PRE concerned at EU recyclate imports direction

  • Spanish Market: Petrochemicals
  • 27/02/24

EU policymakers would be "sending a misleading message that investments in the European plastics recycling value chain are not worth making" by allowing imported recyclates to contribute towards recycled content requirements without "reliable control and verification mechanisms implemented", trade body Plastic Recyclers Europe (PRE) said.

The Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR), which includes recycle content requirements for almost all plastic packaging, "is meant to enhance circularity by… creating a market for recycled products", PRE said. But "the policy direction taken in the trilogues is making the initial optimism fade away".

A leaked draft of the European Commission's implementing decision last week appeared to open the door for imported post-consumer recyclates to count towards recycled content targets in the Single Use Plastics Directive (SUPD), which will come into force for PET beverage bottles from next year.

As listed in the leaked draft European Commission document, post-consumer plastic waste that is allowed to means "waste… that is plastic and that has been generated from plastic products that have been supplied for distribution, consumption or use on the market of a member state or of a third country". This was updated from the previous implementation decision, which only defined post-consumer plastic waste as "waste… that is plastic and that has been generated from plastic products that have been placed on the market", interpreted by many in the industry to mean that only recyclates produced from post-consumer waste generated within the EU could count towards the targets.

The same definition change was also proposed with respect to the upcoming Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR), which extends recycled content requirements to other packaging types, Argus understands. Negotiators from EU member states and the EU Parliament are undergoing "trilogue" meetings to negotiate a compromised between their positions on PPWR, the final one of which is scheduled to take place on 4 March.

"Increasing imports of recycled plastics into the EU are creating an unbalanced market with serious environmental consequences", it said. This is because it would discourage investment in new recycling capacity which could result in more European plastic waste being directed to incineration or landfill.

Destabilisation

Recyclers' operating rates came under pressure in 2023 as a challenging economic environment weighed on demand in most important plastic-consuming sectors in 2023 and a reduction in virgin polymer prices stiffened competition in many of their key markets.

This "destabilisation" caused EU plastic waste exports to rise by 18pc year on year, PRE said. But plastic waste exports from the EU are soon set to be further restricted under revised Waste Shipment Regulations. A final version is scheduled to be voted on in today's EU plenary session — boosting the need for local processing capacity to hit the bloc's recycling targets.

PRE cited a study by consultancy Systemiq projecting that strong investment in PET recycling infrastructure could lift recycling rates for PET packaging and textiles to 67pc by 2040, whereas with no investment the recycling rates would only reach 32pc.

PRE has previously said tighter traceability controls on products from outside the EU to create a "level playing field" for local European recyclers. "EU recyclers are subject to robust legislation and safety requirements, which on the contrary cannot always be verified for the imported material," it said last year, calling for "independent third-party certifications" for extra-EU recyclers to verify the origin of waste and the recycling methods used to reprocess it.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

Low-carbon methanol costly EU bunker option


16/05/24
16/05/24

Low-carbon methanol costly EU bunker option

New York, 16 May (Argus) — Ship owners are ordering new vessels equipped with methanol-burning capabilities, largely in response to tightening carbon emissions regulations in Europe. But despite the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions savings that low-carbon methanol provides, it cannot currently compete on price with grey methanol or conventional marine fuels. Ship owners operate 33 methanol-fueled vessels today and have another 29 on order through the end of the year, according to vessel classification society DNV. All 62 vessels are oil and chemical tankers. DNV expects a total of 281 methanol-fueled vessels by 2028, of which 165 will be container ships, 19 bulk carrier and 14 car carrier vessels. Argus Consulting expects an even bigger build-out, with more than 300 methanol-fueled vessels by 2028. A methanol configured dual-fuel vessel has the option to burn conventional marine fuel or any type of methanol: grey or low-carbon. Grey methanol is made from natural gas or coal. Low-carbon methanol includes biomethanol, made of sustainable biomass, and e-methanol, produced by combining green hydrogen and captured carbon dioxide. The fuel-switching capabilities of the dual-fuel vessels provide ship owners with a natural price hedge. When methanol prices are lower than conventional bunkers the ship owner can burn methanol, and vice versa. Methanol, with its zero-sulphur emissions, is advantageous in emission control areas (ECAs), such as the US and Canadian territorial waters. In ECAs, the marine fuel sulphur content is capped at 0.1pc, and ship owners can burn methanol instead of 0.1pc sulphur maximum marine gasoil (MGO). In the US Gulf coast, the grey methanol discount to MGO was $23/t MGO-equivalent average in the first half of May. The grey methanol discount averaged $162/t MGOe for all of 2023. Starting this year, ship owners travelling within, in and out of European territorial waters are required to pay for 40pc of their CO2 emissions through the EU emissions trading system. Next year, ship owners will be required to pay for 70pc of their CO2 emissions. Separately, ship owners will have to reduce their vessels' lifecycle GHG intensities, starting in 2025 with a 2pc reduction and gradually increasing to 80pc by 2050, from a 2020 baseline. The penalty for exceeding the GHG emission intensity is set by the EU at €2,400/t ($2,596/t) of very low-sulplhur fuel oil equivalent. Even though these regulations apply to EU territorial waters, they affect ship owners travelling between the US and Europe. Despite the lack of sulphur emissions, grey methanol generates CO2. With CO2 marine fuel shipping regulations tightening, ship owners have turned their sights to low-carbon methanol. But US Gulf coast low-carbon methanol was priced at $2,317/t MGOe in the first half of May, nearly triple the outright price of MGO at $785/t. Factoring in the cost of 70pc of CO2 emissions and the GHG intensity penalty, the US Gulf coast MGO would rise to about $857/t. At this MGO level, the US Gulf coast low-carbon methanol would be 2.7 times the price of MGO. By comparison, grey methanol with added CO2 emissions cost would be around $962/t, or 1.1 times the price of MGO. To mitigate the high low-carbon methanol costs, some ship owners have been eyeing long-term agreements with suppliers to lock in product availabilities and cheaper prices available on the spot market. Danish container ship owner Maersk has lead the way, entering in low-carbon methanol production agreements in the US with Proman, Orsted, Carbon Sink, and SunGaas Renewables. These are slated to come on line in 2025-27. Global upcoming low-carbon methanol projects are expected to produce 16mn t by 2027, according to industry trade association the Methanol Institute, up from two years ago when the institute was tracking projects with total capacity of 8mn t by 2027. By Stefka Wechsler Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Japan’s NS United plans methanol-fuelled bulk carriers


15/05/24
15/05/24

Japan’s NS United plans methanol-fuelled bulk carriers

Tokyo, 15 May (Argus) — Japanese shipping company NS United Kaiun plans to order several methanol-fuelled Capesize bulk carriers, targeting to begin delivery from 2027, as its aims to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from shipping raw materials for steel production. NS United Kaiun signed an initial agreement on 13 May with Japanese shipbuilders Imabari Shipbuilding and Japan Marine United and domestic vessel engineer Nihon Shipyard to build several methanol-fuelled ships of 209,000dwt each. The vessels will be equipped with dual-fuel engines, which can burn methanol and conventional marine fuel. NS United Kaiun expects the future use of green methanol will cut GHG emissions by more than 80pc compared with conventional marine fuel. The company will also co-operate with fuel developers to buy green methanol. Methanol has emerged as a potential alternative fuel as the marine sector looks to cut its GHGs. Fellow Japanese shipping firm NYK Line also plans to receive six chemical tankers over 2026-29, which will burn very-low sulphur fuel oil but will be designed to convert to use methanol. By Nanami Oki Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Philippines' JG Summit delays cracker restart


14/05/24
14/05/24

Philippines' JG Summit delays cracker restart

Singapore, 14 May (Argus) — The Philippines' sole cracker operator JG Summit has delayed the restart of its Batangas cracker by another week because of technical glitches. The cracker was shut on 9 May on technical issues and was scheduled to restart over the weekend of 10 May, but this has been delayed again to the weekend of 17 May because of other technical glitches, according to sources close to the company. JG Summit's cracker has a nameplate capacity of 480,000 t/yr of ethylene and 240,000 t/yr of propylene. Toong Shien Lee Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Japan’s Daio Paper to explore biorefinery


13/05/24
13/05/24

Japan’s Daio Paper to explore biorefinery

Tokyo, 13 May (Argus) — Japanese paper manufacturer Daio Paper is planning a trial biorefinery, aiming to begin commercial production of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF), second-generation bioethanol and biodegradable plastic feedstock by the April 2032-March 2033 fiscal year. Daio, in partnership with domestic biorefinery venture Green Earth Institute (GEI), plans to develop technology to demonstrate manufacturing the bioproducts by 2030. Daio Paper plans to use wooden biomass, waste paper and paper sludge as feedstock. The company declined to disclose any planned commercial output capacity, as well as location of the biorefinery. The project is financed by Japan's state-owned research institute Nedo. Daio Paper is attempting to achieve decarbonisation, while weakening paper demand has forced the industry to seek new business opportunities. Fellow Japanese paper producer Nippon Paper has also tried to develop biorefinery technology with GEI, targeting to begin commercial production of bioethanol for SAF and petrochemical feedstock by 2027-28. By Nanami Oki Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more