US Gulf lowest-cost green ammonia in 2030: Report

Spanish Market: Biofuels, E-fuels, Emissions, Fertilizers, Hydrogen, Petrochemicals
16/04/24

The US Gulf coast will likely be the lowest cost source of green ammonia to top global bunkering ports Singapore and Rotterdam by 2030, according to a study by independent non-profits Rocky Mountain Institute and the Global Maritime Forum.

Green ammonia in Singapore is projected to be sourced from the US Gulf coast at $1,100/t, Chile at $1,850/t, Australia at $1,940/t, Namibia at $2,050/t and India at $2,090/t very low-sulphur fuel oil equivalent (VLSFOe) in 2030. Singapore is also projected to procure green methanol from the US Gulf coast at $1,330/t, China at $1,640/t, Australia at $2,610/t and Egypt at $2,810/t VLSFOe in 2030.

The US Gulf coast would be cheaper for both Chinese bio-methanol and Egyptian or Australian e-methanol. But modeling suggests that competition could result in US methanol going to other ports, particularly in Europe, unless the Singaporean port ecosystem moves to proactively secure supply, says the study.

In addition to space constraints imposed by its geography, Singapore has relatively poor wind and solar energy sources, which makes local production of green hydrogen-based-fuels expensive, says the study. Singapore locally produced green methanol and green ammonia are projected at $2,910/t and $2,800/t VLSFOe, respectively, in 2030, higher than imports, even when considering the extra transport costs.

The study projects that fossil fuels would account for 47mn t VLSFOe, or 95pc of Singapore's marine fuel demand in 2030. The remaining 5pc will be allocated between green ammonia (about 1.89mn t VLSFOe) and green methanol (3.30mn t VLSFOe).

Rotterdam to pull from US Gulf

Green ammonia in Rotterdam is projected to be sourced from the US Gulf coast at $1,080/t, locally produced at $2,120/t, sourced from Spain at $2,150/t and from Brazil at $2,310/t.

Rotterdam is also projected to procure green methanol from China at $1,830/t, Denmark at $2,060/t, locally produce it at $2,180/t and from Finland at $2,190/t VLSFOe, among other countries, but not the US Gulf coast .

The study projects that fossil fuels would account for 8.1mn t VLSFOe, or 95pc of Rotterdam's marine fuel demand in 2030. The remaining 5pc will be allocated between green ammonia, at about 326,000t, and green methanol, at about 570,000t VLSFOe.

Rotterdam has a good renewable energy potential, according to the study. But Rotterdam is also a significant industrial cluster and several of the industries in the port's hinterland are seeking to use hydrogen for decarbonisation. As such, the port is expected to import most of its green hydrogen-based fuel supply.

Though US-produced green fuels are likely to be in high demand, Rotterdam can benefit from EU incentives for hydrogen imports, lower-emission fuel demand created by the EU emissions trading system and FuelEU Maritime.

But the EU's draft Renewable Energy Directive could limit the potential for European ports like Rotterdam to import US green fuels. The draft requirements in the Directive disallow fuel from some projects that benefit from renewable electricity incentives, like the renewable energy production tax credit provided by the US's Inflation Reduction Act, after 2028. If these draft requirements are accepted in the final regulation, they could limit the window of opportunity for hydrogen imports from the US to Rotterdam to the period before 2028, says the study.

By Stefka Wechsler

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

23/01/25

Bloomberg to fund UN climate body in lieu of US

London, 23 January (Argus) — Bloomberg Philanthropies and "other US climate funders" will ensure that the US meets its funding and reporting obligations to UN climate body the UNFCCC, after President Trump withdrew the country from the Paris climate agreement earlier this week. This is the second time that Bloomberg Philanthropies has "stepped in to help uphold [the US'] funding and reporting commitments… amid a lack of US federal climate leadership", the organisation said today. Trump pulled the US out of the Paris accord in his first term as US president, although then-President Joe Biden signed the agreement once more in early 2021. Bloomberg will "work to ensure US subnational climate leaders track and report on US climate progress over the next four years", the organisation said today. "Bloomberg Philanthropies has made significant investments in empowering local leaders, providing businesses with the data to track emissions while driving economic growth, and building coalitions across public and private sectors", founder Michael Bloomberg said. He is also a UN special envoy on climate ambition. UNFCCC executive secretary Simon Stiell welcomed the support, also noting that "government funding remains essential" for the climate body. The finance referred to is not the international climate finance often discussed at UNFCCC talks, but funding which helps the climate body operate and host events such as the annual Cop climate summits. It appears likely that the previous US administration had foreseen a lack of financial contributions from the Trump government. The US last year paid its arrears for the UNFCCC core budget in full — just under €3.4mn ($3.5mn) — leaving it in a minority of countries with no outstanding payments, UNFCCC accounts show. The US also contributed just under €7.3mn for 2024 — 22pc of the total contributed — again for the body's core budget, UNFCCC accounts show. Bloomberg Philanthropies contributed $4.5mn to the UNFCCC in 2024 for "supplementary activities", while the US provided $2.74mn, UNFCCC accounts show. Trump, in one of his first acts upon returning to office, on 20 January ordered the US to withdraw from the Paris agreement. That decision will take effect one year after the US gives formal notice to the UNFCCC. By Georgia Gratton Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Poland says EU 2040 climate target a 'challenge'

23/01/25

Poland says EU 2040 climate target a 'challenge'

Edinburgh, 23 January (Argus) — Setting the bloc's climate target for 2040 as well as agreeing additional environmental and climate laws is a "challenge" for the six-month Polish EU presidency, Poland's environment minister Paulina Henning-Kloska said, as there is "no unified position". Speaking to the European Parliament's environment committee, Henning-Kloska, who chairs meetings of both environment and energy ministers, made clear that member state adoption of the bloc's 2040 target for cutting greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions will be difficult. "We had a discussion on this in the council [of ministers] last December," she said. "What is clear is that there is no unified position," she added, as some member states wants greater flexibility in reducing emissions between 2030 and 2050. Difficult discussions between EU states and in the European parliament will likely push the submission of the bloc's nationally determined contribution (NDC) — climate plan — to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) beyond the 10 February deadline. The European Climate Law requires the European Commission to propose a 2040 climate target "at the latest within six months of the first global stocktake". The global stocktake was completed during the UN Cop 28 climate summit in Dubai, in 2023. It gauged countries' progress against the Paris Agreement and proposed measures to keep to its goals — including keeping warming preferably below 1.5°C. EU officials note that the 2040 target will "inform" the decision on the EU's next NDC. Even if the EU's NDC submission does not require a separate law, officials also "expect" to receive a political mandate from member states before the NDC submission by the European Commission and the EU's presidency, led by Poland until the end of June. Despite the threat to a speedy timeline, the commission maintains it will continue to be a "leading" voice for international climate action and aims to submit the EU's next NDC "well ahead" of the Cop 30 climate talks in Belem, Brazil in November. But German member Peter Liese thinks the EU is in "deadlock" on its 2040 target. "We may like it or not, it's very ambitious," he said. "And I don't see enough support for that target." A member of parliament's largest centre-right EPP group, Liese also picked up on Polish prime minister Donald Tusk's and Henning-Kloska's call for changes or delay to the bloc's specific emissions trading system for road transport and heating fuels (ETS2). "I don't see — without the ETS2 — member states have any plan to get to their target," said Liese, who has previously helped draft legislative revisions to the ETS. "I don't think abolishing is a solution. Postponement is also [not] the best solution," Liese said. By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Standardisation, better finance needed for new nuclear

23/01/25

Standardisation, better finance needed for new nuclear

London, 23 January (Argus) — Increasing financing flows and standardising new reactors will be essential to reaching the goal of tripling nuclear capacity by 2050, participants at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, heard. A total of 31 countries have signed up to a pledge, first announced at the UN Cop 28 climate summit in Dubai in 2023, to triple global nuclear power capacity by 2050. The pledge was one of several made at the summit, including a commitment to transition away from fossil fuels in energy systems, triple renewable capacity by 2030 and double the rate of energy efficiency improvements. Installed capacity of nuclear reactors has been roughly stable over the last 20 years, holding in a range of 350-380GW since 2004, according to data from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). And reaching this goal would require building 30 GW/yr of net new capacity over 2030-50. As of 2024, there are 63 reactors under construction, with a capacity of 71GW, of which roughly half are in China, according to IEA data. Standardising new reactors will be key to achieving this goal, according to Luc Remont, head of French state-owned nuclear constructor and operator EdF. The firm's most recently built reactors have been plagued with cost overruns and delays. The 1.5GW Flamanville 3 reactor, which entered service late last year in France, took 17 years to build and cost upwards of €20bn ($21bn). But the firm is preparing to build 6-14 new reactors in France, and hopes to learn from the construction process to reduce costs and delays. EdF has reduced lead times by 30pc on the second reactor of its two-reactor Hinkley Point C plant in the UK, Remont said. Making nuclear power more attractive to investors will unlock some of the vast sums required to reach the tripling goal, according to Darryl White, head of Canadian bank BMO. Tripling nuclear capacity will cost $5 trillion, he said, an "enormous challenge", and while some will come from governments and banks' balance sheets, other investors will be needed. Delivery of projects needs to be more certain, while financing models such as regulated asset base or contracts for difference (CfDs) will be needed to provide certainty on returns, he said. Policy makers are behind the curve on the growing need for base load generation, according to Swedish deputy prime minister Ebba Busch. Money globally has been funnelled into intermittent renewables, but industry is now aware of the need for more clean base load generation, whether nuclear or hydro. Sweden is hoping to pass a law this year to increase financing — including state loans and CfDs — for new nuclear, she said. By Rhys Talbot Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

China’s SOP exports in 2024 fall to five-year low

23/01/25

China’s SOP exports in 2024 fall to five-year low

Singapore, 23 January (Argus) — The halt in customs inspections for SOP exports led to a sharp fall in China's shipments in 2024 as export volumes fell to a five-year low. China's SOP exports in 2024 fell by 84pc on the year to just 16,700t, the lowest since 2018, which recorded 8,700t of exports, GTT data show. About 75pc of total 2024 exports took place in the second half of the year, as buyers sought to shift more product in 9.5kg bags. But this type of packaging was not favoured by buyers from Latin American markets which typically buy for bulk blending, as they needed to pay for additional labour costs to remove these bags. As a result, shipments to Peru and Mexico plunged to 23,800t and 2,600t from 8,600t and 40,500t, respectively. South Africa replaced Mexico as the top export destination in 2024, but shipments to South Africa nearly halved on the year to 4,600t. Chinese SOP exports saw significant growth in 2019-20, supported by strong demand from Latin American and south Asian markets. But export volumes took a downturn from 2021 onwards as suppliers were urged to prioritise supplies for the domestic market and keep domestic prices stable. China mainly exports SOP that is produced by the Mannheim process, which uses MOP as a raw material. China depends heavily on MOP imports based on an annual contract price with global major producers as well as a monthly cross-border contract price with Russian producer Uralkali, as its domestic MOP production is not enough to meet the country's needs. Most Chinese suppliers halted export offers for SOP in 9.5kg bags in January, after a change in the customs clearance definition for small-volume exports was implemented from 1 January 2025, making it difficult for suppliers to ship 9.5kg bags in jumbo bags via break bulk vessels. This could further limit China's SOP export availability this year. By Huijun Yao Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Brazil real recovers ground on US dollar

22/01/25

Brazil real recovers ground on US dollar

Sao Paulo, 22 January (Argus) — The Brazilian real continued to strengthen against the US dollar today thanks to increased investor confidence domestically and an easing in the dollar globally in recent days after the real tumbled in the last weeks of 2024 on fiscal concerns. The exchange rate ended the session at R5.946/$1, as the real appreciated by 1.4pc on the day. The real has strengthened by about 7.8pc to the dollar from an intradday low of R6.4/$1 on 25 December. The last time the exchange rate between the two currencies ended the day below the R6/$1 threshold was on 11 December, when it stood at R5.989/$1. The real's recent appreciation took place as domestic investors are more confident about the country's spending cut plans, according to Sidney Lima, an analyst at Ouro Preto Investimentos, an investment management firm. But it is hard to say whether the recent appreciating trend will continue in the future, he said. That will "depend on the continuity of fiscal reforms in Brazil and global economic conditions," he added. At the same time, the US dollar index, which tracks the dollar against six main trading partner currencies, has fallen from a more-than two-year high on 12 January on uncertainty over whether US president Donald Trump will follow through on his tariff threats. Still, the Brazilian real has depreciated by around 20pc to US dollar since 22 January 2024. By Lucas Parolin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more