Latest Market News

Canada’s greenwashing bill muzzles oil industry

  • Spanish Market: Crude oil, Emissions, Pipe and tube
  • 01/07/24

A Canadian law targeting greenwashing has begun to stamp out much of the oil industry's claims relating to climate pursuits, for better or worse, but environmental policy in general may be at risk as the ruling Liberals show signs of cracking.

Companies must now show proof when making representations about climate and emissions targets, according to the law that took effect from 20 June. Any claim "not based on adequate and proper substantiation in accordance with internationally recognised methodology" could result in penalties of up to C$15mn ($11mn), or "triple the value of the benefit derived from the anti-competitive practice".

This compelled prominent oil sands producers and carbon capture and storage (CCS) venture Pathways Alliance to delete content from their websites the same day, citing the "significant uncertainty" and the risk of litigation that the new law has brought. Leading oil province Alberta's premier, Danielle Smith, said she expects the new law to have the opposite of its intended effect by stifling "many billions in investments in emissions technologies — the very technologies the world needs".

And the political winds might be blowing in her favour as her federal opponent, prime minister Justin Trudeau and his Liberal party, struggle to recover from a steady slide in the polls. Opposition leader Pierre Poilievre has been reaping the benefits of Trudeau's fall from grace, as evinced by the surprise by-election win for his Conservative Party in Toronto last week. This is the first time that a Conservative has won this particular seat — in what had been a Liberal stronghold — since 1988, but Trudeau has no plans to step aside ahead of the next general election that will take place on or before 20 October 2025.

The federal government hopes oil industry concerns will be offset by other aspects of the new law, which include the passage of important carbon capture, utilisation and storage (CCUS) investment tax credits (ITC) that energy companies have been waiting for since they were announced more than three years ago. Eligible expenditures will now receive a refundable ITC of 60pc on capital costs for direct air capture, 50pc on other capture equipment and 37.5pc for money spent on capital relating to carbon transportation, storage or usage. The benefits apply to expenditures between January 2022 and December 2040 but are halved starting in 2031 to encourage investment sooner rather than later.

Polarising effect

Less than one week later, Shell announced final investment decisions (FIDs) for two projects in Alberta that stand to benefit from these ITCs. The Polaris project will capture up to 650,000 t/yr of CO2 from the company's 114,000 b/d Scotford refinery and chemicals complex. And a joint venture between Shell and Calgary-based ATCO EnPower announced an FID for its Atlas Carbon Storage Hub, which will be connected to Polaris by a 22km pipeline. Both projects are to be operational by the end of 2028. But the CCUS ITC, along with other federal and provincial programmes and regulations, have "created an environment that makes the Polaris investment possible", Shell tells Argus.

Pathways says it is pleased the ITCs are now legislated, but that it will scrutinise how they are implemented as it considers moving forward with its massive C$16.5bn CCS project in the heart of Alberta's oil sands region. Pathways includes Canada's six leading oil sands producers, together accounting for 95pc of the province's 3.3mn b/d of oil sands production. That is likely to grow to 4mn b/d within 10 years, the Alberta Energy Regulator says. Capturing carbon will be vital for firms to get to that level while staying under a federally-proposed cap on emissions.

Alberta tar sands raw production '000m³
20222023202420252033
Mineable257.1261.9266.6271.6279.5
In situ270.0280.2293.4309.3348.8
Total527.1542.1560.0580.9628.3
Total mn b/d3.323.413.523.663.95
— Alberta Energy Regulator

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

Mideast crisis puts Iran’s energy facilities at risk


04/10/24
04/10/24

Mideast crisis puts Iran’s energy facilities at risk

Dubai, 4 October (Argus) — Iran's large-scale missile attack against Israel on 1 October pushed the Mideast Gulf region another step closer to all-out war, with Israel vowing to retaliate hard for what it saw as "a severe and dangerous escalation." But unlike previous exchanges, which have largely targeted military assets, critical energy infrastructure including oil facilities appear this time to be in Israel's crosshairs. President Joe Biden on 3 October said the US and Israel are discussing possible strikes on Iranian oil facilities as part of consultations on a response. The Biden administration would not provide any details and the only objection it has voiced publicly is against the prospect of an Israeli strike on sites associated with Iran's nuclear programme. The escalating conflict in the region, which began with a surprise cross-border attack by Gaza-based Hamas militants on Israel almost one year ago, has had a limited impact on oil prices, because the effect on physical supply has been almost non-existent despite the scale of the fighting and destruction in Gaza, northern Israel and southern Lebanon. Attacks by Iran-backed Houthi militants in Yemen on oil tankers in the Red Sea rerouted some oil trade without affecting global supply. That could change if Israel makes good on its threat to directly target Iranian oil infrastructure and, especially, if Iran retaliates — as it did in 2019 to a US attempt to cut off its exports — with indiscriminate attacks on oil tankers and infrastructure in the Mideast Gulf. But the extent of the effect on global supply and price will ultimately depend on Israel's intentions, and what kind of facilities are hit. "If the objective is to hurt the country economically, then the most obvious target would be Iran's oil export terminals," said Vortexa senior oil risk analyst Armen Azizian. Despite US sanctions, Iran continues to be a major crude producer — the third biggest in Opec — and a notable exporter. Oil exports averaged around 1.55mn-1.6mn b/d in the first half of this year, rising to 1.65mn-1.7mn b/d in July-August. Early indications suggest September exports were higher still. Iran has several terminals from where it exports its crude and condensate, all on its Mideast Gulf coast. But one, on Kharg Island, dwarves all others in terms of importance. "About 90-95pc of Iran's oil exports typically come out of Kharg, with the other 5-10pc coming out of considerably smaller terminals, such as Soroush, Sirri or Lavan," Azizian said. "Hitting one of those smaller streams wouldn't impact Iran too much, operationally. But if they decide to take Kharg offline, we're talking about a hit of around 1.5mn b/d to its export capacity." Knock-on effects When Iran was struggling to sell its oil because of sanctions the US imposed in 2018, it had upwards of 60mn-70mn bl in floating storage. But these have fallen to just shy of 40mn bl, which would only sustain exports of about 1.3mn b/d for a month, Azizian noted. Iran has onshore storage, but many of the biggest tanks are at Kharg, which could be at risk of damage should the terminal be targeted. An attack on Kharg Island would strike at the heart of the Iranian economy, given how big a chunk of Iran's foreign exchange revenues come from the sale of its oil. Nearly all Iran's exports are absorbed by refiners in China's Shandong province. But the effect of potentially removing 1.5mn b/d from global supply would be felt far beyond Iran and China, as global markets would be forced to adapt. Crude futures moved higher this week on the prospect of Israeli strikes against Iran. The Biden administration for the past year has worked to keep the conflict from escalating, in part because of the potential knock-on effects on oil prices — a key consideration in the US election campaign where Biden's vice-president, Kamala Harris, is facing former president Donald Trump. If the confrontation results in an Iranian outage, avoiding a price rise would require a co-ordinated move by the US and other large consumers and, possibly, by the wider Opec+ group, to ensure supplies can be brought to the market. Opec+ is holding back close to 6mn b/d of production under a series of formal and voluntary cuts, which it could bring back sooner than currently planned. But doing so in response to an attack on Iran could stoke tensions within Opec and between Iran and its Mideast Gulf Arab neighbours, which improved relations with Tehran in recent years. The US would be hard pressed to again guarantee the security of key oil infrastructure facilities across the region. The tepid initial US response to a 2019 attack on Saudi state-controlled Aramco's Abqaiq complex and to a 2022 attack on UAE energy facilities prompted regional producers to consider Washington's military security guarantee as falling short. Kpler senior oil analyst Homayoun Falakshahi sees the the probability of an attack on Kharg Island as low, given China's relations with Israel and Iran. "I imagine China will put as much pressure on Israel not to target Iran's exports," Falakshahi said. Refining plans Alternatively, Israel could opt to target one or more of Iran's 10 oil refineries or condensate splitters that are largely concentrated in the west of the country. Discussion at an industry conference in Fujairah this week about a possible Israeli retaliation centred on Iran's largest refinery, the recently expanded 630,000 b/d capacity Abadan in Khuzestan province. Targeting Abadan was seen as a less provocative move, while still providing a warning to Tehran that energy installations are ‘in play' and hitting Iran's domestic products supply. A hit to Abadan would be significant, but not impossible to navigate for Iran, according to Falakshahi, who notes it produces mostly fuel oil, a product primarily consumed domestically with some exported to Fujairah in the UAE, China and Singapore, among other destinations. Abadan produces other products such as gasoline, which Iran has recently had to begin importing again to meet demand, but output is only enough to meet around 12-13pc of consumption. "It will primarily impact the local market, but little else," Falakshahi said. "But not to the same extent as if, say, the 360,000 b/d Persian Gulf Star condensate splitter was targeted, as that alone delivers enough to meet around 20-25pc of local gasoline demand." Gasoline is a politically-sensitive issue in Iran, with even minor changes in the price of the road fuel sometimes sparking charged demonstrations and riots. More than 200 people were killed in riots in November 2019 triggered by a sudden cut to subsidies that resulted in a sharp increase in gasoline prices. Israel has so far not given any public hints as to when it plans to retaliate or how. But with tensions in the region already at the highest they have been for some years, Iran will be on high alert, and upping security where it can. A trading source told Argus that Iran's state-owned NIOC has in recent days moved many of its empty tankers away from Kharg Island. By Nader Itayim Iran’s oil refineries and terminals Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Экспортная пошлина на нефть в Казахстане в октябре снизилась


04/10/24
04/10/24

Экспортная пошлина на нефть в Казахстане в октябре снизилась

Riga, 4 October (Argus) — Ставка экспортной пошлины на нефть в Казахстане в октябре уменьшилась до $77/т с $82/т — в сентябре. Среднее значение котировок сорта Kebco (cif Аугуста) и Североморского датированного в период мониторинга цен с 20 июля по 20 сентября составило $77/барр. по сравнению с $82/барр. — в период предыдущего мониторинга, по данным министерства финансов Казахстана. С сентября 2023 г. ежемесячная ставка пошлины на экспорт нефти и нефтепродуктов в Казахстане меняется при изменении средней мировой цены на $1/барр. вместо прежних $5/барр. в пределах диапазона $25—105/барр. При средней рыночной цене нефти $25—105/барр. размер ставки вывозной таможенной пошлины рассчитывается по следующей формуле: ВТП=Ср*К, где ВТП — размер ставки вывозной таможенной пошлины на нефть и нефтепродукты в долларах США за тонну; Ср — средняя рыночная цена нефти за предшествующий период; К — поправочный коэффициент 1. При значении средней рыночной цены на нефть до $25/барр. размер ставки вывозной таможенной пошлины равен нулю. При цене свыше $105/барр. применяются ставки вывозной пошлины в диапазоне от $115/т до $236/т. Средняя рыночная цена определяется министерством финансов Казахстана ежемесячно на основании мониторинга котировок Kebco и Североморского датированного в течение двух предыдущих месяцев. Полученный результат мониторинга в соответствии с поправками математически округляется до целого числа. По условиям действующих контрактов от уплаты пошлины освобождены крупнейшие экспортеры сырья: Тенгизшевройл (ТШО), Karachaganak Petroleum Operating (KPO) и акционеры NCOC, разрабатывающего месторождение Кашаган. Экспорт сырья из Казахстана в январе — августе снизился до 46 млн т с 47,1 млн т — годом ранее, по данным Ситуационно-аналитического центра топливно-энергетического комплекса Республики Казахстан (САЦ ТЭК). ТШО, КРО и NCOC за указанный период отправили за рубеж 38,7 млн т без уплаты экспортных пошлин. Пошлина на вывоз из Казахстана бензина, дизтоплива, авиакеросина и других дистиллятов в октябре также уменьшится до $77/т с сентябрьских $82/т. Ставка экспортной пошлины на экспорт мазута из Казахстана с 8 сентября составляет $30/т. Согласно внесенным в сентябре изменениям в приказ министерства национальной экономики Казахстана, указанный размер вывозной пошлины на мазут будет действовать в течение всего года. Ставка экспортной пошлины на экспорт вакуумного газойля из Казахстана в октябре составит $60/т. ________________ Больше ценовой информации и аналитических материалов о рынках нефти и нефтепродуктов стран Каспийского региона и Центральной Азии — в еженедельном отчете Argus Рынок Каспия . Вы можете присылать комментарии по адресу или запросить дополнительную информацию feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Группа Argus Media . Все права защищены.

UK confirms $28.5bn funding for two CCS, H2 clusters


04/10/24
04/10/24

UK confirms $28.5bn funding for two CCS, H2 clusters

Hamburg, 4 October (Argus) — The UK government has finalised a commitment to provide £21.7bn ($28.5bn) over the next 25 years to two planned clusters for carbon capture and storage (CCS) and connected projects, including for hydrogen production. The government has reached "commercial agreement with industry" for development of the clusters, it said today. The funding will go to the HyNet cluster in northwest England and the East Coast cluster in England's northeastern Humber and Teesside regions. The two projects were selected as "Track 1" priority clusters in 2021 and could together store some 650mn t of CO2. They could attract £8bn of private investment, the government said today. "The allocation of funding marks the launch of the UK's CCS industry," according to Italy's integrated Eni, which leads the development of HyNet's CO2 transport and storage system. Eni in February gave a start date of 2027 for HyNet. The East Coast cluster is led by the Northern Endurance Partnership, a joint venture between BP, TotalEnergies and Norwegian state-controlled Equinor. A range of projects will connect to the two hubs to transport and permanently sequester the carbon. These will include hydrogen production projects and supporting infrastructure. HyNet will involve projects developed by EET Hydrogen , a subsidiary of Indian conglomerate Essar, which is planning to bring a 350MW plant for hydrogen production from natural gas with CCS online by 2027 and another 700MW facility by 2028. The hydrogen will be partly used at EET Hydrogen's sister company EET Fuels at its 195,000 b/d Stanlow refinery but some will also be delivered to industrial consumers in the area. The HyNet cluster includes plans for 125km of new pipelines to transport hydrogen. The East Coast cluster involves Equinor's [600MW H2H Saltend] project and BP's 160,000 t/yr H2Teesside venture . German utility Uniper's 720MW Humber H2ub (Blue) project, UK-based Kellas Midstream's 1GW H2NorthEast plant and a retrofit facility from BOC , which is part of industrial gas firm Linde, could also connect to the cluster for CO2 storage. All the projects are due to enter into operation before the end of this decade. The funding confirmation for the CCS hubs "is a vital step forward, catapulting hydrogen towards long-term certainty we need in the UK", industry body the Hydrogen Energy Association's chief executive Celia Greaves said. The previous government last year picked two "Track 2" carbon capture clusters that are scheduled to start operations by 2030 — the Acorn facility in Scotland and the Viking project in northeast England. By Stefan Krumpelmann Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Dockworkers end US port strike


03/10/24
03/10/24

Dockworkers end US port strike

Houston, 3 October (Argus) — US dockworkers have ended a port strike that had shut container terminals from Maine to Texas, after their union late Thursday struck a tentative agreement on wages. The International Longshoremen's Association (ILA) has agreed to extend its contract with the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX) until 15 January to provide time for negotiating the remaining outstanding issues, the ILA said in a statement. The USMX includes containership owners, terminal operators and port associations. "Effective immediately, all current job actions will cease and all work covered by the master contract will resume," the ILA said. The strike, which started on 1 October, had forced containership operators to queue up outside US east coast ports. Major container shipping agencies such as Maersk had initiated surcharges for US east coast and Gulf coast-bound containers later in October. By Jack Kaskey Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more