Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest Market News

EPA seeks end to power plant CO2, mercury rules

  • Spanish Market: Coal, Electricity, Emissions, Natural gas
  • 11/06/25

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on Wednesday proposed the repeal of CO2 and mercury emissions standards for power plants, its latest steps in an effort to undo many of the regulations enacted by President Donald Trump's predecessors

The agency said the repeals will help bring about an end to the "war on much of our domestic energy supply" waged by previous administrations, while saving consumers money

"We have chosen to both protect the environment and grow the economy," EPA administrator Lee Zeldin said. "There was this false binary choice made before we got here."

Together, the repeals would save more than $1bn/yr for American families, Zeldin said.

The standards, finalized last year by EPA during the administration of former president Joe Biden, cover CO2 emissions from existing and new coal-fired power plants and new natural gas-fired units, as well as mercury emissions from coal- and oil-fired power plants.

At the time, EPA said the CO2 rules will lead to a 90pc reduction in emissions from coal-fired power plants, while it tightened the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) for coal- and oil-fired units by 67pc and included new emissions-monitoring requirements. In addition, the MATS for lignite-fired units were tightened by 70pc to put them in line with the standards for other coal plants.

The CO2 rule includes standards for new coal and gas units and guidance for existing coal-fired power plants, the latter of which vary by unit type, size and other factors such as whether a power plant provides baseload or backup power. It does not include standards for existing gas-fired generators, which EPA had proposed in 2023 but last year decided to scrap in favor of a "new, comprehensive approach".

While the CO2 regulation would be fully repealed, Zeldin said the agency is proposing to only undo last year's "gratuitous" changes to MATS, such as the new lignite standards.

"If finalized no power plant will be allowed to emit more than they do now or as much as they did one or two years ago," he said.

In addition to repealing the two Biden regulations, EPA is proposing to undo the Clean Power Plan, developed by the agency during the administration of former president Barack Obama. It would do this in part by reversing a previous agency determination that it could regulate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from power plants, and by also finding that those emissions "do not contribute significantly to dangerous air pollution."

The Clean Power Plan has never been enforced, and the US Supreme Court in 2022 ruled the agency lacked the authority to regulate CO2 emissions from power plants in the way envisioned by that approach.

Unlike during Trump's first term, when EPA first sought to repeal the Clean Power Plan, the agency this time around is not proposing any replacement. The previous replacement rule was struck down by the US District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals in 2021.

The lack of a new rule could make EPA more vulnerable to legal challenges, which are all but certain to be filed by environmental groups and some states.

"This administration is transparently trading American lives for campaign dollars and the support of fossil fuel companies, and Americans ought to be disgusted and outraged that their government has launched an assault on our health and our future," Sierra Club climate policy director Patrick Drupp said.

Zeldin said he was not concerned about any potential litigation.

"I would say with great enthusiasm and excitement for the future, I know we are absolutely going down the right path," he said.

Coal and electric sector groups cheered EPA's proposal.

"Today's announcement nullifies two of EPA's most consequential air rules, removing deliberately unattainable standards and leveling the playing field for reliable power sources, instead of stacking the deck against them," National Mining Association president Rich Nolan said.

EPA in March included the CO2 and mercury rules among 31 Obama and Biden-era regulations and actions it planned to review and potentially repeal. Since then, the White House has identified more than 60 fossil fuel-fired power plants that will have two extra years to comply with the more-stringent MATS, giving them a reprieve while EPA works to formally repeal the regulations.

The March announcement also included a reconsideration of the 2009 endangerment finding for GHG emissions, which underpins all of the major climate regulations EPA issued in recent years.

"I don't have anything to announce today as it relates to any proposed rulemaking that may be to come on that topic," Zeldin said.

EPA will open a 45-day public comment period on each proposed repeal once they are published in the Federal Register.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

11/07/25

Trump threatens 35pc tariff on Canada by 1 August

Trump threatens 35pc tariff on Canada by 1 August

Houston, 10 July (Argus) — The US will impose a 35pc tariff on all imports from Canada effective on 1 August, President Donald Trump said in a letter to Canadian prime minister Mark Carney. The 10 July letter that Trump posted on social media late Thursday noted that Canada previously planned retaliatory tariffs in response to the US' first tariff threats in the spring. He repeated his earliest justification for the tariffs - the illegal smuggling of fentanyl into the US from Canada - and said he would consider "an adjustment" to the tariffs if Canada worked with him to stop that flow. The 35pc tariff would be separate from tariffs set for specific sectors, which include a 50pc tariff on copper imports . It is not clear if any imports currently covered by the US-Mexico- Canada trade agreement (USMCA) would be affected by the new tariff threats. The Trump administration since 5 April has been charging a 10pc extra "Liberation Day" tariff on most imports — energy commodities and critical minerals are exceptions — from nearly every foreign trade partner. Trump on 9 April imposed even higher tariffs on key trading partners, only to delay them the same day until 9 July. On 7 July, Trump signed an executive order further delaying the implementation of higher rates until 12:01am ET (04:01 GMT) on 1 August. Earlier this week he threatened 50pc tariffs against Brazil for its ongoing criminal prosecution of former president Jair Bolsonaro. Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US biofuel support clears way for new crush capacity


10/07/25
10/07/25

US biofuel support clears way for new crush capacity

New York, 10 July (Argus) — North American oilseed crushers told Argus that projects to increase processing capacity are on track for the next year, potentially enabling more renewable fuel production. After a difficult start to the year for biofuel producers, US policymakers are increasingly making clear that they want refiners to up their output in future years and rely more on domestic feedstocks like soybean oil. That could pave the way for more oilseed crush capacity to come online, after some facilities delayed or cancelled plans over the last year on stagnant demand. Companies confirmed to Argus that more than 620,000 bu/d of new soybean and canola crush capacity were on track to come online in North America in the next year, and other facilities that did not respond to requests for comment have plans in the coming years too. Greater vegetable oil supply also could at least partly address concerns from oil and biofuel refiners that Republicans' protectionist approach to biofuels threatens feedstock shortages and price spikes. A multi-seed crush facility under construction in Mitchell, South Dakota — which will be able to process up to 96,000 bu/d of soybeans — is scheduled to start up this October, South Dakota Soybean Processors chief executive Tom Kersting told Argus. US crush company Ag Processing similarly said that a new 137,000 bu/d soybean crush plant in David City, Nebraska, will open "later this year". In Canada, Cargill confirmed that a 121,000 bu/d canola processing plant in Regina, Saskatchewan is also on track to open this year. In the first half of next year, French agribusiness Louis Dreyfus said it plans to complete two major projects in North America. The company plans to open a 151,000 bu/d soybean crush plant in Upper Sandusky, Ohio, and to double capacity to more than 240,000 bu/d at a canola crush facility in Yorkton, Saskatchewan. US soybean oil futures have climbed by 12pc in the past month on recent policy shifts, providing more incentive for processors — already crushing more soybeans than ever before — to expand production. The US recently proposed record-high biofuel blend mandates for the next two years, projecting that domestic soybean oil production could increase by 250mn USG/yr. And President Donald Trump over the weekend signed legislation that retools a crucial US tax credit to increase subsidies for crop-based fuels. Canadian canola processors, which depend on US incentives because Canada's biofuel sector is far smaller, benefit less from some of these policy shifts. While US fuels made from Canadian feedstocks can still claim the tax incentive next year, the Trump administration has proposed halving credits generated under the biofuel blend mandate for fuels made from foreign feedstocks. That makes US soybean oil a far more attractive input for US refiners than Canadian canola oil. A Canadian farm cooperative earlier this year paused plans for a combined canola crush and renewable diesel plant in Regina, Saskatchewan, citing "regulatory and political uncertainty". And Bunge was vague about its plans for building the world's largest canola crush plant in the same city, which was initially envisioned to start up last year. The US-based agribusiness, which recently took over the project with its acquisition of Viterra, told Argus it was "focused on integration to ensure a smooth transition for our customers" and "may be able to provide an update in the near future". Even then, canola oil stands to benefit from increased demand from food companies if more US soybean oil is diverted to fuel markets. And despite recent struggles for other Canadian biorefineries, ExxonMobil subsidiary Imperial Oil has plans to soon open a 20,000 b/d renewable diesel plant in Alberta that will draw on canola oil. Canadian policymakers have taken steps to assuage local feedstock suppliers and refiners, including a domestic renewable fuel mandate in British Columbia and a proposed mandate in Ontario. Biofuel production and oilseed crush margins also will depend on interactions with other policies, including a temporary tax break through 2026 in the US for small biodiesel producers — historically more reliant on vegetable oils than more versatile renewable diesel plants — as well as low-carbon fuel standards in the US west coast region and Canada. The perennial risk for any company is that policy, especially around biofuels, often swings unexpectedly. By Cole Martin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

EU ministers discuss 2035, 2040 climate target setting


10/07/25
10/07/25

EU ministers discuss 2035, 2040 climate target setting

Brussels, 10 July (Argus) — The EU needs to set its 2040 climate target and derive its 2035 nationally determined contribution (NDC) — climate plan — to the Paris climate agreement from it, European climate commissioner Wopke Hoekstra reiterated today. But France and Hungary's environment ministers have suggested focusing on the EU's 2035 climate target first. European climate commissioner Wopke Hoekstra has repeated the need to first have a "conversation" on setting the bloc's 2040 climate target and only then deriving the EU's 2035 NDC. "That is the way we will approach it," Hoekstra said before an informal meeting of environment and climate ministers in Denmark. This comes after members of the European Parliament rejected the idea of a fast-track procedure for the 2040 target on 9 July . France's environment minister, Agnes Pannier-Runacher, said that the first topic to discuss was the EU's NDC, ahead of the UN Cop 30 climate talks in Belem, Brazil, in November. There is "the question as well of our [2040] objective under the renegotiation of the climate law", she said. Asked about a two-step approach for the setting of the 2040 target and the 2035 goal, Pannier-Runacher said she was "open to all discussions as long as the agenda on competitivity is clear" and goes beyond words. This comes after French president Emmanuel Macron said at the end of last month that setting an EU target for 2040 is not a must for the Belem climate talks. Pannier-Runnacher said that the 2035 target was between 66.5pc, if derived from current efforts to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and 71.5pc, if taking into account the European Commission's proposal to cut GHG emissions by 90pc by 2040 from 1990 levels, accounting for "flexibilities". The commission's proposal includes several flexibilities for the 2040 target, including allowing a "limited" contribution of international carbon credits issued under Article 6 of the Paris agreement to count towards the goal from 2036, and the use of domestic permanent carbon removals in the EU emissions trading system. Hungary's environment state secretary Aniko Raisz said discussions on the NDC and the 2040 climate goal should be separated, because the latter "cannot be rushed" and "the issue won't be finished by the end of September as it needs a "thorough impact assessment". NDCs need to be submitted to the UN by September to be counted in a synthesis report set to ground climate discussions in Belem. Drawing a line between the EU's 2030 and 2050 targets, the 2035 goal for emissions reductions could be over 66pc, Raisz said, adding that NDCs were non-binding commitments. German climate action minister Carsten Schneider did not seem phased by a short timeline to reach an agreement on a 2040 goal and an NDC, which is Berlin's preference. "If the time is long, decisions are postponed," he said. "If Europe is not able to manage that nobody will," he said, citing China, Brazil, India and the US. "We think there's a logic in setting the 2040 target and out of that extracting the 2035 target," Danish climate minister Lars Aagaard Moller said. "That is still the basis for the discussion." Moller chairs meetings of EU climate ministers until the end of December. By Dafydd ab Iago and Caroline Varin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Q&A: Titan on the future of LNG and bio-LNG bunkering


10/07/25
10/07/25

Q&A: Titan on the future of LNG and bio-LNG bunkering

London, 10 July (Argus) — Titan is a leading supplier of LNG and bio-LNG as a bunker fuel, mostly supplying volumes in northwest Europe. Argus spoke to Titan's commercial director, Michael Schaap, about the future of LNG and bio-LNG bunkering. How has the demand for LNG as a marine fuel evolved over the past year, and what factors are driving this growth besides FuelEU Maritime? Demand for LNG as a marine fuel has grown significantly over the past year, driven not only by regulatory developments like FuelEU Maritime but also by the growth of the LNG dual-fuel fleet. According to DNV's Alternative Fuels Insights platform, 642 LNG-powered vessels are currently in operation, excluding LNG carriers. Of these, 169 were delivered in 2024, setting a record. The growth in demand is expected to continue — 264 new orders for LNG-fuelled vessels were placed in 2024, also a record and more than double the number of orders placed in 2023. Essentially, the total addressable market for LNG pathway fuels in 2028 will be enormous. The LNG pathway uses LNG (and its established infrastructure), bio-LNG and e-methane (derived from renewable hydrogen). All of these fuels can be blended at any ratio and ‘dropped into' infrastructure and vessels with little to no modification required. It is increasingly recognised as a practical route to take the shipping industry to net zero greenhouse gas emissions. What are the current challenges in scaling LNG bunkering infrastructure to meet the needs of the growing fleet of LNG dual-fuel vessels? A key challenge is ensuring timely investment in bunkering infrastructure to keep pace with the growing number of LNG-fuelled vessels. Take LNG bunkering vessels, for example. According to the DNV, about 64 LNG bunkering vessels are in operation worldwide today, with a further 16 on order. While this far exceeds other alternative fuels, continued investment and expansion will be important. To maintain safe, timely and efficient LNG deliveries that meet demand, it is also important to maintain a suitable number of LNG loading slots. The increased demand for LNG and bio-LNG could alter the dynamics between buyers and sellers in the market. The spot market may become more challenging and expensive for shipowners and operators going forwards. As a result, those that can plan should book capacity well in advance and sign long-term offtake agreements. A good balance of pre-booked business also allows suppliers to reinvest in infrastructure such as bunkering vessels, shifting the market back towards the buyers. Where is Titan looking to expand — beyond northwest Europe? Titan supplies and bunkers LNG and increasingly bio-LNG around the world, partnering with local companies to support if needed. Titan's base, the Zara (Zeebrugge, Amsterdam, Rotterdam, Antwerp) region, is a key hub for LNG, bio-LNG and in the future, e-methane bunkering, and this is not expected to change. Having said this, the Mediterranean is recognised as a key strategic market for expansion. The Mediterranean became an Emission Control Area (ECA) on 1 May, so we expect this to escalate the need for LNG and bio-LNG in the region. Compared with heavy fuel oil, LNG pathway fuels can reduce nitrogen oxide emissions by up to 80pc and almost eliminate sulphur oxide and particulate matter emissions, offering ECA compliance. How is Titan positioning itself to meet the expected boom in bio-LNG demand growth over the coming years and decades? Titan is leading the way in supplying bio-LNG. We have been bunkering nearly all of [Norwegian shipping line] UECC's LNG-powered car carriers with bio-LNG since mid-2024, offering over-compliance with FuelEU Maritime, which presents financial rewards through pooling or banking. The partnership has now been extended through 2025. In 2024, we completed the world's largest ship-to-ship bio-LNG bunkering. We bunkered 2,200t of mass balanced bio-LNG to a Hapag-Lloyd containership in Rotterdam. The bio-LNG was ISSC-certified and recognised under the EU's Renewable Energy Directive known as Red II, marking a major milestone in the clean marine fuels transition. Going forwards, we hope to continue pioneering bio-LNG bunkering across more ports, and we feel it is important for us to further scale our bio-LNG offering as customers increasingly look to focus on regulatory compliance. We will also continue to closely monitor demand and supply signals for other clean marine fuels and will implement them into our portfolio as necessary. What do you see as the main challenges to bio-LNG growth, both in Europe and globally? High production costs remain a challenge for bio-LNG, but processes such as mass balancing are helping to lower supply-side costs. Mass balancing is a system in which biomethane is injected into the gas network and transported to liquefaction plants and LNG terminals using the existing infrastructure. It is expected to feature on many alternative fuel pathways and is a practical way of delivering clean molecules. The best analogy is when domestic energy companies provide consumers with renewable energy in a very similar way. Co-ordinated and consistent public-sector support for biomethane production will also support continued growth in the sector. The EU REPowerEU plan has ambitious biomethane usage targets of 35bn m³ by 2030. In 2023, the EU produced 22bn m³ of biogas, with biomethane being a key component. There is still plenty of work to do. Public-sector support is not only in the interest of end-users, but also of governments. This is because bio-LNG provides energy security, reducing dependency on any other nation's gas supplies. Bio-LNG can be produced locally, anywhere where waste feedstocks are available. At a time of geopolitical instability, the independence and resilience that lots of smaller suppliers can offer is a powerful incentive to invest. Gas prices have been very volatile since the start of this decade. Do you see this as a limiting factor to LNG and bio-LNG bunkering growth? While price fluctuations are a consideration, they do not fundamentally limit growth. LNG and bio-LNG remain cost-competitive compared with other alternative fuels. As LNG and bio-LNG are produced differently, factors that affect the price of one will not necessarily affect the other. To mitigate against market volatility, building in optionality is key. Shipowners and operators have this through their dual-fuel engines, switching to fuel oil if needed. Our bunkering assets are similarly flexible. Using our specialist skill set, we are also open to delivering any fuel that can substantially decarbonise shipping, which will further diversify our operations and build resilience. By Martin Senior and Natalia Coelho Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Workers strike at Australian coal mine: Correction


10/07/25
10/07/25

Workers strike at Australian coal mine: Correction

Corrects mine lock-out start date in paragraph 3 Sydney, 10 July (Argus) — Mining and Energy Union (MEU) workers at US producer Peabody Energy's Metropolitan mine in New South Wales are striking over an ongoing pay dispute, halting production until 5pm AEST (7am GMT) on 10 July. MEU launched a five-hour stoppage at 5pm on 9 July, before extending it to 12 hours. The unionised workers launched another 12-hour strike early on 10 July, the union told Argus on the same day. Peabody locked miners out of the mixed thermal, hard coking, and pulverised coal injection (PCI) mine from 18 June until 5:30pm on 9 July, without pay, over an increasingly acrimonious employment negotiation. MEU and Peabody negotiators are at odds over the use of contractors at Metropolitan, among other issues. They met for Fair Work Commission-led mediation during the lock-out on 8 July. Metropolitan Coal remains fully committed to ongoing good faith negotiations with the union, a Peabody spokesperson told Argus on 10 July. The MEU's latest strike comes a day after unionised workers at global producer Glencore's 20mn t/yr Ulan thermal coal mine launched a day-long strike, targeting some underground operations at the complex. The Ulan strike is set to end on 10 July. By Avinash Govind Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more