California to consider tougher LCFS, biogas limits

Spanish Market: Emissions
08/09/23

California will target 50pc tougher transportation fuel carbon targets by the end of the decade, impose new obligations for intrastate jet fuel and reduce the use of one of the top credit-producing fuels under changes to state regulations that could be adopted early next year.

The California Air Resources Board (CARB) late today posted materials offering the first details on proposed changes to its Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS), a market-based carbon-reduction program helping to drive a surge in renewable diesel and other alternative fuel production to the state.

The Standardized Regulatory Impact Assessment (SRIA) includes carbon targets requiring a 30pc reduction in transportation fuel by 2030, compared to the current 20pc. New, more aggressive reductions would begin in 2025 under the amendments submitted to California's Department of Finance for review.

Staff also proposed phasing out avoided methane crediting for dairy biogas, an accounting that grants outsized carbon-reducing credits that helped the fuel rise to the second-largest source of new credits generated in 2022. CARB would also require book-and-claim accounting for biomethane seeking California LCFS credits under the proposal.

The program would expand to impose carbon-reducing obligations on federally-regulated petroleum jet fuel used in flights between destinations in California. And staff proposed a mechanism to automatically adjust the program to tougher targets based on certain, unstated market conditions — an idea meant to more quickly respond to the record volumes of unused credits weighing on the program today.

Under pressure

LCFS programs require yearly reductions in transportation fuel carbon intensity. Higher-carbon fuels that exceed annual limits incur deficits that suppliers must offset with credits generated from the distribution of approved, low-carbon alternatives.

Credits in California's market have sunk from near $200/t in January 2021 to $60/t in February. Spot credits have moved between $85/t and $70/t since May.

Towering supplies of unused credits have helped drag prices lower. Available credits rose to a record 16.5mn t by the end of the first quarter, according to the latest state data — enough to satisfy nearly four out of every five new deficits generated in all of last year. Some found bullishness in net credits growing at a slower pace for two consecutive quarters, but the increase still marked the largest first quarter build in program history. LCFS credits do not expire.

Participants have instead focused on how the program may change to address a widening gap between the flow of credit-generating fuels into the state and the dribble of deficit-generating CARBOB demand since the coronavirus pandemic. But long-standing regulatory obligations slowed CARB's ability to adjust targets as credit prices fell by more than half.

Foot on the gas

Through nearly two years of workshops feeling out California's next LCFS steps, few have been more outspoken for aggressive measures than biogas participants. Industry representatives have consistently pushed for the toughest possible targets and lightest revisions to eligible fuels as biogas grew to generate 14pc of all new credits produced last year.

Critics of biogas have added pressure both through CARB and the state legislature. Opponents fault the LCFS for providing incentives to consolidate and grow dairy operations to the detriment of neighboring communities while providing little new methane reduction.

Methane captured from dairy and swine operations and from landfill diversion projects would be phased out by 2040. Amendments would include at least one ten-year crediting period for avoided methane applications certified before the end of this decade, and allow a five-year crediting period for projects certified between 2030 and 2035.

Limits on renewable diesel feedstocks, another target of environmental opponents this year, were not discussed in the document posted today. Renewable diesel generated a third of all new LCFS credits in 2022, and has led credit generation since 2020.

Moving forward

The SRIA lurches the closely-watched amendment process toward a planned formal proposal before the end of the year and board vote in early 2024. The state Department of Finance will review the filing. Staff for that agency responded last year to CARB filings on Advanced Clean Fleets and this year on zero-emissions forklift rulemakings after 30 days. Submitting the document today would suggest a response no earlier than 8 October.

CARB will then post proposed amendments for at least 45 days of review and comment before a board vote. The board could accept, reject or require their own amendments on the proposal.

By Elliott Blackburn

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

24/01/25

US Democrats call for return to Paris agreement

Washington, 24 January (Argus) — US Democrats are pushing back against President Donald Trump's decision to withdraw from the Paris climate agreement. Democrats in the US House of Representatives and Senate on Friday introduced separate but similar resolutions calling on the US to remain a party to the Paris agreement. The House version, backed by more than 120 Democrats, goes a bit further by explicitly expressing "strong disapproval" and urging Trump to reverse course. "President Trump's irresponsible decision to pull out of the Paris agreement sends a shameful signal to our allies and adversaries alike, showing that the US is turning its back on the health and safety of our planet," said US representative Brad Schneider (D-Illinois), the lead sponsor of the House resolution. US senator Ed Markey (D-Massachusetts) is the lead sponsor of the Senate version , which is currently backed by 21 other Democrats. The resolutions are non-binding, which means they cannot force Trump to change his mind. In addition, neither is likely to advance as Republicans hold majorities in both the House and Senate. Trump ordered the US withdrawal from Paris on his first day in office. That decision will take effect one year after the US gives formal notice to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). In response, 24 state and territorial governors told the UN they will continue their work to reduce emissions in line with the Paris agreement and the targets set by former president Joe Biden, seeking to reassure other countries about US efforts. Biden just before leaving office said the US would reduce GHG emissions by 61-66pc by 2035, relative to 2005 levels, in a new Paris pledge. In addition, Bloomberg Philanthropies on Thursday said it and "other US climate funders" will ensure that the US meets its funding and reporting obligations to the UNFCCC. By Michael Ball Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US Paris exit sparks concern but also climate unity

24/01/25

US Paris exit sparks concern but also climate unity

London, 24 January (Argus) — Governments, companies and scientists have expressed concern at President Donald Trump's decision to withdraw the US from the Paris climate agreement, but have committed to continue with plans to decarbonise and drive forward the energy transition. "It's not a complete halt of the efforts but it's definitely a concerning moment," director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research Johan Rockstrom told delegates this week at the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland. "The nervousness is what spillover effects this can have on other countries in the world and that in turn can end up in a serious slowdown of efforts. I'm thinking of Saudi Arabia, I'm thinking of Argentina, I'm thinking of some of the more populist governments now in Europe," Rockstrom added. Action on climate change is competing for space on policymakers' agendas with geopolitical turmoil — war in Ukraine and the Middle East — as well as economic challenges. "We're in a state of crisis fatigue… we only seem to have an attention span for one crisis at a time, so as this polycrisis environment that we've been in for the last few years… climate has been pushed down that crisis priority list, but… science behind climate hasn't changed. The impacts actually have changed in that they're simply getting worse", executive secretary of UN climate body the UNFCCC Simon Stiell said in Davos. In response to Trump's decision to pull the UK out of the Paris accord , the EU and China immediately committed to continue with their action on climate change , and both underlined the importance of multilateralism. "I want to be very clear with my message. Europe stays the course, and we stand ready to work with all global actors to accelerate the transition to clean energy," European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen said. Transition is ‘unstoppable' Many speakers in Davos noted that the energy transition to renewables is well underway, and has advanced rapidly since Trump's first term in office. "The world is undergoing an energy transition that is unstoppable," Stiell said. Several private-sector representatives attending the WEF embraced the energy transition, pointing to increased efficiency and cost savings. "I haven't found one single area where climate smart wouldn't be resource smart and cost smart," Ikea chief executive Jesper Brodin said. "Technology will win the day in the end", Volvo Cars chief executive Jim Rowan said. The consensus from a CEO lunch during the WEF was that "we are not deviating from the plans we have. We're staying on track. We're moving on a decarbonisation path, we're electrifying our industry, we're not going to be shaken up by what's happening," Rockstrom said. Within the US, action to decarbonise looks set to consolidate beyond federal level. A group of 24 US state and territorial governors have assured the UNFCCC of their continued climate action. And Bloomberg Philanthropies this week said it would step in to cover the US' financial obligations to the UNFCCC, as well as support the country's climate reporting. The long-term realities of a heating world overshadow the relatively short-term politics. "It is one of the most challenging things we will be facing in the decades to come, and the effects are devastating," EU climate commissioner Wopke Hoekstra said this week. Extreme heat is projected to cause $2.4 trillion/yr in productivity losses by 2035, as well as $448 bn/yr in fixed-asset losses for publicly listed companies, financial services provider Allianz said. The US in particular has been hit hard by catastrophic weather events — proven to be exacerbated by climate change — in recent months. California governor Gavin Newsom pointed to wildfires, which have this month devastated swathes of Los Angeles. "If you don't believe in science, believe your own damn eyes," Newsom said. By Georgia Gratton Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Bloomberg to fund UN climate body in lieu of US

23/01/25

Bloomberg to fund UN climate body in lieu of US

London, 23 January (Argus) — Bloomberg Philanthropies and "other US climate funders" will ensure that the US meets its funding and reporting obligations to UN climate body the UNFCCC, after President Trump withdrew the country from the Paris climate agreement earlier this week. This is the second time that Bloomberg Philanthropies has "stepped in to help uphold [the US'] funding and reporting commitments… amid a lack of US federal climate leadership", the organisation said today. Trump pulled the US out of the Paris accord in his first term as US president, although then-President Joe Biden signed the agreement once more in early 2021. Bloomberg will "work to ensure US subnational climate leaders track and report on US climate progress over the next four years", the organisation said today. "Bloomberg Philanthropies has made significant investments in empowering local leaders, providing businesses with the data to track emissions while driving economic growth, and building coalitions across public and private sectors", founder Michael Bloomberg said. He is also a UN special envoy on climate ambition. UNFCCC executive secretary Simon Stiell welcomed the support, also noting that "government funding remains essential" for the climate body. The finance referred to is not the international climate finance often discussed at UNFCCC talks, but funding which helps the climate body operate and host events such as the annual Cop climate summits. It appears likely that the previous US administration had foreseen a lack of financial contributions from the Trump government. The US last year paid its arrears for the UNFCCC core budget in full — just under €3.4mn ($3.5mn) — leaving it in a minority of countries with no outstanding payments, UNFCCC accounts show. The US also contributed just under €7.3mn for 2024 — 22pc of the total contributed — again for the body's core budget, UNFCCC accounts show. Bloomberg Philanthropies contributed $4.5mn to the UNFCCC in 2024 for "supplementary activities", while the US provided $2.74mn, UNFCCC accounts show. Trump, in one of his first acts upon returning to office, on 20 January ordered the US to withdraw from the Paris agreement. That decision will take effect one year after the US gives formal notice to the UNFCCC. By Georgia Gratton Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Poland says EU 2040 climate target a 'challenge'

23/01/25

Poland says EU 2040 climate target a 'challenge'

Edinburgh, 23 January (Argus) — Setting the bloc's climate target for 2040 as well as agreeing additional environmental and climate laws is a "challenge" for the six-month Polish EU presidency, Poland's environment minister Paulina Henning-Kloska said, as there is "no unified position". Speaking to the European Parliament's environment committee, Henning-Kloska, who chairs meetings of both environment and energy ministers, made clear that member state adoption of the bloc's 2040 target for cutting greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions will be difficult. "We had a discussion on this in the council [of ministers] last December," she said. "What is clear is that there is no unified position," she added, as some member states wants greater flexibility in reducing emissions between 2030 and 2050. Difficult discussions between EU states and in the European parliament will likely push the submission of the bloc's nationally determined contribution (NDC) — climate plan — to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) beyond the 10 February deadline. The European Climate Law requires the European Commission to propose a 2040 climate target "at the latest within six months of the first global stocktake". The global stocktake was completed during the UN Cop 28 climate summit in Dubai, in 2023. It gauged countries' progress against the Paris Agreement and proposed measures to keep to its goals — including keeping warming preferably below 1.5°C. EU officials note that the 2040 target will "inform" the decision on the EU's next NDC. Even if the EU's NDC submission does not require a separate law, officials also "expect" to receive a political mandate from member states before the NDC submission by the European Commission and the EU's presidency, led by Poland until the end of June. Despite the threat to a speedy timeline, the commission maintains it will continue to be a "leading" voice for international climate action and aims to submit the EU's next NDC "well ahead" of the Cop 30 climate talks in Belem, Brazil in November. But German member Peter Liese thinks the EU is in "deadlock" on its 2040 target. "We may like it or not, it's very ambitious," he said. "And I don't see enough support for that target." A member of parliament's largest centre-right EPP group, Liese also picked up on Polish prime minister Donald Tusk's and Henning-Kloska's call for changes or delay to the bloc's specific emissions trading system for road transport and heating fuels (ETS2). "I don't see — without the ETS2 — member states have any plan to get to their target," said Liese, who has previously helped draft legislative revisions to the ETS. "I don't think abolishing is a solution. Postponement is also [not] the best solution," Liese said. By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Standardisation, better finance needed for new nuclear

23/01/25

Standardisation, better finance needed for new nuclear

London, 23 January (Argus) — Increasing financing flows and standardising new reactors will be essential to reaching the goal of tripling nuclear capacity by 2050, participants at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, heard. A total of 31 countries have signed up to a pledge, first announced at the UN Cop 28 climate summit in Dubai in 2023, to triple global nuclear power capacity by 2050. The pledge was one of several made at the summit, including a commitment to transition away from fossil fuels in energy systems, triple renewable capacity by 2030 and double the rate of energy efficiency improvements. Installed capacity of nuclear reactors has been roughly stable over the last 20 years, holding in a range of 350-380GW since 2004, according to data from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). And reaching this goal would require building 30 GW/yr of net new capacity over 2030-50. As of 2024, there are 63 reactors under construction, with a capacity of 71GW, of which roughly half are in China, according to IEA data. Standardising new reactors will be key to achieving this goal, according to Luc Remont, head of French state-owned nuclear constructor and operator EdF. The firm's most recently built reactors have been plagued with cost overruns and delays. The 1.5GW Flamanville 3 reactor, which entered service late last year in France, took 17 years to build and cost upwards of €20bn ($21bn). But the firm is preparing to build 6-14 new reactors in France, and hopes to learn from the construction process to reduce costs and delays. EdF has reduced lead times by 30pc on the second reactor of its two-reactor Hinkley Point C plant in the UK, Remont said. Making nuclear power more attractive to investors will unlock some of the vast sums required to reach the tripling goal, according to Darryl White, head of Canadian bank BMO. Tripling nuclear capacity will cost $5 trillion, he said, an "enormous challenge", and while some will come from governments and banks' balance sheets, other investors will be needed. Delivery of projects needs to be more certain, while financing models such as regulated asset base or contracts for difference (CfDs) will be needed to provide certainty on returns, he said. Policy makers are behind the curve on the growing need for base load generation, according to Swedish deputy prime minister Ebba Busch. Money globally has been funnelled into intermittent renewables, but industry is now aware of the need for more clean base load generation, whether nuclear or hydro. Sweden is hoping to pass a law this year to increase financing — including state loans and CfDs — for new nuclear, she said. By Rhys Talbot Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more