AMLO shrugs off US lawmakers' energy complaints
Mexican president Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador downplayed complaints of 21 bipartisan US lawmakers who called on President Joe Biden to focus attention on energy policies there that are hurting US investors.
The letter that followed other similar efforts underscored how recent changes to Mexico's energy policy limited even more the participation of US companies and need the US president's "immediate and sustained attention and a timely solution."
The letter was signed by Republican senators John Cornyn and Ted Cruz of Texas and James Inhofe of Oklahoma and 17 members of the US House of Representatives, including Democrat Henry Cuellar of Texas.
But the lawmakers represent a minority, Lopez Obrador said.
"There is really no problem," Lopez Obrador said today. "Mexico's situation is exceptional, unbeatable for investment. We see, as always, some who protest, but they are an insignificant minority."
The lawmakers argued that Mexico's policies "undermines the spirit and letter of the US-Mexico-Canada free trade agreement (USMCA) and affects the livelihoods of our fellow Americans working in the energy sector."
Mexico's recent policy changes deepen the favoritism for state-owned Pemex and CFE in regulatory proceedings that began under the administration of Lopez Obrador, the lawmakers wrote in a letter directed to Biden.
The letter follow several and diverse regulatory measures in the Mexican fuel sector, including a reform that made it harder for private companies to get fuel import and operating permits, a modification to free Pemex from rules that curbed its market power, modifications in the customs law to add hurdles to imports in private-sector owned ports and terminals, and the creation of a state-owned LPG retail company.
Recently passed reforms to the power sector that give dispatch preferences to utility CFE will increase costs for Mexican consumers and manufacturers, and could raise CO2 emissions, the US lawmakers added.
Mexico's economy and trade secretary Tatiana Clouthier is in Washington DC to asses the implementation of the USMCA and continue discussions with her counterpart, US trade representative Katherine Tai, who raised the energy policy complaints during a recent visit to Mexico City.
Related news posts
Canada’s TMX pipeline ready to move crude: Update
Canada’s TMX pipeline ready to move crude: Update
Adds regulatory approvals received. Calgary, 30 April (Argus) — Canada's 590,000 b/d Trans Mountain Expansion (TMX) crude pipeline can now start moving volumes to the Pacific coast after receiving final regulatory approvals today, more than a decade after the project was first conceived. The Canada Energy Regulator (CER) approved Trans Mountain's final applications on Tuesday, giving the midstream company a green light to put its C$34bn ($25bn) project into service. Trans Mountain had recently maintained its commitment to being ready by 1 May. The expansion nearly triples the existing 300,000 b/d Trans Mountain line that runs from Edmonton, Alberta, to Burnaby, British Columbia. Also expanded was the Westridge Marine Terminal from one dock to three, all capable of loading Aframax-sized vessels. The line will provide Canadian oil sands producers with a significant export outlet without having to first go through the US. Much of the new volume to flow on TMX is expected to be heavy sour crude. Federally-owned Trans Mountain had submitted applications as recent as 15 April for the final section of the pipeline about 140 kilometers (87 miles) east of the line's terminus in Burnaby. The final applications concerned piping, valves and other components at two pipeline inspection device traps and the mainline pipe between the two traps. The traps were added for safety assurance when the operator was allowed by CER to use a smaller diameter pipe as part of the Mountain 3 deviation. Mountain 3 was the last segment of the pipeline to be constructed because of delays relating to difficult terrain while tunneling. The "golden weld" marking the end of construction occurred on 11 April, according to Trans Mountain. A group of shippers last week expressed concern that TMX would not be ready for commercial service by 1 May. The pipeline had been marred by legal challenges and cost over-runs since it was first proposed in 2013 by its then-owner US midstream firm Kinder Morgan. The Canadian government took ownership of it in 2018. By Brett Holmes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
New US rule may let some shippers swap railroads
New US rule may let some shippers swap railroads
Washington, 30 April (Argus) — US rail regulators today issued a final rule designed to help customers switch railroads in cases of poor rail service, but it is already drawing mixed reviews. Reciprocal switching, which allows freight shippers or receivers captive to a single railroad to access to an alternate carrier, has been allowed under US Surface Transportation Board (STB) rules. But shippers had not used existing STB rules to petition for reciprocal switching in 35 years, prompting regulators to revise rules to encourage shippers to pursue switching while helping resolve service problems. "The rule adopted today has broken new ground in the effort to provide competitive options in an extraordinarily consolidated rail industry," said outgoing STB chairman Martin Oberman. The five-person board unanimously approved a rule that would allow the board to order a reciprocal switching agreement if a facility's rail service falls below specified levels. Orders would be for 3-5 years. "Given the repeated episodes of severe service deterioration in recent years, and the continuing impediments to robust and consistent rail service despite the recent improvements accomplished by Class I carriers, the board has chosen to focus on making reciprocal switching available to shippers who have suffered service problems over an extended period of time," Oberman said today. STB commissioner Robert Primus voted to approve the rule, but also said it did not go far enough. The rule adopted today is "unlikely to accomplish what the board set out to do" since it does not cover freight moving under contract, he said. "I am voting for the final rule because something is better than nothing," Primus said. But he said the rule also does nothing to address competition in the rail industry. The Association of American Railroads (AAR) is reviewing the 154-page final rule, but carriers have been historically opposed to reciprocal switching proposals. "Railroads have been clear about the risks of expanded switching and the resulting slippery slope toward unjustified market intervention," AAR said. But the trade group was pleased that STB rejected "previous proposals that amounted to open access," which is a broad term for proposals that call for railroads to allow other carriers to operate over their tracks. The American Short Line and Regional Railroad Association declined to comment but has indicated it does not expect the rule to have an appreciable impact on shortline traffic, service or operations. Today's rule has drawn mixed reactions from some shipper groups. The National Industrial Transportation League (NITL), which filed its own reciprocal switching proposal in 2011, said it was encouraged by the collection of service metrics required under the rule. But "it is disheartened by its narrow scope as it does not appear to apply to the vast majority of freight rail traffic that moves under contracts or is subject to commodity exemptions," said NITL executive director Nancy O'Liddy, noting it was a departure from the group's original petition which sought switching as a way to facilitate railroad economic competitiveness. The Chlorine Institute said, in its initial analysis, that it does not "see significant benefit for our shipper members since it excludes contract traffic which covers the vast majority of chlorine and other relevant chemical shipments." By Abby Caplan Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
First TMX cargo booked on Aframax to China
First TMX cargo booked on Aframax to China
Houston, 30 April (Argus) — The first cargo shipped on the Trans Mountain Expansion (TMX) crude pipeline is scheduled to load on an Aframax in Vancouver, British Columbia, beginning 18 May for June delivery in China, according to sources with knowledge of the transaction. Suncor provisionally booked the Aframax Dubai Angel for a Vancouver-China voyage at $3.5mn lumpsum, equivalent to $6.39/bl for Access Western Blend, market participants said. In March, China's state-run Sinochem purchased the first TMX cargo — 550,000 bl of Canadian Access Western Blend — for June delivery. The shipping fixture would mark the first Vancouver-China crude delivery since May 2023, according to Vortexa, a possible indicator of steady Asia-Pacific demand to come with increased maritime access for Canadian oil producers. China already receives heavy sour Canadian crude re-exported from the US Gulf coast, with about 110,000 b/d arriving in 2023, Vortexa data show. The new 590,000 b/d pipeline begins commercial service on 1 May, with three Aframax-capable berths at Vancouver's Westridge Marine Terminal, up from one previously. An oversupply of Aframax crude tankers on the west coast of the Americas in anticipation of TMX-driven demand pressured Vancouver-loading rates to six-month lows on 19 April , according to Argus data, but market participants expect demand to increase beginning in the second half of May. Three regulatory approvals remained under assessment by the Canada Energy Regulator (CER) on 30 April. The applications concern piping, valves and other components at two pipeline inspection device traps and the mainline pipe between the two traps. The traps were added for safety assurance when the operator was allowed by CER to use a smaller diameter pipe as part of the Mountain 3 deviation. By Tray Swanson Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Canada’s TMX awaits regulator OK on eve of service
Canada’s TMX awaits regulator OK on eve of service
Calgary, 30 April (Argus) — Regulatory approvals needed for the 590,000 b/d Trans Mountain Expansion (TMX) crude pipeline in western Canada are coming down to the wire on the eve of entering commercial service. The major crude pipeline last week maintained its plan to start commercial operations on 1 May, but three filings remain under assessment by the Canada Energy Regulator (CER) with less than 24 hours to go. Federally-owned Trans Mountain requires all sections, called spreads, of the pipeline to receive regulatory blessing before the line can be put into service. Outstanding are applications pertaining to Spread 5B Part 3, which runs from kilometer post 1064 to 1067, according to CER's website. The segment is near Hope, British Columbia, about 140 kilometers (87 miles) east of the line's terminus in Burnaby. The three applications concern piping, valves and other components at two pipeline inspection gauge (pig) traps and the mainline pipe between the two traps. The traps were added for safety assurance when the operator was allowed by CER to use a smaller diameter pipe as part of the Mountain 3 deviation. Mountain 3 was the last segment of the pipeline to be constructed because of delays relating to difficult terrain while tunneling. TMX will nearly triple the existing 300,000 b/d Trans Mountain system that connects oil-rich Alberta to the docks in Burnaby, British Columbia. Importantly, the line will provide Canadian oil sands producers with a significant export outlet without having to first go through the US. The "golden weld" marking the end of construction occurred on 11 April, according to Trans Mountain. A group of shippers last week expressed concern that TMX would not be ready for commercial service by 1 May. Spreads 6, 7A and 7B stretching from kilometer post 1075 to 1180 were approved earlier in the week, bringing the total number of approvals up to 39. The expansion was first conceived more than a decade ago with the intention of being operational by late-2017, but that date slipped amid cost overruns and repeated delays. By Brett Holmes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more