Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest Market News

Q&A: Voluntary market, book and claim key to SAF growth

  • Spanish Market: Biofuels
  • 20/08/24

US sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) producer World Energy's vice president Adam Klauber spoke to Argus about the future of the global SAF market.

How could US SAF policy develop under a new administration?

[SAF tax benefits] need to be extended because they're expiring, but the agricultural lobby is quite strong in the US and will have the ear of either administration.

They will be pushing for extension — and potentially expansion — of the tax credit, and for modification to include some more purpose-grown crops, especially because corn-based ethanol needs to go somewhere beyond the road market as EV adoption expands.

[In a Harris administration] maybe what we would see is some type of prioritisation, or rewards, or higher status for lower carbon intensity waste feedstock-based fuels.

With the start of the EU-wide and UK mandates next year, how do you see SAF flows changing?

Some of the SAF will potentially come from the US depending on the value of credits.

It may be more favourable initially to export, and there seems to be some appetite for that within the EU mandates for an interim period. There will be some questions about how much support there will be in North America for SAF use, and this is where the voluntary market comes into play, and that if there are entities in the EU that want to go beyond the mandate they might buy credits from the US to achieve higher levels of ambition.

We're going to start to see volumes out of Brazil. There are a number of different enterprises that are developing there, and in Asia.

Is the difference in sustainability requirements and accepted SAF feedstocks in the US and the EU challenging for producers?

Yes, because there are different classifications — tallow is one of our major feedstocks, and our suppliers will not use the European definition of technical tallow even though they could meet those requirements.

On the flip side, there's a greater ability to track used cooking oil (UCO) in the EU. We hope the US EPA will adopt clear requirements around tracking UCO so that will be able to use that, increase supply, and ensure its sustainability.

Some of our customers are EU-based, and in our contracts they stipulate that when we have available supply for intermediate crops [also called cover crops] such as carinata, they would prefer shifts towards specific feedstocks like carinata or UCO.

Are World Energy projects to grow production in California and to build a new plant in Houston moving forward as planned?

We're lucky that we have generous government incentives, and then we can stack voluntary contributions on top of those, so that enables us to proceed in California and Houston.

Currently we don't expect to address our plans due to the macroeconomic landscape, but we do acknowledge that as a challenge and we are advocates of a hybrid system where there's government support to de-risk investments and cover some of the technological risks, but also provide low interest capital and loans.

Incentives for production are very helpful. They may not cover the full price gap, but that's where the voluntary market may be instrumental because they can then pay a price premium to cover that differential.

Growth in interest from corporate users is maybe the number one demand factor in the US. Airlines in the US, to abide by [emissions measuring model] Corsia, just have to buy carbon offsets, and those are a fraction of the price per ton of carbon abated. Corporations are looking for potentially insets — carbon reduction within the value chain — so SAF competes against carbon removals which are quite costly, upwards of $500/t. And SAF is less than that so we can compete.

Any additional projects in the pipeline?

We are talking with a major infrastructure investor and looking at additional plants.

The investors want de-risked technology, so it may limit us to HEFA production for the foreseeable future. We are looking at green hydrogen and developing a project off Newfoundland that we call GH2, where we could develop electro-fuels or other products for transport.

What regions beyond north America and Europe do you expect will become large SAF demand centres in the next 5-10 years?

Demand may persist in the US and the EU because business travel represents about 20 or 25pc of aviation, and there's going to be significant pressure on those companies to decarbonise, so they're going to be looking for SAF certificates and credits.

Certain parts of Asia, I think Japan and South Korea, will be strong demand centres. But supply may become more global if acceptance of SAF certificates and book and claim increases.

How do you see the development of book and claim?

While policymakers may only view book and claim as having a limited time horizon or an expiration date, for the corporate users that isn't really true.

There are many corporations that want to get to net zero by 2030, so they're going to have to buy credits for a long time, because SAF at best can maybe get to 90pc carbon reduction. And then there are a number of companies, like Microsoft and others, that want to advance new technologies that may not be as cost effective.

So we know that HEFA right now is the most economically competitive, but let's say there is a desire to buy electro-fuels and PTL volumes, a corporation may then pay for those credits what governments and airlines cannot pay because it's too expensive.

All players need to be responsible and think about how we maximize the credibility and the trust in the system, so we make sure we have digital registries that are independent and audited and achieve certain requirements, so there's confidence that we've built something that is robust and worthy of trust.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

06/02/25

Ethanol prices up on uncertainty, low margins in Feb

Ethanol prices up on uncertainty, low margins in Feb

London, 6 February (Argus) — Spot ethanol prices in northwest Europe firmed to a six-month high at the start of February after several months of remaining largely steady. The minimum 64pc greenhouse gas (GHG) savings ethanol spot price reached €700/m³ on 4 February, its highest since 2 August 2024. Despite this, participants are reporting ample supply in the region, sufficient to meet current demand. The gains are largely attributed to a closed arbitrage with the US, higher production costs and ongoing uncertainty surrounding potential US tariffs. Some market participants believe the price rise in the ARA region is partially driven by higher ethanol prices in the US, which have been supported by rising corn prices . These participants said European prices may have tracked US price gains given the closed arbitrage with the country, with expectations that the arbitrage between the regions will reopen as a result of higher ethanol prices in ARA. Looking ahead, some market participants predict that ethanol imports will be reduced in the second quarter, which has caused the ethanol forward curve to shift into contango, with prices peaking at €711/m³ for the second quarter on 5 February. Trump tariffs turmoil Participants said prices are also being supported by uncertainty surrounding US president Donald Trump's plans to impose tariffs on imports from the EU. The European Commission said this week it will respond "firmly" should Trump "unfairly or arbitrarily" impose tariffs on EU goods. Trump made a similar complaint about the UK, but said he thinks "that one can be worked out". Retaliatory tariffs from the EU could affect ethanol flows, as the EU is a net importer of fuel ethanol. It imported almost 69,000t of undenatured ethanol — usually used for road fuel blending in most EU member states — from the US in January-November 2024, according to provisional EU customs data. The UK imported almost 600,000t of ethanol during the same period. The UK can leverage favourable arbitrage opportunities to import ethanol from the US and redirect it to the EU. Producers face higher costs Argus calculations show ethanol production margins for corn and wheat at €168.69/m³ and at €146.71/m³ on 5 February, down from €223.56/m³ and €205.33/m³ a year ago. Variable costs of yeasts, enzymes, chemicals and denaturants are not included in these calculations. Market participants said producers continue to adjust to a poor 2024-25 harvest season in Eastern Europe, caused by unfavourable weather conditions in Ukraine and France. Higher feedstock costs have contributed to higher ethanol prices, although the production margins are still tighter than last year. In Ukraine, Europe's largest wheat exporter excluding Russia, Argus forecasts wheat production will drop to 22.3mn t during 2024-25 , down from a five-year average of 24.7mn t. Corn supply from the country for 2024-25 is projected to fall to 22.9mn t, down from 31.5mn t in the previous season, according to Argus data. France — Europe's largest producer of ethanol — has cut its wheat production outlook for 2024-25 because of wet weather. Rainfall in other parts of Europe has affected corn toxin levels, potentially leading to poorer quality ethanol. This is likely to weigh on ethanol output in 2025 as it will strain feedstock supplies, push production costs up and squeeze margins for producers. More recently, European market participants said a late-winter cold snap may affect winter crops in Ukraine, and if so, strain feedstock supplies and push ethanol production costs up further. It comes as markets are still waiting for an update on level 2 in the nomenclature of territorial units for statistics GHG emission values, the so called Nuts 2 values. Biofuel producer Archer Daniels Midland expects ethanol profit margins to narrow this year, after posting wider margins in the fourth quarter. The company expects ethanol margins to drop to break-even in the first quarter on higher industry run rates, even as robust demand for exports from the US supports improved volumes, it said. ADM is one of the largest exporters of ethanol to Europe, according to those in the market. By Evelina Lungu Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

IMO mulls higher biofuel blend cargoes on Type I ships


05/02/25
05/02/25

IMO mulls higher biofuel blend cargoes on Type I ships

Singapore, 5 February (Argus) — The International Maritime Organization (IMO) is reviewing a proposal on the delivery of biofuel blends of up to 30pc on Type I barges, and is expected to approve this soon, according to several key maritime assessors and classification societies. The proposal, once approved by IMO, is expected to increase B30 bunkering globally as it would allow for the sale of B30 using the current available fleet of IMO Type I oil barges at any port, likely leading to a higher uptake of biofuel blends. B30 is a blend of 70pc very low-sulphur fuel oil (VLSFO) or high-sulphur fuel oil (HSFO) with 30pc used cooking oil methyl ester (Ucome). The draft circular on the carriage of blends of biofuels and MARPOL Annex I cargoes by conventional bunker ships was accepted by IMO's sub-committee on pollution prevention and response (PPR) during its 12th session from 27-31 January. The draft is expected to be approved at the next Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC) 83 meeting to be held from 7-11 April. Details of the 12th PPR meeting had not been published on IMO's website at the time of writing. The International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL) is an agreement that covers the prevention of pollution of the marine environment by ships. Annex I covers pollution by oil and oil products carried or operationally used by ships. Type I ships that deliver conventional bunker fuels can currently carry up to 25pc of biofuels under MARPOL Annex I, which has resulted in the adoption of the B24 blend in key ports across Asia, the Middle East and the Mediterranean region in the past few years. B24 consists of 24pc Ucome blended with 76pc fuel oil, which could be either VLSFO or HSFO. IMO has previously stated that Type II chemical tankers should be used for transporting biofuel blends with concentrations higher than 25pc. Shipowners have hence been waiting for the delivery of more Type II tankers, which are currently in limited supply at many ports. Market participants at the key port of Singapore are awaiting the impact of the decision in April. Enquiries for B30 have been surfacing in the past couple of months and refiners, traders, and shipowners are waiting for the outcome from MEPC 83, as well as subsequent decisions by the Maritime and Port Authority (MPA) of Singapore on how this will be implemented in the country, said several Singapore-based market participants. "[We] need to see if MPA agrees to follow IMO," said a key Singapore-based trader. MPA has not responded to a request for comment. The current push for higher biofuel blends comes as shipowners prepare to meet stricter compliance requirements set by IMO's Carbon Intensity Index and EU-led Emissions Trading Scheme and FuelEU Maritime. Demand for alternative marine fuels, especially biofuel blends and LNG, is expected to rise as shipowners look at reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions across their fleets. By Mahua Chakravarty Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

EU maritime emissions continue to rise: EMSA


04/02/25
04/02/25

EU maritime emissions continue to rise: EMSA

London, 4 February (Argus) — Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the EU's maritime sector have continued to rise since 2015, the European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) found in its 2025 environmental report, although "promising progress" has been made in some areas. Maritime activity was responsible for 26pc of methane emissions and 39pc of NOx emissions in the EU transport sector in 2022, as well as for 14.2pc of CO2 emissions from the sector, the report said. Methane emissions from maritime "at least doubled" from 2018-23, the report found, pushed up by growth in the LNG fleet. NOx emissions rose by 10pc from 2015-23, while CO2 emissions totalled 137mn t in 2022, having risen by 8.5pc from a year earlier. But sulphur oxide (SOx) emissions fell by approximately 70pc in 2023 compared with 2014 levels, EMSA said. This was driven mainly by the implementation of Sulphur Emission Control Areas (SECAs) in the Baltic and North seas, while the tightening of maximum sulphur levels in marine fuel in 2020 further contributed to the fall in SOx emissions. EMSA expects SOx emissions to drop further once a SECA is established in the Mediterranean Sea. And the northeast Atlantic countries may set up an emission control area by 2027. Biofuels are an "immediate, attractive and cost-effective solution" to cutting GHG emissions in the maritime sector, EMSA said. And synthetic and other drop-in fuels, which can be blended with fossil fuels, could help the shipping sector transition to lower emissions. But their costs could prove an obstacle because they are still "significantly higher" than for marine fossil fuels, the report said. Further electrification of ships could assist in decarbonising short-range waterborne transport, the report said. And the establishment of green shipping corridors — zero-emission maritime routes — could further encourage investment in sustainable fuels and supply chains, EMSA added. The EU emissions trading system-financed Innovation Fund has already supported more than 300 shipping projects, the report said, with funding to be deployed out to 2030. By Navneet Vyasan Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Tariffs not only US threat to Canada canola oil


04/02/25
04/02/25

Tariffs not only US threat to Canada canola oil

New York, 4 February (Argus) — Canadian canola farmers have reason to celebrate a last-minute deal to at least delay US tariffs. Changing US biofuel policies, however, could dim their excitement. The two countries agreed Monday to pause for a month 25pc tariffs on most Canadian imports, including agricultural products like canola oil. While best known for its use in food, canola oil has become an increasingly important ingredient in US biofuel production. Canada exported 800,000 lbs of crude canola oil to the US in 2021, before US regulators allowed more canola-based fuels to qualify for a biofuel mandate, but more than three times that total over just 11 months in 2024 according to customs data. Canola oil from all origins made up around 12pc of the US biomass-based diesel feedstock mix last year. The challenge for Canada is that policies in the US that helped cement canola oil's role in biofuel production are increasingly encouraging producers to use other feedstocks. The mere threat of tariffs could speed that trend along. A long-running US tax credit for blenders of biomass-based diesel expired last year and was replaced by the Inflation Reduction Act's "45Z" credit, which requires fuels to meet an initial carbon intensity threshold and then ups the subsidy as emissions fall. This shift was always expected to benefit waste feedstocks over crops, which incur a carbon penalty for land changes and fertilizer use. The clear message to refiners — both from the US government and from California regulators that run the state's influential low-carbon fuel standard — has been to diversify beyond vegetable oils. But an updated emissions model released by the Department of Energy last month surprised some in the industry by assessing the default carbon intensity of canola-based fuels as too high to automatically qualify for 45Z. Although fuels from soybean oil generally earn some credit, diesels made from canola oil could go from earning $1/USG last year to nothing this year. Before even factoring in potential tariffs, Canadian canola oil appears less attractive for refiners than even competing crops. Guidance on 45Z is preliminary , meaning canola crushers can push for final rules that are less restrictive. But energy lobbyists say privately that they do not expect the new administration to act with urgency to implement an incentive created by Democratic lawmakers and oriented around climate change. And many Republicans' concern with the credit is not that it is too harsh on canola — but that it is too permissive of foreign feedstocks they see as hurting US crop demand. The introduction of 45Z could simultaneously leave Canadian biofuel producers less able to backfill canola oil demand if US buyers look elsewhere. The credit can only be claimed by US producers, cutting off subsidies for imported fuels. At the same time, 45Z does not require fuel to be consumed stateside — meaning that US biorefineries can send subsidized fuel abroad to chase additional incentives Canada offers for biofuel usage. "The on-again off-again status of US tariffs and Canada's counter-tariff response do not alter the bare economics of biofuel production between jurisdictions when one has an exportable tax credit and the other does not," said Fred Ghatala, president of Advanced Biofuels Canada. The future of renewable diesel production in Canada, previously expected to grow significantly to the benefit of farmers, is in doubt. ExxonMobil's Canadian subsidiary is on track to open a 20,000 b/d renewable diesel plant this year, but other companies collectively representing more production capacity are wavering. Plans for an integrated canola crush and 15,000 b/d renewable diesel facility in Saskatchewan were paused last month. And it is unclear if Braya Renewable Fuels' 18,000 b/d biorefinery in Newfoundland is running now or if Tidewater Renewables' 3,000 b/d British Columbia plant will run after March. If demand from Canadian biorefineries remains limited, some traders expect that Trump's tariff threats could divert more canola oil previously bound for the US to Europe . But there is no perfect alternative to the US market, which accounted for 91pc of all Canadian canola oil exports in 2023 according to the US Department of Agriculture. "There is logistics capacity to sell canola oil, seed, or meal abroad. That's certainly an option," said Chris Vervaet, executive director of the Canadian Oilseed Processors Association. "The best option though is to continue to maintain and grow our trade relationship with our most important trade partner, which is the United States." By Cole Martin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Study calls for e-fuels bunker subsidies, GHG tax


30/01/25
30/01/25

Study calls for e-fuels bunker subsidies, GHG tax

New York, 30 January (Argus) — E-fuel subsidies and a greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions tax is needed for e-fuels to compete as a bunkering fuel before 2044, said a study by maritime consultancy University Maritime Advisory Services (Umas) and the UCL Energy Institute. The study found that adding a multiplier of the GHG intensity credit given to e-fuels could help to make e-fuel use financially competitive, but it would have to be set at high levels at the start. Using a multiplier of two, where one ship running on zero emissions e-fuel could generate credits to offset three other similar ships operating on conventional fossil fuels, was not able to make e-fuels more competitive before 2041. The multiplier would have to be set initially at 15 in 2030, falling to 10 by 2035, to enable the competitiveness of e-fuels, concludes the study. Additionally, levying a GHG tax or fee of $150-$300/t of CO2-equivalent would also make e-fuels more competitive. A tax of $30-$120/t CO2e is close to the aggregate level of subsidies, and would not create a sustained promotion of e-fuels. Under the current marine fuel standards, a combination of fossil fuels, including LNG, biofuels and carbon capture and storage systems would be most competitive up until 2036. After, blue ammonia dual fuel ships would be the lowest-cost solution until 2044. Ships that were more competitive from 2027-2035 would have at least 25pc higher operating cost from 2040 onwards. Thus, if ship owners order newbuild vessels to maximize short-term competitiveness, the sector is at a "major risk of technology lock-in" and will not be as cost-effective for reaching net zero by 2050. The study models a 2027-build, 14,000 twenty-foot equivalent unit container ship. The vessel sails between Asia and Latin America using different marine fuels such as bio-methanol, e-methanol, LNG, bio-LNG, e-LNG, bio-marine gasoil (MGO), e-MGO and very low-sulphur fuel oil. By Stefka Wechsler Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more