27/05/26
Q&A: Australia's Santos plans growth in PNG, Alaska
Sydney, 27 May (Argus) — Argus spoke to Kevin Gallagher, chief executive of
Australia's second-largest listed oil and gas producer Santos, about the
company's outlook for its most prospective assets located in Australia, Papua
New Guinea and the US state of Alaska. Edited highlights follow: The Barossa
project, which is backfilling Darwin LNG and came on line in February, has faced
some issues. Are you confident these have been resolved? There's been a few
bumps along the road, some fouling on our heat exchangers . We now know what
caused it, we've cleaned the heating exchangers back up to factory spec, and
importantly, we know how to prevent it, and we're now currently producing around
70-75pc of full planned rates for this year and we look forward to getting 100pc
of production rates over the next month or so. I detect a bit of urgency
regarding a potential phase two of the Pikka oil project. Can you explain your
thinking regarding how that Alaska North Slope (ANS) basin is going to develop
for Santos? I think that urgency that you detected is just my natural nervous
energy that you've picked up on. But we're very excited by it, Pikka's about to
come on line and ramp up to full production. It's a tier one basin, and Pikka is
most likely a billion-barrel field. We have a 51pc equity in it and if you look
at Quokka [field] that's a potential to be the same, and Horseshoe [field]
potentially the same again. We will look to get Pikka established , we're not
going to rush forward but I'd say the expansion of Pikka, from 80,000 b/d to
120,000 b/d, is a very strong competitor to be one of the next projects. In
terms of the cash flow that asset produces, how critical is that going to be for
these new phases? Our business is built on maximising free cash flow from our
assets, and we do that by controlling the costs as best we can, fighting against
those inflationary pressures. One of the great things about Pikka is that that
ANS crude is commanding very strong premiums to Brent, it peaked in March of
this year with a $20/bl premium to Brent. Back in Australia, the 7.8mn t/yr
Gladstone LNG (GLNG) will be under the gas reservation policy , just how much
does that expedite the need for Beetaloo, in your thinking, as a prospect to
backfill GLNG? We'll appraise three wells thoroughly and properly, and it'll
come along at the right time for us. We'll produce it for 9-12 months into the
market, and that will give us a good feel for the economics, depletion curves et
cetera. From my perspective the Beetaloo has the potential to supply our LNG
assets and the east coast [domestic] market fully for the next 50-plus years.
Taking our time to get this right is important, because if we get it right, it's
a game changer for Santos and Australia, absolute game changer, and it will
ensure all this noise about the east coast market becomes a distant
conversation. You have discussed potential expansion of Darwin LNG to 10mn t/yr
capacity through additional trains. How critical are these three initial
Beetaloo wells to that decision? Very critical, we want to prove up the
resource. We want to prove the economics and the performance and the
deliverability of the reservoir then thirdly, that cost of supply. These initial
wells will be quite expensive because they're very standalone, they're very
remote, but we will get the indications from that as to what we can get those
well costs down to when we scale up for a full-scale development. On the $14bn
Papua LNG's final investment decision (FID), what exactly must happen between
the development forum, which is likely scheduled for late June or early July and
getting to that FID? It's really just the financing. There's a couple of
regulatory approvals that come following the development forum but nearly
everything's in place. The contracts are all there, my view is once the
development forum is out of the way, if everything goes to plan there, I expect
it will move very quickly thereafter. On achieving FID-ready status for the 10mn
t/yr Bayu-Undan CCS project this year, what are the key hurdles? It's really
more just about getting the regulatory framework in place for CCS, because they
don't exist today. East Timor's ministers are taking a very personal interest in
this project now. And then it comes down to government-to-government, getting
the arrangements in place to facilitate the transport of CO2 across borders. And
that's ultimately the more critical path. The US-Iran war, how has it confirmed
your thinking about the oil and gas business and how has it challenged that
thinking in the last couple of months? I think what it's done is highlighted
that the world runs on oil and gas, the energy mix globally is still around 83pc
fossil fuels. For all the trillions of dollars we're investing in renewables,
it's taking up a portion of the additive energy demand, not replacing the demand
for fossil fuels. Gas will grow considerably between now and 2050. Some of the
latest estimates I'm seeing are up to 60pc in the Asian region alone. Everything
we do is built on a foundation of fossil fuels. If that's the case,
decarbonisation needs to be a priority, as opposed to defossilisation. AI's
going to require a lot more energy in the future, and every country's committing
3pc of their GDP to defence budgets. Ships, tanks, aeroplanes, that's a lot of
steel, that's a lot of energy. So that's going to take more energy at demand,
add more to demand. I think it's a great opportunity for CCS to grow, because if
we're going to decarbonise, we need to get serious about supporting technologies
like CCS and not dreaming about technologies that are going to replace fossil
fuels. By Tom Major Send comments and request more information at
feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights
reserved.
