Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest Market News

Strong start to Australia's wheat export season in Asia

  • Spanish Market: Agriculture
  • 20/01/25

A race to meet southeast Asian demand is driving Australian wheat prices lower as traders, spurred by a China-shaped hole in buying, wrestle with South American supply for a stronger grip on one of the world's major wheat importing regions.

Australia is scheduled to load over 1.3mn t/month of wheat in December and January, with over 40pc heading to southeast Asia, according to Argus-aggregated data. This suggests a surge in activity after a relatively slow start to 2024-25 (October-September), with customs data — available to the end of November — showing combined exports in October and November at just 1.7mn t, down by a third on the year. This drop was partly down to a lack of shipments to China, which took just 12,000t of Australian wheat in October-November, compared with 450,000t a year earlier.

The pressure on Australian exporters is twofold. As well as a lack of Chinese demand, a larger Australian crop this year means higher exports forecast this season — at 25mn t for 2024-25, a notable jump from the 19.8mn t estimated over 2023-24, according to the US Department of Agriculture (USDA). This could also mean a greater amount of feed grade Australian Standard White (ASW) wheat in the country's exports, market participants said, bringing Australian wheat sellers into direct competition with US and South American corn.

Australian wheat began competing in southeast Asia again in mid-December as sellers cut prices to compete with South American supply. The rise in activity was somewhat helped by sliding freight rates and a lower Australian dollar-US dollar exchange rate, which encouraged farmer selling, allowing traders to break out of a situation in late November where heavy cif commitments for December loading had yet to be covered on the domestic market.

In the past two weeks, importers in southeast Asia have finalised the bulk of their purchases to cover February-March with a mix of ASW wheat (basis 11pc moisture and 9pc minimum protein content), and competing 11.5pc protein wheat from South America.

Opportunities for feed wheat sales

Demand for Australian export feed wheat — ASW with no minimum protein content — is likely to depend largely on prices for corn, particularly new-crop corn from Argentina and Brazil.

Sellers of ASW without minimum protein content have attracted a steady stream of demand in southeast Asia, with prices comfortably below feed wheat available from South America. This is particularly helped by a seasonal drop in freight rates, with those between Australia and Thailand down to under $15/t, according to market participants.

Australia sold three Panamax-sized cargoes of feed wheat to Thailand last week, for shipment in May-July. Prices were just below $260/t cfr, traders said.

For now, South American corn is struggling to compete. Argentina's spot corn price even rose above the corresponding 11.5pc milling wheat contract on a fob upriver basis last week (see chart).

But South American corn could pose more competition in the medium term. Argentinian corn is at risk of drought, with some potential relief as forecasts show rain over the next seven days. Brazilian corn is also at risk, from wet weather causing delays to the soybean harvesting and in turn to safrinha corn planting, possibly even resulting in lower acreages. Prices currently reflect the very real risk of unfavourable weather weighing on the outlook for Argentina and Brazil's upcoming crops. But if weather conditions improve to allow the season to continue without a significant change in production outlook, prices could succumb to even greater pressure at harvest time.

In either scenario, US corn prices remain a key driver in the short term as private exporters continue to sell at pace.

Argentina's spot grain prices, fob upriver $/t

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

CME Black Sea Wheat Argus futures trade for September


18/06/25
18/06/25

CME Black Sea Wheat Argus futures trade for September

Paris, 18 June (Argus) — Black Sea CVB Wheat (Argus) futures have traded on the CBOT exchange for the first time since they were launched by CME on 2 June . Two counterparties agreed on 18 June to trade 200 lots (10,000t) on the September 2025 futures contract at $231/t. Another 200 lots traded on the same futures contract at $233/t later in the day. The contract's financial settlement price will be equal to the arithmetic average of the 12.5pc Romania-Bulgaria fob CVB price published in the Argus AgriMarkets report from 1-15 September. The trades are the first of their kind since CBOT suspended trading and clearing of all Black Sea futures and options in August 2023. The launch of the new futures allows market participants to hedge or gain exposure to the world's largest wheat export market. Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US biofuel feed prices jump on blending plan


16/06/25
16/06/25

US biofuel feed prices jump on blending plan

Houston, 16 June (Argus) — Prices for US biofuel feedstocks have risen sharply since the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) late last week proposed ambitious biofuel blending targets for the next two years along with lower incentives for using foreign feedstocks. Futures prices for soybean oil, the most widely used input for biodiesel production, have led the feedstock gains as the market prices in potentially higher demand. The Nymex front-month contract for soybean oil rose by 6.3pc on 13 June and by an additional 7.8pc on Monday to 54.6¢/lb, the highest since October 2023. The proposed targets , released on 13 June, would mandate that an equivalent amount of 5.61bn USG of biomass-based diesel be blended in 2026 and 5.86bn USG in 2027. The proposed volumes exceeded most market expectations and industry requests of 5.25bn USG and were significantly higher than the current-year mandate of 3.35bn USG, fueling expectations for increased biofuel feedstocks demand. In addition, domestic feedstocks may face reduced competition from foreign feedstocks under the proposal, which would cut federal Renewable Identification Number (RIN) credit generation by 50pc for imported biofuels or fuels produced from foreign feedstocks. Biomass-based diesel D4 RINs for the current year rallied Monday morning, trading between 127-132¢/RIN, up significantly from Friday's close of 109¢/RIN. Used cooking oil (UCO) railcar volumes to the US Gulf coast were reported trading at 59¢/lb early Monday morning, a 3.5pc jump from Friday's closing price of 57¢/lb, with additional selling interest emerging in the 60s¢/lb. UCO offers for volumes into California were noted in the high 60s¢/lb, up from last week's close in the high 50s¢/lb. Distillers corn oil (DCO) fob truck volumes in the Midwest traded at 61¢/lb on Monday morning, reflecting a 9pc jump from Friday's close of 56¢/lb. Poultry fat fob truck volumes in the southeast were offered in the low 50s¢/lb, up from last week's closing levels in the low 40s¢/lb, but buying interest has not emerged at those levels. Activity for other renewable feedstocks remains limited for now, but market participants anticipate increased trading later this week, driven by the recent proposal and gains in futures markets. The EPA proposal is currently in an open comment period, with a public hearing scheduled for 8 July. By Payne Williams and Jamuna Gautam Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

EPA proposes record US biofuel mandates: Update


13/06/25
13/06/25

EPA proposes record US biofuel mandates: Update

Updates with new pricing, reactions throughout. New York, 13 June (Argus) — President Donald Trump's administration today proposed requiring record biofuel blending into the US fuel supply over the next two years, including unexpectedly strong quotas for biomass-based diesel. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposal, which still must be finalized, projects oil refiners will need to blend 5.61bn USG of biomass-based diesel to comply with requirements in 2026 and 5.86bn USG in 2027. Those estimates — while uncertain — would be a 67pc increase in 2026 and a 75pc increase in 2027 from this year's 3.35bn USG requirement, above what most industry groups had sought. The proposal alone is likely to boost biofuel production, which has been down to start the year as biorefineries have struggled to grapple with uncertainty about future blend mandates, the halting rollout of a new clean fuel tax credit, and higher import tariffs. The National Oilseed Processors Association said hiking the biomass-based diesel mandate to the proposed levels would bring "idled capacity back online" and spur "additional investments" in the biofuel supply chain. The EPA proposal also would halve Renewable Identification Number (RIN) credits generated from foreign biofuels and biofuels produced from foreign feedstocks, a major change that could increase US crop demand and hurt renewable diesel plants that source many of their inputs from abroad. US farm groups have lamented refiners' rising use of Chinese used cooking oil and Brazilian tallow to make renewable diesel, and EPA's proposal if finalized would sharply reduce the incentive to do so. Biofuel imports from producers with major refineries abroad, notably including Neste, would also be far less attractive. The proposal asks for comment, however, on a less restrictive policy that would only treat fuels and feedstocks from "a subset of countries" differently. And EPA still expects a substantial role for imported product regardless, estimating in a regulatory impact analysis that domestic fuels from domestic feedstocks will make up about 62pc of biomass-based diesel supply next year. The Renewable Fuel Standard program requires US oil refiners and importers to blend biofuels into the conventional fuel supply or buy credits from those who do. One USG of corn ethanol generates one RIN, but more energy-dense fuels like renewable diesel can earn more. In total, the rule would require 24.02bn RINs to be retired next year and 24.46bn RINs in 2027. That includes a specific 7.12bn RIN mandate for biomass-based diesel in 2026 and 7.5bn in 2027, and an implied mandate for corn ethanol flat from prior years at 15bn RINs. EPA currently sets biomass-based diesel mandates in physical gallons but is proposing a change to align with how targets for other program categories work. US soybean oil futures surged following the release of the EPA proposal, closing at their highest price in more than four weeks, and RIN credits rallied similarly on bullish expectations for higher biofuel demand and domestic feedstock prices. D4 biomass-diesel credits traded as high as 117.75¢/RIN, up from a 102.5¢/RIN settle on Thursday, while D6 conventional credits traded as high as 110¢/RIN. Bids for both retreated later in the session while prices still closed the day higher. Proposed targets are less aspirational for the cellulosic biofuel category, where biogas generates most credits. EPA proposes lowering the 2025 mandate to 1.19bn RINs, down from from 1.38bn RINs previously required, with 2026 and 2027 targets proposed at 1.30bn RINs and 1.36bn RINs, respectively. In a separate final rule today, EPA cut the 2024 cellulosic mandate to 1.01bn RINs from 1.09bn previously required, a smaller cut than initially proposed, and made available special "waiver" credits refiners can purchase at a fixed price to comply. Small refinery exemptions The proposal includes little clarity on EPA's future policy around program exemptions, which small refiners can request if they claim blend mandates will cause them disproportionate economic hardship. EPA predicted Friday that exemptions for the 2026 and 2027 compliance years could total anywhere from zero to 18bn USG of gasoline and diesel and provided no clues as to how it will weigh whether individual refiners, if any, deserve program waivers. The rule does suggest EPA plans to continue a policy from past administrations of estimating future exempted volumes when calculating the percentage of biofuels individual refiners must blend in the future, which would effectively require those with obligations to shoulder more of the burden to meet high-level 2026 and 2027 targets. Notably though, the proposal says little about how EPA is weighing a backlog of more than a hundred requests for exemptions stretching from 2016 to 2025. An industry official briefed on Friday ahead of the rule's release said Trump administration officials were "coy" about their plans for the backlog. Many of these refiners had already submitted RINs to comply with old mandates and could push for some type of compensation if granted retroactive waivers, making this part of the program especially hard to implement. And EPA would invite even more legal scrutiny if it agreed to biofuel groups' lobbying to "reallocate" newly exempted volumes from many years prior into future standards. EPA said it plans to "communicate our policy regarding [exemption] petitions going forward before finalization of this rule". Industry groups expect the agency will try to conclude the rule-making before November. The proposed mandates for 2026-2027 will have to go through the typical public comment process and could be changed as regulators weigh new data on biofuel production and food and fuel prices. Once the program updates are finalized, lawsuits are inevitable. A federal court is still weighing the legality of past mandates, and the Supreme Court is set to rule this month on the proper court venue for litigating small refinery exemption disputes. Environmentalists are likely to probe the agency's ultimate assessment of costs and benefits, including the climate costs of encouraging crop-based fuels. Oil companies could also have a range of complaints, from the record-high mandates to the creative limits on foreign feedstocks. American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers senior vice president Geoff Moody noted that EPA was months behind a statutory deadline for setting 2026 mandates and said it would "strongly oppose any reallocation of small refinery exemptions" if finalized. By Cole Martin and Matthew Cope Proposed 2026-2027 renewable volume obligations bn RINs Fuel type 2026 2027 Cellulosic biofuel 1.30 1.36 Biomass-based diesel 7.12 7.50 Advanced biofuel 9.02 9.46 Total renewable fuel 24.02 24.46 Implied ethanol mandate 15 15 — EPA Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

EPA proposes record US biofuel mandates, foreign limits


13/06/25
13/06/25

EPA proposes record US biofuel mandates, foreign limits

New York, 13 June (Argus) — President Donald Trump's administration today proposed requiring record biofuel blending into the US fuel supply over the next two years, including unexpectedly strong quotas for biomass-based diesel. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposal, which still must be finalized, projects that oil refiners will need to blend 5.61bn USG of biomass-based diesel to comply with requirements in 2026 and 5.86bn USG in 2027. That's a 67pc increase in 2026 and a 75pc increase in 2027 from this year's 3.35bn USG requirement, above what most industry groups had sought. The proposal alone is likely to boost biofuel production, which has been down to start the year as biorefineries have struggled to grapple with uncertainty about future blend mandates, the halting rollout of a new clean fuel tax credit, and higher import tariffs. The EPA proposal also would halve Renewable Identification Number (RIN) credits generated for foreign biofuels and biofuels produced from foreign feedstocks, a major change that could increase US crop demand and hurt renewable diesel plants that source many of their inputs from abroad. US farm groups have lamented refiners' rising use of Chinese used cooking oil and Brazilian tallow to make renewable diesel, and EPA's proposal if finalized would sharply reduce the incentive to do so. The Renewable Fuel Standard program requires US oil refiners and importers to blend biofuels into the conventional fuel supply or buy credits from those who do. One USG of corn ethanol generates one RIN, but more energy-dense fuels like renewable diesel can earn more. In total, the rule would require 24.02bn RINs to be retired next year and 24.46bn RINs in 2027. That includes a specific 7.12bn RIN mandate for biomass-based diesel in 2026 and 7.5bn in 2027, and an implied mandate for corn ethanol of 15bn RINs, similar to prior years. EPA currently sets biomass-based diesel mandates in physical gallons but is proposing a change to align with how targets for other program categories work. US soybean oil futures surged following the release of the EPA proposal, and RIN credits rallied similarly. Current year D6 credits, typically generated from conventional ethanol production, traded at 92¢/RIN near the opening of the session before peaking at 110¢/RIN and then retreating slightly. Current year biomass-based diesel D4 RINs followed a similar trajectory, trading up to 116¢/RIN and widening the gap with conventional D6 RINs. Proposed targets are less aspirational for the cellulosic biofuel category, where biogas generates most credits. EPA proposes lowering the 2025 mandate to 1.19bn RINs, down from from 1.38bn RINs previously required, with 2026 and 2027 targets proposed at 1.30bn RINs and 1.36bn RINs, respectively. In a separate final rule today, EPA cut the 2024 cellulosic mandate to 1.01bn RINs from 1.09bn previously required, a smaller cut than initially proposed, and made available special "waiver" credits refiners can purchase at a fixed price to comply. Small refinery exemptions The proposal includes little clarity on EPA's future policy around program exemptions, which small refiners can request if they claim blend mandates will cause them disproportionate economic hardship. EPA predicted Friday that exemptions for the 2026 and 2027 compliance years could total anywhere from zero to 18bn USG of gasoline and diesel. EPA plans to continue a policy from past administrations of estimating future exempted volumes when calculating the percentage of biofuels individual refiners must blend, effectively requiring those with obligations to shoulder more of the burden to meet high-level volume targets. EPA in the proposal said it plans to "communicate our policy regarding [exemption] petitions going forward before finalization of this rule". Industry groups expect the agency will try to conclude the rule-making before November. Notably though, the proposal says little about how EPA is weighing a backlog of more than a hundred requests for exemptions stretching back to 2016. Many of these refiners had already submitted RINs to comply and could push for some type of compensation if granted retroactive waivers, making this part of the program especially hard to implement. An industry official briefed on Thursday ahead of the rule's release said Trump administration officials were "coy" about their plans for the backlog. The proposed mandates for 2026-2027 will have to go through the typical public comment process and could be changed as regulators weigh new data on biofuel production and food and fuel prices. Once the program updates are finalized, lawsuits are inevitable. A federal court is still weighing the legality of past mandates, and the Supreme Court is set to rule this month on the proper court venue for litigating small refinery exemption disputes. By Cole Martin and Matthew Cope Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more