Latest Market News

Feedstock imports shake up US biofuel production

  • Spanish Market: Agriculture, Biofuels, Chemicals, Emissions
  • 24/07/24

Waste from around the world is increasingly being diverted to the US for biofuel production, helping decarbonize hard-to-electrify sectors like trucking and aviation. But as refiners turn away from conventional crop-based feedstocks, farm groups fear missing out on the biofuels boom.

Driven by low-carbon fuel standards (LCFS) in states like California, US renewable diesel production capacity has more than doubled over the last two years to hit a record high of 4.1bn USG/yr in April according to the Energy Information Administration. Soybean and canola processors have invested in expanding crush capacity, expecting future biofuels growth to lift vegetable oil demand.

But policymakers' growing focus on carbon intensity, a departure from the long-running federal renewable fuel standard (RFS) that sets volume mandates for broad types of fuel, primarily benefits waste feedstocks, which generate larger LCFS credits because they are assessed as producing fewer emissions. Argonne National Laboratory's GREET emissions model, which has been modified by federal and California regulators for clean fuels programs, factors in emissions sources like fertilizers and diesel use on farms for virgin vegetable oils but not for used oils sourced from cooking operations.

Refiners trying to maximize government subsidies are thus sourcing waste-based feedstocks from wherever they can find them. Through May this year, imports to the US under the tariff code that includes used cooking oil (UCO) and yellow grease rose 90pc from year-prior levels to more than 1.8bn lb (844,000t). While China represents most of that, sources are diverse, with significant sums coming from Canada, the UK, and Indonesia. Imports of inedible and technical tallow, waste beef fat that can be turned into biofuels, have also risen 50pc so far this year to 800,000lb on ample supply from Brazil.

While soybean oil was responsible for nearly half of biomass-based diesel production in 2021, that share has declined to around a third over the first four months this year as imports surge (see graph).

"Every pound of imported feedstock that comes in displaces one pound of domestically sourced soybean oil or five pounds of soybeans," said Kailee Tkacz Buller, chief executive of the National Oilseed Processors Association.

Even as LCFS and RFS credit prices have fallen over the last year, hurting biofuel production margins and threatening capacity additions, imports have not slowed. Feedstock suppliers, many from countries with less mature biofuel incentives and limited biorefining capacity, might have few options domestically. And exporting to the US means they can avoid the EU's more prescriptive feedstock limits and mounting scrutiny of biofuel imports.

More ambitious targets in future years, particularly for sustainable aviation fuel, "will create a lot of competition for UCO in the global market," said Jane O'Malley, a researcher at the International Council on Clean Transportation. But for now, "the US has created the most lucrative market for waste-based biofuel pathways."

Incentives for US refiners to use waste-based feedstocks will only become stronger next year when expiring tax credits are replaced by the Inflation Reduction Act's 45Z credit, structured as a sliding scale so that fuels generate more of a subsidy as they produce fewer greenhouse gas emissions. While essentially all fuel will receive less of a benefit than in past years since the maximum credit is reserved for carbon-neutral fuels, the drop in benefits will be most pronounced for fuels from vegetable oils.

Granted, President Joe Biden's administration wants the 45Z credit to account for the benefits of "climate-smart" agriculture, potentially helping close some of the assessed emissions gap between crop and waste feedstocks. But the administration's timeline for issuing guidance is unclear, leaving the market with little clarity about which practices farmers should start deploying and documenting.

"While a tax credit can be retroactive, you can't retroactively farm," said Alexa Combelic, director of government affairs at the American Soybean Association.

Squeaky wheel gets the soybean oil

The concerns of agricultural groups have not gone unnoticed in Washington, DC, where lawmakers from both parties have recently called for higher biofuel blending obligations, prompt 45Z guidance, and more transparency around how federal agencies scrutinize UCO imports. There are also lobbying opportunities in California, where regulators are weighing LCFS updates ahead of a planned hearing in November.

At minimum, agricultural groups are likely to continue pushing for more visibility into the UCO supply chain, which could take the form of upping already-burdensome recordkeeping requirements for clean fuels incentives and setting a larger role for auditors. Fraud would be hard to prove, but two external groups told Argus that the Biden administration has indicated that it is looking into UCO collection rates in some countries, which could at least point to potential discrepancies with expected supply.

More muscular interventions, including trade disincentives, are also possible. Multiple farm associations, including corn interests frustrated that the country's first alcohol-to-jet facility is using Brazilian sugarcane ethanol, have asked the Biden administration to prevent fuels derived from foreign feedstocks from qualifying for 45Z. The possible return of former president Donald Trump to the White House next year would likely mean sharply higher tariffs on China too, potentially stemming the flow of feedstocks from that country — if not from the many others shipping waste-based feedstocks to the US.

Protectionism has obvious risks, since leaving refiners with fewer feedstock options could jeopardize planned biofuel capacity additions that ultimately benefit farmers. But at least some US agriculture companies, insistent that they can sustainably increase feedstock production if incentives allow, see major changes to current policy as necessary.

Waste imports crowd out soybean oil

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

12/09/24

Australia's CER undecided on SMC issuance details

Australia's CER undecided on SMC issuance details

Sydney, 12 September (Argus) — Australia's Clean Energy Regulator (CER) has not yet decided on the level of details that will be published alongside the upcoming safeguard mechanism credits (SMCs), while estimated issuance numbers remain within a "wide" range, delegates heard at a forum in Sydney. The regulator will start to issue SMCs early next year to safeguard facilities that report scope 1 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions below their annual baselines. Each SMC will represent 1t of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) below a facility's baseline, which will have the option to either hold it for future use or sell it in the market. The CER has an estimated range of SMC issuance numbers for the July 2023-June 2024 compliance year, the first under Australia's reformed safeguard mechanism . But this range is "very wide" as several factors are at play, executive general manager Carl Binning told delegates at a safeguard mechanism forum organised by the regulator in Sydney on 11 September. SMC issuances will be "relatively modest initially" according to Binning, but volumes are expected to build up over time as companies intensify efforts to reduce emissions while baselines converge to industry averages. He declined to provide any internal estimates on SMC issuances. Australian companies need to submit their emissions and energy data under the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (NGER) scheme by 31 October, including covered emissions data for individual safeguard facilities. The CER is finalising the so-called energy intensity determinations for each facility, which will be used to set their baselines. Baselines will be based on a production-adjusted framework initially weighted towards site-specific emissions intensity values, transitioning to industry average emissions intensity levels by 2030. Under the reformed mechanism, facilities that emit more than 100,000t of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) in a fiscal year face declining baselines — at a rate of 4.9 pc/yr until 2030 — and need to surrender Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCUs) or SMCs if their onsite abatement activities were not enough to keep their emissions below thresholds. Australia's Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (DCCEEW) late last year estimated SMC issuances would start at around 1.4mn units in the 2024 financial year ending 30 June 2024, rising to 7.4mn in 2030 and 10.3mn in 2035. Facilities that fall below the coverage threshold of 100,000t CO2e can choose to continue receiving SMCs for up to 10 years — with their baselines continuing to decline if they opt in — and the DCCEEW expects such issuances will be the main source of SMCs by 2035 (see table). Uncertain data level All safeguard facilities will need to give a breakdown of the surrendered ACCUs by the method under which they were generated for the first time from the 2024 financial year, as well as a breakdown of their emissions by CO2, methane and nitrous oxide. The CER will publish 2023-24 safeguard data by 15 April 2025. But while the regulator will also need to publish the number of SMCs issued to a facility, there is still no definition on whether it will disclose where SMCs surrendered by facilities came from, Binning told delegates. "One of the issues we're really wrestling with in the design of our new registry is how much information we tag," Binning said. "I think the marketplace is interested in more granularity… so I'd actually invite feedback on this topic," he added. The CER expects that the new registry replacing the Australian National Registry of Emissions Units (ANREU) will be operational by the end of calendar year 2024. It plans to issue SMCs into the new registry and transfer all ACCUs from the ANREU "gradually" over the following months before the start of the next safeguard compliance period. By Juan Weik Projected SMC issuances (mn) Financial year From safeguard facilities From below-threshold facilities Total 2024 1.36 0.05 1.41 2025 1.62 0.13 1.75 2026 2.27 0.06 2.33 2027 3.20 0.26 3.46 2028 3.52 0.22 3.74 2029 4.34 0.54 4.88 2030 5.67 1.77 7.44 2031 5.31 1.92 7.23 2032 5.29 3.75 9.04 2033 6.77 3.47 10.24 2034 5.82 4.72 10.54 2035 4.80 5.51 10.31 Source: DCCEEW Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

South Korea's SK to begin SAF output at Ulsan in Oct


11/09/24
11/09/24

South Korea's SK to begin SAF output at Ulsan in Oct

London, 11 September (Argus) — South Korean refiner SK Energy said it has completed a dedicated sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) production line at its 840,000 b/d Ulsan refinery and will begin commercial output next month. The firm said it plans to use co-processing methods, integrating bio-feedstocks such as used cooking oil (UCO) and animal fats with traditional oil production processes to produce SAF alongside conventional oil products. A 5km pipeline will feed renewable feedstocks to the refinery, enabling continuous production of SAF and other low-carbon products, SK said. According to the company, it is South Korea's first dedicated SAF facility. SK said it obtained multiple certifications for SAF production and sales in June, including ISCC Corsia, ISCC EU and ISCC Plus. It plans to supply SAF to Korean Air for passenger flights from early 2025. The company will continue to monitor domestic and global policies and market conditions to explore the expansion of its SAF production capabilities, SK's head of strategy division Hong Kwang-pyo said. By Toby Shay Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Biofuel, farm groups file suit over EPA auto standards


10/09/24
10/09/24

Biofuel, farm groups file suit over EPA auto standards

Houston, 10 September (Argus) — Road fuel industry representatives have filed suit before the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit challenging the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) finalization of tailpipe emissions standards. The finalized EPA standards would force automakers to decrease the CO2 emissions of cars and trucks made between 2027 and 2032. The brief draws support from 56 groups, ranging from agriculture labor unions, the automotive industry and the American Farm Bureau Federation to organizations representing shipping, retail fuel distributors, petroleum refiners, biofuel producers, manufacturing, and corn grower associations. Several petitioners behind the brief filed a lawsuit in June of this year following regulations that the EPA said would cut road fuel consumption by 2.6mn b/d. The petitioners assert the claim that the EPA lacks statutory authority to regulate tailpipe emissions and that the regulations currently in place would favor electric vehicles over internal combustion engine automobiles. Fewer internal combustion vehicles soften the demand for renewable fuels as a result, the filers argue. According to the EPA, electric vehicles made up 7.5pc of light and medium duty vehicle sales in 2022, but by 2032, 68pc of corresponding sales must be electric vehicles to comply with the regulation. The brief goes on to scrutinize the EPA's calculations used to craft policy that support electric vehicle adoption, suggesting the finalized standards fail to account for emissions created in the production of electric vehicles as well as the ability of renewable fuels to lower emissions as a substitute good. The Renewable Fuels Association, one of the petitioners named in the brief, voiced its concerns that the EPA ignores the benefits of high octane ethanol and more fuel efficient internal combustion engines' ability to lower emissions at a lower cost to domestic consumers. It also said the tailpipe emissions standards would conflict with Congress' Renewable Fuel Standard (RFA), which mandates set volumes of biofuel in the nation's road fuel supply. "While we certainly share the Biden administration's vision for reducing carbon emissions from transportation, EPA's tailpipe rule is clearly the wrong way to pursue that goal and the agency obviously overstepped its authority," RFA chief executive Geoff Cooper said. The Illinois Corn Growers Association echoed the sentiments from the perspective of the agricultural sector, as president Dave Rylander voiced the industry group's goals of building a robust farm economy while opposing the EPA's regulations as they "exceed their authority as a government agency and jeopardize farm family profitability." The group claims that President Joe Biden's administration's target for electric vehicle growth will have adverse effects on corn demand by way of decreases in biofuel production. The EPA is expected to respond by 26 November. Members of the US House of Representatives have drafted a joint resolution attempting to block the standards from going into effect. By Matthew Cope Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Port of NOLA to close prior to TS Francine


10/09/24
10/09/24

Port of NOLA to close prior to TS Francine

Houston, 10 September (Argus) — The port of New Orleans (Nola) in Louisiana and terminal operators there are limiting operations today in preparation for a full closure Wednesday as tropical storm Francine passes. Terminal operators are expected to reopen on 12 September after damages are assessed. United Bulk Terminals (UBT) issued a force majeure this morning from the Davant terminal on concerns for employee safety. The company did not disclose a timeline for reopening. UBT specializes in coal and petcoke along with other commodities. Associated Terminals will suspend operations 11-12 September and will assess damages on 13 September. The National Weather Service forecasts Francine to make landfall tomorrow on the Louisiana coast as a hurricane. Commodities including petcoke, coal, agriculture and fertilizer are likely to be affected by the port closure. By Meghan Yoyotte Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Carbon markets need frameworks, Article 6 progress


10/09/24
10/09/24

Carbon markets need frameworks, Article 6 progress

Berlin, 10 September (Argus) — International carbon markets need better frameworks both at domestic and international level, and consistent guidance on the role of carbon credits and their legal nature, a report by the World Bank has found. The report, presented at the World Bank's Innovate4Climate conference in Berlin today, calls for better harmonisation at several levels, including governance structures but also extending to frameworks such as integrity initiatives, independent standards, verification bodies, registers, transaction registries or exchanges. The World Bank also urges progress on the framework for a new UN-supervised carbon market under Article 6 of the Paris climate agreement at the UN Cop 29 climate conference in November in Baku, Azerbaijan. Article 6.4 additionally provides for so-called mitigation contribution units, which could be used in the voluntary carbon market for "appropriate claims", the World Bank said. Greg Murray, founder of the KoKo networks which sell carbon units from projects providing efficient cookstoves to African households, called at the conference today for Europe to show "more leadership" on carbon markets at Cop 29. Article 6 negotiations failed last year to a large degree because of the EU's fears of insufficient environmental safeguards for the more regulated Article 6.4 mechanism. There was "big enthusiasm" at Cop 28 in Dubai last year about the work carried out by the Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market (ICVCM) and the Science Based Target Initiative (SBTI) to raise standards, Hania Dawood, contributor to the report and World Bank practice manager for climate finance and economics, said at the conference today. But this enthusiasm has had no impact on the market, Dawood said. Agreement is still lacking in ongoing Article 6 discussions on key operational issues related to transparency, environmental integrity and the avoidance of double counting of mitigation outcomes. But the long debates over Article 6 are precisely to ensure the mechanism does not suffer the same fate as the voluntary carbon market, said Swiss climate negotiator Simon Fellermeyer, who has also been a member of the Article 6.4 supervisory body. By Chloe Jardine Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more