Coal use up at some plants with high heat rates
Some of the least efficient US coal plants still have no firm retirement dates, and together are generating more power this year amid an uptick in electricity demand and natural gas prices.
About 50 utility-scale facilities that burn coal had a heat rate above 11,500 Btu/kWh in the first half of 2021, which is considered high, not just above average, according to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA).
Many of the plants, which consumed nearly 27mn short tons (25mn metric tonnes) of coal in January-July, are set to close between 2021-28, company announcements show. Only a handful have retirement dates beyond that.
And there are about 18 facilities with high heat rates that have no scheduled closing dates. In the first seven months of this year, those plants burned nearly 12mn st of coal, up from 10mn st a year earlier, according to EIA data.
Most US coal-fired power plants are running at a higher capacity this year, regardless of their efficiency, as a combination of factors including higher natural gas prices drive up coal generation.
Utility-scale facilities with high heat rates had a sharper percentage increase in coal generation than more efficient plants, dispatching about 37mn MWh from January-July, a 44pc increase from a year earlier, according to EIA data.
Coal power from plants with a heat rate below 10,500 Btu/kWh climbed by 26pc to 246mn MWh. Whether power generators have a high or low heat rate, most are burning more coal "because their gas-fired competitors have to pay more for the fuel than they used to," said Paul McArdle, an economist at EIA.
"It is probably a matter of a rising tide floating all boats," he said.
Natural gas prices have trended higher since late 2020, making coal-fired generation more competitive. The day-ahead Henry Hub price averaged $3.285/mmBtu in January-July, up from $1.756/mmBtu in the same period in 2020.
The higher natural gas prices and a rebound in total generation led to US coal power rising by 30pc in the first seven months of 2021 when compared with a year earlier. More than 80pc of utility-scale facilities had an increase in coal power during that period. That included 39 of the 50 plants with a heat rate above 11,500 Btu/kWh.
Of the 18 least efficient facilities with no set retirement dates, five burn lignite only. Because of its lower heating value, more lignite must be consumed to produce a given amount of power.
Six of the 18 plants used 3.8mn st of Powder River basin (PRB) coal from Wyoming mines in the first half of 2021. And three facilities burned 1.2mn st of coal from Pennsylvania, including the Logan and Chambers Cogeneration plants in New Jersey, the St. Nicholas Cogeneration plant in Pennsylvania and the Merrimack Power station in New Hampshire.
Neither Starwood Energy, which owns the Logan and Chambers facilities, nor Schuylkill Energy Resources, which owns the St. Nicholas plant, responded to a request for comment.
Black Hills Energy said the Wygen 1 plant, which burns PRB coal, has historically had a heat rate above 11,500 Btu/kWh because of its design. It has a small boiler with no re-heater and significant auxiliary loads because of environmental control equipment and an air-cooled condenser.
But the plant plays an important role in the company's long-term capacity needs and provides a reliable, low-cost source of base load generation, Black Hills said.
Other less-efficient plants that burn PRB coal include the Big Cajun 2, John P Madgett, Powerton, Sheldon and Wyodak facilities.
The Nebraska Power Public District tied the high heat rate at its 225MW Sheldon plant to a combination of using PRB coal and a cyclone boiler. No measures are available to reduce the heat rate except through routine maintenance, the utility said.
Cleco Power said suboptimal heat rates can occur at its 1,277MW Big Cajun 2 plant in Louisiana when coal units are dispatched at lower loads. The plant's two units are subject to dispatch directed by the Midcontinent Independent System Operator.
Cleco will retire one of the Big Cajun units in 2025. It has not made any final plans for the other unit.
"There are no specific capital improvements planned at this time to change the plant's efficiency, but Cleco utilizes prudent generation practices in operations to optimize efficiency at all load levels," the utility said.
The coal plants with the lowest heat rates in January-July included the Belews Creek, Elm Road, John Turk Jr. and Longview supercritical plant. West Virginia's Longview plant, which entered service in 2011, had the lowest at 8,900 Btu/kWh. The Turk, Elm Road and Belews Creek plants' heat rates ranged from about 9,200-9,400 Btu/kWh.
| High heat rate coal plants with no known closure dates | |||
| Coal consumed (st) | Heat rate | ||
| Plant | Jan-Jul 2020 | Jan-Jul 2021 | Jan-Jul 2021 |
| Milton R Young | 2,445,572 | 2,341,191 | 11,800 |
| San Miguel | 1,426,006 | 1,449,590 | 12,600 |
| Coyote | 1,138,063 | 1,201,510 | 11,700 |
| Major Oak Power | 1,125,864 | 1,137,584 | 11,700 |
| Powerton | 464,084 | 1,052,232 | 12,200 |
| St Nicholas Cogen Project | 803,085 | 799,053 | 15,600 |
| Wyodak | 831,726 | 771,605 | 12,700 |
| Big Cajun 2 | 93,245 | 722,079 | 12,500 |
| John P Madgett | 538,578 | 651,238 | 11,500 |
| North Valmy | 232,225 | 361,343 | 11,500 |
| Sheldon | 190,748 | 328,873 | 11,800 |
| Wygen 1 | 301,297 | 299,553 | 12,200 |
| Sunnyside Cogen Associates | 157,907 | 225,247 | 11,900 |
| Logan Generating Plant | 132,741 | 151,608 | 12,400 |
| Chambers Cogeneration LP | 140,143 | 131,470 | 13,100 |
| Merrimack | 24,017 | 108,401 | 11,500 |
| TES Filer City Station | 127,421 | 100,372 | 12,900 |
| Spiritwood Station | 50,118 | 70,279 | 27,800 |
| — EIA | |||
Related news posts
Canadian rail workers vote to launch strike: Correction
Canadian rail workers vote to launch strike: Correction
Corrects movement of grain loadings from a year earlier in final paragraph. Washington, 2 May (Argus) — Workers at the two major Canadian railroads could go on strike as soon as 22 May now that members of the Teamsters Canada Rail Conference (TCRC) have authorized a strike, potentially causing widespread disruption to shipments of commodities such as crude, coal and grain. A strike could disrupt rail traffic not only in Canada but also in the US and Mexico because trains would not be able to leave, nor could shipments enter into Canada. This labor action could be far more impactful than recent strikes because it would affect Canadian National (CN) and Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CPKC) at the same time. Union members at Canadian railroads have gone on strike individually in the past, which has left one of the two carriers to continue operating and handle some of their competitor's freight. But TCRC members completed a vote yesterday about whether to initiate a strike action at each carrier. The union represents about 9,300 workers employed at the two railroads. Roughly 98pc of union members that participated voted in favor of a strike beginning as early as 22 May, the union said. The union said talks are at an impasse. "After six months of negotiations with both companies, we are no closer to reaching a settlement than when we first began, TCRC president Paul Boucher said. Boucher warned that "a simultaneous work stoppage at both CN and CPKC would disrupt supply chains on a scale Canada has likely never experienced." He added that the union does not want to provoke a rail crisis and wants to avoid a work stoppage. The union has argued that the railroads' proposals would harm safety practices. It has also sought an improved work-life balance. But CN and CPKC said the union continues to reject their proposals. CPKC "is committed to negotiating in good faith and responding to our employees' desire for higher pay and improved work-life balance, while respecting the best interests of all our railroaders, their families, our customers, and the North American economy." CN said it wants a contract that addresses the work life balance and productivity, benefiting the company and employees. But even when CN "proposed a solution that would not touch duty-rest rules, the union has rejected it," the railroad said. Canadian commodity volume has fallen this year with only rail shipments of chemicals, petroleum and petroleum products, and non-metallic minerals rising, Association of American Railroads (AAR) data show. Volume data includes cars loaded in the US by Canadian carriers. Coal traffic dropped by 11pc during the 17 weeks ended on 27 April compared with a year earlier, AAR data show. Loadings of motor vehicles and parts have fallen by 5.2pc. CN and CPKC grain loadings fell by 4.3pc from a year earlier, while shipment of farm products and food fell by 9.3pc. By Abby Caplan Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Battery storage stands out in Japan clean power auction
Battery storage stands out in Japan clean power auction
Osaka, 2 May (Argus) — Japan's first auction for long-term zero emissions power capacity has attracted strong bidding interest with a plan to install battery storage, as investment in the power storage system is gaining momentum in line with expanded use of fluctuating renewable energy sources. Japan launched the clean power auction system from the April 2023-March 2024 fiscal year, aiming to spur investment in clean power sources by securing funding for fixed costs in advance to drive the country's decarbonisation by 2050. The first auction, which was held in January, has awarded 1.1GW capacity for battery storage, or 27pc of total contract capacity for clean power sources, excluding gas-fired generation that has been temporally included in the auction system to help ensure stable power supplies, nationwide transmission system operator Organisation for Cross-regional Co-ordination of Transmission Operator (Occto), which manages the auction, said on 26 April. Bidding capacity for battery storage totalled around 4.6GW, the highest volume among any other clean power sources. This means the contract ratio for storage batteries was 24pc compared with the 100pc ratio for ammonia co-firing, hydrogen co-firing , biomass dedicated and nuclear capacity, along with gas-fired capacity . Awarded capacity for battery storage as well as pumping-up electric power facilities reached 1.67GW, exceeding the 1GW sought by the auction. Japan has secured a total of 9.77GW of net zero capacity through the 2023-24 auction. Contract volumes covered 1.3GW of nuclear, 199MW biomass, 577MW of pumping-up electric power, 770MW for ammonia co-firing and 55.3MW hydrogen co-firing, as well as 1.1GW of battery storage. This also included 5.76GW of gas-fired projects. All winners under the auction can generally receive the money for 20 years through Occto, which collect money from the country's power retailers, although they need to refund 90pc of other revenue. The first auction saw total funding of ¥233.6bn/yr ($1.51bn) for decarbonisation power sources and ¥176.6bn/yr for gas-fired capacity. Japan's battery requirements are expected to continue rising, with uncertainty over future nuclear availability likely to spur Tokyo to accelerate the roll-out of renewable energy to meet a 46pc greenhouse gas emissions reduction by 2030-31 against 2013-14 levels — a target still far above the 23pc recorded in 2022-23. Japan will need to install 38-41GW of renewable capacity, nearly triple actual output of 14GW in 2019. Japan is looking to establish lithium-ion battery production capacity of 150GWh/yr domestically and 600GWh/yr globally by 2030. The trade and industry ministry projects the latter target will require 380,000 t/yr of lithium, 310,000 t/yr of nickel, 600,000 t/yr of graphite, 60,000 t/yr of cobalt and 50,000 t/yr of manganese. By Motoko Hasegawa Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Japan's trading firms see metals prices cutting profits
Japan's trading firms see metals prices cutting profits
Tokyo, 2 May (Argus) — Major Japanese trading houses are expecting lower profits from their metals businesses during the April 2024-March 2025 fiscal year, mostly because of lower prices of commodities such as iron ore and coking coal . Japanese trading house Mitsui forecast profits for its metal and natural resource business falling by 14pc on the year to ¥290bn ($1.87bn) during 2024-25, primarily because of lower iron ore prices. Mitsui plans to cut iron ore output by 0.3pc on the year to 60.9mn t at its mining projects where the company owns production ri ghts or a production stake during 2024-25 . This includes the joint venture project Robe River in Australia with Australian iron ore producer Rio Tinto. Japanese trading house Sojitz also expects profits from its metal and natural resource business to decline to ¥35bn, down by 20pc on the year, mostly because of a bearish coking coal market. The company said its overall coal business can cut production costs during 2024-25, partly because it plans larger-scale output at the Gregory Crinum coking coal mine in Australia, without disclosing further details. But Sojitz said it cannot generate higher profits because of lower coking coal prices. The trading house expects the average coking coal price to fall to $230/t during 2024-25, according to the company's chief financial officer Makoto Shibuya, down by $57/t from a year earlier. The company reiterated that the price is not necessarily their selling price. Sumitomo expects profits from its natural resource business would remain flat at ¥72bn on the year, mostly as its nickel production in Madagascar recovers from the output cuts in 2023 , with an aim to produce 19,000t of nickel during 2024-25, up by 9.8pc on the year. A rebound in nickel production could offset possible losses from coal and coking coal prices falling to $266/t and $133/t respectively in the ordinary market, down by $21 and $9, according to the trading house. Sumitomo plans to increase coking coal production by 9.1pc to 1.2mn t but reduce coal output by 4.8pc to 4mn t during 2024-25. By Yusuke Maekawa Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Australia issues offshore wind feasibility licences
Australia issues offshore wind feasibility licences
Sydney, 2 May (Argus) — The Australian federal government has issued the first feasibility licences for offshore wind projects in the country following a competitive process, for up to 12GW of capacity off the coast of Gippsland in the southern state of Victoria and a potential further 13GW in the next stage. Six projects have received approval to explore the feasibility of offshore wind farms in the Bass Strait off Gippsland's coast, which was the first offshore wind zone declared in Australia at the end of 2022. Successful applicants include Danish investment firm Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners (CIP), Danish utility Orsted, Australian utility AGL Energy, European utilities EDP Renewables and Engie and Japanese utility Jera. The government also intends to grant another six licences, subject to consultation with First Nations groups. The 12 projects could have a potential combined capacity of around 25GW, the government said ( see table ). Projects that prove feasible will be able to apply for commercial licences and move to the construction phase if they secure financing, with the most advanced wind farms expected to start generating power in the early 2030s. CIP secured site exclusivity to develop two projects with a combined 4.4GW through a newly launched platform company Southerly Ten. The projects comprise the 2.2GW Star of the South, which claims to be the most advanced offshore wind project in Australia , along with the early stage 2.2GW Kut-Wut Brataualung. Southerly Ten is also developing the Destiny Wind project in Australia's second declared offshore wind zone off the Hunter region in New South Wales. Orsted was given one licence for a 2.8GW project and might receive another one for a 2GW wind farm. It said it will proceed with site investigations, environmental assessments and supply chain development, with a view to bid in future auctions planned by the Victorian government, which are expected to start in late 2025. Victoria is targeting 2GW of offshore wind capacity by 2032 and 9GW by 2040. "Subject to the above steps and a final investment decision, the projects are expected to be completed in phases from the early 2030s, with the aim to maximise dual site synergies through shared resources and economies of scale," Orsted said. The 2.5GW Gippsland Skies offshore wind project, belongs to a consortium made of Irish renewables firm Mainstream Renewable Power with 35pc, UK-based firm Reventus Power 35pc, AGL Energy 20pc and Australian developer Direct Infrastructure 10pc. The first phase of the project is expected to be operational in 2032, according to the consortium. The list of six projects already granted feasibility licences also include High Sea Wind, a proposed 1.28GW wind farm developed by EDP Renewables' and Engie's 50:50 joint venture Ocean Winds, along with Blue Mackerel North, a 1GW development by Japanese utility Jera Nex's subsidiary Parkwind. Parkwind is also developing another offshore wind project in Australia, with Australian utility Alinta Energy, the 1GW Spinifex in the Southern Ocean off Victoria, which was declared Australia's third wind zone in March. The other projects that might receive licences are being developed by companies such as Spanish utility Iberdrola, Spanish developer Bluefloat Energy, Australian firm Macquarie's wind developer Corio Generation, German utility RWE and a joint venture between Australia's Origin Energy and UK-based developer RES Group. By Juan Weik Australian offshore wind projects with feasibility licences Developer Capacity Licence Orsted Offshore Australia 1 Orsted 2.8 Granted Gippsland Skies Consortium* 2.5 Granted Star of the South Southerly Ten 2.2 Offered Kut-Wut Brataualung Southerly Ten 2.2 Granted High Sea Wind Ocean Winds 1.3 Granted Blue Mackerel North Parkwind 1.0 Granted Aurora Green Iberdrola 3.0 Under consultation Great Eastern Offshore Wind Corio Generation 2.5 Under consultation Gippsland Dawn Bluefloat Energy 2.1 Under consultation Orsted Offshore Australia 2 Orsted 2.0 Under consultation Navigator North Origin Energy, RES 1.5 Under consultation Kent Offshore Wind RWE N/A Under consultation Source: federal government, companies *Mainstream Renewable Power, Reventus Power, AGL, Direct Infrastructure Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more