Mexican energy shift hits Nuevo Leon industrial hub

  • Spanish Market: Metals, Natural gas, Oil products
  • 11/01/21

Mexico's industrial hub of Nuevo Leon state may have the most to lose as the country's regulatory changes and possible energy reform rollbacks sour the outlook for private investment.

Since coming to power just over two years ago, the administration of President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador ordered regulatory changes that seek to fortify state-owned Pemex and power utility CFE, while in many cases sidelining new private-sector investment in sectors ranging from oil to solar and wind power generation.

As a result, foreign and local energy companies are delaying or scrapping new power generation projects across the country. That includes projects planned for Nuevo Leon, which had a bright outlook as a destination for energy investment given its high solar radiation levels and proximity to the US border.

More broadly, freezing plans for new power generation could keep electricity costs high, putting industry at a disadvantage in the manufacturing-heavy state, says Regulo Salinas, head of the energy commission at Mexico's confederation of industrial chambers.

"This is a major worry that we have," said Salinas, who is also institutional director at Ternium Mexico, the steelmaker based in Nuevo Leon.

Delayed renewables

The uncertainty has delayed renewable energy projects valued at more than $900mn, said Jorge Gorozpe, head of energy development at Nuevo Leon's economy and labor ministry.

Private-sector companies had performed feasibility studies for numerous solar and wind projects in the state and had planned to take part in Mexico's fourth renewable energy auction in 2019. But the federal government cancelled that process, preventing investments from materializing.

Then last year, electrical grid operator Cenace restricted testing on new solar and wind project connections waiting to go into operation. The energy ministry also published rules imposing additional obligations on renewable power generators prior to launching operations, and allowing Cenace to prioritize CFE requests for grid access.

"They have changed the rules of the game several times," Gorozpe said. "There is no certainty that projects can be developed."

Companies have also been unable to move forward with plans to build natural gas-powered plants that have sought to take advantage of the cheaper commodity imported from neighboring Texas. Federal regulators have not been giving them operating permits under the timelines required by law, says Monterrey-based attorney Jorge Arrambide.

"I can think of 10 large electric power plant projects of over 100 MW each that are not moving forward in Nuevo Leon because of this," says Arrambide, who represents some of the companies overseeing these projects. "That translates to millions and millions of dollars of investment that are not panning out."

Impact on power costs

The longer-term economic impact of freezing these projects could potentially affect the overall competitiveness of Nuevo Leon's major industries, including steel, cement, appliances and auto manufacturing.

The 2014 energy reforms passed under Mexico's previous administration opened the power sector to private investment and set up rules that gave priority to the least expensive energy. That encouraged waves of investment in renewables and natural gas-fired plants that can provide cheaper power than CFE.

While those changes have already helped Nuevo Leon boost its power generation to 30,600GWh in 2019, the state had expected that figure to increase even further, which would significantly lower electricity costs, Gorozpe said.

Now, industrial firms are concerned the slowdown in energy investment will prevent more power supply from coming online, ultimately keeping power expensive.

"Given the lack of competition, we think the industrial sector will be paying higher electric costs than it should and higher than our competitors," Salinas said.

In October 2020, Mexico's retail industrial electricity prices were 10¢/kWh for power supplied to medium-sized plants, according to the country's energy regulatory commission (CRE). That was 49pc higher than the 6.72¢/kWh for retail industrial electricity in the US during that period, according to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA). It was 81pc higher than the 5.52¢/kWh for the west south central region, which includes Texas.

High power costs are particularly harmful for industry in Nuevo Leon because around 30pc of Mexico's total electricity is consumed by companies headquartered in the state, including their operations in other states, Salinas says.

Nuevo Leon led all Mexican states in manufacturing in 2019, followed by Coahuila and Mexico states, according to the country's national institute of statistics and geography (Inegi). The state accounts for 11pc of Mexico's manufacturing GDP and 9pc of its manufacturing exports, according to the state's economy and labor secretariat.

"It is a generalized problem, but the difference in the case of Nuevo Leon is that it has such a huge industrial presence," said Rosanety Barrios, former head of the industrial transformation policy unit at Mexico's energy ministry. "An administration that inhibits investment necessarily impacts that region."

Mexico's industrial hub Mexico's industrial hub

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

03/05/24

Indonesia’s Tangguh LNG facility offers Jun-Jul cargoes

Indonesia’s Tangguh LNG facility offers Jun-Jul cargoes

Singapore, 3 May (Argus) — Indonesia's 7.6mn t/yr BP-operated Tangguh LNG facility is offering four LNG cargoes for June-July loading, through a tender that closes on 6 May. The Tangguh LNG project in Indonesia's west Papua province is offering four cargoes on a fob basis for loading on 17, 22, 27 June, and on 2 July, or two cargoes on a des basis. But the delivery windows are unclear. The firm was last in the market in March , when it offered four cargoes on a fob basis for loading during 28-29 April, 1-2 May, 3-4 May and 17-19 May, or three cargoes on a des basis for delivery over 6-8 May, 8-10 May and 12-14 May. But it is unclear if these cargoes were sold eventually. This offer adds to a growing pool of availability for June and July cargoes, as summer restocking demand among traditional major importing region northeast Asia is poised to be lower this year. This is mainly owing to higher inventories after the winter season and more than sufficient contracted term deliveries, buyers in the region said. This is despite Japan and South Korea forecasting higher summer temperatures this year as compared to the previous year, according to the Japan Meteorological Agency and Korea Meteorological Administration on 23 April. Spot prices have remained relatively rangebound at around high-$9s to low-$10s/mn Btu since the end of March despite weak demand. Spot prices have been tracking some strength in Dutch TTF contract prices, which has reduced importers' incentive to step up spot purchases since imported spot has no obvious price advantage. The front half-month of the ANEA — the Argus assessment for spot LNG deliveries to northeast Asia — was last assessed on 3 May at $9.955/mn Btu, lower by about 11¢/mn Btu from a week earlier, but about 71¢/mn Btu higher from a month earlier. Spot demand has been mostly confined to south and southeast Asian importers. Most of southeast Asia is currently experiencing a heatwave, which is likely to continue driving spot LNG demand from firms like Thailand's state-controlled PTT. The firm has issued another tender seeking three deliveries over 1-2, 7-8 and 10-11 July that closed on 3 May. It may have awarded the tender, but further details are unclear, traders said. By Rou Urn Lee Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Australia's WesCEF to pursue Li plans despite hurdles


03/05/24
03/05/24

Australia's WesCEF to pursue Li plans despite hurdles

Singapore, 3 May (Argus) — Australian conglomerate Wesfarmers will still pursue the strategy for its chemicals, energy and fertilisers arm (WesCEF) to be an integrated lithium producer, despite the recent lithium market downturn. Wesfarmers earlier this year warned of unprofitable lithium sales from its Mount Holland project , owing to high production costs as it goes through a ramp-up. But WesCEF plans to weather through the downturn and plow ahead with its lithium downstream developments, given strong long-term fundamentals and despite the market's immaturity and cyclical demand, according to the group's executives on 2 May. Spodumene prices in China — which dominates global consumption of lithium raw materials — were assessed at $1,080-1,180/t on 30 April, down sharply from $5,750-5,900/t at the start of 2023. "It's also worth remembering that when we invested in Covalent and took the final investment decision , lithium hydroxide prices were lower than they are today," said WesCEF's managing director Ian Hansen. Wesfarmers and Chilean lithium firm SQM jointly own Australian firm Covalent Lithium, which looks after the Mount Holland project that includes a mine, concentrator and its 50,000 t/yr Kwinana lithium hydroxide refinery. Completing the refinery's construction and commissioning remains WesCEF's priority, with the mine and concentrator going through a ramp-up, according to WesCEF. The firm is also progressing its potential expansion project for the mine and concentrator, which it submitted an application for environmental approvals. The first lithium hydroxide output out of the Kwinana refinery is still expected in the first half of 2025, with a delay in timeline. Covalent completed its first spodumene concentrate shipment earlier in March, said WesCEF. Wesfarmers expected its share of spodumene concentrate output from Mount Holland to be 50,000t in the current July 2023-June 2024 fiscal year. The share will rise to 150,000-190,000t in the upcoming July 2024-June 2025 fiscal year. Lithium downturn The lithium downturn has led to multiple firms, including major particpants across the lithium and battery supply chain, reporting poor January-March results. Australian lithium and nickel producer IGO, affected by slumps in the lithium and nickel markets, reported its first quarterly loss in years while posting lower output . Major US lithium producer Albemarle's executives have also called the market "unsustainable" in the long run, as it posts a whopping $1.1bn year-on-year fall in sales from its energy storage division. Major Chinese lithium producer Tianqi Lithium also suffered heavy losses, while global lithium firm Arcadium Lithium earlier this year cut its planned sales numbers this year and warned that current market prices will weigh on future supply. South Korea's top battery manufacturer LG Energy Solution (LGES) reported W157bn of operating profit in January-March , but would have reported an operating loss of W32bn if it did not receive almost W189bn in US Inflation Reduction Act tax credits. By Joseph Ho Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Nippon Steel delays timeline to acquire US Steel


03/05/24
03/05/24

Nippon Steel delays timeline to acquire US Steel

Tokyo, 3 May (Argus) — Japan's Nippon Steel has extended the scheduled timing of its US Steel acquisition completion until the end of the year, following a request by US authorities to submit more documentation, postponing an original plan of closing the deal by September at the latest. Nippon Steel will take more time to complete its $15bn deal to buy US Steel , as the Japanese firm received from the US Department of Justice a "second request" on submitting further documents necessary for the approval procedure. The deal was initially scheduled to close during April-September but is postponed to sometime during July-December, the Japanese firm announced on 3 May. Nippon Steel received the additional request in April, according to a company representative who spoke to Argus, without disclosing the specific date. The company anticipated the possibility of additional requirements, he added. The acquisition procedure may not finish before the US presidential election in November. Both the Democratic and the Republican party candidates repeatedly and vocally have opposed the deal , with incumbent US President Joe Biden pledging that a fellow American steel producer will be "American owned, American operated by American union steel workers". Nippon Steel is confident that its acquisition plan will eventually clear regulatory hurdles with "fair and objective judgement" from the US authorities, the representative added. By Yusuke Maekawa Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Canadian rail workers vote to launch strike: Correction


02/05/24
02/05/24

Canadian rail workers vote to launch strike: Correction

Corrects movement of grain loadings from a year earlier in final paragraph. Washington, 2 May (Argus) — Workers at the two major Canadian railroads could go on strike as soon as 22 May now that members of the Teamsters Canada Rail Conference (TCRC) have authorized a strike, potentially causing widespread disruption to shipments of commodities such as crude, coal and grain. A strike could disrupt rail traffic not only in Canada but also in the US and Mexico because trains would not be able to leave, nor could shipments enter into Canada. This labor action could be far more impactful than recent strikes because it would affect Canadian National (CN) and Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CPKC) at the same time. Union members at Canadian railroads have gone on strike individually in the past, which has left one of the two carriers to continue operating and handle some of their competitor's freight. But TCRC members completed a vote yesterday about whether to initiate a strike action at each carrier. The union represents about 9,300 workers employed at the two railroads. Roughly 98pc of union members that participated voted in favor of a strike beginning as early as 22 May, the union said. The union said talks are at an impasse. "After six months of negotiations with both companies, we are no closer to reaching a settlement than when we first began, TCRC president Paul Boucher said. Boucher warned that "a simultaneous work stoppage at both CN and CPKC would disrupt supply chains on a scale Canada has likely never experienced." He added that the union does not want to provoke a rail crisis and wants to avoid a work stoppage. The union has argued that the railroads' proposals would harm safety practices. It has also sought an improved work-life balance. But CN and CPKC said the union continues to reject their proposals. CPKC "is committed to negotiating in good faith and responding to our employees' desire for higher pay and improved work-life balance, while respecting the best interests of all our railroaders, their families, our customers, and the North American economy." CN said it wants a contract that addresses the work life balance and productivity, benefiting the company and employees. But even when CN "proposed a solution that would not touch duty-rest rules, the union has rejected it," the railroad said. Canadian commodity volume has fallen this year with only rail shipments of chemicals, petroleum and petroleum products, and non-metallic minerals rising, Association of American Railroads (AAR) data show. Volume data includes cars loaded in the US by Canadian carriers. Coal traffic dropped by 11pc during the 17 weeks ended on 27 April compared with a year earlier, AAR data show. Loadings of motor vehicles and parts have fallen by 5.2pc. CN and CPKC grain loadings fell by 4.3pc from a year earlier, while shipment of farm products and food fell by 9.3pc. By Abby Caplan Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

FTC clears Exxon-Pioneer deal but bars Sheffield


02/05/24
02/05/24

FTC clears Exxon-Pioneer deal but bars Sheffield

New York, 2 May (Argus) — US antitrust regulators signaled they will clear ExxonMobil's proposed $59.5bn takeover of Pioneer Natural Resources but banned the shale giant's former chief executive officer from gaining a seat on the board. A proposed consent order from the Federal Trade Commission seeks to stop Scott Sheffield, Pioneer's former chief executive, from taking part in "collusive activity" that would potentially raise crude prices and cause US consumers to pay more at the pump. The order paves the way for ExxonMobil to close its blockbuster deal for Pioneer, which will make it the leading producer in the prolific Permian shale basin of west Texas and southeastern New Mexico. It is also the top US oil producer's biggest transaction since Exxon's 1999 merger with Mobil. ExxonMobil's Permian output will more than double to 1.3mn b/d of oil equivalent (boe/d) when the acquisition closes, before increasing to about 2mn boe/d in 2027. The FTC, which has taken a tougher line on mergers under the administration of President Joe Biden, has paid close attention to oil deals announced during the latest phase of shale consolidation. Only this week, Diamondback Energy said it had received a second request for information from the regulator over its $26bn proposed takeover of Endeavor Energy Resources. And Chevron's planned $53bn acquisition of US independent Hess has also been held up. The FTC alleged in a complaint that Sheffield exchanged hundreds of text messages with Opec officials discussing crude pricing and output, and that he sought to align production across the Permian with the cartel. His past conduct "makes it crystal clear that he should be nowhere near Exxon's boardroom," said Kyle Mach, deputy director of the FTC's Bureau of Competition. ExxonMobil said it learnt about the allegations against Sheffield from the FTC. "They are entirely inconsistent with how we do business," the company said. While Pioneer said it disagreed with the FTC's complaint, which reflects a "fundamental misunderstanding" of US and global oil markets and "misreads the nature and intent" of Sheffield's actions, the company said it would not be taking any steps to stop the merger from closing. By Stephen Cunningham Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more