Japan remains focused on restarting nuclear reactors
Japan will continue to focus on restarting nuclear reactors instead of building new reactors. This may complicate the country's target to realise carbon neutrality by 2050, as it will have little nuclear output by then without new construction.
Japanese premier Fumio Kishida and cabinet ministers on 22 October endorsed a basic energy policy that did not lay out any plans for construction or replacement of nuclear reactors and only focused on the restart of safe reactors. The government did not modify prospects for the nuclear sector from the draft plan that was made in July, despite requests from industry groups such as power and steel to allow new building and replacement, to ensure energy security and reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
Japan typically reviews the country's basic energy policy every three years. The trade and industry ministry (Meti) started discussion on the latest revisions in October last year, forming a key part of efforts to update its April 2030-March 2031 goal to reduce GHG emissions by 46pc from 2013-14 levels and to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050. The cabinet adopted the policy in time for the COP 26 climate change conference that takes place in Glasgow on 31 October-12 November.
Under the latest energy policy, Japan plans to generate 20-22pc of power output from nuclear energy, with 36-38pc from renewables, 41pc thermal power and 1pc from hydrogen and ammonia in 2030-31, which were also unchanged from the draft plans.
The Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan, a group of major power utilities, expressed regret over the latest energy policy that does not mention new building and replacement of reactors. But it also said the new policy is meaningful, as it still includes a description to continue using necessary nuclear capacity.
Kishida, who named a new cabinet on 4 October, has adopted a positive stance towards the nuclear industry, favouring restarting safe reactors and considering replacing ageing ones. But Kishida also had said the cabinet would review public comments before approving the draft policy.
The government has well reviewed public hearings that was carried out from 3 September-4 October, which included both positive and negative opinions against nuclear energy, an official at Meti said. The current priority is to earn public understanding by restarting safe reactors, the official added.
But Japan will phase out nuclear reactors without any capacity additions. Under the current nuclear safety rules, all reactors are allowed to operate for 40 years with a one-time option to extend their lifespan to 60 years. This suggests that 15 of the existing 33 reactors with a combined capacity of 14,057MW will close by December 2030 and there will be no operational reactors in 2050, assuming a 40-year lifespan.
The future of the nuclear industry also depends on which political party will take majority seats in the 31 October lower house parliamentary election, as most parties have pledged a no-nuclear society. The current ruling liberal democratic party of Japan promotes the restart of safe reactors, without directly prohibiting building reactors. But the second largest the constitutional democratic party has pledged not to allow any new building of reactors in its manifesto.
Related news posts
BP inks another LNG deal with Korea's Kogas: Correction
BP inks another LNG deal with Korea's Kogas: Correction
Corrects total volume of LNG supplied in paragraph 2 Singapore, 29 April (Argus) — BP has signed another long-term LNG sales and purchase agreement with South Korean state-owned importer Kogas, the former said today. BP will provide Kogas with up to 9.8mn t of LNG over 11 years from mid-2026 on a des basis. But other details regarding pricing and the origin of the contracted supplies were not available. This most recent deal is in addition to the existing long-term sales and purchase agreement between the two companies that was signed in 2022. Kogas on 22 April 2022 signed an 18-year LNG purchase agreement to buy 1.58mn t/yr of LNG from BP that will begin in 2025. Australian independent Woodside Energy and Kogas in February signed a sales and purchase deal for term supplies of LNG to South Korea. The deal for 500,000 t/yr on a des basis will start in 2026 and run for 10½ years. Kogas may be seeking more imported term supply as the firm has increased its downstream contractual supply deals. Kogas signed a series of deals to supply gas to subsidiaries of the country's state-controlled utility Kepco in December 2023. By Simone Tam Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Singapore’s Jadestone cuts 2024 output guidance
Singapore’s Jadestone cuts 2024 output guidance
Sydney, 29 April (Argus) — Singapore-listed independent Jadestone Energy has cut its 2024 oil and gas production guidance, citing disappointing first-quarter group production. Jadestone said the impact of planned and unplanned downtime across its portfolio resulted in it narrowing its guidance from 20,000-23,000 bl of oil equivalent (boe/d) to 20,000-22,000 boe/d in its results for 2023 published on 29 April. Average production for January-March was 17,200 boe/d, which Jadestone said reflected the impact on its Australian assets, including the 6,000 b/d Montara oil field, of an active cyclone season at the start of 2024. The firm produced 14,000 b/d in 2023, up from 11,500 b/d in 2022. But problems at Montara and lower realised oil prices resulted in a loss of $91mn in 2023 following a $9mn profit recorded in 2023. Jadestone's realised oil price of $87.34/boe in 2023 was 16pc lower than $103.85/boe a year earlier. Proved and probable reserves at the end of 2023 totalled 68mn boe, a 5pc increase on a year's earlier 64.8mn boe, mainly because of the acquisition of a 9.52pc stake in Thailand's Sinphuhorm gas field and increases at the Cossack, Wanaea, Lambert and Hermes oil fields offshore Australia and the Akatara gas field in Indonesia's Sumatra. By Tom Major Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Australia’s QPM hikes gas reserves estimate
Australia’s QPM hikes gas reserves estimate
Sydney, 29 April (Argus) — The energy arm of Australian battery metals firm Queensland Pacific Metals (QPM) has announced its certified reserves have increased more than a third on previous estimates at its Moranbah gas project (MGP) in Queensland state. QPM Energy (QPME) reported a 38pc increase in its total proven and probable (2P) gas reserves to 331PJ (8.8bn m³) on 29 April compared with a March 2022 estimate of 240PJ, as it pivots towards its energy business and pauses spending on its proposed Townsville Energy Chemicals Hub (TECH) project . QPME's waste coal mine gas reserves will be developed along with 300MW of new gas-fired power generation at the firm's Moranbah facilities located in the Bowen basin, a metallurgical and thermal coal producing region. The company is also planning to build compressed natural gas and micro-LNG facilities to distribute gas to northern Queensland customers. The company will seek to increase its output by 25pc to 35 TJ/d (935,000 m³/d) by late 2024, up from October-December 2023's average of 28 TJ/d by drilling a further seven wells by the year's end. A rig has arrived on site for drilling the first well of its Teviot Brook South Well programme, QPM said on 24 April. Australian independent Blue Energy, which is developing the Sapphire pilot project with 59PJ of 2P reserves near MGP, said QPM has confirmed it intends on taking gas Blue makes available to the MGP, in line with an existing non-binding agreement signed in June last year. Blue and QPME's parent company QPM also have a separate non-binding deal for supply of 7 PJ/yr of gas over 15 years to the TECH project. By Tom Major Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
STB chair Oberman to leave rail agency on 10 May
STB chair Oberman to leave rail agency on 10 May
Washington, 26 April (Argus) — US Surface Transportation Board (STB) chairman Martin Oberman (D) said today that he would retire in two weeks, though a replacement has not been named. Oberman informed President Joe Biden of his decision in a letter earlier today. Oberman said in mid-November 2023 that he would exit the agency in early 2024 . His five-year term expired on 31 December but he continued to serve into his one-year holdover term. No additional details have been announced, but vice chairman Karen Hedlund (D) is expected to lead the rail regulator until a formal appointment has been made. Chairman Oberman's "commitment to exploring all sides of an issue was pivotal in helping to find solutions for stakeholders," the Freight Rail Customer Alliance said. National Grain and Feed Association chief executive Mike Seyfert said pointed to Oberman's actions in working toward significant regulatory milestones for agricultural shippers and railroads. Under Oberman's leadership, STB has moved forward on long-standing proposal to allow reciprocal switching. The switching plan would allow a shipper served by a single railroad to request that its freight be transferred to another major railroad at a designated interchange point. STB is expected to act on reciprocal switching as early as this month, after introducing a plan tied to railroad service performance in September 2023. His term was also highlighted by several major industry events, such as the Covid-19 pandemic, the merger of Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern and the 2022 rail service crisis. Oberman was nominated by former US president Donald Trump in July 2018. His appointment was confirmed by the US Senate in January 2019 and he was appointed chairman by President Joe Biden in January 2021. By Abby Caplan Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more