The terms in the original contracts signed between shippers and then-owner Kinder Morgan were no longer appropriate as they did not reflect the rising risks of the project, said the IISD. Kinder Morgan suspended the project in 2018, which led to the Canadian government buying both the expansion project and the original 300,000 b/d Trans Mountain line from US midstream company that same year. The federal government has maintained its plan to sell the pipeline once operational, but the final tolls are yet to be determined. Whether the operator or shippers will bear the brunt of the massive cost overruns is also still unknown. Tolls, representing cash flows for any prospective buyer, will help dictate the price that the expanded Trans Mountain system will fetch. The IISD suggests a sale price is likely to be between C$17.6bn-26.6bn, resulting in a net loss to the government of between C$8.9bn-18bn assuming its cost of investment climbs to nearly C$36bn before a sale is reached. But despite warnings by opponents it would go underused, TMX has been as advertised, opening a new frontier for oil sands operators and disrupting trade flows throughout the Pacific Rim. By Brett Holmes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Indian windfall tax on domestic crude output at zero
Indian windfall tax on domestic crude output at zero
Mumbai, 18 September (Argus) — India has reduced the windfall tax on domestic crude production to zero from a previous 1,850 rupees/t ($3/bl), in line with a fall in global oil prices. The new rate is effective from 18 September. The rate was last revised on 31 August when it was cut by 12pc . The rate is revised every two weeks. Global crude prices fell nearly 9pc during 1-18 September. The windfall tax was cut to zero during 4-19 April and 16 May-15 July 2023. The Indian government first imposed the windfall tax in July 2022 because of a sharp increase in crude prices that led to domestic crude producers making windfall gains. Indian producers sell crude to domestic refineries at international parity prices. India's crude production in August fell by 4pc from a year earlier to 520,000 b/d, oil ministry data show. Crude imports in August fell by 8pc from July and by nearly 1pc against a year earlier to 4.22m b/d in August, Vortexa data show. India has again extended a deadline to 21 September for submitting bids for the ninth bidding round under the Hydrocarbon Exploration and Licensing Policy's Open Acreage Licensing Programme, as it attempts to boost investment to lift domestic upstream output. By Roshni Devi Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more