Iraq strives for output transparency after Opec dispute
Iraq's oil ministry is striving to make the assessment of its monthly production figures more transparent following a disagreement with other Opec countries over the use of secondary sources that Baghdad argues have been underestimating the country's output.
Iraq argued at the Opec meeting in Algiers last month that it should be exempted from a proposed Opec production restraint deal. Failing this, its delegation argued against having its output and, hence, the level from which it might have to freeze or reduce production, based on secondary source numbers. This contributed to extending the meeting in Algiers to a six-hour discussion. Iraqi oil minister Jabbar al-Luaibi argued that Iraq's oil output was seriously underestimated by the secondary sources. Subsequently, the country's oil ministry met with several of the secondary sources used by the Opec secretariat — including Argus — in Baghdad on 23 October to provide a breakdown of regional oil production for Iraq, excluding territory controlled by the semi-autonomous Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG).
Oil ministry officials and heads of provincial oil companies provided clarity on Iraq's production and domestic consumption. But uncertainty still remains over production from the federal governments unaudited fields — which could increase or decrease official figures — as well as output controlled by the KRG.
Director general of state-owned marketer Somo Falah al-Amri said international auditing companies check the monthly production, consumption and export figures for state-owned South Oil (SOC). But analysts suggest that there could be some discrepancy in production numbers from small fields controlled by the oil ministry that are not internationally audited. This could increase or decrease official figures. There are currently seven oil fields not producing as a result of security risks, deputy oil minister Fayadh al-Nema said. These include the Hamreen and Ajeel fields in northern Iraq, which previously produced 6,000 b/d and 28,000 b/d, respectively. And analysts said some small unaudited fields are sporadically producing, but that official data on this is limited.
The Iraqi oil ministry in Baghdad concedes that it does not have access to official production figures for fields controlled by the KRG in the Kurdistan and Kirkuk regions.
Production in Kirkuk is split between state-owned North Oil (NOC) and the KRG's ministry of natural resources.
Al-Amri said the absence of official data from the ministry of natural resources has forced the government to estimate the region's figures.
"They have refused to give us data and information officially from the ministry of natural resources," deputy oil minister Fayadh al-Nema said. The ministry in Baghdad uses exports from northern Iraq to the Turkish point of Ceyhan as its main reference for northern production as well as data from officials within the ministry of natural resources. But their estimation is also based on reports, meetings, newspapers and interviews, al-Nema said.
Some major fields such as Tawke and Taq Taq and Shaikan are operated by foreign oil companies that provide monthly or quarterly production data to their stock exchanges.
Iraq placed KRG production at 595,000 b/d in September. This excluded 31,000 b/d of crude exported from the Baba Dome, and the smaller fields Jambur and Khabbaz controlled by NOC in Kirkuk. Until the beginning of September, crude exported through the Iraq-Turkey pipeline was being unilaterally marketed by the KRG and exported from Ceyhan. But Iraq recently resumed oil flows from state-owned NOC fields in Kirkuk through the pipeline and the KRG has resumed transfer of crude to Somo tanks at Ceyhan.
The federal government's September figure for the KRG region also included 50,000 b/d of exports by truck to Turkey. Oil ministry officials said that they rarely receive intelligence on truck exports, but they have been given information on unknown quantities of crude being taken to a number of countries. The KRG's ministry of natural resources included truck exports in its 2015 annual oil production report but has not provided this figure on a monthly basis. In the past, Shaikan crude was trucked to the Turkish port of Dortyol for export.
The oil ministry in Baghdad is unable to provide an exact production breakdown for fields controlled by the KRG. It is also unclear if its September production figure for the KRG region excludes the Avanah Dome and Bai Hassan, which NOC director general Farid al-Jadir said were producing 275,000 b/d. Iraq's oil ministry includes the total for these two fields in its own production figures, despite the KRG takeover in 2014 to prevent the fields falling to Islamist group Isis. Officials at Kurdistan's ministry of natural resources told Argus that their production figures also include these two fields, leading to the question whether some of the production of these fields is being counted twice.
The KRG annual oil production report for 2015 does not include the Avanah Dome or Bai Hassan fields, but said Khurmala produced 285,000 b/d in 2015. Previous Argus estimates placed Khurmala output at around 100,000 b/d in 2015. In June 2014, the KRG built a new 200,000 b/d pipeline linking the Avanah Dome of Kirkuk and Bai Hassan to the 100,000 b/d Khurmala field, operated by local Kurdish group Kar on behalf of the KRG. KAR declined to comment.
Production and consumption figures in recent months have fluctuated because of security incidents and technical issues, enormously complicating attempts to provide reliable numbers.
The 180,000 b/d Bai Hassan field reduced output following an explosion on 10 August and attacks on 30-31 July that led to a fire at the field's storage sites. The field has now resumed full production, al-Jadir said. The oil ministry has regained control of the oil wells at the Qayara field from Isis, which set fire to the oil wells and fled ahead of the military advance. Iraqi security forces regained control of the region's oil refinery on 25 August. There was a major counter-attack on 21 October in the Kirkuk province by Isis in response to advances by Iraqi and Kurdish security forces towards Mosul. Isis attacked power stations in the Dibis District, but the stations were under construction. The attacks had no impact on oil production. Al-Amri also said that the Basrah refinery processed 187,000 b/d of crude in September, but that two months ago this was over 200,000 b/d.
Despite a lack of transparency from the KRG, the federal government would not consider excluding Kurdistan's production figures for the sake of Opec discussions over market share, oil officials said. And acquiring official information from the regional government requires rapprochement between the two sides. There are signs that tensions between Baghdad and Erbil are thawing, as the KRG has now resumed transferring a portion of oil exports to Somo. Previously, the crude was unilaterally marketed by the KRG and exported from Ceyhan after a failed agreement over the division of oil revenues. The president of the Kurdistan region Masoud Barzani also visited Baghdad last month for the first time since 2013. Al-Amri said the federal government is discussing including payments for KRG crude in its 2017 budget. And Iraq's oil ministry recently launched a new bidding round for 12 oil fields, which included invites for Crescent Petroleum and Gulfsands Petroleum. This suggests that the federal government has scrapped its policy of excluding companies that have signed upstream contracts with the KRG without federal government approval.
Iraq is looking to boost revenues from oil exports and push a figure of 4.7mn b/d as its base crude production ahead of discussions by Opec members to limit output. Consequently, it is in Baghdad's interest to ease tensions with the KRG, as Iraq's production fell at the start of the year because of an ongoing dispute between the two sides. The oil ministry in Baghdad halted around 150,000 b/d of exports from NOC fields through the Iraq-Turkey pipeline in March. And NOC reinjected over 80,000 b/d of crude back into the ground as a result of limited storage and trucking capacity.
Iraq's oil minister Jabbar al-Luaibi had been looking for an exemption from the mooted production limits at the start of Opec discussions in Algeria last month. Iraq deserved the exemption, al-Luaibi said, because over 10 years of war and economic crises have drained the country's revenues.
Opec secretary general Mohammad Barkindo and a delegation from the Opec secretariat met this week with Iraq's oil ministry and other senior officials. Barkindo also met with the leader of the National Alliance, the largest Iraqi parliamentary bloc, the head of Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq Ammar al-Hakim as well as other top government functionaries.
A statement from Opec after the meetings stressed the current military push on Mosul, a factor that might encourage other Opec members to exempt Iraq from the time-limited constraints they hope to adopt at the end of November.
Tomorrow, Opec members hold a technical committee meeting in Vienna to hammer out the parameters of the proposal to agree a production ceiling of 32.5mn-33mn b/d.
| September production from Kirkuk, Central, Southern Iraq | 000 b/d | |
| Region/company | Production | Number of fields |
| South Oil Company | 3,234 | 12 |
| Missan Region | 364 | 6 |
| Midland Fields | 196 | 4 |
| North Oil Company, Kirkuk | 434 | 5 |
| Total | 4,228 | 27 |
| Iraq Oil Ministry | ||
| North Oil Company, Kirkuk includes production from KRG's Bai Hassan and Avanah Dome fields | ||
| Iraq September consumption | 000 b/d | |
| Usage | Consumption | Capacity |
| Consumption in Kirkuk, Central, Southern Iraq | ||
| Daura Refinery | 115 | 210 |
| Basrah Refinery | 187 | 210 |
| Najaf Refinery | 27 | 30 |
| Kirkuk Refinery | 30 | 30 |
| Samawah Refinery | 27 | 30 |
| Diwaniya Refinery | 18 | 20 |
| Nasiriyah Refinery | 28 | na |
| Missan Refinery | 27 | na |
| Electricity | 194 | na |
| Refinery stocks | 24 | na |
| Consumption in KRG region | ||
| Electricity, refineries | 226 | na |
| Iraq Oil Ministry | ||
Related news posts
Iraq to keep 3.3mn b/d crude export cap until year end
Iraq to keep 3.3mn b/d crude export cap until year end
Dubai, 24 April (Argus) — Iraq will stick to its pledge to cap crude exports at 3.3mn b/d until the end of the year, regardless of what the Opec+ coalition decides at its June meeting, sources with knowledge of the matter told Argus. Baghdad announced the 3.3mn b/d export limit last month , representing a 100,000 b/d cut compared with the first-quarter average. April's exports will be in line with recent months, according to the sources, indicating that Iraq has yet to adhere to the cap. The self-imposed limit on exports is part of Iraq's commitment to compensate for exceeding its 4mn b/d Opec+ production target in the first three months of 2024. It produced 211,000 b/d above target in January, then overshot by 217,000 b/d and 194,000 b/d in February and March, respectively, according to an average of secondary sources including Argus . Prior to that, Iraq exceeded its then 4.22mn b/d output ceiling in each of the last six months of 2023. The persistent overproduction has drawn scrutiny within Opec+, prompting repeated reassurances from Baghdad in recent months that it is committed to its output pledges. Iraq blames it on its inability to oversee production in the semi-autonomous Kurdistan region in the north of the country. Most Iraqi Kurdish crude output is being directed to local refineries or sold on the black market following the closure of the export pipeline that links oil fields in northern Iraq to the Turkish port of Ceyhan just over a year ago. Iraq's federal oil ministry says its Kurdish counterpart has stopped providing production data. Baghdad recently sent the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) an official request to hand over oil produced in the region to federal marketer Somo in order to resume Kurdish exports through Turkey, the sources said. Baghdad also urged the KRG back in January to curb output to help Iraq adhere to its lower Opec+ production quota. Ever-widening gap The Association of the Petroleum Industry of Kurdistan (Apikur) said international oil companies (IOCs) operating in the region were hoping that a long-awaited visit to Baghdad by Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan on 22 April might help pave the way for a restart in exports. "We definitely believe the Iraqi government seems more serious about resolving the issues after prime minister [Mohammed Shia] al-Sudani's visit to the US," an IOC source told Argus. But differences between the KRG and Baghdad, mainly over contracts that the former signed with international oil companies (IOCs) in Kurdistan, continue to delay the restart. And tensions between the two sides show little sign of easing. In a statement on 22 April, the KRG's ministry of natural resources accused Baghdad of misleading statements by seeking to blame the KRG for the export shut-in, adding that there is no provision in Iraq's constitution that gives power to the federal government to approve contracts issued by the KRG. With the help of multiple federal court rulings, Baghdad has been attempting to downgrade the KRG's autonomy over its finances and energy sector. A court ruling in February 2022 overturned a law governing Kurdish oil and gas exports and upheld Baghdad's request that all KRG production-sharing contracts be placed under federal oil ministry oversight. The judgment rendered the KRG's 2007 oil and gas law unconstitutional, raising questions over the future of the KRG's active contracts. The KRG's natural resources ministry has dismissed the February 2022 court order, saying it was delivered by a "committee of political appointees in Baghdad". While the federal Iraqi oil ministry "publicly refers to that committee as the 'Federal Supreme Court', everyone knows that it is no such thing", the ministry said. By Bachar Halabi Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
EU adopts sustainability due diligence rules
EU adopts sustainability due diligence rules
Brussels, 24 April (Argus) — The European parliament has formally approved a Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), which will require large EU companies to make "best efforts" for climate change mitigation. The law will mean that relevant companies will have to adopt a transition plan to make their business model compatible with the 1.5°C temperature limit set by the Paris climate agreement. It will apply to EU firms with over 1,000 employees and turnover above €450mn ($481mn). It will also apply to some companies with franchising or licensing agreements in the EU. The directive requires transposition into different EU national laws. It obliges member states to ensure relevant firms adopt and put into effect a transition plan for climate change mitigation. Transition plans must aim to "ensure, through best efforts" that business models and company strategies are compatible with transition to a sustainable economy, limiting global warming to 1.5°C and achieving climate neutrality by 2050. Where "relevant", the plans should limit "exposure of the company to coal-, oil- and gas-related activities". Despite a provisional agreement, EU states initially failed to formally approve the provisional agreement reached with parliament in December, after some member states blocked the deal. Parliament's adoption — at its last session before breaking for EU elections — paves the way for entry into force later in the year. Industry has obtained clarification, in the non-legal introduction, that the directive's requirements are an "obligation of means and not of results" with "due account" being given to progress that firms make as well as the "complexity and evolving" nature of climate transitioning. Still, firms' climate transition plans need to contain "time-bound" targets for 2030 and in five-year intervals until 2050 based on "conclusive scientific" evidence and, where appropriate, absolute reduction targets for greenhouse gas (GHG) for direct scope 1 emissions as well as scope 2 and scope 3 emissions. Scope 1 refers to emissions directly stemming from an organisation's activity, while scope 2 refers to indirect emissions from purchased energy. Scope 3 refers to end-use emissions. "It is alarming to see how member states weakened the law in the final negotiations. And the law lacks an effective mechanism to force companies to reduce their climate emissions," said Paul de Clerck, campaigner at non-governmental organisation Friends of the Earth Europe, pointing to "gaping" loopholes in the adopted text. By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Oman latest to insist that oil, gas is 'here to stay'
Oman latest to insist that oil, gas is 'here to stay'
Muscat, 24 April (Argus) — Omani and Oman-focused energy officials this week joined a growing chorus of voices to reiterate the pivotal role that hydrocarbons have in the energy mix, even as state-owned companies scramble to increase their share of renewables production. Some producers cite the risk of leaving costly, stranded oil and gas assets as renewable energy alternatives become more favoured. "This is a common concern among producers who are focusing on short-term developments to maximize cash flow — [but] if we continue to do that, with the clean energy transition, will we be left with stranded assets in the long-term", state-controlled PDO's technical director Sami Baqi told the Oman Petroleum and Crude Show conference in Muscat this week. "We need to redefine and revamp our operation model to produce in a sustainable manner." "We are in an era where most of the production does not come from the easy oil but comes from difficult oil," Oman's energy ministry undersecretary Mohsin Al Hadhrami said. "It requires more improved and enhanced oil recovery (EOR) type technologies to extract it." Oman is heavily reliant on tertiary extraction technologies like EOR given its maturing asset base and complicated geology. "We know that most of the oil fields [in the region] are maturing and costs are going to escalate, so we need to be mindful of it while discussing cleaner solutions going forward," Hadhrami said. PDO, Oman's largest hydrocarbon producer, aims for 19pc of its output to come from EOR projects by 2025, and has said it is looking at 'cleaner' ways to implement the technology. PDO in November started a pilot project to inject captured CO2 for EOR at its oil reservoirs. Baqi's concerns were echoed by PDO's carbon capture, utilisation and storage (CCUS) manager Nabil Al-Bulushi, who said even solutions like CCUS can be expensive and come with their own challenges. There is a need for a proper ecosystem or regulatory policies to avoid delays in executing such projects, he said. When it comes to challenges associated with commercialising green hydrogen, Saudi state-controlled Aramco's head of upstream Yousef Al-Tahan said higher costs already make hydrogen more expensive than any other energy sources. "Not only should the costs go down, but the market has to be matured to take in the hydrogen," he said. "We also need pipelines and facilities that are able to handle hydrogen, especially when it gets converted to ammonia." Gas here to stay Oman, like many of its neighbors in the Mideast Gulf, insists gas needs to be part of the global journey towards cleaner energies. "Asia-Pacific is still heavily reliant on coal, this is an area where gas can play an important role," Shell Oman's development manager Salim Al Amri said at the event. "I think there is no doubt that gas is here to stay." Oman is a particularly interesting case as it "has moved from a position of gas shortage to surplus", Al Amri said, enabled by key developments in tight gas. "Output from fields like Khazzan and Mabrouk will continue to produce nearly 50pc of output even by 2025, which is indicative of how important tight gas developments are," he said. The Khazzan tight gas field has 10.5 trillion ft³ of recoverable gas reserves. Mabrouk North East is due to reach 500mn ft³/d by mid-2024. But even as natural gas is touted as the transition fuel, executives from major producers like state-owned OQ and PDO warned there are technical risks associated with extracting the fuel, including encountering complex tight reservoirs, water production and difficult geology. By Rithika Krishna Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Australia’s Woodside pledges extra domestic gas in 2025
Australia’s Woodside pledges extra domestic gas in 2025
Sydney, 24 April (Argus) — Australian independent Woodside Energy has promised to increase gas flows to domestic customers with a predicted national shortfall. The firm promises to make an extra 32PJ (854mn m³) available to the Western Australia (WA) domestic market by the end of 2025, Woodside chief executive Meg O'Neill said at its annual meeting in Perth on 24 April, following criticism of the state's LNG projects' contribution to WA supplies . Woodside produced 76PJ for the WA market in 2023. The company has initiated an expression of interest process for an additional 50PJ of gas from its Bass Strait fields offshore Victoria state for supply in 2025 and 2026 when a tight market is expected for east Australia . Woodside also said its Sangomar oil project offshore Senegal is 96pc complete with 19 of 23 initial wells complete. WA's Scarborough project is 62pc complete with trunkline installation and well drilling having started in the offshore Carnarvon basin. It last month awarded the sub-sea marine installation contract for its 100,000 b/d Trion project offshore Mexico, which is targeting its first oil in 2028. Woodside's 2023 operating revenue was $14bn , resulting in a profit of $1.7bn. Climate tensions Woodside's climate transition action plan saw 58.36pc opposition from shareholders at the annual meeting but is non-binding on the company. Woodside's 2021 climate report also faced significant opposition with 48.97pc voting against its adoption. The company did not put its 2022 climate report up for vote at last year's annual meeting. Its new emissions abatement target aims to reduce Woodside's customers' scope 1 and 2 emissions by 5mn t/yr by 2030, along with a $5bn investment in new energy projects by the same date. Net equity scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions rose to 5.53mn t carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) in 2023 from 4.61mn t CO2e in 2022 because of its merger with BHP Petroleum in mid-2022. Several major institutional shareholders including large domestic and international pension funds had already flagged their vote against Woodside's climate report, citing an insufficient urgency to reduce the firm's emissions. By Tom Major Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more